if they are not silenced
Look at how that turned out...few silencing many by drowning them in noise.
Meanwhile a jew tells how it is...
- "People talking without speaking...People hearing without listening"
- "People writing songs that voices never shared"
- "No one dared...Disturb the sound of silence"
He also called out the Jews. So you can't tell me "Protestants are jew worshipers".
a) Calling out the jews implies Martin Luther protesting. Protestant implies one who follows by consent those who suggest protestantism in the name of Martin Luther....followers aren't protesting anything.
b) A jew exploits gentile ignorance of the aforementioned in a way more devious way...
PROTEST', verb (Latin protestor; pro and testor, to affirm it) - "to affirm with solemnity; to make a solemn declaration of a fact or opinion; as, I protest to you, I have no knowledge of the transaction"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/protest
Hence to protest implies a transaction between a jew selling (suggestion) and gentiles buying (consent).
c) Martin Luther aka MARS (war) LOOTER...spoils for the takin'...handrubbin' intensifies...
believe in the concepts of...those would solve
How could holding onto a concept solve anything? Doesn't solving imply taking apart what one holds together?
like me
Being implies different from one another...likeness implies ones choice to ignore that.
Alt righters
How could one alternate (alt) when holding onto a side (right)?
Libertarianism
Using free will of choice to consent to a suggested -ism tempts one to ignore being free (liber), while binding oneself to another.
individual liberty
Within (in) the division (divi) of two (dual)...one cannot be free without being tethered aka bound to another.
common good of society
How could one be free (liber) if one consents to suggested common-ism (communism) and society-ism (socialism), while fighting others within a conflict of reason (good vs bad)?
data breaches
Data implies ongoing transmission (perceivable) or temporary storage (suggested)...few utilize data as a transmittable current, while tempting many to store data as an evaluated currency.
Fake breaches are used to distract those who temporary store from the ongoing transmission of what they are storing.
The trick...ones ignorance blocks ones discernment of being a breach aka of being within the act (inception towards death) of breaking apart (life).
thoughts on the motive
Those who hold onto suggested data ignore the perceivable motive force. Thinking about suggested data implies circular logic aka 0 vs 1 aka binary thinking.
Word Smithers?
How does smithers/smith/smi - "to cut" assist burning (mr. burns)? Think stoking aka feeding and stirring up fire...why does one chop wood into smaller pieces? What about using sparks to ignite?
As for words...how does one make sound malleable? How does a suggested LETTER tempt ones consent to LET another shape words? Where is the heat coming from which tempts one to give consent?
And what about the hammer of the smith shaping the malleable heat...how do these shapes cool off? Speech is fluid; right...
Waylon J. Smithers aka WAY (inception towards death) LAND (life) SMI (to cut). And what about the J? Joseph from Hebrew Yoseph - "adds; increases"
How does one let go
By resisting (life) to hold onto what velocity (inception towards death) gives and takes.
The issue....others artificially shape (suggested information) what nature gives and takes (perceivable inspiration) to make it more tempting for one to hold onto it. And it's ones consent given which holds the artificial shape in shape...mentally and physically...as idols/eidos - "likeness; resemblance".
What do you mean by Nature?
Nature implies generator of reacting beings...meaning implies being reacting to each other, while ignoring natural generation.
A meaning is suggested by others, while tempting one to consent to mass consensus aka tempting a different one to seek likeness among other ones...that's idolatry.
Think...nature aka U RE NAT (you are native) which implies ones immigration (momentum) from foreign origin (motion) into native being (matter).
Self discernment cannot be shared since it implies a separation during procession...not a shared consensus among many.
While being in the flesh, we may be apart. But in spirit we are together?
a) Motion generates flesh (matter) within spirit (momentum) by setting apart.
b) Few suggest pluralism (we) and progressivism (together aka towards getting) to tempt consenting many to ignore being separated within origin.
c) May/mæg/magh - "to be able"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/may as suggested by another implies magic aka a spell tricking one to disable self by consenting to another being aka by misusing ones choice to select a chosen one above self.
MAY DAY aka "magic daze" aka a distress signal by one calling for help from others.
Now try to apply this to International Workers' Day on May 1st...
d) Only matter can be a unit (one)...motion (whole oneness) breathes (spirit) momentum which gives matter (flesh) being. So being requires the separation of motion, through momentum and into matter to be apart from one another.
There's no state of togetherness for being other than being holding onto each other, while ignoring being set apart from one another. Motion always takes matter apart...no matter the shape.
Nothing is the opposite of something.
a) IS implies ones suggestion of what WAS perceivable towards another ones consent. One can easily take "something" perceivable and make a suggestion about it, but how does one take "nothing" to make a suggestion about it?
Example..."something like my left hand is the opposite of my right hand". That's perceivable. "If my hands are something, then putting them behind my back makes them nothing, since you can't perceive them". That's suggestion tempting consensual de-nial (nihilo,nothing) of something hidden...hidden by consensual denial.
b) Notice the difference between implication (if/then) and reason (consent vs denial). Balanced opposition (if/then) or imbalanced opposition (consent vs denial)...depending on ones free will of choice.
By making something, nothing becomes something.
That's called suggested creationism aka Creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo
Aka "The Tree of Life, or Etz haChayim (עץ החיים) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric Judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)."
By free will of choice, you chose to deny self discernment as being within everything for the magical jewish suggestion of coming into being out of nothing aka out of your own denial.
This is how the big bamboozle operates and others trying to get you out of that self inflicted denial are chiseling away at your ignorance, while each jewish mason of free-will utilizes suggested information as bricks and your consent as mortar to keep the wailing wall of ignorance from crumbling.
Alas...back to chiseling...
let it all out
Aka trauma based mind control by first emptying, then refilling memory...utilizing sodomy as the trigger. The younger the target; the more impressionable the memory, because the less garbage already carried within.
bad bunny
a) Didn't want the carrot...got the stick instead.
b) Never heard of him; checked him out (Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio)... "His album Un Verano Sin Ti is the most streamed album on Spotify with over 14 billion streams". Uh-huh...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Un_Verano_Sin_Ti#/media/File:Bad_Bunny_-_Un_Verano_Sin_Ti.png
Symbolism through and through...
Even yandex not having any hits
Engine/engin - "trick, deceit, stratagem; war machine"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/engine
Maybe a suggested search engine only tricks one to find something, while tempting one to ignore that everything perceivable is the foundation for ones perception?
you just made it up
Like how the jew Maksymilian Faktorowicz (Max Factor) made up "make up"? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Factor_Sr.
According to one source...
...as if there's another source for ones perception than all perceivable.
the well-known plague doctor mask...the use of such a mask may have stemmed from the belief
Knowledge implies perception, belief implies suggestion...consenting to latter tempts one to ignore former.
I know some people dont believe
Knowledge implies naturally inherent...believing implies artificially extrinsic.
Best explanation I could find that makes sense
The suggested explanations you looked for imply "consenus"...not ones perceiving senses. While you are trying to join a consensus with others, nature sets all perceivable and each ones perception apart from one another, so that senses can perceive moving differences.
A jew utilizes suggested information to tempt consent from each gentile, while shaping mass consensus out of it aka collectivization aka herding cattle.
Nature doesn't give explanations...nature implies plane of action for expressions within. One has to discern self as expression (life) within the plane (inception towards death) of all action.
Seeking an explanations implies looking towards outcomes..being ex within plane of ation implies adaption to origin. That's how one suggested word (explanation) can distract from all perceivable (ex-plan-ation)...if one consents to it.
I cant even get recognition
Wanting from another makes one uneven. Being implies odd (choice) within even (balance)...inclining towards another imbalances self.
Re-cogn-tion implies ones response to knowledge of action...which seeking recognition from others inverts.
these people have no problem getting legal retribution on anyone who even slights them.
Because natural law moves forwards, while suggested laws (legal) tempt those who believe to hold onto them, for which natural law demands payback aka retribution.
A jew sets up the legal system to distract gentiles from natural law...which when ignored forces retribution upon gentiles, which a jew exploits.
It's not that hard to discern this for self...while almost impossible to explain to others.
you cant judge an entire people just by a few of their race
a) A people cannot be entire...people implies an accumulation of partials within whole. Only nature implies entire...not the shit we slap together within.
In other words...every moment(um) a jew is born and a jew dies, so there can never be an entire jewish people within the momentum of motion. YET...a gentiles can be tricked to believe that an accumulation represents an entirety.
An example for such a trick...a puzzle. One cannot put a puzzle together into its entirety, because each part was cut apart from one another, so there will always be a "space" in-between partials. A gentile willingly ignores that the entire picture was on the box, and that the pieces within can never achieve the clarity thereof.
That's an allegory for nature...suggestion can never achieve the clarity of perception.
b) Race/raddix/radius/ray....not something one joins, but that which sets one apart from others. A jew suggests race-ism to tempt consenting gentiles together and thereby against each other...no matter which side they choose to join.
us white people
a) Nature sets units apart from one another... a jew suggests United States (US) to tempt gentiles together.
b) Light sets rays apart from one another within a visible spectrum aka in-between white (pure light) and black (absence of light). A jew suggests the masonic checkerboard to tempt gentiles to choose white or black, while ignoring the visible spectrum of light aka the very rainbow a jew suggests for equality through diversity.
c) Being implies person aka by (per) sound (sonos)...a jew suggests for example "we the people" and "e pluribus unum" (out of many; one) to tempt gentiles together.
Each person implies resonance within sound; any accumulation into people implies dissonance within sound, hence each jew representing a chosen ONE.
corrupt pieces of shit
Shit aside...a piece implies a corruption (life) within whole (inception towards death), which is why life has to struggle within the process of dying to sustain itself.
you can't judge
All perceivable implies "value of justice"; each ones perception implies "evaluation by judge"...judging each other with suggestions tempts one to ignore justice, hence establishing injustice for one another.
Perception is the judge; perceivable the executioner, and suggestions the jury trying to trick the judge with offense vs defense (reason) into giving a mistrial (consent).
Being implies as judge of ones life, while being executed by the ongoing process of dying. Consenting to others implies that one didn't even TRY to sustain self, which is ones TRIAL within nature.
A jew suggests Judge Dredd to tempt gentiles to "fear judging" self...by letting others pass the judgement.
a) Holding onto a friend implies the enemy within self. Nature sets each off-spring apart from one another, hence no attachments.
b) Being implies ones life sentence towards point of death...a jew suggests F.R.I.E.N.D.S to establish a point of death in-between life sentences among gentiles.
They are telling you that..."Your job's a joke, you're broke, your love life's D.O.A. (dead on arrival)", so don't complain that "no one told you life was gonna be this way"...
Black plaque and dark ages aka a jew casting ignorance upon gentile discernment within light, hence mask/mascara - "to blacken; darken".
Can implies a vessel to hold soup and food
Implication cannot be held onto since it moves, hence implicating the folding within motion (im-plic-ation). Few suggest conservatism (hence the can) to tempt many to ignore being a vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death).
In the beginning there was the word.
a) Only within sound can a word be shaped.
b) Beginning implies be (being) ginnan (to open up) aka inception of being alive, while being moved towards death.
Suggested "in the beginning" inverts perception be (being) within perceivable ginnan (to open up)...
c) THE aka suggested the-ism implies an authority before word...hence sound aka entire aka all aka whole...God. It's ones consent to the suggested word, which authorizes a chosen one to shape words in the name of (in nomine) God.
Consenting to a suggestion implies holding onto words, while ignoring perceivable sound.
Sound is vibration
Sound implies entire...vibration implies a setting apart of action and reactions, hence tion generating vibra/weip - "to turn".
Sound was before vibration comes into being.
vibration means energy
Energy vibrates...meaning tempts those vibrating within energy to hold onto something while pretending to be still.
Meaning/mean/men - "to think"...thought can be corrupted by tempting one to ignore that which moves (perceivable inspiration) for that which one holds onto (suggested information).
Life is able to exist because of the word
Suggested "because" inverts cause (sound) towards being (word)...if one consents to it.
Cause enables being...suggested words tempt being to disable ones choice for a chosen ones suggested meaning attached to a word.
Schumann resonances
Suggested Schumann (singular) resonances (plural) tempts one to ignore RE (ones response) SON (all sound)...energy implies all in one.
Consenting to another ones (schumann) suggested pluralism (resonances) establishes dissonance for one (re) within all (sonance).
What's the implication of echo/reflection among differences (waves) within same (sound)?
the reason for life
Life sustains itself through resonance...reason implies dissonance among life.
You gave up your secret there Willy... That is why you are such a word smith eh....etymonline
a) Smith/smi - "to cut"...hence me cutting apart words shaped together within sound setting apart.
Bonus...Mr. Burns (rothschild) assistant? Smithers...
b) Etymology aka etymon (actual/real) + logy (logic aka reasoning about fiction)...that's what I try to cut apart.
How did the Roman empire fall
Rom aka roam/ramian (wandering about) + aræman (arise)...there can be only one fall (inception towards death) for each one rising (life) within.
Empire implies dominion aka rise (free will of choice) during fall (dominance of balance).
Being implies roaming within empirical....others suggest the fall of the roman empire to distract one from discerning self.
what about the invasion of...
IN (life) VASION (inception towards death)...not retreat; no surrender!
From the perspective of a jew... https://genius.com/Bruce-springsteen-no-surrender-lyrics
As suggested to the gentiles... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcThFswcLB0
The US called those "wars" when it was clearly sticks and stones vs advanced artillery.
a) Ones (singular) consent to suggested US (plural) aka united states establishes the VS aka VERSUS aka WAR.
b) If "sticks and stones may break my bones...but words shall never hurt me" then why can US make any such CALL?
c) Nature advances...artifice tempts those within nature to stagnate, hence few suggesting artillery/articulum/apere to tempt many to attach consent to suggested artifice.
They call it a war
Those responding to the call are establishing the war aka consent establishing conflicts of reason. IT implies suggested theaters of war by few for many to reason against each other within.
Nature neither establishes imbalance, nor does nature call out those living within. Nature generates balance for each ones free will of choice coming into being within.
We were made to love one another
a) Nature generates units by setting whole apart internally, hence setting each one apart from one another.
b) Few suggest pluralism (we the people) to tempt many together (united states aka US).
c) Few suggest moralism (love or hate) to tempt many together within conflicts of reason (love vs hate)....ones consent to either side establishes the conflict against the other. Both love (want) and hate (not want) tempt one to hold onto, while ignoring the need to let go.
d) To love one another implies one holding onto another, while ignoring that nature set one apart from one another...adding hate to the mix implies holding onto what one loves, while stuck fighting what one hates.
We were made to...,not...
What made not/nothing? How could nothing be made?
What do you think the plague doctor is based upon... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plague_doctor#/media/File:Paul_F%C3%BCrst
Obligatory... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egAMgNY84do
ufo
Things within nature cannot be identical since nature differentiates by setting each apart from one another. Therefore...each differentiated object, coming into being within nature, implies an unidentified flying object.
On the other hand...each different object within nature can be shaped alike, while branded identical. This trick is called idealism and few utilize it to equalize differences among many.
immaculate constellation
Shining together (con-stellare) implies each dirty ray within immaculate light being set together. Why are rays dirty? Because immaculate light generates an internal spectrum of visible light, which allows each ray within to perceive differences...these differences imply a lesser (dirty) of immaculate (pure) light, hence the ongoing process of differentiation/separation.
Can't really call it a war
a) Can't implies versus can...that's logic/reason/conflict/war.
b) Nature moves sound...few within suggest words to tempt many into consenting to a CALL; verb - "summon, invoke; ask for, demand, order; give a name to, apply by way of designation"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/call
one side is heavily armed and the other is not...it's a slaughter
America is heavily armed...yet being slaughtered without any noticeable resistance from within.
targeted...fighters
If one targets another, then one fights. If one is targeted, then one is under attack.
the resident bot/autistic lmao. Free Will.
a) How could a bot be deficient at social communication aka autistic?
b) What if residing requires one to resist socializing?
c) How does social communication keeps one free instead of confining one to social consensus?
I am slowly dying from whatever is happening to me. Its hard not to be full of hate.
a) Holding onto instead of letting go establishes a happenstance within self.
b) Nature aka the ongoing process of dying...empties life, hence the need for life to eat and drink. Filling oneself up with anything establishes constipation during procession.
insulate themselves from opposing points of view
One (perception) within all (perceivable) implies being insulated from one another's opposing points of view (suggested)...unless consented to.
Nature insulates being through segregation...few suggest e pluribus unum (out of many, one) to unite many together, as to desegregate each natural being.
What kind of weird name is Amler
Could be the usual de-judaizing of "Adler" or Jane/John/Jehovah + Francis/Frank/free + Amler/amble/ambi /around aka Yahweh free around.
why are all her books glorifying jews?
Reading a book binds ones focus to a chosen one, hence glorifying suggested over perceivable.
On the other hand...what else is there to write about?
a) Fluid implies form within flow...flow implies before form came into being.
b) Reasoning (right vs wrong) implies form ignoring flow by holding onto an opinion.
c) Being implies different form (life) within same flow (inception towards death)...drawing comparisons for each other inverts sameness with likeness, which mentally confuses differences.
Here's what a jew named David wrote in the book reviews..."She (Jane Frances Amler) fails to understand the complex nature of pre-modern fluid identities..."
do you believe...DNA
Ones consent to believe suggested information shapes a double helix aka a spiral turning (circular logic) around a fixed center (consent).
Nature turns whole (oneness) into partials (one), hence no two-folded (double) anything...unless one ignores perceivable nature for another ones suggestion, which implies a dual-ism aka a double; a duplicate; a fictitious turn into the opposite direction of reality.
If one resists to believe, then the contradiction within DNA...TWO... becomes apparent to ONE-self.
sephardic
Se-phar aka seafarer or seeing far...
Everyone is always writing the script of their own life using their inner being
Inner being implies being (life) within line (inspection towards death), hence drawing from origin. Writing tempts one to draw outlines towards outcomes.
Drawing implies pulling; writing implies pushing. Now add nature pushing (inception) and pulling (death) each one living in-between.
a positive life in the future
Life's position as positive (growth) within negative (loss) can only be in-between origin and outcome. Others suggest progressivism (in the future) to tempt ones life forwards, while utilizing the natural pull towards death.
Ones who focus...
...spend ones resistance on narrowing all offered down, hence narrowing down ones life sentence towards a point of death...the only point of convergence for life's focus.
not physical. It’s mental
Physical (matter) within mental (momentum) of abstract (motion) aka ever existing generating pre-existing for temporal phenomenon.
The mind creates the physical
The abstract was before mental brings physical into being...suggested creationism permits others to shape physical descriptions within ones consenting mind.
What came first...the tree of life or the life within suggesting meaning to each other?
What came first...motion or the allotment of time?
What came first...being free or owning aka freely choosing to take into possession?
Southland corporation
Before that it was called Tote'm Stores aka storing a totem pole aka making an artificial fetish/charm out of the tree of life.
Meaning implies your choice to hold onto suggested information, while ignoring that holding onto (truth) is the foundation for "the jews and their lies".
Suggested meaning...Martin Luther writing on jews and their lies, while reforming and protesting the status quo by nailing theses onto churches.
Perceivable...a jew suggesting lutheranism; protestantism; reformism etc. in the name of Martin Luther to tempt consenting gentiles to follow jewish suggestions.
Seeking meaning tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction). Nature changes...holding onto the meaning of 1483 Martin Luther in 2024 ignores change. A jew ruthlessly exploits ignorance among gentiles with suggested meaning.
What I write isn't about discrediting what happened 500 years ago, but about those who ignore reality right now, and those who exploit that ignorance with fiction right now.
Plane (inception towards death) generates plants (life)...a jew tempts gentiles to ignore that, which then corrupts growth of seeds.