social engineering

Nature implies the engine which privatizes each being within by separating each from one another. As the natural engine reveals private; so the suggested engineering of "social" occults the private underneath the public.

"They" will almost exclusively use fake events

a) Event/exvenire - "coming out" implies effects (life) coming out of cause (inception towards death)...staging events for one another tempts one to ignore this.

b) All (motion) generates (momentum) ones (matter) will (choice)...others suggest "they" aka pluralism to shape private choice into a public following of choices.

c) Exclusive/exclude implies a contradiction in itself aka ex (expression) cluse/clude/close (suppression).

Nature impresses (perceivable) expressions (perception)...artifice (suggested) tempts ones consent to suppress ones expression.

d) Ones consent to suggested eventism (monistic ontology of physics founded on events) establishes a conflict of reason (real vs fake).

They avoided real ones

a) Notice that THEY (fake) contradicts ONE (real)...

b) Notice that ONES (plural) contradicts ONE (singular). The plural of one (ones) still implies EACH one...no matter how many are counted together and blanketed by a suggested pluralism.

c) Consenting by ones choice to a suggestion by another ones choice implies "avoiding" ones choice by selecting a chosen ones suggestion to shirk ones response-ability onto.

d) A jew doesn't avoid reality...a jew suggests fiction to tempt gentiles to avoid reality for it, which each one gentile does willingly when giving consent to a jewish suggestion.

They didn't have control of the Reality

Reality reveals by setting apart...fiction tempts those who consent to roll together (con-trol).

Sleight of hand: Katamari (something which rolls up other objects, growing increasingly large) ...that's what a jew does to gentiles, and what control implies aka rolling clumps of useless matter together for the King of All Cosmos.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katamari_Damacy

Real things lock into all other real things and are hard to dislodge.

• Reality (motion) moves (momentum) things (matter) apart
• Reality moves (inception towards death) things (life) apart

A thing can only lock onto other things if being set apart from one another...wanting to hold onto tempts one to ignore needing to let go of.

What you call "hard to dislodge" implies an indigestion of matter within the reality of motion, established by a jew tempting gentiles to hold onto suggested (information) within perceivable (inspiration).

Circular logic implies rolling together an indigestion of thought, while reasoning against others implies the continuous wasted effort to protect one side of indigestion from the other.

infinitely malleable

Only finite (matter) within infinite (motion) can be shaped. A jew suggests fiction to tempt gentiles to hold onto shapes, which in return permits a jew to utilize infinite reality to shape at will what gentiles cannot ever grasp.

Matter (life) cannot hold onto motion (inception towards death)...but it can be tempted to hold onto each other, hence suffocating each others as indigestion of matter during motion.

any degree desired

Desire focuses ones sight, hence narrowing ones degree/spread/growth.

the current state of the art

Artificial (suggested) state (perception) within current (perceivable)...consenting to suggested (art) tempts one perception to ignore perceivable (nature).

State implies one; current implies all...art implies another one making suggestions about all.

all false

All (motion) generates right (momentum) aka a straight (inception towards death) for each bending (life) one (matter) within.

A jew inverts rise (life) during fall (inception towards death) by suggesting false/falsetto aka an artificial high for gentiles to climb up to like a career ladder; a chain of command, or a pyramid scheme.