That you're gullible.
Faith is belief in lieu of evidence.
The book you love was written by man.
The stories in it were made up by man.
The money you donate goes to fund a mans extravagant lifestyle.
It's conspiracy 101.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
All implies God; each one within implies a Christian.
Each one is gullible when ignoring perception (reality) for suggestion (fiction).
a) Giving faith/having belief implies ones consent to the suggestion of another...which makes the suggested evident to the one consenting to hold onto it.
b) There's only ones position within all...consenting to a suggestion of another tempts one to ignore ones position for a "lieu" of another, hence a shirking of response-ability.
a) A book binds those who read in-between covers, hence in-between a conflict of reason like love vs hate.
b) Nature does not write/outline...it implies the line (inception towards death) for those within (life).
Nature doesn't store...it processes (inception towards death) products (life). Few tempt many to abuse mind/memory as storage for suggested information, while ignoring that perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto; saved; stored...without destroying self.
All perceivable (value) generates each ones perception (evaluation)...few suggest money to tempt many to devalue themselves, which in return permits few to set a price for that which nature offers towards each ones FREE will of choice.
Current implies a moving foundation; currency tempts those within (life) a moving foundation (inception towards death) to accumulate debt aka a self inflicted burden...
Living within the process of dying implies ones need to stay out of DEBT/DEAD by resisting wanted temptations luring one into it.
God implies mono; our implies poly...two contradicting sides tempting ones (yours) free will of choice to imbalance itself by holding onto either.
Being implies inter (choice) fere (balance) of God. In other words...Energy internally establishes action and reaction in balance with each other aka DOM-inating action (balance) and FREE reactions (choice).
Few suggest "free will" without OF CHOICE as a liberty to tempt ones consent by "free will of choice" to ignore self as FREE within DOM.
All perceivable generates each ones perception by setting apart aka by internal separation aka by differentiation aka by alternation...few suggest pluralism (we) for many to tribute consent together aka con-tribute, which is what one (singular) does when speaking in the name of others (plural) by simply using the word WE.
WE THE PEOPLE implies a suggested fiction...not a perceivable reality.
Species implies specification by separation of whole into partials. Few suggest speciesism to tempt many to consent to classification of each into many, which few then direct back from many into one aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one).