Are Jews Mad? Jewish Encyclopedia
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
People implies an aggregate of many together, which can only exist a) by each different person joining and b) by few remaining apart, hence different from the "same" people.
Do you see the trick of few tempting many together aka aggregating them?
Meanwhile in reality... each person (different); many persons (alike) per-sonos aka by sound (same).
Action sets reactions apart from one another...suggested accord tempts together, while permitting few to attach A CORD upon many aka a string to puppeteer by a hidden hand.
a) Seem/sem - "semblance; sameness" tempts one to ignore being different from one another.
b) Ones perception SEES differentiation; the suggestions by others SEEM the same if one consents. A jew suggests what SEEMS as a SEAM upon what a gentile actually SEES.
b) Being (life) within way (inception towards death) implies differentiation...not likeness, hence differ/disferre - "carrying apart; away from".
a) Each one (perception) is born into all (perceivable)...a jew tempts gentiles into a case (suggested), while using suggested progressivism to tempt them out of being.
In other words...consenting to a suggestion permits others to dangle the suggested in front of ones eyes, while one chases after it. This CHASE for outcomes implies the CASE concealing ones mind from origin.
b) Being (life) born into it (inception towards death) implies as temporary growth into ongoing loss...the origin cannot be blamed for lack of growth. Blaming aka finding a fault implies holding onto something, hence faulting self for lack of growing.
Being (life) going along with origin (inception towards death) dies faster...a jew suggests program/prographein - "to write forth" to tempt consenting gentiles to follow leaders along towards outcome.
Consenting to follow a suggestion, while ignoring to resist origin implies each ones free will of choice.
If one ignores to discern for self that life is being moved towards death, for chasing towards alternative outcomes, then who is to blame but oneself?
Notice that you view jews as THEY aka as an aggregate of people, while ignoring that gentiles are the larger aggregate, and that the chosen few imply a people apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
Religion/religio - "to bind anew"...a jew tempts gentiles to bind each other together, which in return permits a jew to control those in bondage; those bound together; those within a BUND... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundism
Cause advances thinking, hence delivering input for thought. A jew suggests nihilism (not) and pluralism (we) and progressivism (advance) to tempt consenting gentiles to ignore perception for suggestion.
Suffer; verb - "allow to occur or continue, refrain from hindering, fail to prevent or suppress"...life being moved from inception towards death can not suffer (prevent origin); only suffocate (deprive of) self by denying reality (perception) for fiction (suggestion).
Consenting to hold onto a suggestion implies ones denial of being moved...that's self imposed suffering.
Change advances...truth and lies tempt one to hold onto it (circular logic); fighting others for it (conflicts of reason), while ignoring change aka alternation/differentiation/separation/transformation etc.
Being implies problem (life) during solution (inception towards death), hence ones struggle to sustain self. A jew suggests gentiles to ignore HERE (as problem within solution) for THERE (solution to problem) to invert reality by sending those within to chase after fiction.