Where is this AI revolution all these globo corpos keep telling us is occurring?
a) Re-volu-tion (response turning from action)...using artificial implies turning from natural.
b) Ones consent to a suggested artifice implies occur, verb - "to meet in argument"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/occur#etymonline_v_2471 hence reasoning if something is vs is not occurring.
c) The rhetoric "keep telling" tempts one to ignore that a tale is given out by suggestion, while those who consent are keeping it.
AI...is about controlling our lives.
Intelligence/intelligo - "to understand" implies ones consent standing under suggested artifice, while ignoring to stand up within nature.
This is for you
A suggestion tempting consent...
...are not...
A suggestion tempting those who consent to ignore reality (everything) for fiction (nothing).
you are not needed
Before a suggestion can tempt ones consent to want or not want it...all perceivable was needed for ones perception to be able to perceive a suggested temptation.
you are not special
If not special, then why specialize "you" when addressing "me"?
a waste of
Can energy produce and destroy "waste"? How?
fights are rigged
Rig/reig - "to bind"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rig#etymonline_v_15065 Hence stepping into a "ring" when boxing or into circular logic when entering a conflict of reason.
All fights are about money.
a) ALL implies origin for each one within...few suggest about-ism to distract many from it. About/abutan - "by outside" tempts one to ignore being inside all.
b) ALL implies ongoing current for each temporary one within...few suggest money as a currency to tempt many to hold onto it, while ignoring natural current.
Any known boxing conspiracies?
Left/right + front/back + up/down implies being within a box...going into a boxing RING (shaped like a square) permits others to circle the square aka to tempt those free within a box into self confinement (circular logic) while opposing each other (conflict of reason).
50/50 odds
Being implies odd (choice) within even (balance)...betting tempts one to ignore ones choice for a chosen ones suggestion within an imbalance (win vs lose).
No matter the odds one bets on...one sacrifices self to another, hence BET; verb - "pledge as a forfeit to another".
Logos implies the suggested word, which when consented to, shapes circular logic within self and a conflict of reason against others.
Nature doesn't shape words...it moves sound.
To LOG implies "record of observations; to enter into"...hence ones consent to a suggestion, to a word; to logic; to reason. As a formed vessel (life) within flow (inception towards death) this also implies the record of a ships progress aka a ships log book.
bad theology
Theology aka theos + logic...the latter implies the conflict of reason (good vs bad), while the former implies the few suggesting what many are reasoning over.
Theos aka god/ghut - "that which is invoked"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=god Any suggestion invokes ones consent.
fuck over an opposition, and derail their entire career
Being (life) implies on a rail (inception towards death)...opposition implies circular logic aka a conflict of reason. It's the circular thinking which derails one.
hire and fire
Being hired implies agreeing to work for wages...this tempts one to wage self by selling out to another. This kindles the fire. Many working for few burns many in the process. Getting fired simply increases the desperation among many to find other work from few.
the number two guy pulls the strings
Consenting to a suggestion implies ignoring ONEself (the number one guy) for another pulling ones strings.
false names
Name/nombre/number - "designation of a unit", hence unit/unitas/unus - "one"...the only real name and number. Nature doesn't shape names or numbers, it designates units by setting apart each one being from one another.
the media
Media/medius - "middle"...ones perception can only work at the middle of all perceivable. Ignoring this by consenting to a suggestion makes others the "media" aka the suggesting mediators of perceivable.
America has become...
Always was... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_the_East_India_Company#/media/File:Flag_of_the_British_East_India_Company_(1801).svg
Notice that the British flag represents a double cross aka "to betray or swindle (a colleague); to promise (a collaborator) one thing and to treacherously do another, to the detriment of the collaborator".
a colony
Aka COL (collecting together) ONY (ones apart), hence e pluribus unum (out of many; one)...
We still move thru slavery.
DOM (inception towards death) moves FREE (life)...ones consent to suggested pluralism (we) tethers self to another, hence slavery.
There is a whole department to make sure nothing comes out which they don't want to come out.
a) Mind (ment) implies divided partial (depart) within whole. The suggested rhetoric "whole department" inverts and conceals the origin of separation.
b) A jew shapes nothing (suggested information) within everything (perceivable inspiration) to conceal with artifice what nature reveals.
c) Do vs don't and want vs not want imply conflicts of reason among gentiles about jewish suggestions.
A jew utilizes implication instead of reason as the foundation to operate within.
d) Consider this...why compromise a military operation with any footage, when you can simply shoot anything before the military operation starts? This way you control the foundation for any leaks or extra footage added or cut.
a) Yahya implies "alive", hence the war (reason) on sin (consent) continuing.
b) Conclusion (outcome) inverts implication (origin)...
c) Suggested glory implies "fame" and a jew attaches it to progressivism to tempt gentiles (life) to follow the way (inception towards death), hence destroying self through fame/fames/famine - "starvation".
Those hungry for fame are starving themselves to death...
d) Perceivable glory/gnoria - "knowledge"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/glory implies ones perception within all perceivable aka ones response to origin, hence resisting hunger instead of seeking star-vation. Knowledge fills the one who draws from it.
Compare aka com (together) par (equal)...within a spectrum rays are set apart from one another, hence differentiated into colors.
Few suggest many to draw comparisons together, which diminishes each ones sight within the visible spectrum of light.
a) Demon aka dai (divide) mon (provide)...all provided divides into each one provided for.
For example...one has perception because all perceivable provides itself by dividing into each ones perception.
b) If the divided (ones perception) ignores the providing (all perceivable), then another ones suggestion becomes a sphere of influence aka a "demonic realm".
Ones consent shapes ones mind/memory into an isolated sphere (circular logic) for the suggested information by another, which establishes an imbalance within self against others aka a conflict of reason, with two opposing sides tempting ones free will of choice.
This internal conscience of circular logic and the temptation of external conflicts of reason represents a plot device suggested through rabbinical judaism to promote progressivism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoulder_angel
c) If one consents to follow suggested orders, while ignoring the perceivable natural order moving ones life from inception towards death, then shifting the visible spectrum of light imbalances one mentally and physically.
A being within the visible spectrum of light implies a ray thereof...if such a ray follows the spectrum of light towards the end, instead of resisting the origin thereof, then such a ray gets bend out of shape, hence spectrum/spectra - "apparition, phantom, specter"
What's interesting the black mirror that we use to access technology. (monitors and screens)
a) Interest implies internal (inter) cessation of motion (rest)...no such thing within motion, unless one chooses to ignore being moved.
b) Black implies absence of light...being implies send by light, while having sense.
Few suggest black (absence of light) and white (pure light) to distract many from being in-between the visible spectrum of light with the free will of choice to abstain sense through ignorance.
In short...light implies ones discernment; black implies ones ignorance.
Sleight of hand: Exit light (discernment) Enter night (ignorance) Take my hand (consent to my suggestion) We're off to never-neverland (bye bye potential)... https://genius.com/Metallica-enter-sandman-lyrics
c) Mirror/mirare - "to look at" implies looking/locking onto a suggestion hence reflecting perceivable with suggested aka choosing ignorance (black) over discernment (white).
d) Only ALL gives each ONE within access by transmutation aka internal separation aka differentiation of action (inception towards death) into reactions (life).
Being moved from inception towards death implies an "all access pass", and since inception implies import and death export...life implies VIP aka very imported per-sonos (by sound).
Few utilize suggestion to tempt mass consent, which in return permits few to withdraw access to many, while offering VIP access to few in return for a price of admission.
e) Technology aka techno/tekhnē - "artifice" and logy/logic - "reason"...suggestion shaped within perception implies artifice and ones consent to it established a conflict of reason against others and circular logic within self.
Technology (artificial reason) inverts natural implication (if/then). There's no conflict in implication and no circulatory shape within straight motion...unless one chooses to ignore that.
The symbols used for electronic components are very similar to symbols of alchemy
a) Symbol aka syn (together) bole (throwing)...nature doesn't throw together, it sets each one within apart from one another.
b) Electric and Magnetic aka ELECT (ones choice) MAG (to knead; fashion; fit)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*mag-#etymonline_v_52644
Few utilize mag/magic/masonry to make suggestions, which tempts ones choice to select a chosen ones suggestion. Magnetic suggestion drawing in; electric consent empowering...
c) ALL (perceivable) differentiates ONE (perception), hence each one having a different perspective within the same origin (blind men and an elephant parable).
Few utilize suggestion to tempt mass consent, hence equalizing differences, while making similarity aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one).
d) Before suggested CHEM-ism tempts the compounding of matter together, AL (all) perceivable sets each (one) matter apart through motion...which one ignores when consenting to another ones suggested -ism.
If you use...
ALL uses; each ONE re-uses (perception) what all offers (perceivable). Ignoring this for the suggestions of each other permits others to ab-use one.
https://genius.com/Eurythmics-sweet-dreams-are-made-of-this-lyrics
- Some of them want to use you...Some of them want to get used by you
- Some of them want to abuse you...Some of them want to be abused
Can't be responding on this board and consider it a "natural process."
Con-sider implies "siding together", hence each com-ment (minding together) suggesting an upvote vs downvote conflict of reason as a side to choose from.
Instead of reason (upvote vs downvote) based on ones consent to suggested information, ones free will of choice can utilize implication (if/then) to draw from perceivable inspiration...which implies the natural process of "knowledge".
Notice that your sentence starts with "can't", which implies a conflict of reason (can vs can't)...hence making the foundation of your response a conflict against others.
alchemy of Sugar
a) Few suggest CHEM-ism (uniting substances to form compounds) to tempt many to ignore AL (all dividing into each one).
A being isn't compounded (mixed together) put set apart from one another. This process implies transmutation of partials (matter) within whole (motion).
b) Another layer of deception...nature doesn't brand anything with a label. Few within nature tempt many to attach artificial labels (words) onto a natural process (sound). This implies spell-craft.
Transhumanism (smartphone shape) underneath anthropomorphism (animals shaped as humans)... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3Lu6BhBG.jpg
- Weather as a Force Multiplier - 'Owning the Weather in 2025' (published 1996)
https://ia601605.us.archive.org/35/items/WeatherAsAForceMultiplier/WeatherAsAForceMultiplier.pdf
Kaifeng
a) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaifeng_Jews
b) "The name (kaifeng) literally means "opening the border" and figuratively "hidden" and "vengeance"
vaccine is only...
a) There can be only one. All was before each one within came into being. What others suggest "is" tempts one to ignore that.
b) Vaccine/vacca - "cow" and vaccant - "idle, unoccupied".
Occupant implies one who takes into possession that which doesn't have an owner. Nature moves (inception towards death) matter (life) which implies active and reactive state...idle implies reaction ignoring action (perceivable) for each others reactions (suggestion).
Ones idleness permits another occupancy within self, hence allowing suggested information entrance into ones consenting mind/memory aka an INJECTION.
System of A Down - Sugar...Seems relevant.
- You know that every time I try to go...Where I really want to be
- It's already where I am...'Cause I'm already there
Now aka this perceivable MOMENT implies the MOMENT-um (inception towards death) of ongoing motion for each temporary matter (life) within.
Matter needs to resist motion, while being tempted by motion to want to ignore resisting.
Origin (inception) and outcome (death) imply the same momentum of motion for each different matter (life) in-between, and only in-between cause (motion) can there be effects (matter).
As for sugar...
- Where all they really do is suck out my mother fucking brains...My brains (sugar)
Temptation implies absorption, hence getting sucked in, while resistance implies emission, hence giving out.
The trick...only nature gives out aka all perceivable to each ones perception. Few utilize suggestion to tempt ones consent to suck in, hold in, and resist giving out, which tempts other suckers to respond alike.
- How do I feel? What do I say?...Fuck you, it all goes away
Feeling aka emotio implies to move from, which inverts being (life) moved by (inception towards death)...the suggestions by others tempt ones emotions to move from ones position.
Saying implies uttering artifice (suggested words) within reality (perceivable sound) aka making noise.
Few utilize alchemy to mix feelings and noise together; like for example "Cum On Feel the Noize"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78ezU7x3jfE
More alchemy about sugar...
Daddy implies sugar (motion); mommy implies oil (momentum); child implies salt (matter)...
scientists...discovered
a) -ist (scientism) implies ones consent to an -ism (scientism), hence ones submission to another. What discovery could be made by submitting?
b) A cover overspreads a surface, so dis-cover implies the division of those above and below the cover, like...those who suggest scientism from above and those consenting scientists below.
c) Nature reveals all perceivable to each ones perception...by di-vision of all into each one. Nature doesn't cover by spreading something over the surface...it implies all above (sur) for each one (face) within.
look the other way
There can be (life) only one way (inception towards death) and looking/locking ignores the motion thereof.
Instead of looking try presence aka sensing (sence) what comes before (pre)...
we are critical of ourselves
Critic/krei - "to sieve; to pour out; distinguish"...suggested pluralism (we; our) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore that.
If one joins "we or our", then one disregards ones distinction from one another.
Sleight of hand: every ONE is a critic.
A chosen ONE hides distinction from the masses, while amassing others by equalizing differences among them aka equality through diversity.
I know we have no say in trump or any slave master we get, but I still like him better than libtards. Not that that makes any difference.
a) Nature differentiates; choosing to like or dislike what others suggest makes one alike others aka slaves. This in return permits those who suggest to remain different from slaves aka masters.
b) Ones choice (slave) selects a chosen ones (master) suggestion...there cannot be a master without consent given by slaves.
c) Trump aka triumph implies "success in battle"...slaves battling each other within a conflict of reason (like vs dislike) make those who suggest what to like or dislike a "success" aka the card (suggestion) within a game (reason) which trumps each player.
white
How could a being within the visible spectrum of light perceive white (pure light) or black (absence of light)?
What if few tempt many to ignore being within the visible spectrum of light by suggesting them a white vs black conflict of reason? Like a masonic checkerboard type of game...
How can you not be exhausted with this rhetoric
a) Being (life) exhausted (inception towards death)...nature exhausts being.
b) Rhetoric (suggested words) tempt one to ignore nature (perceivable sound)...sound moves; while words tempt one to hold onto definitions.
c) Rhetoric implies spell-craft utilized by few to tempt many into conflicts of reason about the crafted spells...a redistribution of exhaustion.
Few tempt many to mutually exhaust each other...just as written in the Protocols.
Operate implies "to be in effect"...psyche/psykhē - "animating spirit" implies all as the cause animating each effect within.
Who publishes revelations in the bible? Who publishes Hitler speeches? Who publishes Piers Morgan and his guests? Who makes public?
What if suggestion conceals what perception reveals?
How could one wake up when blanketed by masses? Why do cattle huddle up to sleep?