Oligos (few) arkhia (to rule)...not all, but each one of few ruling many. How? By tempting each singular one among many to consent to suggested pluralism (these).
Neither God, nor nature implies plural...but one and only/oli aka singular.
the effort to convince
As effortless as using suggestion to tempt consent to convince itself to shirk response-ability onto another.
the surveillance state for intelligence
Intelligence/intelligo - "to understand"...if many "stand under"; then few simply have to hammer down anyone standing up. Wack a mole isn't that hard to watch over aka surveil.
both conservatives and leftists alike
Both conservatism vs liberalism and leftism vs rightism imply alike consent to mutual conflict in-between aka to a conflict of reason.
Before one can choose a side within such an imbalance...one is choice within balance.
they hold all the power
Nature cannot be held onto, since it moves velocity (inception towards death) through resistance (life). The power of few implies consenting many choosing to hold onto suggestions by few, hence collectivizing all ignored resistance of the unwashed masses into the hands of a persistently resisting few aka israel/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God".
until they can separate rhetoric from action
It's action (inception towards death) which separates into reactions (life)...few suggest rhetoric to tempt many to ignore that, while grinding against each other within conflicts of reason over suggested rhetoric.
Rhetoric/rhetorice/rhētorikē tekhnē aka "artificial oration"...an inversion of natural action, which doesn't orate words, but moves sound through each instrumental being.
Oligos (few) arkhia (to rule)...not all, but each one of few ruling many. How? By tempting each singular one among many to consent to suggested pluralism (these).
Neither God, nor nature implies plural...but one and only/oli aka singular.
As effortless as using suggestion to tempt consent to convince itself to shirk response-ability onto another.
Intelligence/intelligo - "to understand"...if many "stand under"; then few simply have to hammer down anyone standing up. Wack a mole isn't that hard to watch over aka surveil.
Both conservatism vs liberalism and leftism vs rightism imply alike consent to mutual conflict in-between aka to a conflict of reason.
Before one can choose a side within such an imbalance...one is choice within balance.
Nature cannot be held onto, since it moves velocity (inception towards death) through resistance (life). The power of few implies consenting many choosing to hold onto suggestions by few, hence collectivizing all ignored resistance of the unwashed masses into the hands of a persistently resisting few aka israel/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God".
It's action (inception towards death) which separates into reactions (life)...few suggest rhetoric to tempt many to ignore that, while grinding against each other within conflicts of reason over suggested rhetoric.
Rhetoric/rhetorice/rhētorikē tekhnē aka "artificial oration"...an inversion of natural action, which doesn't orate words, but moves sound through each instrumental being.