people will believe anything without doing an ounce of research
Look at the religions of this world...which one offers something to believe in exchange for research made? Which religion is based upon ones effort made before entering? Why does a so called jew makes it hard for gentiles to join the jewish faith?
This is shit we expect to see from leftists, but many on the so-called "right" are just as guilty of believing anything so long as it confirms their bias.
Being able to stand implies choosing to balance IN-BETWEEN left and right...holding onto either side would imbalance ones choice.
"There are too many temples; we have too many churches; we have too many mosques"
What about the synagogues?
"We have to get rid of all the monks; get rid of all the preachers; all the imams."
What about the rabbis?
If you're saying X or Y or Z are bad...
...then you established a conflict of reason (good vs bad); which your further comparisons are distracting from.
If you say "life is hard," just what are you going to compare it too?
Living implies within process of dying...a conflict of reason (easy vs hard) distracts from ones struggle to sustain self nonetheless.
Drawing comparisons about life being as hard as...tempts one to ignore that living isn't equal (par) together (com), but oddly apart from one another. Few tempt many to draw comparisons among each other to lure them together into conflicts of reason against each other.
I'm no genius
Reacting (life) to generation (inception towards death)...that's what genius/gene - "generative power" implies. Debating each other over genius vs dunce tempts one to ignore that.
Humans are weird" --- Compared to what?
Weird/wer - "to turn; bend"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/weird#etymonline_v_4898
Direction (inception towards death) bends (life), hence each being representing a temporary growth (sinus curve) within an ongoing loss (base line).
Turning against each other within conflicts of reason tempts one to ignore that.
Wasn't the nazis, but the one's who funded them.
a) Ashke-nazi
b) All implies ones foundation...ashke-nazi tempt one to ignore all (perceivable) for nothing (suggested), hence establishing a fictitious foundation within reality, held together by the consenting masses.
Example...if one evaluates a gold bar as a door stopper, then few can suggest a value for gold to tempt consenting many to kill one for the door stopper.
a) Only nature uses..each being within re-uses what nature offers.
b) Nature implies first...each being implies second aka seco - "to divide" aka an ongoing division of nature into each temporary being.
c) Ones perception (secondary effect) implies a tool implemented by all perceivable (first cause)...suggested tools and implements tempting ones consent to use them imply a third party offer.
Suggested (third) tempts perception (second) to ignore perceivable (first)...
why do we put up with this shit?
Because WE (plural) implies the accumulation; the indigestion; the amassing; the shit.
Cause (inception towards death) sets being (life) apart from ONE (singular) another.
inflammatory comments about white people
a) White implies "pure light"...it cannot be commented upon, since mending (ment) together (com) implies impurity.
b) White (motion) inflames rays (matter) within spectrum (momentum). Rays (life) within spectrum (inception towards death) are burning out.
c) Few suggest pluralism (people) to tempt each one of many to ignore being a perceiving singular (person).
union cancel an event
Event (inception towards death) generates union (life) by setting each unit apart from one another. Ones consent to a suggested union like "united states" tempts many together under a chosen ONE, which establishes an event horizon (a boundary beyond which events cannot affect an observer) because the observer holds onto the suggested union.
yellow vest in the background...
45 (9) 47 (11)...
will fix it
Nature sets WILL free...
a) There are no missing parts within nature.
b) Putting parts together cannot make whole, hence a puzzle coming within a box, and each connecting part is surrounded by an outline...representing the moving differentiation of whole (motion) into partials (matter) within a box (momentum).
c) Whole implies one...as does each one partial within. Without whole setting partials apart from one another, other ones couldn't tempt one to puzzle together.
d) Puzzling together tempts one to miss that nature sets each thing within apart from one another. The missing part implies ones lack of self discernment.
e) Here's a little background about the Maier family behind the Ravensburger jigsaw puzzles...
- 1885: Maier published a collection of patterns for stonemasons.
- 1945: Otto Maier Verlag survives World War II undamaged and receives a publishing license.
- 1959: The game MEMORY is launched.
- 1960: The game MALEFIZ ("Barricade") is introduced.
- 1964: Ravensburger puzzles are launched
If God gave man our Free Will
God implies mono; our implies poly...two contradicting sides tempting ones (yours) free will of choice to imbalance itself by holding onto either.
why would God interfere with said "Free-Will"?
Being implies inter (choice) fere (balance) of God. In other words...Energy internally establishes action and reaction in balance with each other aka DOM-inating action (balance) and FREE reactions (choice).
Few suggest "free will" without OF CHOICE as a liberty to tempt ones consent by "free will of choice" to ignore self as FREE within DOM.
we contribute to the reality that is perceived
All perceivable generates each ones perception by setting apart aka by internal separation aka by differentiation aka by alternation...few suggest pluralism (we) for many to tribute consent together aka con-tribute, which is what one (singular) does when speaking in the name of others (plural) by simply using the word WE.
WE THE PEOPLE implies a suggested fiction...not a perceivable reality.
shared with the species
Species implies specification by separation of whole into partials. Few suggest speciesism to tempt many to consent to classification of each into many, which few then direct back from many into one aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one).
one thing true about all Christians
All implies God; each one within implies a Christian.
gullible
Each one is gullible when ignoring perception (reality) for suggestion (fiction).
faith is belief in lieu of evidence.
a) Giving faith/having belief implies ones consent to the suggestion of another...which makes the suggested evident to the one consenting to hold onto it.
b) There's only ones position within all...consenting to a suggestion of another tempts one to ignore ones position for a "lieu" of another, hence a shirking of response-ability.
The book you love was written by man
a) A book binds those who read in-between covers, hence in-between a conflict of reason like love vs hate.
b) Nature does not write/outline...it implies the line (inception towards death) for those within (life).
The stories in it were made up by man.
Nature doesn't store...it processes (inception towards death) products (life). Few tempt many to abuse mind/memory as storage for suggested information, while ignoring that perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto; saved; stored...without destroying self.
The money you donate goes to fund
All perceivable (value) generates each ones perception (evaluation)...few suggest money to tempt many to devalue themselves, which in return permits few to set a price for that which nature offers towards each ones FREE will of choice.
Current implies a moving foundation; currency tempts those within (life) a moving foundation (inception towards death) to accumulate debt aka a self inflicted burden...
Living within the process of dying implies ones need to stay out of DEBT/DEAD by resisting wanted temptations luring one into it.
One of the Tesla deceptions about using AC to generate electricity is a) current (inception towards death) generates alternation (life) and b) generated electricity implies a dis-charge aka a further division of charge, which tempts the alternating being within current to ignore to re-charge self.
The deception of charging...building a vessel to hold charges tempts one to ignore being a vessel; processed within charge, hence unable to contain within self without needing to let go.
Resistance during velocity can sustain temporal neutrality without participating in + vs - discharges...and that resistance builds up.
God is patient
a) WAS (perceivable) before IS (suggested)
b) All (god) was before one (being) can come into being a patient.
does not abide forever
Abide denotes "onward motion"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/abide#etymonline_v_38 aka ever forward (for-ever).
Few suggest nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to tempt many to ignore temporarily being (life) done (inception towards death) within forever, for the inversion "does nothing".
repentance
One cannot repent (grieving what came before, while seeking forgiveness from what comes) without ignoring oneself as choice within balance.
In other words...holding onto one side (grieve), while inclining towards another (forgiveness) ignores being (life) in-between sides (inception/death).
The Lord is not slow to fulfil His promise
A promise implies a pledge/vow of one to another...before such can be made ALL sets each ONE apart from one another.
Lord/laverd/loverd/wer - "perceive, watch out for"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/lord#etymonline_v_12435 implies ONE (perception) within ALL (perceivable), while the lord implies suggested THE-ism tempting ones consent to submit ones free will of choice to another lord above self.
salvation
There can be no salvation for emergency (life) during solution (inception towards death)...yet that which emerges can temporary grow during ongoing loss by resisting temptations like others suggesting one to seek salvation aka a way out of being.
a) “Every Masonic Lodge is a temple of religion; and its teachings are instruction in religion.” ~ Albert Pike
Talmud; noun - "instruction" from lamadh "he learned"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Talmud#etymonline_v_4343 hence senate/sen - "old, eld" aka learned elders.
b) Denomination; noun - "a calling by anything other than the proper name"
Denoumenon (suggestion) tempts phenomenon (perception) to ignore noumenoun (perceivable).
Noumenoun differentiates phenomenon. Denoumenon is "something like a phenomenon"... https://genius.com/Ll-cool-j-phenomenon-lyrics
DENOUM/demon-enoun...
- Behind every playa (life) is a true playette (inception towards death)
- Bounce you up (inception) outta there (death), push eject
- Taster's Choice, have her nice and moist
- But you're worth it playgirl, it's real in the field
- Say what you want, but keep your lips sealed
mass awakening
Wake/wacan - "to become awake, arise, be born, originate"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/wake#etymonline_v_4796
One starts awake...then struggles with the temptation of falling asleep, while others try to put one to sleep by luring masses together.
pagan faiths
Pagan/pag - "to fasten"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/pagan#etymonline_v_2984
Faith tempts one to hold onto, while ignoring to be solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death). Therefore...faith contradicts pagan, hence few suggesting pagan-ism to tempt many into consenting/having faith in the -ism, while ignoring the implication of pagan.
one world religion
Religion/religio - "to bind anew" implies binding one to another, hence establishing a dual-ism. Religion cannot be one, hence monotheism being contradicted by anyone joining.
rebranded
Few suggest a burned offering to tempt many into responding to a brand (re-brand) by giving consent.
image generation
Nature doesn't generate images (piece of statuary; artificial representation)...few suggest images to tempt the imagination of many to ignore nature.
Image/imitari/aim - "to copy"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/image#etymonline_v_1520
to sell a product
Selling (suggested) a product (perceivable) to ones FREE will of choice for the price of selling self out.
to place blame
Blaming/blaspheming - "finding fault"...consenting to suggestion, while ignoring perception implies blasphemy.
A jew, as a merchant of temptation selling suggestions, accepts the blame, while returning it by claiming persecution...with interest.
social engineering
Nature implies the engine which privatizes each being within by separating each from one another. As the natural engine reveals private; so the suggested engineering of "social" occults the private underneath the public.
"They" will almost exclusively use fake events
a) Event/exvenire - "coming out" implies effects (life) coming out of cause (inception towards death)...staging events for one another tempts one to ignore this.
b) All (motion) generates (momentum) ones (matter) will (choice)...others suggest "they" aka pluralism to shape private choice into a public following of choices.
c) Exclusive/exclude implies a contradiction in itself aka ex (expression) cluse/clude/close (suppression).
Nature impresses (perceivable) expressions (perception)...artifice (suggested) tempts ones consent to suppress ones expression.
d) Ones consent to suggested eventism (monistic ontology of physics founded on events) establishes a conflict of reason (real vs fake).
They avoided real ones
a) Notice that THEY (fake) contradicts ONE (real)...
b) Notice that ONES (plural) contradicts ONE (singular). The plural of one (ones) still implies EACH one...no matter how many are counted together and blanketed by a suggested pluralism.
c) Consenting by ones choice to a suggestion by another ones choice implies "avoiding" ones choice by selecting a chosen ones suggestion to shirk ones response-ability onto.
d) A jew doesn't avoid reality...a jew suggests fiction to tempt gentiles to avoid reality for it, which each one gentile does willingly when giving consent to a jewish suggestion.
They didn't have control of the Reality
Reality reveals by setting apart...fiction tempts those who consent to roll together (con-trol).
Sleight of hand: Katamari (something which rolls up other objects, growing increasingly large) ...that's what a jew does to gentiles, and what control implies aka rolling clumps of useless matter together for the King of All Cosmos.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katamari_Damacy
Real things lock into all other real things and are hard to dislodge.
- Reality (motion) moves (momentum) things (matter) apart
- Reality moves (inception towards death) things (life) apart
A thing can only lock onto other things if being set apart from one another...wanting to hold onto tempts one to ignore needing to let go of.
What you call "hard to dislodge" implies an indigestion of matter within the reality of motion, established by a jew tempting gentiles to hold onto suggested (information) within perceivable (inspiration).
Circular logic implies rolling together an indigestion of thought, while reasoning against others implies the continuous wasted effort to protect one side of indigestion from the other.
infinitely malleable
Only finite (matter) within infinite (motion) can be shaped. A jew suggests fiction to tempt gentiles to hold onto shapes, which in return permits a jew to utilize infinite reality to shape at will what gentiles cannot ever grasp.
Matter (life) cannot hold onto motion (inception towards death)...but it can be tempted to hold onto each other, hence suffocating each others as indigestion of matter during motion.
any degree desired
Desire focuses ones sight, hence narrowing ones degree/spread/growth.
the current state of the art
Artificial (suggested) state (perception) within current (perceivable)...consenting to suggested (art) tempts one perception to ignore perceivable (nature).
State implies one; current implies all...art implies another one making suggestions about all.
all false
All (motion) generates right (momentum) aka a straight (inception towards death) for each bending (life) one (matter) within.
A jew inverts rise (life) during fall (inception towards death) by suggesting false/falsetto aka an artificial high for gentiles to climb up to like a career ladder; a chain of command, or a pyramid scheme.
a) Militant implies "to be in conflict", which contradicts the natural ORDER. A jew suggests gentiles to follow orders towards conflicts as the inversion of the natural order.
b) There's always a difference between zog following jewish orders and a jew suggesting gentiles what orders zog follows, because why give public access to private information? Also...jew over zog; zog over gentiles implies layering, hence a pyramid scheme.
$300 million dollar
Who sets the value of $?
William Morgan
Morgan in welsh stands for "sea-dweller"...being free will of choice (will I am) implies ones struggle of dwelling (to be led into error, go wrong in belief or judgment) within sea/see aka being tempted to ignore perceivable for suggested.
A mason of free (will of choice) utilizes suggested information as bricks and ones consent as mortar to build walls of ignorance within the minds of many, for them to dwell within. Beliefs are held within ones mind, which is where one also makes judge-MENTs from.
Edit: Avdi Vide Tace (hear, see, be silent...if you would live in peace)
people who are schizo
a) People implies an aggregate of each one person...schizo/schism implies a division from one another.
b) What if the original schism of person implies per sonos (by sound) aka the internal division of all sound into each one instru-MENT within aka ones mind?
c) What if a jew aggregates gentiles together aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together), while also using psychoanalysis (jew Freud) to label resisting gentiles as schizo (jew Bleuler)?
cleansing
a) The foundation of clean/pure implies white (pure light) as opposed to black (absence of light).
b) Being implies in-between the visible spectrum (color) of light (white); while struggling with the temptation of ignorance (black). Ignoring implies abstaining from light, hence staining self discernment with the "dreck" suggested by others.
c) In short...holding onto stains one (ignorance); letting go cleanses one (discernment).
it is putting parasite before the spirit
Consent (host) to suggested (parasite) permits parasite before host. Coming into being implies as guest (life) within host (inception towards death).
Host IN-SPIRES guests to breathe apart from one another, hence offering room to breathe...ignoring this for suggested permits others to CON-SPIRE (breathing together).
The first mind parasite is Judeo-Chirstianity
Ones consent (host) to a suggested -ism (parasite) holds it together...
people believing the idea of one world, one nation, one faith.
a) Both suggested pluralism (people) and idealism (idea) tempt each consenting one together with others.
b) ONE implies apart from one another...not aggregated together with other ones.
Exactly what it is evidence of, I don't yet know.
Evident/exvidere - "out of seeing", hence to know - "to perceive"...looking at suggested evidence contradicts that.
I consider
I implies holding onto that which nature set apart from one another aka oneself. Consider aka siding together tempts one to join others, while ignoring to be set apart from one another.
All perceivable sets each ones perception apart from one another, while any suggestion by another tempts one to ignore that.
consistent
Aka standing (stance) together (con)...an inversion of standing apart from one another, hence being enabled to balance as choice freely.
general narrative
Suggested narration contradicts perceivable generation...if one consents to hold onto it.
Nature doesn't narrate (utter words) it generates by moving sound.
a segregated population, forbidden from freely interbreeding
a) A jew suggests populism to tempt freely consenting gentiles together on segregated fields, which are bound together within a conflict of reason against each other, which a jew exploits to tempt the further mixing together of gentiles in controlled environments aka herding cattle.
b) Breed/bhreu - "to boil, bubble, effervesce, burn"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/breed#etymonline_v_17087
Mixing implies "blend promiscuously into one mass"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=mix which inverts nature setting each one within apart from one another, hence each being standing out from one another aka being special as opposed to COMMON.
Interbreeding implies a jew using alchemy to bring gentiles to a boiling point aka a burned offering of the living (ingredients) back into the process of dying (base). Real growth implies singular resistance, fake growth implies plural aggregation into a bubble ready to be busted... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tdyU_gW6WE
mentally stable
Natural order implies stable (balance)...each mind within wields the choice to stabilize (balancing) by adaptation aka alternation aka separation aka transformation etc.
had they been more
THEY implies suggested pluralism, and MORE implies ones singular consent to reason (more vs less) about it against others...that's mentally unstable.
they truly are pursuing insane goals.
A jew suggests goals (outcomes) to tempt gentiles to ignore perceivable origin. Suggested "truth" for example tempts one to hold onto it, while defending it from the onslaught of lies until kingdom come...aka pursuing fiction (suggestion) within a circle (logic) while mutually fighting others (reason).
Insane aka in sanus - "within sound"...that's what a gentile ignores (origin of being) when consenting to a jewish suggestion.
The way they are running the planet
Only flow (inception towards death) runs form (life) into shapes...ones consent to a suggested form (planet), while ignoring perceivable flow (plane) permits another to shift shapes.
people are all the same
People implies an aggregate of many together, which can only exist a) by each different person joining and b) by few remaining apart, hence different from the "same" people.
Do you see the trick of few tempting many together aka aggregating them?
Meanwhile in reality... each person (different); many persons (alike) per-sonos aka by sound (same).
act accordingly
Action sets reactions apart from one another...suggested accord tempts together, while permitting few to attach A CORD upon many aka a string to puppeteer by a hidden hand.
seems like the right way to be
a) Seem/sem - "semblance; sameness" tempts one to ignore being different from one another.
b) Ones perception SEES differentiation; the suggestions by others SEEM the same if one consents. A jew suggests what SEEMS as a SEAM upon what a gentile actually SEES.
b) Being (life) within way (inception towards death) implies differentiation...not likeness, hence differ/disferre - "carrying apart; away from".
In the case of jews, if someone is born into it
a) Each one (perception) is born into all (perceivable)...a jew tempts gentiles into a case (suggested), while using suggested progressivism to tempt them out of being.
In other words...consenting to a suggestion permits others to dangle the suggested in front of ones eyes, while one chases after it. This CHASE for outcomes implies the CASE concealing ones mind from origin.
b) Being (life) born into it (inception towards death) implies as temporary growth into ongoing loss...the origin cannot be blamed for lack of growth. Blaming aka finding a fault implies holding onto something, hence faulting self for lack of growing.
they pretty much just go along with the program
Being (life) going along with origin (inception towards death) dies faster...a jew suggests program/prographein - "to write forth" to tempt consenting gentiles to follow leaders along towards outcome.
Consenting to follow a suggestion, while ignoring to resist origin implies each ones free will of choice.
If one ignores to discern for self that life is being moved towards death, for chasing towards alternative outcomes, then who is to blame but oneself?
they
Notice that you view jews as THEY aka as an aggregate of people, while ignoring that gentiles are the larger aggregate, and that the chosen few imply a people apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
just as the vast majority of Christians, Muslims, and whoever else do.
Religion/religio - "to bind anew"...a jew tempts gentiles to bind each other together, which in return permits a jew to control those in bondage; those bound together; those within a BUND... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundism
I do not think we advance the cause
Cause advances thinking, hence delivering input for thought. A jew suggests nihilism (not) and pluralism (we) and progressivism (advance) to tempt consenting gentiles to ignore perception for suggestion.
the alleviation of human suffering
Suffer; verb - "allow to occur or continue, refrain from hindering, fail to prevent or suppress"...life being moved from inception towards death can not suffer (prevent origin); only suffocate (deprive of) self by denying reality (perception) for fiction (suggestion).
Consenting to hold onto a suggestion implies ones denial of being moved...that's self imposed suffering.
advance the cause of truth
Change advances...truth and lies tempt one to hold onto it (circular logic); fighting others for it (conflicts of reason), while ignoring change aka alternation/differentiation/separation/transformation etc.
there really does seem to be a "problem"
Being implies problem (life) during solution (inception towards death), hence ones struggle to sustain self. A jew suggests gentiles to ignore HERE (as problem within solution) for THERE (solution to problem) to invert reality by sending those within to chase after fiction.
Everything is under his control
Everything reveals, hence setting each one within free to choose for self. Others tempt one to ignore this to gain consensual control over ones free will of choice by binding it.
He allows pedos for reasons unknown to us mortals
a) Collective guilt makes singular innocence attractive...few tempt many to reason against each other, while ignoring the implication of making self guilty by association with a conflict of reason. This in return permits few to exploit mass guilt by farming that which nature innocently reveals...
b) Mortal implies subjected (life) to the process of dying (inception towards death)...which one needs to resist the wanted temptation thereof.
Few suggest "Mortal Kombat" to tempt many into conflicts of reason aka combat for the mutual destruction of each others lives. Any one reasoning tries to reach the end of conflict as to dissolve problems, hence "Finish Him". Reason is decreed by fate, hence "Fatality".
For those with eyes to see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8V7TwlYCt0
The kid screaming at the beginning is a jew tempting gentiles into conflicts of reason, the iconic Mortal Kombat scream afterwards shows a black gentile, while the making of reveals that the voice was uttered by a white guy and edited onto the black guy... that's a jew using the masonic checkerboard to destroy the visible spectrum of light (color) by tempting white (pure light) and black (absence of light) together.
If one puts flag/flacceo/flaccid - "to bend; to recede; to limp; to hang loose" before pole, then how much resistance should others expect?
What if few are phallus worshipers who erect basilisks and skyscrapers, while tricking many with flagpoles to show their impotence?