According to
Accord; verb - "come into agreement" that's a) how ones consent to the suggestion of another occults ones mind from perceivable, and b) a hidden contradiction aka agree-MENT implies mind, while ac-CORD implies heart.
black magic
The foundation of black-magic is about tempting the mind to ignore (black) discernment (white)...meanwhile, ones heart cannot ignore anything.
Obscurantism
Ones consent to suggested information obscures ones perception of all perceivable inspiration.
Ignorance represents the scurus/skeu - "cover" one imposes willingly over ones discernment.
esoteric
Eso implies internal (ones perception) Exo implies external (all perceivable)...the suggestions by another represent an internal cover over ones sight within external.
what does one find?
Only within foundation can one find...it's "looking for" which tempts one to ignore foundation aka origin.
It is magic
Magic/magh - "to be able"...that which WAS enables that which IS. Suggesting each other what IS tempts one another to ignore what WAS perceivable.
Magic (being able) isn't the issue...disabling self by enabling others is.
hypno-
Consenting to suggested "blankets" ones perception, hence keeping one asleep.
Jezebel > Impudence > shame/kem - "to cover"...
Male impression (motion) through female expression (momentum) for transformation (matter) of each off-spring. The issue...the temptation of others, hence pride, which covers (shame) the natural process.
Notice furthermore...pride/prude.
white
White implies a setting apart of light (motion) through spectrum (momentum) into each ray (matter)...
terrain theory vs germ theory
a) Germ sprouts; terrain dries...both imply within the procession of water.
b) Ones consent to suggested theorism establishes a conflict of reason (germ theory vs terrain theory) within which one HOLDS to a side, which imbalances ones choice.
Choice (matter) can only exist within balance (momentum) of motion aka the procession that allows sprouting and drying. Holding onto by giving consent to a suggested -ism tempts one to ignore this process.
destroy a computer
To compute implies to "put together", hence putting together ones consent and another ones suggestion. It's called a PC aka "personal computer" because each person wields the free will of choice to compute what another person SERVES, which the movie inverts by making the hero destroy the server.
that blinds humanity
All (perceivable) generates each ones sight (perception)...consenting to suggested implies willingly putting the blinders onto self.
veil of illusion
Ignorance veils self while making discernment illusive.
light of God
Light (motion) separates into spectrum (momentum) and ray (matter)...putting together (compute) casts shadows onto each other.
lack of imagination
There's no lack of anything within ATION (action) only the rise of reactions. Few suggest IMAGES to tempt many to hold onto within their imagination. A reaction cannot hold onto action...yet imagination distracts from that.
Therefore...ignoring motion, while holding onto matter, tricks one to believe in lacking aka lagging - "fail to keep pace".
add all that uninteresting and boring "feelings and relations" into the movie script
Those who ignore motion for fiction are a) relating to fiction by holding onto it and b) feeling emotion/emotio/emoveo/meue - "to push back".
In other words...a jew suggests a movie to draw consenting gentiles to relate, which results into their emotions pushing back.
always some script writer who pervert and distort the original story
Origin cannot be stored...the cause (inception towards death) of being (life) moves.
The perverted distortion of reality implies ones choice to store fiction within self, while ignoring change.
same pattern
Same (all perceivable) generates differences (each ones perception)...suggested patterns tempt "alike" consent, hence equalizing differences.
always the same...fall; power; amnesia
Fall (inception towards death) generating rise (life) aka ongoing energy generating temporal powers within memory.
story
That's the deception...power within memory cannot be stored without ignoring the nature of energy.
incredible
That's how the deception comes into being...creed/belief/faith aka holding onto within memory, while ignoring motion.
to defeat the devil
De (division) feat/fait (action) + Devil aka diablo aka dia (across) + ballein (to throw)
Action divides into reactions by throwing (life) across (inception towards death).
Devil also implies DE (division) VIL (will), hence ones free will of choice in-between need/want balance, hence vilify/vilis - "cheap, base"...selling oneself out when buying into another ones suggestions by free WILL of choice.
to help strangers
Strange/strano - "foreign, outside of", hence estrange - "separated"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/strange#etymonline_v_22146
Being implies native; one inside all; hence separated/differentiated from one another aka native/natif - "natural; inborn; innate; produced by birth"...
Help implies "support"...only motion (inception towards death) supports separation of matter (life); not matter holding onto each other aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together).
raise the vibe
Vibe/vibrare/weip - "to turn"...turning native and foreign against each other diminishes growth, hence nature setting each one apart from one another to make room for growth.
Native grows outwards; foreign restricts outwards growth...native supporting foreign destroys native.
aren't barbaric
a) Ever heard of BARBARY pirates and BARBARossa? Sinan Reis the "great jew" sailed with him... https://forward.com/culture/463443/once-upon-a-time-jewish-pirates-ruled-the-seas/
b) Babaric/barbarikos - "like a foreigner"...each jew implies a native among gentile foreigners.
sharia
Aka shari'ah "the revealed law" aka revelation of natural law aka the law of all aka AL'LAH...
All perceivable gives rise to each ones perception...suggestions by few draws consent by many away from perceivable.
That's the original DERIVATIVES market...
a) 33 degrees...just like the peace sign.
b) To vulcanize implies "to put into flames", hence more burned offering rhetoric.
c) Vulcan and Venus imply penis and vagina.
guy in the bleachers
I deleted that link...with that reaction on my face.
Which site...wikipedia or gvid?
Neo-Judaizers are the biggest threat to the Church
"The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no NEW thing under the sun." ~Ecclesiastes 1:9
Ecclesiastic from Hebrew qoheleth - "one who addresses an assembly" and therefore Greek ekklesiastikos - "of the church aka a preacher".
Christ implies "anointed one", hence EACH one anointed at birth, hence church implying the body of EACH Christ. There's no preacher within the body of Christ...unless invited into by consenting to a suggestion of another.
"AI" is about controlling information
Consenting to an artificial suggestion rolls-together (con-trol) many under few, hence intelligence/intelligo - "to under-stand".
isolating knowledge to filtered knowledge
Consenting to artificial suggestion (information) isolates ones thoughts from real perceivable knowledge (inspiration). To defend oneself from the resulting conflicts of reason against others, one uses circular logic to isolate ones thoughts.
Inspiration moves through one; information is shared among ones, and held within one.
not freedom to explore
Dominance (all perceivable) sets free (ones perception) within...to explore implies "search out". Few suggest exploration to tempt many outwards, hence from center towards circumference.
the greatest psyops
To operate logic into psyche aka tempting gentiles to reason against each other (greatest vs worse); while ignoring animating power.
Shortening this into PSYOP is in itself a clandestine operation to hide logic/reason from those operated upon.
you lose the context
Con (together) text/teks - "to weave; fabricate; make wicker/wicca framework"... that's what a jew does when weaving suggested information together with gentile consent, which in return permits a jew to "tear at the fabric of life until there's nothing left but a thread".
I take context (words) apart to grow (instrument) within loss (sound)...others struggle to hold onto context, while desperately trying to weave more information into it, in an attempt to fix the holes aka "finding the missing link".
this obsession with English
a) Few use a compass to draw a circle (logic/reason), and a square to draw angles/anglo/english within the minds/memories of many.
b) Obsess aka ob (against) sedere (to sit) implies gentiles reasoning against each other, while each ones consent sits on suggested information by a jew.
c) I simply reverse engineer words within sound and shapes within motion...among those who choose to hold onto the inversion, which turns them against each other.
I get that it's a common language
One doesn't get...one takes part in suggested common-ism. The more participate; the more common it becomes.
Few suggesting common -isms are centralizing control over consenting many through languages, which represent trade currencies, hence each word (seller) requiring letters (buyer).
ignores the etymology of other languages
ETYMON (true; real; actual)...implies the perceivable sound one ignores, when LOGY (logic/reason) reasoning against each other over suggested words...traded in suggested languages.
I break apart etymo + logy to make ignorance uncomfortable.
it's quite useless to be wrong, but it's almost as useless even if you're right
That's the LOGY (circular logic within self; conflicts of reason against others) within etymo-logy.
your delivery is too long, or hard to follow
a) Only motion delivers life from inception towards death, which by its temporal nature can never be "too long". Most even complain that it's "too short"...
b) Following is easy, because life is being moved from inception towards death, hence needing to resist the wanted temptation to follow along.
c) If a delivery is brought to you; then why would you follow it? If all perceivable is delivered to each ones perception; then how could all be TOO long; short; much; less; hard; soft etc. for one?
d) What I write wasn't delivered by another...I'm drawing it from within an all one can eat buffet, where one needs to resist the tempting suggestions of one another.
might as well not even try
Try/trial/trail aka flow (inception towards death) behind (life)...if one is formed behind flow; then one needs to resist the temptation of moving along, which grows resistance.
Being able to choose in-between resistance (need) and temptation (want) implies might/magen - "to be able"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/might#etymonline_v_14812
A jew utilizes this magen/magic to trick ones free will of choice to consent to a suggestion, hence to follow along instead of resisting.
Furthermore..."might is right" aka right/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/right#etymonline_v_15068
high IQ people
a) Intelligence/intelligo - "to understand" implies to stand under, hence ligo/lego - "to collect" aka burdening oneself with the suggested information by another when giving consent.
Intelligence implies a lowered being.
b) Quotient implies "the division of one number by another", hence another tempting one to lower self by standing under, hence dividing low from high.
b) People implies plural; person implies singular...a singular has a hard time growing within a plural, based on lack of space to grow.
Few tempt many together to reduce the space of each to grow outwards. There ain't no high people unless one piles them up, hence each layer understanding aka standing under each other within a pyramid scheme.
wasting their minds in endless work getting nowhere
a) Work implies energy (internal power). Energy establishes power by division (momentum) of external energy (motion) into internal energy (matter).
b) Division (inception towards death) directs internal energy (life) from beginning towards end within "endless" external energy.
c) The division of external into internal energy establishes a momentary center within an ongoing circumference...this momentary aka momentum aka moment aka mo-MENT implies the mind/memory of each being.
d) As for waste..a beast aka a being (be) who is astute (ast) aka a self discerning being resists the temptation of w-ast-ing self by h-ast-ing after the suggestions of others aka by trying to reach a MARK.
Like Sisyphus
a) Sisyphus/syphos - "the crafty" from craft/kraft - "might; power"...
Power (all) generates potential (one) trough differentiation...choosing to respond "alike" diminishes ones potential.
b) Circular logic tempts one to take into memory more and more suggested information, which makes it harder and harder to push forward.
Sisyphus isn't pushing up a mountain...he amasses a ball within himself, which drowns his resistance until he's forced to let go.
A less occulted version of Sisyphus is called Katamari Damacy... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katamari_Damacy
I convince no one
Another convinced one that "no; not; nothing" exists...and that one can claim self as "me; myself; or I".
I waste my time and energy
a) "I" and "my" implies ones resistance trying to hold onto a solid (life) within a fluid (inception towards death)...what a waste.
b) Time/tima - "temporal duration" tempts one to ignore energy (ongoing action).
Duration implies dura/deru (solid) within tion/action (fluid) aka dura (life) tion (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see...TIME (tie me). Time cannot be measured without being tying oneself to measure-ment.
in this succubus
a) The world wide web only sucks those who log/lock into the internal net.
b) Cubus/cubit/keub - "to bend" aka bhend - "to bind"...consent to suggestion binds ones FREE will of choice.
I can't say these things irl.
Does one have FREE will of choice irl? Does saying anything binds one to words suggested by others? Does many consenting to suggested words by few establish a common courtesy aka a court of public opinion ruled by few?
Say/sekw - "to follow"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/say#etymonline_v_22810 Try resisting the sooth-saying of others...
I used to hope to meet like minded people
a) Hope implies towards outcome...meeting in death doesn't sound like a lively experience to share.
b) Like minded implies hive minded...just tune into "narrative" and tada...as many like minded hive minds as there can be.
c) To meet implies "coming together"...to be implies "apart from one another". Only apart from one another can one choose to meet with one another.
A real meeting (inter-course) sets further apart (off-spring), which is how motion forces matter apart from one another aka coming into being.
foundational component
ATION implies action, which sets PONERE (position; potential; reaction) apart from one another, not together (com).
Only within foundation aka fall of action (inception towards death) can reactions rise (life).
The first major conspiracy
Con (together) spira (to breathe) tempts one to ignore that first (motion) breathes (momentum) life into secondary (matter).
Secondary doesn't imply two, but seco - "to divide" aka the division of one (whole) into ones (partials) aka the internal division of external energy into motion (loss) and matter (growth).
for this we pay
a) Paying how? By ones FREE will of choice.
b) FOR-wards (inception towards death) sets free (life)...
live with ridiculous regulations.
Using ones choice to select a chosen ones suggested regulations willingly? Sounds ridiculous...
You're too wrapped up in over analyzing words
a) How does taking apart words wrap one up? What if taking apart fiction (words) relieves one from self imposed burdens within reality (sound)?
b) Being implies RE (living response) SOLUTION (being dissolved within process of dying).
Few utilize synthesis (consent to suggestion) to distract many from analysis (all perceivable dividing into each ones perception)...free will of choice resolutely utilized analyses to destroy synthesis.
you're a LLM or something
a) Language learning is based on ones consent to the suggested words by another, which among humans is called "civilizing", while upon animals is called "domesticating"...
As free will of choice...one has to analyze the contradiction within that synthesis to remain free.
b) Model/med - "to measure" implies taking measurements in-between points, while ignoring ones life sentence. That's why any suggested model fails within perceivable reality.
It's not like a regular conversation
a) Con (together) vers (to turn)...turning together implies facing each other within a conflict of reason for mutual destruction.
b) Regular/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies winding being (life) within straight line (inception towards death) set apart from one another.
c) The opposite of "not like" implies "everything different"...what if everything (whole) differentiates each thing (partial)?
I don't seem to have those (regular conversations) anymore
Because a want vs not want discussion was never needed. You just participated by joining, from which you then departed by resisting the temptation thereof.
Instead of turning (verse) together (con)...you're now a part within whole, hence within (life) direction (inception towards death).
What does that imply (if/then) for you to not have to reason against others?
I delete
Only nature can de-lete aka division (life) of line (inception towards death). Trying to add; save or delete each other distracts one from discerning self.
my account
Taking into account gives others accountability over one.
We have talked many times before
I haven't said a word on the internet since 2008 (playing Burnout Paradise online)...
The first product of the Parker Brothers game manufacture responsible for Monopoly and Clue(edo) was called BANKING...
Parker's philosophy: "games should be played for enjoyment and did not need to emphasize morals and values"
Parker Brothers was gobbled up in 1991 by Hasbro aka the (((Hassenfeld Brothers)))
You're point is
a) At inception...life is SENTENCED towards POINT of death. A point implies the end of sentence, which is why few suggest many to make points, and come to the point, and point it out, and what's the point etc.
Distracting from life sentence by continuously willing the end of a sentence (point) into reality...a life to death inversion.
b) All perceivable WAS before one within can suggest what IS. Ones consent to what IS permits another one aka a chosen one to occult what WAS.
I am creating a dichotomy of real or not...BUT
a) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo aka the jewish origin of nihilsim and creationism as in "the manner in which HaShem created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)."
b) Real implies ones RE-sponse to ALL...which one denies (de-nihilo; division-nothing) when ignoring perceivable for suggested -isms.
c) BUT aka butan/buton aka be-ut...being out. A suggested inversion of being (ones perception) within (all perceivable).
In short...ones consent to creationism establishes a dichotomy between everything (perceivable) and nothing (suggested), which tempts oneself to ignore being within for believing to be without.
The words "creation; nothing and but" signal a jew that the gentile using them has been successfully inverted from reality into fiction.
there are grey areas
a) There implies within the visible spectrum of light, hence in-between pure light (white) and the absence thereof (black), neither of which those within the visible spectrum can see.
A jew tempts gentiles to identify as white or black, which by choosing either side establishes a conflict of reason aka a dichotomy...white vs black, which implies both sides MIXING against each other.
This a) equalizes perceivable differences within the visible spectrum of light, which distorts ones sight and b) establishes a grey area, where a jew can operate undercover among mixed gentiles.
b) Area implies "vacant piece of ground; open space; bare space cleared by burning" aka an arid (dry) area.
Gentiles within a conflict of reason are grinding against each other, hence drying each other out, while ignoring to be solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death). The jewish suggestion tempting consenting gentiles into conflicts of reason aka into a dichotomy aka into mutual destruction implies a "burned offering" aka a holocaust...
Another example...Amazon selling "KINDLE FIRE" aka amazon (from Iranian) ha-maz-an implies "one fighting together"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=amazon
And then there's pharmacy/farmacie - "a purgative" using pharmaceuticals aka drugs/droge - "dry" to purge solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death).
aren't you guilding the lilly with blaming jew
Blame implies blasphēmos (evil speaking)...hence me taking apart words (suggested fiction) within sound (perceivable reality).
Using suggestion (word) within perceivable (sound) implies to gild the lily. Sound was filled with beauty/bealte/beauto aka be (being) auto (self) before each being chose to shape sound into words, hence establishing noise aka noisome aka noi (nothing) some/sem (one) aka no-one.
A jew utilizes spell-craft to tempt consenting gentiles into negating the state of being into nothingness.
In their own words: "cause it's the deepest impulse of the jewish soul to pull at the very fabric of life until there is nothing left but a thread. He wants nothing but nothingness"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRUjy1Dhx-k
jew is unclear and unspecific
a) Nature reveals everything (perceivable) through each one (perception). Nature cannot conceal...it's each ones free will of choice to conceal self from natural (perceivable) by consenting to artificial (suggested); which then makes revelation "unclear" to oneself, hence lack of self discernment.
b) Being implies one (partial) within all (whole); hence specific (life) within general (inception towards death). A jew suggests UN- (not; nothing; nothingness) to distract consenting gentiles from everything perceivable.
You using UN-clear and UN-specific implies your de-nial (nihilo, nothing) of everything perceivable and your willing consent to suggested nihilo-ism by a jew. You choose to hold UN before clear (all) and specific (one), thereby negating both for your perspective.
c) JEW (phonetic YOU) originates by one claiming self as "me; myself or I", which brands every other one into a YOU/JEW.
YOU (jew) implies a liability shield used by others, which hides underneath ME aka the last place one would assume others to hide.
A chosen one is selected by ones choice...an inversion of self.
d) Nature (all) generates units (one) through internal separation/differentiation/transformation, and all is one in EN'ERGY, noun (Gr. work) - "internal or inherent power".
"There can be only one" aka "one for all and all for one" aka alone...ALL(in)ONE.
Do you mean
a) All does, each one within re-does self. One cannot "do"...only react to being enacted upon.
b) All generates each ONE. If one chooses to claim self as ME, then each other one becomes a YOU (jew), which also establishes a dichotomy aka ME vs YOU aka "me against the world"... https://genius.com/2pac-me-against-the-world-lyrics
c) Mean/men - "to think"...asking for meaning implies ignoring perceivable reality for suggested fiction, shaped by others. Notice also the ME in MEaning aka "YOU (jew) give ME MEaning"
khzarian jews
That originates from the 1961 speech by Benjamin Freedman... https://archive.org/details/benjamin-h.-freedman-speech-unedited-version-1961
Which prompted the modern narrative: "The ruling elite of the Khazars was said by Judah Halevi and Abraham ibn Daud to have converted to Rabbinic Judaism in the 8th century, but the scope of the conversion to Judaism within the Khazar Khanate remains uncertain."
Khazar/quasar/qaz - "to roam"...that's the same trick used for rome (to roam) and egypt (a gypsy; nomad; wanderer; bohemian; rootless aka one who roams).
control media
a) Media/mediate - "middle"...each one (perception) implies middle of all (perceivable). Ones consent to a suggestion permits a chosen one the middle aka central position, while mediating perceivable reality through suggested fiction.
b) Nature directs (inception towards death) apart (life)...many consenting to few rolls them together aka con-troll. A jew rolling gentiles together implies a kike/kikel - "circle", hence establishing circular logic for gentiles to reason against each other about.
A jew doesn't "control media"...gentiles roll together around a mediated suggestion by a jew, which each one does willingly.
In reality...each ones perception implies the medium for all perceivable directed through one.
or do you mean Larry
Larry/lowrie - "a hypocrite" from hypokritēs - "stage actor; pretender, dissembler"...
- https://www.etymonline.com/word/Lowrie#etymonline_v_52038
- https://www.etymonline.com/word/hypocrite#etymonline_v_29958
new accounting specialist
a) New implies suggested creatio ex nihilo aka creation out of nothing, and is an inversion of perceivable "now". Ones perception within all perceivable can only operate NOW...not before or after.
"There is nothing new under the sun" ~Ecclesiastes 1:9
b) All separates each one from one another...a jew tempts gentiles to count each other, which when consented to, makes gentiles accountable to a jewish accountant.
Here's a jew suggesting gentiles to count... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2AaaXSGq.jpg
c) -ist (specialist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (specialism)...joining consent and suggestion together contradicts being special aka apart from one another.
The jew is more dichotomous
a) It's ones consent to the-ism, which establishes the dichotomy between selected authority (jew) and subjecting being (gentile).
b) More vs less tempts one (partial) to ignore all (whole)...the conflict only exist during ones ignorance.
searching for
For implies "forwards" aka towards outcome, which for life implies towards death. ALL generating each ONEs life implies origin...which one ignores when searching for outcomes.
"Seek and ye shall find" is a rhetorical trick tempting one to ignore that only within all (whole) can one (partial) seek. Furthermore, shall, which hides (sh)ALL implies shall/scyld/schuld - "guilt; debt"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/shall#etymonline_v_23330
Ignoring origin (all perceivable) for seeking outcomes (another ones suggestion) puts one into debt to another, while guilty of ignorance.
A jew suggests progressivism to tempt consenting gentiles forwards... https://forward.com/
not a person claiming to be a source
a) Person aka per sonos (by sound) implies source and resolution.
b) A moving source cannot be claimed without ignoring motion...holding onto a suggestion implies such a claim.
In the case of true or false, there is no grey area
True VERSUS false mixes both sides (white and black) within the visible spectrum of light into a "grey" area. Those fighting each other ignore that what they're fighting over was suggested from outside the conflict.
Case/kad - "to fall; decline"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/case#etymonline_v_5432
A jew utilizes suggestion to tempt consenting gentiles into conflicts of reason against each other, hence tricking them into a case of mutual destruction.
of my own free will choose life under
a) To own implies taking into possession, hence choosing to hold onto. FREE will of choice implies wielding a potential given by balance.
b) Both possession (own) and subjugation (under) contradict FREE, and despite taking possession or subjugating self...one remains free to choose to let go and liberate self.
God's guidance
Motion (inception towards death) inspires matter (life) to resist...the temptation to ignore resisting by following along is what others suggest as "guidance", which is why many constantly seek guidance from few.
If God implies one, then there's one way (inception towards death) for each one being (life) within...how does one need a guide for a one way direction back to origin?
he protects me
Protection aka pro (forward) tegere (to cover) tion (action)...action forwards reactions by setting free aka by revealing being.
It's ones free will of choice consenting to suggested protection which covers ones perception from all perceivable revealed to one.
I know the worth of my soul now
a) To know implies to perceive; my implies to take possession of...how could one take possession of what one perceives if all perceivable moves?
b) If soul/sole - "one and only", then why claim possession as MY over YOURS?
Doesn't soul/sole - "one and only" imply God? Why then establish a MY vs YOURS conflict by claiming possession over the one and only soul/sole?
me, Hebrew
He-brew implies "for others", me implies "for self"...a contradiction.
What if the wavelength never ends?
a) Beginning and end implies inception and death of amplitude (life). Wavelength doesn't have a beginning or end unless the amplitude within shapes points of measurement.
Notice that while alive, one cannot perceive ones inception or death...yet life constantly measures in-between beginnings and ends, while ignoring that.
b) Never (nothing ever) implies suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) tempting ones de-nial of EVER-ything perceivable.
Once again it was your free will of choice to hold onto "never" as a suggested point of measurement, while ignoring that all perceivable moves.
Exponential growth
Wavelength implies loss (inception towards death); amplitude implies growth (life) aka temporal growth within ongoing loss.
Exponent implies "put forth"...that which puts forth growth (living) implies loss (dying).
unimaginable, I imagine
Image/imitari - "to copy" aka to copy (consenting to suggested) original (perceiving perceivable).
An image aka a picture implies a captured moment tempting ones mind/memory to hold onto it, while ignoring the ongoing momentum (inception towards death) moving through ones (life) sight.
am a slave and I serve the greatest Master.
a) A master reduces a slave to subjugation...being given FREE will of choice liberates one from subjugation.
b) "I" implies ones choice to take possession of self, which subjugates ones potential to express self freely. "I" also establishes "YOU" (phonetic jew)...
I am tuned to the Lord's frequency,
a) Frequent implies "repetition of action" aka ones reactions (Christ) within all action (God).
b) Inception towards death implies wavelength of frequency; while life implies amplitude of frequency....only as amplitude (growth) within wavelength (loss) can there be a tone/tonos/ten - "to stretch" aka a raising of voice.
Some theoretical concept and its implementation could be a very different things.
To imple-MENT a concept implies different minds consenting alike. A concept equalizes differences...if one consents to it.
Fiat (let it be so) implies the authoritative sanction by free will of choice of each gentile, which thereby puts TRUST into a suggested jewish BANK.
It's called fractional banking, because each fraction (ones perception) within whole (all perceivable) can be banked by trust in suggested.
social media
Social implies gentiles coming together; media implies each jew mediating information to tempt consenting gentiles together.
all major
Only within all (whole) can ones (partials) be divided into major and minor.
jew infiltrating gentile groups
A jew suggests pluralism (groups) to trick each single gentile to filtrate into (in-filtrate) aka joining by consent to a jewish suggestion.
A jew exists within any group before a gentile can join, because grouping together is an inverted fiction, shaped by a jew within a reality that sets each one apart from one another.
To join implies ones choice selecting a chosen ones suggestion, while ignoring that all perceivable sets each ones perception apart from one another.
Soul (motion) > spirit (momentum) > body (matter)...
Plural (they) pulls singular (will) into ignoring self for others...
All sets each one free...ones free will of choice consenting to another ones suggestion attaches strings to self.
Do implies all; be implies one..."not" implies a suggested deception tempting one to ignore all.