b) A peon implies a debtor held by his creditor, yet it's gentiles who give creed/credit; while taking on jewish debt.
c) To usurp implies "seizing without right"...a gentile giving creed/credit to a jew; while taking jewish debt into possession usurps oneself from being within (life) right of passage (inception towards death).
d) Nature cannot be seized aka ones perception cannot seize all perceivable...trying to seize the suggestions by one another establishes seizure within self, which in return permits others upon (epi) seizure (lepsis).
The jewish concept of a golem/golum/goyim implies jewish control from outside (by suggestion) of what a gentile seizes within self (by consent). Consenting to a suggestion establish a conflict of reason among gentiles about seized suggestions by a jew, which implies an "epi-leptic-shock".
Utilizing implication (if/then) instead of reason (versus) prevents "shock".
Withdrawing consent from suggestion prevents "epi"
Adapting to perceivable instead of seizing suggested prevents "leptic"
a) European aka EU R O PEAN (you are a peon)
b) A peon implies a debtor held by his creditor, yet it's gentiles who give creed/credit; while taking on jewish debt.
c) To usurp implies "seizing without right"...a gentile giving creed/credit to a jew; while taking jewish debt into possession usurps oneself from being within (life) right of passage (inception towards death).
d) Nature cannot be seized aka ones perception cannot seize all perceivable...trying to seize the suggestions by one another establishes seizure within self, which in return permits others upon (epi) seizure (lepsis).
The jewish concept of a golem/golum/goyim implies jewish control from outside (by suggestion) of what a gentile seizes within self (by consent). Consenting to a suggestion establish a conflict of reason among gentiles about seized suggestions by a jew, which implies an "epi-leptic-shock".