And how do you suppose to receive any 5G band on the antenna of 50μm size? Size of antenna should correspond to wavelength. You need at least two 1/4-wavelength segments to get something decent. If your object is magnitude orders smaller than wavelength, it just can't be used as antenna, you will not get any significant potential difference to be somehow useful from object of that size.
When some business offer you something for free, that means you are not a customer, you are a commodity they will sell.
Why are you obsessed with that HIMARS junk? It is a system inferior to old soviet Smerch/Tornado kind systems, and Ukraine had at least 80 Smerch systems and who knows now many Tornadoes at the start of war.
HIMARS is unuseable without satellite support and when the weather is bad and could hit only fixed stationary targets with relatively small warhead. And could not carry nuclear warheads. It is also insanely slow for rocket and barely could maneuver that makes it wulnerable for AD.
All (I mean literally all) of Ukrainian successful strikes in that war was achieved with soviet weapons, not western ones. TU-141/143 drones (at the time of manufacturing, of course, there was no "drone" term), Tochka-U, S-300, Neptun and so on. Where is Western weapons in that list? Why? How is it possible that Western "wonderweapons" and "game-changers" are inferior to not even Russian, but old Soviet weapons?
HIMARS is just another overpriced crap specifically designed to launder tax money and make MIC elite rich.
Seems that elites thoroughly destroying US MIC, creating economy conditions to force MIC to produce as expensive weapons as possible to launder tax money and hike stock prices now, but they absolutely don't care what will MIC do when the war ends. Who in sane mind will want to buy all that overpriced and inferior crap?
US and EU MIC is just used to drain state budgets and then will be thrown out, as elites decide that this milking round is over, leaving millions of educated and skilled people without job and perspectives.
So, it is better not to care about degenerate us, but to take a close look at the current state of US engineering and manufacturing and what elites really try to do with them. We already passed that stage, and fortunately stopped just at the moment when damage almost become critical, so I have full rights to issue a warning. I see exactly same pattern in US now - huge rising the profits of MIC owners with simultaneous destruction of engineering traditions and real manufacturing, hence you have now all that B-21, F35 and other overpriced non-functional MSM-targeted crap rising.
Globalists don't care about Americans at all, just like they don't care about anybody except themselves. And the destruction of advanced nations are among their primary goals. You could be glad of stock prices of Lockheed-Martin or Raytheon now, may be, but hardly you will be happy with the results, when the last old guy who remember the tricky nuances of correct jet turbine blade tempering will be replaced with gender-tolerant zoomer who care more about satisfying manager with ESG, KPI and other bullshit than about making real things working.
I think it's like why people buy advertising bullshit. "It's modern and cool, using it will make you modern and cool".
In telegram.
Just as a start - https://t.me/s/intelslava https://t.me/s/Rybar https://t.me/s/DonbassDevushka and so on, follow the links to others. Tons of videos. Not all of them are available in web-interface, so if you really need all of them, you need telegram account.
JFYI
Something is weird with allergies, at least with food ones.
In Russia, peanut allergy among children measured as ~0.09% - 0.1% F.e. on the sample size of 13000 children in Tomsk region: https://www.lsgeotar.ru/kharakteristika-evolokumaba-yego-effektivnost-lechenii-giperlipidemii.html - in Russian, use online translator, it's not the only paper with that estimates).
AFAIK on the West 1-2% vulnerable to peanuts.
So, 10 times difference out of nothing.
Peanuts in Rusia and USSR was not delicacy at all, peanuts imported from South America, India and Africa in huge amounts. Russia is one of the largest importers of peanuts. It is a part of many products and I doubt that we eat less peanuts than Americans. Peanut butter as separate product is not very popular, but a lot of cookies and snacks. Even in distant village grocery, you will find salted peanuts and cookies/cakes with them.
So, there is definitely some unknown factor. I'm in doubt that Russian food corporations and authorities somehow care about citizens health, and hardly climate plays so significant role.
I also never heard about high level of peanut allergy in Asia or any other place except West. Also interesting that US/Canada is not significantly differ from West Europe.
What could be the reason of 10 times more peanuts allergy that is very specific exclusively for West? Nutrition? Medicine?
Also found a map of allergies rise from Nature, 2006 - https://germguy.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/allergy-rise.jpg but not shure about validity, since Nature usually paywalled and it is hard to search through it to find a source.
Or there could be another explanation - BigPharma want to sell more anti-allergic drugs so inflating allergyhoax, just like they do with coronahoax, but sloper.
So, to find out what is really happening fist you need to find out does that allergy rise real, and then, if it does, find out what is significantly different between countries wil low and high allergy that could be connected with allergy.
You can't use all available bandwidth of 4G and often even 3G, because bandwidth is limited not by bandwidth of mobile - base station link, but by base station - internet link.
For an ISP that's nice as they can service more people with less equipment
They can't. Because the bottleneck is between base station and internet, not between mobile and BS. People don't need faster connetion to BS, they need faster connection to internet.
little spy crap will not be running 5g in the foreseeable future
Nearly everybody have spy crap in pocket. Powerful enough crap. But you can't stream all data continously from that devices, first - bottleneck from BS to server and second - power consumption. 5G with local storage and lower power consumtion solves that surveillance problem perfectly.
Basically it's an over blown slight upgrade over existing technology.
Senseless for customer upgrade. Customer will prefer more base stations with thick fiber uplinks, not adding 5G modules to base stations without any upgrade of infrastructure.
So the threat is surveillance not physical health?
I think so. 4g network as it was build do not allow streaming sirveillance video/audio/data and storing it. Upgrading BS uplinks and building giant datacenters is insanely expensive, you need a fiber to every single BS and huge upgrade of backbone to withstand all that new datastreams to datacenters. Adding distributed storage to BS and enhancing client capacity with 5G looks like best solution. And all payments could be placed on clients through buying new devices and dataplans.
From the health view 5G is not different from 4G. Difference only in modulation, basically, all other parameters are the same, including frequencies and TX power. So, those who are very concerned about 5G health issues but somehow don't care about 3G/4G are definitely doing something suspicious.
Do you have any concerns about 5g?
Of course. It is definitely some conspiracy with 5G, but not one they try to push.
If so, what are they?
Shortly: 5G main official advantage over 4G is higher bandwidth and more clients for one BS. But significantly higher bandwidth you could get only in Frequesncy Range 2 (27GHz and 38GHz bands). But that bands barely works inside buildings, not even talking about outside - they are easily muted even by rain or fog. And even inside you need antennas in sight of each other to get some Gbit speeds. So, in reality, 5G gives slightly wider bandwidth and more clients for Base Station.
And now the most interesting thing - Base Station is definitely not the endpoint of your high bandwidth connection. You need thick fiber channels from BS - uplinks to some backbone. But nobody upgrade that uplinks. And that uplinks are the bottleneck of cellular networks.
4G hardly utilise 30% of it's possible capacity because uplinks can't provide necessary bandwidth. Even in towns. Situation in suburban and rural areas much worse, because even 1Gb radiolink is often a luxury for rural base station. And nobody want to bury fiber under all that fields and forests. So, 1000 clients who have 1Gb connection to base station will fight for that 1Gb uplink with all consequences. Changing 4G to 5G gives nothing in terms of real bandwith and number of clients.
So the question is - why they need 5G, when they can't even utilize 4G?
They often tell us about IoT crap in connection with 5G. Here the larger number of clients will be a significant advantage. But more spying devices will need much more bandwidth. So, all IoT traffic should be terminated on the base station. And here comes my theory - they will collect all surveillance from 5G IoT devices right on the BS. When they will need an info about you they will just downloand only data recorded from your devices using that narrow uplink.
So, 5G is a prerequisite for total surveillance network with local storage of all raw surveillance on BS with access to it provided to agencies and businesses.
Pretty logical scheme - you turn every base station into local network storage without any need to buld giant datacenters and upgrading uplinks and backbone. 4G base stations don't have large enough storages, and have lower maximum number of clients. So, add 5G modules to the base stations, and you get state wide surveillance storage that could hold data on every single person who use any smartphone, IoT device or use cellular network for internet access.
That concerns about creation of country-wide distributed storage surveillance network with enormous capacity was rised in the early days of 5G rollout. "What the fuck, we can't even utilize 4G, why roll out 5G instead of upgrading all BS uplinks?" Even Apple founder (real one) Stieven Wozniak rised that concern at the time, but all that was quickly buried under the insane "5G health issues" storm.
Hardly today any questions about 5G will be heard and answered.
For example:
That have nothing to do with 5G. that MDLEDs will light up with any microwave radiation, 5G, 4G, 3G, WiFi, microwave oven and so on. And you need 65W of microwave for 30 minutes on 14 25x7mm capsules to kill E.Coli in 350ml per minute flow. Seriously?
You can't make something that gather microwaves that is much smaller than 1/4 microwave length. And lower the length of microwaves, the lower penetration they have into conducting body. If you make any device small enough to be able to hide in some jab, than you will have no way to get to them with microwaves because human body will effectively shield them from your microwaves.
Also, something tell me that 65W of 2.4Mhz will perfectly kill E.Coli without any MDLEDs at all. They "forgot" to do control experiment without their capsules. :)
you can't dismiss the connection between the expensive 5G network rollout and things like neural link,
I perfectly can. Because 5G gives absolutely nothing better than 4G without upgrading backbone of cellular network. You can't utilise 4G yet, not because your device can't and not because base station can't, but because connections between base stations and upstream can't, especially in suburban and rural areas. Replacing 4G wihth 5G gives absolutely nothing that could be somehow connected with all that brain chips.
That IS the Norm.
I know that, you know that. But most sheeple already don't. So, no, average western sheeple think that it is underground cult today.
How to make it back to norm from underground?
How do we know they are ignorant bastards and not glowies just muddying the waters
We don't. They could be both - ignorant glowies. I would not be surprised at all, if a shit of paper with something like "grant payments of project 1234-XYZ" stored in some file on some shelf in some state building. We saw similar papers about different hoaxes numerous times, and while we don't know if they are exist in that case, it is more than valid theory.
Looking at all consiracists scene, I see two distinct groups of participants - one group are those who question everything, try to find the answers by themselves, generate some theories and trying to connect the dots, and others who just copypasting some narratives round and round without adding anything or questioning anything at all. Latter could look wery interested in what they share, looking closely it is obvious, that they are not interested in what they share at all. They are more interested in sharing and protecting what they share than about digging deeper or questioning what they share.
F.e., if you are really interested in that 5G stuff, why not to try to find out what that 5G is, how it works, how it differ from 4G and so on?
F.e. a picture in that article is a cut out from frame from infamous hoax video with "cell company worker" with some board in hands who tells that they was ordered to put that board on cell towers. However, the board is from old DVB set top box Cisco 4585DVB with typical SCART TV connector that had never used in anything cellular. IIRC that set top box production was canceled even before 5G become adopted standard. You could even see the case of 4585DVB on the hood of "workers" car in that video. https://skelbiu-img.dgn.lt/1_5_3514572942/cisco-4585dvb-virgin-media-kabelinis-imtuvas.jpg
Who and for what purpose will spend time to shoot and spread the completely fake video that could be (and AFAIK was, with following scream in MSM about "banning misinformation") easily debunked?
Who will spend time 2 years later and write insane article about 5G and vaccines and use a frame from already widely debunked video?
There is definitely some game ongoing, and I think it is well paid by those who want to silence any reasonable questions about 5G, coronahoax, vaccinehoax and other shit.
The question really is only about those who post that crap here. Are they doing that because of ignorance, or is it their job?
What is once considered unacceptable and insane is introduced to the general public and normalized by wearing the people down gradually through attrition so they accept it as a norm.
Today, normal family, existence of only two genders, disregard of Mammon, denial of lies and hoaxes of elites and so on are considered unacceptable and insane. According to your logic all that should not be normalized and accepted as a norm.
You miss an important thing about Christianity. Church as institution and Christianity as faith are different things. That difference was the real main reason for Great Schism. West church completely subdued faith, while East didn't. That is why Western christianity as a rebellion against dying gay-pedo Roman Empire ended with becoming what they rebel against. If you do not separate faith and church, than there are a lot of those who wish to infitrate the church and rule over, declaring himself as speaking from God's mouth.
Bible is telling a story about exactly same thing. Jews was given a chance to become better people, by living by their own free will, but they eventually replaced God with idolatry and turn into complete bastards, so evil, that God had to send His Son to them, in attempt to bring them to the reason, but they just set Him up and voted to kill Him. That story is exactly about how to not fall into that shit. Don't make yourself an idol. Jews made one and become a children of Satan. Catholics made and become Vatican. and so on. All history you described is exactly creating an idol.
Today's idols are "freedom and democracy", with MSM as priests and NWO as highest hierarchy, and their cultists are rushing to exterminate those who don't want to praise their idols and sacrifice to them.
And suddenly, sane Christians, who don't sell their faith to bureacracy, represent the huge part among those who do not want to obey that idols.
5G light-emitting diode (LED) network and planned neural connection to the 5G grid
Looks like all that turning into pure clown show now.
Congratulations, ignorant bastards, who don't bother to learn anything, you successfully muted all really important questions about 5G with your stupid clown crap.
Why would the elite want a cashless society? Cash enables them to hide transactions and avoid taxes.
Elites print that cash to control their herds, why would they use it? Elites use pieces of art, archeological artifacts, rare gems and so on as their currency. They don't need to use cash at all at their scale. Also, they are those who lay down and gather taxes, not those who pay them.
They perfectly control all cash and have no problems with it. In a second they could change a value of cash in your pocket, using all that inflation/deflation or any other economic bullshit as a cover of their influence.
Cash is just another elite tool to control people, just like bank accounts or proposed CBDC.
Cashless society agenda looks more like an attempt to close banknote factories or make a larger profit, because it is much cheaper to "print" digits in computers backed with nothing than spend some efforts to print banknotes backed with nothing.
I have nothing against resisting Digital ID, there are a lot of reasons to do it.
But I don't see any technical connection between Digital ID, UBI and cashless society. Fact that TPTB want them all to be implemented does not mean that one thing is necessary to implement another.
So, how exaclty Digital ID required to implement cashless society and how exactly cashless society connected with UBI?
Anti-NWO propaganda is a good and necessary thing, but it should be based on exact and proven facts, unlike NWO propaganda. Just sticking together all bad things hardly will work as expected.
In this example it is obvious for me, that cashless society could be easily implemented regardless of implementing Digital ID. UBI is also could be easily implemented regardless of implementing of cashless society or Digital ID. Also, Digital ID does not inevitably mean UBI and cashless society. If I was TPTB, I will not do anything with cash usage to keep the herd calm. I will just use Digital ID (or any other ID, like SSN or whatever) to control cash, making impossible to withdraw or pay to any officialy registered business without showing ID. And I will not care at all if some tiny part of cash will circulate uncontrolled. If people use cash I print and can't spend it for usual things without ID, it is more than enough for me to have full control over them.
like anyone who doesnt want to accept the simple truth
Nobody should accept anything without checking it by himself. Everything should be questioned. Especially when somebody name it "simple truth".
May be you are used to "accept a simple truth" about coronahoax, terrorhoax, holohoax, free energy hoax, water fuellled car hoax and other hoaxes you like, but not all people are so lazy.
Have YOU done that? No.
Nice. You don't even need an answer. :) Why I'm not surprised? Typical propagandist behaviour.
I did it with laser gyro. It perfectly shows both, Earth rotation and Earth curvature. It is cheap, simple and have no moving parts. I grudge to break my working avia horisons, I value them as vintage avionics, they really pieces of mechanic art, so to cut the weights from them will be just vandalism.
Niether of us can use gyro to prove shit at this point.
I can. Everybody with hands from right place can. For less than $100. You can't or don't want.
Why?
I don't see any technical problems implementing UBI without digital ID at all. Some taxpayer number or SSN in case of USA will be more than enough to do everything connected to UBI, including social score crap.
I'm much more concerned about smartphones with IOS and Android that are already widespread and fully adopted by public than that Digital ID crap.
How exactly Digital ID is necessary to implement cashless society? You already can't create anonymous bank account, f.e. and from other side, why whould you check Digital ID of a person who will pay you in cash of whatever form?
Just want consistency and logic. Memes and imageposting destroys critical thinking. I think memeimageposting is more harmful than Digital ID.
Ya, i saw a video of a guy explaining it too.
So, you have hands from the ass and is able to only "look videos" that just not long enough to show anything about earth rotation and curvature?
Why do you think the simple gryoscope adjusts itself to account for curvature?
Who tell you that bullshit? Simple gyro, obviously, will perfectly show you Earth curvature and rotation. But that is not what you need in plane to fly. That is why avia horizon specially designed to show horizon, not something flat-earthers want them to show.
So, what stops you to make a "simple gyro", mechanical (or remove correction from used avia horizon) or optical one and check everything by yourself?
If your hands grow from ass, why do you think copypasting bullshit somehow making you right? Or may be, you believe that repeating bullshit again and again will make it true? I know that approach. WEF, WHO, ADL and other terrorist organisations constantly use that approach to push their agenda. But, obviously, here they have no any success. Why do you believe that you will succeed doing the same thing?
You debunked only your sanity, nothing more. Obviosly you don't care about the truth, you care only about poisoning the well.
so basically now your like "of course gyros only measuree level"
Aviation gyro horizons designed to measure level. That is why horizon in the plane should not and do not drift because of Earth curvature. So, it is insanely stupid to make videos how aviation gyro horizon do not show Earth curvature. Because aviation gyro horizons designed for completely another purpose.
To detect Earth curvature using gyro you should not use aviation gyro horizon that is designed for completely another purpose. At least you need to remove all correctors from aviation gyro horizon.
while still thinking interferometer light gyros have something to do with the ground beneath it
Sagnac interferometers have nothing to do with ground. They do not behave like regular gyros at all. They measure rotation speed in the coil plane. And perfectly measure rotation speed of the Earth and, consequently angle of coil plane to the rotation axis.
Again - you even don't bother to study how things work and continue to post ignorant nonsense. You had enough time to do it, but obviously did not. Why? Are you so dumb that can't find info and check it by yourself, or you just a paid troll poisoning the well?
What the fuck are you talking about? My english skills are not enough to extract any sense from that incoherent word salad, sorry.
How could you combine that:
it just shows level ... its not proving that the device actually registers a drop due to earth curve during flight
with posting a link to a dumb video that declare opposite? Device is designed to show level, not some "drop to earth curve" that is why it does not show it. Aviation gyro horizon is literally designed to ignore "drop to Earth curve" and "just show level" so it could not be used as a proof of anything about "Earth curve". Is that something complex to understand? And why some dumbfucks would create a youtube video about "how actual aviation gyro work" without any attempt to find out how they really works? Do you understand that this stupidity have no any sense at all? Do you understand that link to the video you posted is a clear prrof that flat-earthers are ether ignorant dumbfucks, either paid liars? You already acknowledged that real aviation gyro "just shows level", i.e. direction of g-force and does not "maintain orientation in 3D" and should not show "drop to earth curve". So, the link you posted is a blatant lie. So tell me, with what purpose did you posted it?
And as for "light gyros" they register diffraction of light with the medium
And that interference is changing if device is rotating, because light travel different distances if coil is rotating. That is how they are sensitive to rotation. To any rotation, including rotation of the Earth that is perfectly registered by that simple and cheap devices.
what do you think light from the sun bounces differently depending on how much it spun and then goes into the interferometer?
What light from the sun? Laser is the source of light in laser gyro. Looks like you have some random soup instead of your thoughts in head and it is pouring out in form of your texts.
Interferometry has nothing to do with the shape of the ground
Unless interferometry is used to measure rotation speed comparing paths light pass in different directions. Suddenly, thanks to obvious geometry, the difference of light paths of stationary laser gyro coil depends on the angle of laser gyro coil to the rotation axis. And, suddenly, you have to position it nearly parallel to ground in high latitudes and nearly perpendicular closer to equator to get maximum reading because Earth is round and rotating. Easy as fuck. And verifyable with less than $100 and a weekend by anybody.
Interesting, that in your inconsistent word salad i didn't find anything like "I built device from this and that and it do that and this, you could do it yourself too". :) Because you never did anything by your hands for curiosity.
Shut u and do yourself a flavour and just go away with your rage posting
Suddenly, this is the only option you could imagine. :) Just like dumb leftists with their cancel culture. "You can't name niggers niggers here, go away!", "How dare you call gays faggots, go away!". Nice. The best proof that falt-earthers are from the same liberal sewage.
I still don't have any guarantees that a flat-eather will publicly renounce his faith after that proof. As soon as I get that guarantees, I'll gladly make a video for you how aviation gyro horizon really works with undeniable proof that it does not "maintain orientation in 3D", if you are unable to understand anything except youtube videos and can't read horizon manual or any avionics schoolbook.
I didn't tell anything about gloriosity of Russian technology. If you want to think out shit to dispute about, than it's up to you, I'm pass.
Destroyed what? Nobody count that stupid HIMARS separately from other MLRS, because they are not somehow special or exclusive. Russian MoD publish only totals, for now it is 984 pieces of MLRS launchers if you are curious.