So the threat is surveillance not physical health?
I think so. 4g network as it was build do not allow streaming sirveillance video/audio/data and storing it. Upgrading BS uplinks and building giant datacenters is insanely expensive, you need a fiber to every single BS and huge upgrade of backbone to withstand all that new datastreams to datacenters. Adding distributed storage to BS and enhancing client capacity with 5G looks like best solution. And all payments could be placed on clients through buying new devices and dataplans.
From the health view 5G is not different from 4G. Difference only in modulation, basically, all other parameters are the same, including frequencies and TX power. So, those who are very concerned about 5G health issues but somehow don't care about 3G/4G are definitely doing something suspicious.
I think so. 4g network as it was build do not allow streaming sirveillance video/audio/data and storing it. Upgrading BS uplinks and building giant datacenters is insanely expensive, you need a fiber to every single BS and huge upgrade of backbone to withstand all that new datastreams to datacenters. Adding distributed storage to BS and enhancing client capacity with 5G looks like best solution. And all payments could be placed on clients through buying new devices and dataplans.
From the health view 5G is not different from 4G. Difference only in modulation, basically, all other parameters are the same, including frequencies and TX power. So, those who are very concerned about 5G health issues but somehow don't care about 3G/4G are definitely doing something suspicious.