Theoretically, there could be a chance that Russia have some connection with modern influx of West-beloved Uighurs from China.
Uighurs from China enter to Syria as mercenaries for current West-beloved head-chopper leader. In Syria, probably with some help of Russia, that have military bases including port here, Uighurs leave Syria to Europe.
At least, current rising number of Uighurs among ISIS militants in Sirya is a fact. Taking in account that Uighurs believe that West love them a lot, there will be a significant part of Uighurs that will try to reach West by any means. Russian naval base in Syria is a perfect unattended gate to Midterranian sea for that. :)
If only Russia would have done everything it was accused of..... :) However, chances are around zero, because Russia is a bureaucratic state that do everything by bureaucratic books and principles that had to be based on some "international law" and similar stuff.
I'm afraid that it will not be dolphin who will be asked by judge if he was really disturbed or disrupted, it will be some woke "green" "expert" with all consequences, not dolphin.
Dophins are pretty sociable, smart and curious species, and with teeth and muscles, so they hardly could be harrased by just communication with a human, unlike all that woke ecologists. Even if something will go wrong, they are pretty able to stand for themselves without any legislations.
They don't need to pay. Those who own MSM are the same who hold a lot of lithium industry stocks. Simple as that.
"Green" EV/solar/wind MSM hype was so loud, that all that big guys owning MSM believed their own lies and so heavily invested into that lies. All that "green" garbage heavily depend on the lithium batteries, so huge part of that "green" investments was in the Lithium.
Now they just conspired to protect their Lithium money by any means, that's all.
Lithium may have more marketing force behind it promoting it.
Interesting way to say "persons who invested heavily in technology A shadow out anything about better technology B that could make technology A obsolete". :)
It is like if those who invested in cassete tapes manufacturing paying MSM to not mention anything about compact disks.
Perverted market competition.
Lithium-nickel batteries hold considerably more charge-per-gram than sodium-ion batteries
Who considered that?
Let's talk about nuances.
- LiIon degrades when stored fully charged.
- LiIon degrades each time when discharged fully.
I bet, you connect charger to your phone when go to bed, and highly likely prefer to power your notebook from wall socket when home. A lot of time with fully charged LiIon doing nothing apart from rapid degrading. Then happens "my phone/notebook don't hold the charge anymore" and you buy new phone/notebook or at least replace battery. For the price.
To have promised 500 cycles you should not charge your LiIon battery higher than 80% and do not allow discharge to nominal 2.5V, turn off the load at 2.8-3.0V. So, with that limits you have only 60-70% of declared capacity. And only then your LiIon will live promised 500 cycles.
Nice catch, isn't it?
With SIB you could use full capacity and still have more than 2000 cycles.
As a sane man I'll prefer less capacity printed on battery cell over much more cycles and ability to fully use that capacity.
Real practical energy density of LiIon is 190Wh/kg. But you could use only 70% of it if you want cell to last 500 cycles. It is 133Wh/kg.
Real practical energy density of NaIon is 125Wh/kg. And you could use it all for 2000 cycles.
Do you want to say, that you really will trade 6% larger capacity for at least 4 times less battery life? If the price is the same, then you pay 4 times more for just 6% increase of capacity. What's the point of that economy?
Nobody wants a heavier phone that dies sooner.
It's LiIon that dies much sooner than SiB and LiFePO4, not even talking about LTO.
There is even huge political noise about that "right to repair" and implementing laws that force manufacturers to make batteries in phones and notebooks easily replaceable. LiIon batteries, meanwhile. Didn't you notice that too?
Why is so much need to replace battery, risen to the level of legislation if phones with LiIon battery doesn't die too soon, even before it become unfashionable?
LiIon is the worst type of Litium cells. SiB solves not only a problem with Lithium, but also a problem with premature LiIon battery failure. For the price of just 6% of real capacity.
And you still insist that there are no any conspiracy?
Meanwhile you... weighed two AA batteries you have lying around, on your kitchen scale?
It's not AA batteries. It's 18650 batteries. And yes, on kitchen scale. See, how easy you could check things by yourself?
Without doing any measurement whatsoever of how much charge they hold?
I measured all capacity values by myself. By discharging on the load, not from some stupid numbers of how many mAh was pushed into a cell some chargers show.
because they each weigh one pound.
I don't care about battery weight at all. Rechargeable battery is so inferior fuel tank, that it does not matter how much this shit weight and what volume it have. In any case it will be too much for that tiny amount of energy they could store.
It was you who start that bullshit about "sodium batteries are 3 times heavier". They are not. You lied.
And also, you bought a commercial AA battery, and now you're saying there's a conspiracy making that kind of battery unavailable?!
I bought not AA, but 18650 batteries. 18650 is twice larger than AA. 18650 dimensions encoded in this number, they are 18mm diameter and 65mm in length. How you could think about AA with 18650 dimensions right before your eyes? Supposedly, like you can't see a conspiracy I'm talking about. :)
SiB are mass-produced,for a years already, but I bet you heard about them for the first time from my post. :) How it could be that all mass-media soaked with everything lithium, lithium here, lithium there, litium investments, lithium technology, lithuim EV and lithium power storages, but nobody dare to tell a thing about sodium batteries? Lithium-connected stocks should stay high, aren't they?
see little chart
I don't have to. I have personal expirience with all kind of electric current sources, including even betavoltaic and aluminium-air cells. :)
In practical use, I found SiB cells superior to LiIon in reliability and longevity. On par with LiFePO4 in longevity but without that annoying full-charge storage degradation and coldfodia.
I'll easily trade slightly lower capacity to the few times more cycles and sustainability to environment conditions.
what did you pay for the sodium 18650's?
150 roubles each with shipping. IDK, less than $2 at the time
best sony/lg lithiums for 3-5 bucks each.
Best by what measure?
Main problems of LiIon is cold and cycles. Are "best lithiums" better than SiB in that?
Really, I hate all rechargeable batteries. I think it is a dead-end tech and stupid idea. Worst fuel tanks ever. And even around this stupid things I see a conspiracy to push one of the most unreliable and short-living type with trillion dollars bubble and shadow censorship.
Do you understand that battery weight is a sum of many things, not just lithium?
Average 18650 cell have only 7% of weight in Lithium.
Lithium alone, can't be a battery. So, you are still a liar, repeating marketing lies based on closing eyes on 93% of battery weight and then discussing how Sodium is heavier than Lithium.
Meanwhile, just weighted LiFePO4 cells, just for fun:
- 18650 1700mAh LiFePo4 - 40g
- 18650 2300mAh LiFePo4 - 42g (however, real measured capacity was around 1900mAh new)
So, your "three times heavier" SiB is a pure bullshit, even if calculate energy density according to voltage and capacity.
Also interesting experiment is to measure real capacity during cell lifetime. Tells a lot about what Lithium Battery Industry become.
F.e. if you buy cool 2800mAh 18650, and measure it new, it could even show slightly more than 2800mAh of real capacity. However, if you use it a little, capacity will stabilise at around 2000mAh and then will drop with a slower pace. Just like you paid extra for some additives that give a burst for capacity for few first charge-discharge cycles and then burned out, turning cell into standard 18650 with 1700-1900 mAh for 500 cycles.
Never saw this with LTO, SiB or LiFePO4. But I also never saw exaggerated capacity on that cell types too. It is only LiIon thing. :)
So, I'm in great doubt about exaggregated figures of LiIon energy density. Probably you could really create a cell with announced capacity (290Wh/kg), but it will sharply drop after few charge-discharge cycles and will fall to typical ~190Wh/kg ( 1.8Ah * 3.7V / 0.035kg ) LiIon density with typical 500 cycles.
With SiB you have your honest 125Wh/kg (1.5Ah * 3.1V / 0.037kg) but with more than 2000 cycles.
To have same or better total use as one SiB cell have, you need 3 LiIon cells. :)
Do you still want to talk about weight (and price)? :)
And it is just few years of SiB technology development, in comparison with half-century of LiIon tech. I would not be surprized if within next few years SiB will reach honest 160Wh/kg density in mass-production, so you will need 4 LiIon cells to make same use as 1 SiB cell.
And again - with all that obvious superiority, SiB don't need all that trillion dollar lithium industry and market.
And you didn't answer the main question - do you have real personal expirience with SiB, or you just copypaste some articles from internet?
Real thing, sure. SiB are better withstand cold. Not that they will run outdoor in winter like it's nice summer day, but they are able to provide noticeably more current in cold and, what is important, will not turn to garbage if you discharge your tool and leave it for few winter nights in non-heated shed.
One thing to consider - is lower voltage per cell. LiIon is 3.7-3.6V and SiB is 3.1-3.0V, and LiIon discharge cut-off is in the best case is 2.5V (actually deadly for LiIon battery) and SiB is 1.5V nominal so if you want to repack tool battery with SiB, adjust BMS in battery pack accordingly. Usually it is just a resistor replacement on BMS board. Read BMS IC datasheet for how to set discharge cut-off voltage to desired value. Another option is to make a tool battery from larger number of cells. Say, for 18V battery use 6 SiB cells in series, instead of 5 as with LiIon.
Usually in cordless tools it is BMS in battery that cut-off power when it see battery drained, cordless tool electronics continue to work even with lower voltages.
Also, choose high-current cells, like with LiIon. They have lower capacity in exchange to electrodes being made more tough to sustain high discharge current. It is important for cordless tools that could draw significant current.
I'll also recommend to slighlty lower charging cut-off voltage in charger from 4.2V to 4.0. I didn't notice any bad side-effects from charging SiB to 4.2V, but manufacturers write 4.0-4.1V in datasheets. Also, it will lengthen LiIon batteries life too, since they will be charged to ~85% and this is good for them. LiIon degrades when stored fully charged, maximum LiIon cycles and longest life achieved when charged to 70-80%.
Apart from cold, if you use cordless tools constantly, look at Lithium Titanate batteries (LTO). They have tens of thousands charge-discharge cycles, the only drawbacks are that they rarely made in 18650 format and have a low cell voltage of 2.3V, so to make 18V battery f.e. you will need 8 cells, not 5 as with LiIon/SiB. In exchange you will get really long lasting battery. LTO is also vulnerable to the cold, so, not an opton if you really need to work below 0°C.
Sodium-ion batteries are three times heavier
Lie. Real figures:
- 18650 1500mAh SiB - 37 grams
- 18650 1700mAh LiIon - 35 grams
:)
Interesting that SiB with lower capacity in practice will last noticeably longer in, say, flash-light, because you could drain it to 1.5V or even deeper without any consequences, the same discharge will kill LiIon instantly. Also, this SiB have 3000 cycles (still have 98% of capacity after ~1500 cycles), this LiIon had only 750 (nearly dead with 30% after only ~500). Price was the same.
In any case, nowhere near "three times".
Lithium and Sodium does not constitute all mass of battery. There is metal case, electrolyte, separators, anode and cathode and so on. Lithium and Sodium are less than 10% of battery weight.
only produce about half as much charge
Lie. Charge depends on amount of Li+ or Na+ ions involved in chemistry. So, with everything equal there is no any difference in charge. Moreover, since Sodium ion batteries allow much deeper discharge, with everything equal will show larger practical capacity than Lithium ion, You will have to severely limit LiIon discharge to preserve LiIon life.
It's just the way the chemistry works.
Chemistry is identical. Lithium and Sodium are metals from the same group, so their chemistry is pretty similar.
Lithium have no any preferences in area of possible maximum capacity over other metals from same group, including even potassium and cesium.
Also, Lithium batteries have a half-century of tuning and engineering, while Sodium ones are relatively new technology. And still Sodium batteries already show better overall performance over LiIon, especially taking in account number of cycles.
you wouldn't want them in a phone or a car.
China is already making EV with SiB, and also there are regular SiB 12V car batteries on the market. Latter have better performance in cold weather with much less weight than lead-acid ones.
And any sane person will always prefer a battery that wouldn't suddenly catch fire, just because it sit in cold discharged for some time or was overcharged.
Meanwhile, where exactly did you get your assumptions? Did you personally have an expirience of using Sodium batteries instead of Lithium ones to make this statements, or just read something somewhere? What exactly did you read in latter case and where? Why do you trust that sources?
They seriously looking for a new palce for their "safe space". This is the best indicator that they already lost in ME.
Greece and Cyprus are tricky for Jews. It is Orthodox Christian countries and Jews are afraid Orthodox Christianity the most. AFAIK, on Cyprus there is already noticeable buzz of dissatisfaction among locals. Don't know about Greece, I don't have trusted friends in Greece, but probably situation is the same.
East Africa is questionable, because here they will clash with Islam again.
Madagascar looks promising, because Judaism of strange kind is one of local religions, but AFAIK, Mdagascarans are in no way happy about prospect of arriving of new "coreligionist". And Madagaskar have a very good relations with Russia, hated by Jews.
Australia - IDK, never was interested in Australia-Jewish relations. May be this could work.
Latin America is also hardly a good choice - history of Latin America show that situation when some Jew or Jewish puppet is controlling the state could change quickly and some CheGevara could pop up suddenly and ruin all Jewish plans about New Israel.
I think that most Jews from Israel will try to sneak into what they name "first world" - US/UK/WesternEurope and obtain a good welfare at expense of local populations. That's really what Jews everywhere in the world dream of for a long time, and where they have a largest and wealthiest diaspora.
Then there will be a lot more criminals who will need protection.
That is why Jews are urgently trying to clean some place for themselves in South America.
Have you seen this?
No, but it is hard to confirm such rumors.
On the other side, Israel never had any decent missile production or even engineering skills to be able to create it. The only ballistic missiles Jeriho Israel declaring to have, was designed and manufactured by French and only assembled in Israel if not in South Africa at the time. No Israel ballistic missiles was actually used in any war Israel started. There is only rumors of test launches of Jeriho I and II in South Aftrica. Funniest thing is that South African nuclear warheads Israel have does not fit into Jericho I or II missiles due to heavy weight. Jeriho III and so on seem to exist only in Israel press.
Israel use only bombs and air-launched rockets in his wars, which is much more expensive and risky than ballistic missiles. If Jews really had any working ballistic missiles production, they would have definitely use them against their neighbours in their endless wars.
So, in any case Israel don't have any useable ballistics. And for more than half century of Jeriho series history Jews was not able to produce anything somehow working, not even talking about useable as a real weapon. In addition, Israel still constantly begging US for any, even absolutely inferior Pershing, but AFAIK was always refused.
If that's the case the diesel agreement was definitely cracked some time back.
And not a single peep from any MSM at the time. So, all that current information campaign about diesel is thoroughly controlled and have some purpose.
What do you think about the project?
It will be much more expensive, because it is not completely stable seismically region, so tunnel of such length should be significantly tougher and so much more complex engineering and building task than, say one under LaManche.
do you agree?
I don't care. There should be no any need for such infrastructure in XXI century.
There is no commerciall sense in this tunnel, because both sides have poor road infrastructure on both ends of proposed tunnel. Both sides will have to spend much more on building roads in sparsely populated Chukotka and Alaska that will make this tunnel useable. And still there will be no much trafic, because it is much easier and cheaper to deliver goods by sea, and faster by plane.
IMHO this tunnel thing looks more like trolling of kind. There could be many much more interesting joint projects between Russia and US to spend billions.
Also, how about the name "Putin-Trump Tunnel,". Do you like the name?
Somebody trolling Trump.
Some have questioned what does Elon Musk know about building undersea rail tunnels?
Somebody trolling Musk.
IIRC this thing about tunnel between Chukotka and Alaska popped up when Russian authorities gifted to US all documents that somehow could have connection to the JFK and his murder. And there was a letter from some schoolgirl about a friendship and stuff with that same proposal of building a tunnel or bridge between USSR and USA.
Israel is not a "safe space" today. Iran could destroy Israel at any moment and nobody could do anything about that.
AFAIK, this diesel is already somewhere near US. Tanker (or few?) departed a week ago from StPeterburg. So, this sell was signed quite a time ago, we only observe results.
And this is not the first direct sale of Russian diesel to US. At least Alaska was getting some directly all that time AFAIK.
Also, somehow aviation kerosene question is missed in that MSM narrative. Kerosene is made along with diesel from heavy crude, so if you have some shortage in diesel, then you have even larger shortage of aviation kerosene. But there is nothing about any jet fuel in MSM. IDK, may be in US English kerosene is "diesel" too, but MSM should have some mention of "lower jet fuel prices" too.
How do you negotiate anything with the midget dictator in Kiev?
There is no any sense to negotiate with any US/UK/EU puppet.
"midget dictator" is just a proxy of western elites and the person at this position does not matter.
Zelensky will only agree his job is done when Ukraine is part of NATO, something that will never happen.
Zelensky can't agree his job done until his personal security will be guaranted. The problem is that none of his masters could guarantee his personal security.
Russian bureaucracy perfectly understand this and don't care about Zelensky at all, trying to negotiate with bureaucracy of his handlers according to their bureaucratic textbooks. Don't think that this work as expected, because US/UK/EU are puppets themselves, but bureaucracy is bureaucracy and just can't work out of bureaucratic line.
If simplify things to the limit, Russian bureaucracy want a bureaucratic solution to the whole conflict. One that will be bureaucratically fixed for a more or less long time, not in just some treaty or agreement, that could be easily dropped when next western talking head will be "elected", but in western bureaucracy itself, and so deep that this treaty or agreement would be impossible to revoke or drop without nearly unpassable bureacratic procedure and so it will be completely independent from any "elected" actor.
Think about something like "importance of elections" or "LGBTXYZ+ rights" that are already so deep in Western bureaucracy, so there is no any chance that Western bureaucracy could somehow renounce this things in observable future. Russian bureaucracy, for some reason, think that if they force Western bureaucracy to add something like "Don't do anything hostile to Russia" to all those "elections", "democracy" or other fundamentals of Western bureaucracy, it will solve the "root causes of conflict".
Russia demanded a stop to energy sanctions.
No, Russia demanded to stop all (that means all that was ever announced) sanctions once and forever. Not only US sanctions. And not only against Russia. And not in exchange for some ceasefire, but as a prerequisite for a possible peace treaty. :)
Funny how different Western MSM pick different kinds of sanctions from "all" - some write about "energy", some write about stolen assets, some write about "fertilizer" and so on. :)
There will be no ceasefire.
Also notice, that amount of 300 000 ton of diesel is a ridiculously tiny amount. Less than a day of consumption here, may be a whole day in US. It's nothing at all and could not mean anything. US buy much more our diesel trough grey schemes. Don't know why our bureaucrats selling it to US at all.
Probably just another set of Trump hallucinations.
-
It's not about "IT term". It's about understanding what are you doing. This idiots in the movie don't understand what they are doing.
-
It's as easy, as
$ hcitool scan
Scanning ...
AA:BB:FF:FF:FF:FF BT Keyboard
^C
$ sdptool browse AA:BB:FF:FF:FF:FF
Browsing AA:BB:FF:FF:FF:FF ...
Service Name: BT Keyboard
Service Description: Bluetooth KB
Service Provider: Airoha
Service RecHandle: 0x10000
Service Class ID List:
"Human Interface Device" (0x1124)
Protocol Descriptor List:
"L2CAP" (0x0100)
PSM: 17
"HIDP" (0x0011)
Language Base Attr List:
code_ISO639: 0x656e
encoding: 0x6a
base_offset: 0x100
Profile Descriptor List:
"Human Interface Device" (0x1124)
Version: 0x0100
Browsing AA:BB:FF:FF:FF:FF ...
Service Search: Success
Service RecHandle: 0x10001
Service Class ID List:
"PnP Information" (0x1200)
Protocol Descriptor List:
"L2CAP" (0x0100)
PSM: 1
"SDP" (0x0001)
Profile Descriptor List:
"PnP Information" (0x1200)
Version: 0x0100
And this is just two commands you have out of the box on any Linux distro. You could get much more from random BT device if you are really interested.
If you are not interested, then you will shoot a stupid movie with just a list of BD_ADDRs and pose that as some "research"
- English is not very rich language. It can't be used to properly map sounds of most other languages. But it is more than enough to make you understand what Gorbachev I meant and produce a lot of butthurt in you from that comparison. :) Don't play jew and pose like you didn't get who I mantioned. :)
Interesting, that you avoid to discuss the second talking head of some reptilian in that movie. :)
People faces tell a lot. Such faces in a movie is a clear red flag. Not even talking about tech things this actors know shit about.
Really pathetic. You know nothing, but still trying to protect the old rotten shit you bring here.
Everything you said is wrong.
I bet you didn't understand a tiny bit from what I'm wrote. :) Of course, it's not a stupid video, you used to consume. But I don't care.
All this winephiles, coffeephiles, audiophiles, whateverphiles are groups of completely retarded persons who are trying to rise their self-estimation spending money on things that doesn't cost the money they are sold for.
Disturbing thing here, is that it spreads even on the brands today. There is no any real reason now to buy BMW or Cadillac, because they are the same as, or even worse than much cheaper Chinese cars of same class, and even also made from Chinese made parts, but spending money that way make their buyers feel better without any real reason.
PS: Audiophiles are much funnier than others, actually. :) Those, who buy "oxygen-free-copper" wires, not even knowing that absolutely all copper wires on the market are made from oxygen-free-copper, because you will not be able to make a wire from copper if it will not be oxygen-free. :) And this wardrobe-hanger case that forced audiophiles to completely prohibit any blind tests... :)
Again this idiotic movie.
First - BT doesn't have "MAC addresses". It have Bluetooth Device Addres with different structure. MAC address have 3 byte Organization Unique Identifier where first byte contain type bits and 3 byte network address. Bluetooth Device Address have 2 bytes Non-address part (used f.e. for initial encryption), 1 byte Upper Address and 3 bytes of Lower Address. Only common thing between MAC and BD_ADDR is their total length. They are not the same, not interchangeable and have different purpose in corresponding protocols.
Second - every Bluetooth device could easily tell you a lot of things about itself if you know its BD_ADDR. Including purpose, manufacturer, available data endpoints and so on. Even before any pairing, where device could ask you to enter PIN-code you don't know.
If you just scan for suspicious BD_ADDRs around and don't go further, without any attempts to get SDP/GATT/LMP attributes, profiles, services and descriptors from BT devices with known addresses to find out what are they - you are a complete idiot.
It is like while searching for gold, you notice yellow spark in the sand and then don't even bother to find out what you actually saw and just go away, to make a long and absolutely senseless movie about how you found a lot of gold.
Complete, unbelievable idiocy. Either people who made this movie are absolute idiots, either they made this completely senseless movie for a very dirty purpose.
PS: And their ugly faces. One resemble traitor Gorbachov, another don't even look like human. Just looking at their faces, I'll never believe anything people with such faces will tell.
- I don't give any fuck if country is communist or not. I'm not indoctrinated with that "communism bad" or any other slogan bullshit.
- I just count jews in top of country
- Check if country support illegal state of Israel.
- China don't have jews in top of country and does not support Israel.
That's it.
He don't say anything new nor have unique point of view. At least for me.
Toad fucked viper. Or vice versa.
At least, Israel loving beast lost and run away to his masters, so, another Argentine failed. I think that's good.
Interesting, that recently in Serbia that slippery Israel loving Vuchich also lost.
Will that pattern turn into something real? IDK, will see. It's dumb to believe politician word.
As for internal Brazilian things, you need to talk to Brazilian really living and working in Brazil. And better with multiple ones, Things could be very far from what MSM write.