IDK, most in Russian, may be you could find books of somebody like Klimov translated. Also you could take the most hateful authors who worte a lot about "Evil USSR Empire", open the part about tyrant Stalin and carefully look what exact crimes Stalin did to be named a tyrant. Surnames of his victims and their profession, ideology and all that stuff will tell you everything.
Stalin was definitely an authoritarian ruler with his own idea of Soviet Empire. He obviously didn't care about human lives if necessary, but accounted people as an only available resource that could be used to build his Empire. And unlike his political rivals from trotskists side he perfectly understand that population is not a cattle and have to be cared and treated with respect to be effective for his plans. All in all his rivals, who see USSR population only as a cannon fodder for their World Revolution, was unimaginably worse for regular people than tyrant Stalin. Trotskists didn't care about education, industry, science, health care, food supplies, anything, they hated Russians religiously and cared only about their ideology.
Do you know what exact model of shovel used by US military as trench/sapper one? Can't find any info on that. And obviously, special forces have to have such tool for obvious reasons.
Trotskyism is what we call "International Communism" and promotes an ideology of "permanent revolution"--that is to say, continuous disruption, conflict, and war for "as long as it takes", which basically means forever. Any rational person could recognize that that is literal insanity, which is why Stalinism prevailed in the USSR. Stalin--who favored a nationalist version of communism--was a vicious brute, but at least he understood that the Trotskyites had to be either eradicated, or driven out. Consequently, the Trotskyists fled to America
Agree. Something like that, but more complicated. Trotskists nearly wanted destroy Russia / newborn USSR with creating starvation, destroying religion, traditions, industry all that stuff. The idea was to create a population that "owns nothing" that could be thrown into the fire of World Communist Revolution. Stalin had another plans so in 30s he began to exterminate Trotskists and their shills massively. That is why they so hate Stalin telling wet stories about gulags and trying to equal Stalin with Hitler for that. Do you see that fascinating acknowledgement from their own mouths - Stalin bad because he opressed trotskists and Hitler is bad because he opress jews. Stalin and Hitler are equally bad for that. Ergo, jews and trotskists are same group in the eyes of that public. As usual, they project casualities they inflicted to Russian population during years of Civil War, Wartime Communism, Collectivisation and all that stuff in 20s - ealy 30s to the Stalin regime who in reality stop that shit in mid 30s and exterminated most of trotskists as soon as he obtained some real power in country. And suddenly population become grow, industry rised and so on. Immidiately after their complete defeat in USSR, suddenly, WWII began to unwind. What a fascinating coincidence!
You could also notice interesting thing - only actual Soviet (Stalin) type of communism ideology was shamed and anticipated in the West, while all that Trotskists who evaded Stalin repressions was kind of untouchable and I never heard about any kind of Western prosecution of any of that gulag victims to be.
Today, many surnames in Western politics that floats on the top of political foam are the same as surnames of those who was declared Stalins victims. Seriously, reading Western news, many associations with History of Revolution come to mind. Like "Wait, that ***berg isn't a relative for revolutioner ***berg?".
Also, many top Russian emigrants of later times, who tried to continue life of intelectual elite in the West was forced to blame only Stalin for all the shit Bolsheviks did in Russia. If they began to talk about those who really did that, naming surnames and everything, they quickly was kicked out of Western establishment for, you know - antisemitic views.
When you see somebody talking about bloody tyrant Stalin, check what he say about much worse bastards like Trotsky (Bronshtein), Zinoviev (Apfelbaum), Kamenev (Rosenfeld), Kaganovich and so on, who perpetuated real extermination of Russian population in 20-s and early 30-s. You will be amased, I assure you.
Funny, I'm trying to find what is official military shovel in US, as "navy seal shovel", "special forces shovel", etc, but google gives me mostly images of that Soviet standard sapper/trench shovel and it's modern varieties from amazon or survivalist and tourist hardware sites.
Theoretically Gerber could produce such kind of equipment for US military, but I could not find any mention of that on their site, only camping things.
What is official military shovel in US? Sapper shovel, trench shovel, something like that definitely should exist, I'm shure.
It is true that some special forces trained to effectively use that sapper shovels shown on photo as weapon. Kind of Russian version of tomahawk. Silent, deadly and handy thing, that shovel blade is made from very good, nearly knife grade steel (have one in car trunk as a tool). So, it is quite possible that in some circumstances some reconnaissance/saboteur group killed some enemy guard with shovel.
That is the only truth behind that article.
Also, there exist an old anecdote (just like about any profession) about engineering forces (stroybat) - "Stroybat is toughest Russian forces among all, they even afraid to give them guns, looking at what they do with shovels."
Something tell me that in other countries, special forces have a lessons of using sapper shovels as a weapon too and that is not uncommon thing at all.
You have such a negative perspective of society
I would not say "negative", I'll prefer term "foggy". I believe that there is multiple ways of society evolution toward the more honest and fair one. But, when somebody describe that good future society, the exact details are always omitted. However, details are very important, because devil could hide in them.
Aym not saying there is not cyclical greed that eventually takes over
I think greed is more or less resolvable. For grred to exist there should be some kind of deficit of some resource. Money, gold, art, food, whatever. If resource is unlimited or not needed anymore, there could not be any greed. Also, greed could be mitigated by society rules. It could be just inapropritate to be greedy, like it is inapropriate to shit in public places, without posiibility to hide behind all that "antisemitism" calls. Or it could be punished by society forcefully.
So there is a ways to strike out greed from equation, but without mentioning one of them, it is senseless to talk about better society.
Although that is effective, you're still relying on a corrupt court system
No. More exactly - not only on that.
The problem is that manufacturer of some medical shit have overhelming advantage over their customer. The most honest court will rely on hard proofs. And regular customer have no chance to prove that it was a medicine sold by that businessman was a cause of his suffering.
How to resolve that issue? Who should pay for obtaining proof of damage in case of damage from bad medicine? Customer have no such resources, pharma business have, but it will obviously prove that it is innocent. State? Juridical system? How that will look like in case of completely honest courts, free trade and malicious pharma business?
How about rebuild a nation with a distinct PEOPLE?
To do that, you need a place where you could welcome distinct people, i.e. new country. I see no realistic way to do it in any existing country.
How will you prevent lying advertizing, buying MSM, selling shit for profit?
Ulike with shitty phone,pharma things are different. You can't just buy another, better drug, you already have irreversable damage of your health.
So you propose some kind of capitalism where every business is free to sell anything and advertize anything without any government intervention, but for pharma there would be some limitations?
I just can't get your whole picture - free trade, OK, but then big pharma immidiately will be on their regular rails - advertize panacea, sell shit with enormous profit, run from any complaint asking victims to prove that it is their pharma shit do the damage, that is nearly impossible because insanely expensive because its the same pharma that make all med and bio tech and reagents.
I understand how free trade could perfectly work with food production, consumer tech, even building and weapons. But there is areas where free trade is a direct way for awful damage.
You are asking for faith in a system right now that can not exist.
No, I asking about how the drawback of free trade apllied to certain areas of human life could be mitigated, or, may be there is another solution, outside kind of free trade we name capitalism.
You mean like how Pfizer just got done paying a record fine before then going on to poison every with the help of the government.
Of course not. I mean real responsibility. When every single person damaged by bad medicine could not only bankrupt producer, but also make criminal charges for physical harm.
Just like truck driver could be charged for accident.
No, the only way is war and then to remake our society. No less.
So, you are talking about replacing capitalism with something else? I'm all ears.
There is simple way to stop this vaccination madness - revoke all and any liability extemption laws for big pharma and that's all. Suddenly, making and pushing vaccinnes will become not so profitable and safe for them.
If business have a way to make endless profit from thin air without any liability they will do everything to push their shit. It is much easier than drugs, weapons or slave trade with higher profit, so that business will only grow.
Again, it is not business that is just go where money is, it is authorities who create special laws to make that kind of business extremely profitable and extremely safe.
Remove all IP rights from the pharma that allow them to hide fromula and prohibit study of what really in their products and revoke any liability protection.
Almost all of the Anunnaki lore comes from Sitchin, not from the tablets.
So, the lore exists and it is relatively known for whatever reason. How is that different from comics superheroes/supervillains or heroes/villains of fantasy books/movies? They are completely fictional too with tiny tie to actual legends and myths.
And to me, they are not mythology.
How do you know, if the only source of any knowledge about Annunaki is a stories written on clay tablets?
conspiracies.win using Cloudflare too. :)
Always was. How the fuck that could be something new for anybody?
Annunaki "gods" are part of shumerian myths. Everything else is just a speculations.
As with any other speculations they could be used by enemy to create false narratives or whatever.
If some Jewish story tellers think out something about Annunaki, that does not make shumerian myths non-existent.
There are tons of such things around, when some tiny and obscure thing in some ancient folklore inflated to enormous scale for money, attention or whatever. Of course without any solid proofs behind.
This is new folklore, nothing more.
And as with folklore or fairy tales, people use references in describing real life. You often use references to characters in movies, books, comics, fairy tales and folklore to describe reality.
Same with all that annunaki/reptiloids/whatever - they are part of folklore/literature, whoever wrote it. If you see something like that in real life, it is completely valid to make a reference.
Hardly many of us referring to, say, Soros and naming him reptiloid mean he is literally a reptile looking alien. It is a reference. With the same probability you would have referenced him as goblin, ifrit, koschey, daemon, supervillain, depending on your legacy and cultural background.
That does not mean that you have to take folklore as truth, it just exists, like it or not. That annunaki/reptiloids folklore/literature exists, Even if it is all made up and false, it is still a source of references.
I don't trust Elon Musk.
I don't care about Elon Musk. How he is different from some Monsanto owners or BigPharma guys? They personally can't force you to use anything they produce or do not allow you to use their products. It is the authorities who have a power to do it, not them. They could bribe authorities, but it is only authorities decision to take that bribe or not, to side with that bastards or to side with people. And more important, it is authorities duty to oversee that megalomaniacs and greedy bastards.
So, without subbmission of authorities in the first hand it is mostly senseless to hate or love big business. For obvious reasons you can't do anything serious to big business, especially if authorities in on its side.
You have to find a way to mitigate authorities first. Their orders, laws, rules, control, everything that give them power. And here, even things all that Elons Musks enterprises produce could be easily used.
Elon produces cars that could be disabled by authorities anytime? That's nice! That means you could do that too. Car electronics does not care who send command to shut down and who is inside at all. So, with Elon's cars you getting a bit of power over authorities who use that cars. And avoiding authorities power over you is just not buying Elon's car.
Something like that.
Theoretically - yes.
Try to look at the picture you painted from the practical side. What exactly you have to know to do that practically?
- how information (knowledge and reflexes that assemble a skill) is stored? Unknown. And nobody even trying to reserch that.
- Where the paths you need to connect to goes? Unknown. And nobody even trying to research that.
- Where you will get information to upload? Unknown. And nobody even trying to reserch that.
And so on. You clearly see that "mind manipulation" or whatever is out of question.
I'm in doubt they will be afraid of something that is so far from reality. I think it is something much more simple.
What do we actually know in the area of connecting human neural system to computers? How to read simpliest pulses and send simpliest signals. It is enough to make prostetic hand, low resolution kind of eye implant, move mose cursor or somehow unpredictably disturb some basic feeling (pleasure/fear/pain/whatever) neural node. But they are already afraid of that.
I suppose, authority/megalomaniacs in the worst case want to implement a simple award/punisment interface to humans. Using just simple activation of pleasure/pain neural nodes.
OK, that's what looks like what they always do. Seems legit.
Now, let's try to imagine, how that things could be a threat for them? Just a random assumption. Do you know how many money laundered through all that funds that "helps" blind, death, disabled people? What if all that problems suddenly disappear, like VHS tapes and horseshoe industry?
So, would they risk to lose huge and profitable business in exchange to highly questionable way to control very few sheeple who are so dumb to agree for "neuralink implant" that there are no any need to implant anything, and honestly I'm in doubt that kind of sheeple have an organ that neuralink supposed to be implanted into. :)
Just one of numerous variants.
I'm more angry toward authorities for the one simple reason:
It is not technology that doing bad things. It is pople who are in charge.
Any technology could be used for good and bad. Same with neural implants tech too. It could be used for many good things and many bad things. Nobody could be against returning a vision or hearing to a blind or deaf person using some implant. Mechanic hand for those who lost one in accident. It's all about connecting human nervous system to the computer. And you could hate me, but I could not see anything bad in such use of that tech.
It is megalomaniacs and authorities who could do bad things using tech. But it is authorities who for some unknown reason afraid of that tech. Why do they afraid of it? May be they clearly see how that tech could be used against them? And the main question here, that we should ask - how exactly it could be used against them?
Safety risk for whom?
I'll never believe that bastards who forced not-a-vaccines. lockdowns, masks and other shit on humans care a bit about safety of humans.
So whose safety they care about?
You are right that it is prolonged process that goes for some time, but I think it is far from final.
I think that if NWO was already established we would have no means in our language to formulate a question about NWO.
While you could formulate a question about that shit, NWO is not ready yet.
It is hard to prove evil supernatural beings exist if they don't want to be caught.
There are a lot of things that invisible and unsensible that actually not hard to proof at all. Electricity, radiation, atoms, whatever. It is just a question of willing to find and detect them. Another option is to continue to tell fortunes about "supernatural beings".
There is no magic or supernatural. Only technology we are not aware of yet. And "supernatural beings" are not supernatural, just unstudied and unresearched.
We need to try to prove they exist or do not, once and for all.
There could be a lot of things that could help.
- Technologies appeared from nowhere, without preceeding techs
- things that elites routinely do that looks completely senseless
- elites reactions to some things or events that looks totally unimportant
- chains of relations between elite members that goes into nowhere
and so on.
I think 1 and 4 are very promising approaches. If we are alone with elites, then that things will be totally in closed loop, there could not be gaps or loose ends. all circles will be closed and everything will be sequential. If there is gaps, loose ends and all that stuff, then it is a basic proof of third-party presence.
Perhaps there are beings that know this is going to happen soon and order society accordingly
Perhaps. But who exactly that beings? Where they come from? How exactly they contact with Earth elites? What language they speak? How they look like? And so on.
It is easy to make wide assumptions about reptiloids, aliens, daemons, whatever. We have a lot of them around for a long time. More complex thing is to find details, dots that could be connected.
Its like with elites - first you find out there is somebody behind politicians, then you began to collect the dots - all that corporations, clubs, families and so on. Then you connect the dots - this is corporation that owns half of world assets, here is their accounts, here they have a contracts with those institution, here they pay MSM to hide something, this man is a head of something, and that man is in charge of that and so on. That is how you get a whole picture about thing you guessed at the beginning.
Same should be done again, but with upper level. Everything from previous dots that looks unnecessary on previous level should be collected, systematised and studied. This will be the next group of dots for next level. And so on.
I think we don't even start with rabbit holes, really. Just enter them and find out something. All things you mentioned could easily be just a reception on the rabbit hole entrance.
Things that seems to be completely unanswered - who is really behind all that cults/elites/whatever? Who stopped humanity progress in 1970 and why? What is the real source of all that agendas and other shit?
The more we know, the more question arise. And they are not so easy to answer.
The cost of internet infrastructure in low density areas makes it difficult to bring reliable high speed to those areas.
It is complete bullshit. I'm living in low density rural area, literally in the forest and 1G fiber to my house cost me something like ~$500 at the time for 6km of fiber to closest muff. Starlink terminal costs nearly the same.
My monthly fee is ~$15.
Fiber is dirt cheap, if you have electricity in your house, you have poles to hang that fiber. That's all. If some monopoly tells you that it is very complex and expensive to lay a fiber to your rural house - they are lying.
Starlink could have single advantage - if they rise their intersatellite connections, then delay between distant part of the world could be lower than over the ground, because path will be shorter and there will be less hops between distant points. Hi frequency traders will pay a lot for such opportunity.
Starlink also highly weather dependent. Snow or rain lower the rate.
May be it is useable for ships and planes or for really very distant points, thousands miles from any civilization, but I'm in doubt that this will be profitable.
The collapse of the Khazarian mafia (MK) financial system will happen when there will be no any trust in money they print.
All that bank runs and other similar things is obvious scams to achieve some goals. It is absolutely clear if you continue to remember that they print money.
The signs of collapse you talk about will be when those who withdraw money from their bank accounts will say - "we don't need your senseless paper dollars/euros/franks/whateve or a digits in another bank computer, give us back something really worthy". That will be a sign of collapse.
While people still believe in cutted paper or digits in somebody computers as in real real things, "khazarian mafia" will have their power over people. And no next artificial bank crisis will change that.