There is simple way to stop this vaccination madness - revoke all and any liability extemption laws for big pharma and that's all. Suddenly, making and pushing vaccinnes will become not so profitable and safe for them.
If business have a way to make endless profit from thin air without any liability they will do everything to push their shit. It is much easier than drugs, weapons or slave trade with higher profit, so that business will only grow.
Again, it is not business that is just go where money is, it is authorities who create special laws to make that kind of business extremely profitable and extremely safe.
Remove all IP rights from the pharma that allow them to hide fromula and prohibit study of what really in their products and revoke any liability protection.
You mean like how Pfizer just got done paying a record fine before then going on to poison every with the help of the government.
Of course not. I mean real responsibility. When every single person damaged by bad medicine could not only bankrupt producer, but also make criminal charges for physical harm.
Just like truck driver could be charged for accident.
No, the only way is war and then to remake our society. No less.
So, you are talking about replacing capitalism with something else? I'm all ears.
How about rebuild a nation with a distinct PEOPLE?
The USA was originally founded by immigrants from NORTHERN and WESTERN Europe. They were WHITE EUROPEAN immigrants and mostly CHRISTIAN.
A nation is a PEOPLE. A country is a regional area with enforced borders.
We currently do not have a nation and do not have a country. It's open borders and a clusterfuck of odd people from around the world who do not get along and can't get along because they are culturally too different. Do you want to listen to the loud siren call for prayer five times a day to prove your TOLERANCE for Islam? I don't either.
How will you prevent lying advertizing, buying MSM, selling shit for profit?
Ulike with shitty phone,pharma things are different. You can't just buy another, better drug, you already have irreversable damage of your health.
So you propose some kind of capitalism where every business is free to sell anything and advertize anything without any government intervention, but for pharma there would be some limitations?
I just can't get your whole picture - free trade, OK, but then big pharma immidiately will be on their regular rails - advertize panacea, sell shit with enormous profit, run from any complaint asking victims to prove that it is their pharma shit do the damage, that is nearly impossible because insanely expensive because its the same pharma that make all med and bio tech and reagents.
I understand how free trade could perfectly work with food production, consumer tech, even building and weapons. But there is areas where free trade is a direct way for awful damage.
You are asking for faith in a system right now that can not exist.
No, I asking about how the drawback of free trade apllied to certain areas of human life could be mitigated, or, may be there is another solution, outside kind of free trade we name capitalism.
Although that is effective, you're still relying on a corrupt court system at that point, managed by a lying, corrupt Jew at the top level of Justice Department and a Supreme Court that has up to 3 corrupt hypocrite jews on the bench at any time.
Although that is effective, you're still relying on a corrupt court system
No. More exactly - not only on that.
The problem is that manufacturer of some medical shit have overhelming advantage over their customer. The most honest court will rely on hard proofs. And regular customer have no chance to prove that it was a medicine sold by that businessman was a cause of his suffering.
How to resolve that issue? Who should pay for obtaining proof of damage in case of damage from bad medicine? Customer have no such resources, pharma business have, but it will obviously prove that it is innocent. State? Juridical system? How that will look like in case of completely honest courts, free trade and malicious pharma business?
revoke all and any liability exemption laws for big pharma
Are consumers exempt from being liable for consenting to suggested ingredients and side-effects of pharmaceuticals offered to them?
Ask yourself what draws the snake-oil salesmen to come back after being chased out over and over again? Would killing the snake-oil few prevent the many from wanting snake-oil?
There is simple way to stop this vaccination madness - revoke all and any liability extemption laws for big pharma and that's all. Suddenly, making and pushing vaccinnes will become not so profitable and safe for them.
If business have a way to make endless profit from thin air without any liability they will do everything to push their shit. It is much easier than drugs, weapons or slave trade with higher profit, so that business will only grow.
Again, it is not business that is just go where money is, it is authorities who create special laws to make that kind of business extremely profitable and extremely safe.
Remove all IP rights from the pharma that allow them to hide fromula and prohibit study of what really in their products and revoke any liability protection.
Of course not. I mean real responsibility. When every single person damaged by bad medicine could not only bankrupt producer, but also make criminal charges for physical harm.
Just like truck driver could be charged for accident.
So, you are talking about replacing capitalism with something else? I'm all ears.
Capitalism is just a form of economy.
How about rebuild a nation with a distinct PEOPLE?
The USA was originally founded by immigrants from NORTHERN and WESTERN Europe. They were WHITE EUROPEAN immigrants and mostly CHRISTIAN.
A nation is a PEOPLE. A country is a regional area with enforced borders.
We currently do not have a nation and do not have a country. It's open borders and a clusterfuck of odd people from around the world who do not get along and can't get along because they are culturally too different. Do you want to listen to the loud siren call for prayer five times a day to prove your TOLERANCE for Islam? I don't either.
To do that, you need a place where you could welcome distinct people, i.e. new country. I see no realistic way to do it in any existing country.
How will you prevent lying advertizing, buying MSM, selling shit for profit?
Ulike with shitty phone,pharma things are different. You can't just buy another, better drug, you already have irreversable damage of your health.
So you propose some kind of capitalism where every business is free to sell anything and advertize anything without any government intervention, but for pharma there would be some limitations?
I just can't get your whole picture - free trade, OK, but then big pharma immidiately will be on their regular rails - advertize panacea, sell shit with enormous profit, run from any complaint asking victims to prove that it is their pharma shit do the damage, that is nearly impossible because insanely expensive because its the same pharma that make all med and bio tech and reagents.
I understand how free trade could perfectly work with food production, consumer tech, even building and weapons. But there is areas where free trade is a direct way for awful damage.
No, I asking about how the drawback of free trade apllied to certain areas of human life could be mitigated, or, may be there is another solution, outside kind of free trade we name capitalism.
Although that is effective, you're still relying on a corrupt court system at that point, managed by a lying, corrupt Jew at the top level of Justice Department and a Supreme Court that has up to 3 corrupt hypocrite jews on the bench at any time.
No. More exactly - not only on that.
The problem is that manufacturer of some medical shit have overhelming advantage over their customer. The most honest court will rely on hard proofs. And regular customer have no chance to prove that it was a medicine sold by that businessman was a cause of his suffering.
How to resolve that issue? Who should pay for obtaining proof of damage in case of damage from bad medicine? Customer have no such resources, pharma business have, but it will obviously prove that it is innocent. State? Juridical system? How that will look like in case of completely honest courts, free trade and malicious pharma business?
Are consumers exempt from being liable for consenting to suggested ingredients and side-effects of pharmaceuticals offered to them?
Ask yourself what draws the snake-oil salesmen to come back after being chased out over and over again? Would killing the snake-oil few prevent the many from wanting snake-oil?