James Corbett comes close but his time is primarily allocated to zoomed-out big-picture research, so there's many important pieces that barely even make it onto his radar.
There's gotta be at least one other person out there somewhere with similar abilities but more time (eg, someone retired, financially secure and no wife & kids to deal with).
no, no one person has put it all together yet. People should leave books for the future, because this seems like generational war.
Speaking of the future. covid worries me. Not the fake virus of course but how history will spin it for the coming generations
Of course. Look at all the other lies as well. History is all a lie.
They'll say that Christianity made Europe prosperous for 1,000 years after it took over Rome. What they actually did was to blast Europe back to the stone age and took over the useless serfs with Fedualism while parading their sugar-coated Blood God religion around as "truth". And when people call of their shit they infiltrated the secularist Renaissance-era movement and rebranded themselves as "Communists" and "Revolutionaries" while parroting none the less the same religious agenda. Even now there are people who believe in and defend this bullshit.
Now we're seeing a rehash of the entire thing around the corner with gender, racial and sexual equality.
a) If there's more than history, then it can't be ALL.
b) What if ones consent to HIS suggested STORY makes it true for self? What if HE BREW HIS STORY to temp one to hold onto something from another one, while ignoring that all moves?
If all moves and one within chooses to look/lock onto anything, then one ignores being (life) moved (inception towards death).
A suggested book/bind/bond/bondage tempts ones consent in-between covers, while focusing on spell-craft by others...this tricks the reader to bind self to that which was; covering self from that which is, while waiting for that which comes to be.
What happened to the Library of Alexandria is happening under the disguise of "kindle fire"...and yet the readers only ever want more books to consume.
Generation (inception towards death) establishes reaction (life)...war implies a conflict among reactions aka a conflict of reason. You chose to react by opening your comment with NO, which implies a conflict of reason (yes vs no) against other. That's war.
How would one perceive the future without another suggesting speeches about it? Does ones origin speak aka does nature shape words to tell anyone being within about whats gonna happen next?
Can life discern its own death? Can life perceive its own death?
What if generation implies origin for each generated being coming to be within? What if suggested pluralism contradicts singular generation? What if you as singular could be tricked with suggested pluralism to believe in more than generation aka more than perceivable origin is offering?
What if ones will turning/spinning towards "his story" implies turning away from nature/origin/all?
This guy really knows how to smear shit all over a comment section
What will really bake your noodle is when you block him and still see his posts. I think "he" is a bot that the mods won't allow you to block.
Have blocked. Will check noodles later, thank you
To put all pieces together you have to know what and how many pieces exists in the first place. However there still huge problems even with basic ones.
I don't see any serious studies on that topics. Only senseless bullshit about abstract daemons, satan, anunaki and all that. Their bosses are not abstract. And they have to communicate with their puppets. There are even no any attempts to properly study and surveil public figures movements and meetings. Does anybody ever track, say, Soros and make a detailed map with all his movement tracks for a period, say one month? And it is just a basics of finding "gang boss".
So we are very far from "putting all pieces together". And I don't see conditions yet for creation of such community that will be able to fulfill that task.
Conspiracy theorists community currently severely suffer from absense of methodical and scientific approach to the problem. For now, it is like alchemists of Middle ages who are not aware of periodic table, and who don't even try to create it. It's important, because when you have periodic table you could easily fill the gaps with new elements, because you know where they are and how to find them. So, it is not the time yet for any breakthroughs.
a) To know implies to perceive moving differences...putting differences together equalizes them.
b) What if all (perceivable) sets each one piece (perception) apart from one another?
c) If few are in control of many, then that implies that many were put together by few...do you think more goyim put together will change that dynamic?
d) Notice the hostility when trying to put a chosen one together as "the jews"...how is it so hard for many to put few together?
a) First implies whole (oneness)...second/seco - "to divide; separate" implies partials (ones). Whole places partials.
b) How? Motion (oneness) to momentum (separation) to matter (ones)...internal separation of whole into partials.
c) MANY, noun (men'ny) - "a retinue of servants"...hence each one of many consenting to serve in bondage to few, who suggest abrahamism (father of multitude).
HIND, noun - "a domestic; a servant; pertaining to the part which follows, in opposition to the fore part"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/hind
ALL moves one from inception towards death...many choose to ignore this by following BE-HIND the suggested progressivism by few.
Behind inverts fronted (inception towards death) to be (life).
Perception is given, suggestion is taken. Few adapt to what is given, while giving many suggestions to take hold of. The latter is being called "communication", while the former is being ignored by many.
What many call "communication" implies a huge game of telephone/chinese whispers/stille post/russian scandal/whisper down the lane/telefon shavur etc.
Nature gives sound; few within suggest words to trick many to play telephone against each other. Whatever many are communicating to each other was shaped by few...not by nature.
Being implies expression (matter) within term (momentum) of foundation (motion) aka EX within TERM of FIND. One can only find something if a foundation already exists...looking/locking to find tempts one to ignore being within a moving foundation.
Consenting to suggested implies employee selecting boss aka follower selecting leader...student selecting teacher...voter selecting representative...slave selecting master...many selecting few....ones choice selecting chosen ones suggestion.
If one claims self as "me; myself or I"; then one selects all other ones as "YOU" (phonetic jew).
Boss - "overseer"...ones consent to "understand" selects another as "overseer".
Consent by puppet implies attachment to string aka ones mind attaching itself to the suggested information from another by holding onto it. As long as puppets are bound; a puppeteer is in control of a self confined golem which follows orders blindly.
Example...a jew suggests religion (Latin religio; to bind anew). Each consenting gentile keeps himself in bondage by "faith", while viewing all of reality through the lens of suggested fiction aka through a self confining lens. As soon as consent was given does "communication" happen among many about the suggestions of few...not communication with few.
This communication among many keeps them within conflicts of reason aka following the process of dying without resisting, while spending their resistance against each other by coming together in endless wars until spend. Few simply set the stage for these conflicts; while contradicting both sides to keep them going at each other.
To surveil a moving mind (move ment) implies confining self by focusing on another. A public figure implies a form held within focus of public...hence tempting the minds of many to ignore motion.
Motion frees (matter) mind (momentum)...
Aka creationism and communism...both suggested by few to collectivize the consent of many.
Solution (inception towards death) towards problem (life)...few suggest many to solve problems instead.
It's really gone the other way: there's almost no theory left in conspiracy theory.
Picture the classic conspiracy theorist meme of a wall covered in pushpins and red string. Reduce that down to two pushpins and one bit of string between them. The pushpins are facts and the string a theory of their connection, and each of these elements may not be well known or even unknown. To say that 5% of conspiracy posts fit this model of theory may be an overstatement. Two percent? Sub one?
To be blunt--and not to single him out but only because he was specifically mentioned--James Corbett is not a conspiracy theorist either. He's a stenographer, a collater, a documentarian, but not a theorist. Nothing he says breaks new ground or reveals that which was previously hidden.
Frankly, I suspect he's a certain type of long-running disinfo mole. I didn't realize it until he made certain comments on the Ukraine War. How could any self-respecting conspiracist be in total agreement with the NYT and WaPo without having deep misgivings? And even if you somehow did, you'd still feel compelled to begin with a disclaimer such as, "It's bizarre to me that I'm in agreement with these people, but...."
Just as the normie world has official narratives set by the mainstream media, so too does the conspiracy world, set by people like Corbett. Could anyone possibly believe that "They" would infest and dominate one world, but it completely slipped Their minds and Their grasp not to do so with the other? That's retarded.
From another angle, you can see he has nothing to say about issues where you'll stir up a real controversy in conspiracy circles. Did planes crash into buildings on 911? Were the towers nuked? Were Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuked? Did anyone actually die at the Vegas shooting? Who shot JFK? Nope, none of these questions were intriguing enough for him to wish to find an answer.
What you are describing sounds a lot like Cass Sunsteins proposals as outlined in his 2008 paper ‘Conspiracy Theories: Their Cause and Cure’ in which he suggested that government infiltrate conspiracy theories in order to steer them into supporting the actions of government.
Shortly afterwards, Sunstein was appointed to the UK governments Behavioural Insights Team (Behavioural manipulation. This team was largely responsible for their overt manipulation via their Spi-B branch relating to the drumming up of pandemic fear, lockdown compliance and vaccine uptake). At the same time he was appointed to some US Government consultancy role too.
In the documentary Hypernormalisation, there is a section on the methods the Russian government used to befuddle its population and how those same tactics were now in use in the UK and other western countries like USA. Although the documentary itself, being made by the BBC, is also deceptive and misleading it nevertheless has some enlightening moments. Anyway, Putin employed a theatre producer called Vladislav Surkov who funded and arranged both pro-government and anti-government protestors in a big theatrical display and then let it be known (methods unknown/undisclised) that that’s what they were doing so that the Russian people couldn’t tell what was fake and what was real.
In a striking parallel, Trump appointed Hollywood producer Steve Mnuchin to his cabinet and during the Trump administration we saw all these similarly choreographed anti and pro government protests such as BLM, proud boys, Qanon, Jan 6 etc and the entire narrative took on a distinctly fake, WWE-type feel with the media feeding the narratives continuously, in addition to the usual fake fayre such as shootings, assassination attempts et al
We have similar in the UK with news items like Sarah Everard and resultant ‘Reclaim these Streets!’ pop-up protests, Lucy Letby and the more recent riots of ‘far right thugs’ and Muslims as well as other assorted atrocity propaganda. Each side having their appointed spokespersons like GB News, Tommy Robinson, Neil Oliver, Russell Brand, Andrew Tate, Jordan Peterson, Candace Owens. The cast list is long.
Of course, then there is the deliberately directed resurgence of Christianity and Christ is King mob who want Christian nationalism and the like - anything so long as people maintain their belief that the Jewish Messiah who is the same figure as the ‘Lord God of Israel’ is actually their own ‘Lord and saviour’ and that the Jews were god’s chosen people and responsible for the civilisation and glorification of Europe with their “values” etc. Quickened as a response to the force feeding of LGBTQ and other Diversity agendas and the Islamic takeover - both of which, surprise surprise, are also Jewish ideological inventions.
It’s all designed to keep people off guard and it can be incredibly self-perpetuating, with false beliefs and false solutions taking root in peoples minds like a virus and spreading in the same manner, instigated by disinformation Typhoid Mary’s like the mainstream and alternative media’s in cahoots with all manner of people - including our respective militaries who make a study of psychological warfare and have entire brigades dedicated to waging it on domestic audiences.
The angles I think about are the ones no one talks about, no one sees, no one even seems to suspect. I've been meaning to write up big posts on some of these, but as I alluded to in first comment, there are only a handful on the same wavelength to receive them.
Take, for example, the book "Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon" by Dave McGowan which has rightly become legendary. Essentially, the book was about the children of the MIC pumping out programming through your local FM station, right? It has gotten so much worse since then.
I stumbled onto the fact that the same "money guy" was behind Napster, Facebook, and Spotify. I realized that "They" had clandestinely changed the entire media landscape and installed a stranglehold on society's listening habits (and we know it's all about habits).
So we've gone from rock bands with suspicious origins to completely manufactured acts and songs. We've gone from a handful of talk radio shows to hundreds of "independent" podcasts either infiltrated or constructed from scratch as psyops. All this gets pumped out through Spotify and Apple, where they know exactly what you're listening to and when. You used to turn the dial yourself, but now their "algos" put each of us in our own personalized Skinner Box.
There's a level of conspiracy beyond the one where "conspiracy theorists" operate, and getting them to realize that is exactly and precisely the same as convincing normies that conspiracies exist. So, you know, that's why I haven't got around to posting about this yet... lol
Then you would have to contend with the fact that, if you did make such a post, it might be forum slid into oblivion or deliberately deprived of engagement.
There’s also the fact that this very site in which you would be making this post is already a Skinners Box.
If media of all types is in the grip of such a stranglehold and subject to algorithmic siloes then what chance is there?
I would recommend creating your own substack maybe, if the fruits of your labour would take a lot of effort and editing. That way it wouldn’t be lost down the back of the Conspiracy consumers armchair!
You should do it anyway - even if only for your own sake as it would help clarify and solidify your own understanding and connections.
I agree that there is a much bigger picture afoot, Anne much more subtle and devious and longer term tricks in play
Theory (suggestion) tempts one to ignore practice (perception)...ignorance confines expression.
Ones (life) way (inception towards death)....and what other?
Aka ones bit (choice) of stringing (consent) self to another ones suggestion.
Con (together; with) nectere (to bind) tion (action)...if action binds together, then how could reactions react to being (life) enacted upon (inception towards death)?
What if few suggest "con-nect" to tempt consenting many to ignore "tion"? What if consent binds many together, which in return permits few to amass many through suggested temptations?
All the bad in the world is orchestrated by dark forces/archons that infest the minds of individuals. In other words: there is no one individual on earth who is the evil mastermind behind all of the nefarious activities.
The flip side to that must then be also true: there is no one individual who can piece together and trace all the nefarious activities.
The one person I have found who has come close, is Joseph P Farrell
Four dozen books, all thoroughly researched and footnoted, dozens of speeches/podcasts, and countless online articles that are of book-quality make me admire him.
All I know is that I love your handle, OP
Islamic Honkin thread - A new faction, Islamists, have taken over the Capitalist Meta-Infrastructure that Socially Engineered The West.
Nobody "pulls it all together" because they all think there is a different cabal at the heart of the mess.
pictures_joined_by_string.jpg
What are you even saying?
There you go
The Sanhedrin exists and that's the short version of how all conspiracies coalesce into one.
When you put all the pieces together, you get full-blown Communist Genocide with the full setup beginning in the foreseeable decade or so. Think of the European Dark Ages or the entirety of the 20th Century. You have lost the infowar, people are now twisted into caricatures of themselves, and the USA is one election away from communist revolution and civil war.
And if you do let them pull this out, you will die, your children will die at 30 years old max, and even if you survive this have fun dealing with the aftermath. You won't recover. The previous genocides are all local test runs, and they know it worked goddamn well. Their end goal is not to consolidate eternal power but to kill and ruin as many people as possible before shit inevitably hits them.
ONE implies a piece set apart from one another within ALL...one (partial) cannot put all (whole) together, while being within.
Instead of putting all together...try setting oneself apart from others.