James Corbett comes close but his time is primarily allocated to zoomed-out big-picture research, so there's many important pieces that barely even make it onto his radar.
There's gotta be at least one other person out there somewhere with similar abilities but more time (eg, someone retired, financially secure and no wife & kids to deal with).
To put all pieces together you have to know what and how many pieces exists in the first place. However there still huge problems even with basic ones.
I don't see any serious studies on that topics. Only senseless bullshit about abstract daemons, satan, anunaki and all that. Their bosses are not abstract. And they have to communicate with their puppets. There are even no any attempts to properly study and surveil public figures movements and meetings. Does anybody ever track, say, Soros and make a detailed map with all his movement tracks for a period, say one month? And it is just a basics of finding "gang boss".
So we are very far from "putting all pieces together". And I don't see conditions yet for creation of such community that will be able to fulfill that task.
Conspiracy theorists community currently severely suffer from absense of methodical and scientific approach to the problem. For now, it is like alchemists of Middle ages who are not aware of periodic table, and who don't even try to create it. It's important, because when you have periodic table you could easily fill the gaps with new elements, because you know where they are and how to find them. So, it is not the time yet for any breakthroughs.
a) To know implies to perceive moving differences...putting differences together equalizes them.
b) What if all (perceivable) sets each one piece (perception) apart from one another?
c) If few are in control of many, then that implies that many were put together by few...do you think more goyim put together will change that dynamic?
d) Notice the hostility when trying to put a chosen one together as "the jews"...how is it so hard for many to put few together?
a) First implies whole (oneness)...second/seco - "to divide; separate" implies partials (ones). Whole places partials.
b) How? Motion (oneness) to momentum (separation) to matter (ones)...internal separation of whole into partials.
c) MANY, noun (men'ny) - "a retinue of servants"...hence each one of many consenting to serve in bondage to few, who suggest abrahamism (father of multitude).
HIND, noun - "a domestic; a servant; pertaining to the part which follows, in opposition to the fore part"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/hind
ALL moves one from inception towards death...many choose to ignore this by following BE-HIND the suggested progressivism by few.
Behind inverts fronted (inception towards death) to be (life).
Perception is given, suggestion is taken. Few adapt to what is given, while giving many suggestions to take hold of. The latter is being called "communication", while the former is being ignored by many.
What many call "communication" implies a huge game of telephone/chinese whispers/stille post/russian scandal/whisper down the lane/telefon shavur etc.
Nature gives sound; few within suggest words to trick many to play telephone against each other. Whatever many are communicating to each other was shaped by few...not by nature.
Being implies expression (matter) within term (momentum) of foundation (motion) aka EX within TERM of FIND. One can only find something if a foundation already exists...looking/locking to find tempts one to ignore being within a moving foundation.
Consenting to suggested implies employee selecting boss aka follower selecting leader...student selecting teacher...voter selecting representative...slave selecting master...many selecting few....ones choice selecting chosen ones suggestion.
If one claims self as "me; myself or I"; then one selects all other ones as "YOU" (phonetic jew).
Boss - "overseer"...ones consent to "understand" selects another as "overseer".
Consent by puppet implies attachment to string aka ones mind attaching itself to the suggested information from another by holding onto it. As long as puppets are bound; a puppeteer is in control of a self confined golem which follows orders blindly.
Example...a jew suggests religion (Latin religio; to bind anew). Each consenting gentile keeps himself in bondage by "faith", while viewing all of reality through the lens of suggested fiction aka through a self confining lens. As soon as consent was given does "communication" happen among many about the suggestions of few...not communication with few.
This communication among many keeps them within conflicts of reason aka following the process of dying without resisting, while spending their resistance against each other by coming together in endless wars until spend. Few simply set the stage for these conflicts; while contradicting both sides to keep them going at each other.
To surveil a moving mind (move ment) implies confining self by focusing on another. A public figure implies a form held within focus of public...hence tempting the minds of many to ignore motion.
Motion frees (matter) mind (momentum)...
Aka creationism and communism...both suggested by few to collectivize the consent of many.
Solution (inception towards death) towards problem (life)...few suggest many to solve problems instead.