2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting how the paid shill flat earth spammers are gone now that the mods are also gone…

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

strawman in the first line

We’re done. You’ve admitted your OP is a lie. You get no further responses on this topic.

5
TallestSkil 5 points ago +6 / -1

Thanks for admitting the holocaust didn’t happen.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +4 / -2

Thanks for admitting that I only have one account on this website and only ever have, as proven by moderators and administrators.

Read the Bible, kike. Jesus was not a jew.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +3 / -1

Thank you for saying the name.

You’re powerless.

Your contradiction shows that the "Jesus" you claim is not a Jew.

Already had this conversation with you half a dozen times. You were blown the fuck out every single time. It’s not happening again. Everything you say is a lie, jew.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +1 / -2

The tests from Galileo to Michelson relied on physical apparatus catching the light. In 1983 they switched to measurement of cesium radiation and then krypton. So people aren't doing mirror interferometry anymore. If they did, it might help "prove me wrong".

Nothing you say is even remotely close to reality.

It's not my job to know

So you can’t answer. Then don’t fucking say.

BBT shows them inapplicable in the Planck epoch

Guess we better throw out all classical mechanics, then.

[link]

Thanks for showing we don’t actually see it.

The fact that all life hasn't been extinguished means more than evolutionary factors are at work, which means evolution as a mechanism is unnecessary and so are the billions.

Amazing how you can just tack on things no one said to your narrative and claim victory.

By saying the Oxygen Holocaust corresponds with Day 3 I point out it doesn't look to me like an ELE but like a special creation of plant life in which animal life isn't considered.

So definitely throw out classical mechanics, right?

False comparison

Direct comparison.

with no macroevolution you don't get the narrative that this species comes from a thousand others.

Microevolution can cause speciation.

The fact that you propose with some seriousness the extinction of about 7 billion humans as some kind of necessity is clearly shill territory and I have no idea why you went there except your nihil narrative.

Enjoy being raped and murdered by the demons you worship as they flood over the Earth, then. You can’t actually reply to anything anyone says, so I don’t really care if you live or die anymore.

Malthus was an idiot.

Yes.

fuel resources are nowhere near exhaustion.

Any evidence of that?

Then stop implying loss of seven billion is inevitable.

Nah, it is. More, even, because the collapse won’t quite happen (at current behavioral rates) until there are a few billion more useless eaters.

Which is why it's odd for the billions-trusters that life continues.

“The conditions for life to exist continued to exist so it’s odd that life continued to exist” is not even remotely an argument.

No, we have no photo of a supernova actively triggering a molecular cloud

We have several.

However, observations [show] rotational velocities do not decrease with distance from the galactic center.

My question is why you’re believing this, given the custom laws of physics you’ve applied to your one-shot setting, and therefore why it’s impossible for the velocities to stay the same.

Dated canard

Literally your precise claim, right now, today.

Nowadays people deceive themselves.

So stop doing that.

Not for long

Tens of millions of years, yeah.

"Despite various proposed models aimed at elucidating the mechanisms behind the formation of spiral arms in galaxies, none of these models have garnered conclusive confirmation. As a result, there is presently no reliable method for describing the evolution of spiral patterns in galaxies."

Literally the same shit as how stellar systems form, which we’ve seen happen both in reality and in computer models…

It's not implicit that VSL would entail changing "material composition of the Universe" whatever you mean by that.

The speed of light dictates the physical behaviors of all matter at the subatomic level. You can’t fucking change it without changing all physical laws.

If you mean they're in the range of tens of thousands, irrelevant.

Observationally. Predate. All. Of. Human. History. Read or don’t reply.

I'm not here to defend my calculation

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

You act like agreeing with thousands proves thousands wrong.

Blatantly lying about all known laws of existence proves it wrong.

What we don't have is a giant physical death epoch before Adam

Plenty of evidence, yeah.

which you proposed without defense.

Posted about six defenses.

Uniformitarian fallacy again.

“WOW EVERY SINGLE TIME I RUN THIS EXPERIMENT I GET THE SAME RESULT! I GUESS EVERY SINGLE RESULT WAS WRONG BECAUSE THINGS ARE DIFFERENT BECAUSE I SAY THEY ARE!” ~ the clinically insane

Right now it's defined that way

No, it defines itself that way. That’s what it means to live in a Universe that wasn’t created by Allah.

by circular reference to radioactivity

Nah, it’s defined by its measurable physical properties.

This definition changes the interpretation of many kinds of data.

Is this a sad attempt at a joke about how old sci-fi used to write about “2c” spaceship drives, wherein ‘c’ could be cited as a unit in and of itself? Because no, otherwise.

I showed you the models.

And yet we know that atoms collapse below certain energy densities.

Circular, you haven't established why nobody's corrected what the error range should have been

They have. They did. We know it now.

and what faulty assumption led to your charge the math was wrong.

There were no such assumptions. The measurements are more precise now. They were wrong before.

We did not correct the older measurements

We did. Your own chart shows it. You were wrong.

demonstrate why they gave answers outside our defined rate now

They made shit measurements with shit equipment. Claim the Earth is flat, then. Do it, you fucking faggot. Claim the Eratosthenes experiment relies on “circular” measurements.

Not true

Sure thing; we just so happened to arbitrarily pick those numbers for the metric system.

other coincidences

Lol

Now you know why.

No, now I know your “justification” for why you didn’t.

Funny how you don't rake the heat-death calculators over this way.

I don’t need to. It’s a matter of the laws of physics itself. We can measure the energy density of any given region of space. If it falls below a given level, stellar formation can’t continue. If it falls even lower, no chemical interactions can occur. If it falls even further, no interaction on any scale can continue. If the Universe is expanding infinitely, its finite contents will eventually reach this final energy state, wherein nothing can ever physically happen again. This is all stuff that can be measured right now.

1-3 days before.

Not according to all physical evidence, Allah worshipper.

You still forget satan.

It’s not relevant to the statement and you refuse to reply to the statement.

they both began at a point

A separate point.

I don't see your mechanism for concluding physical interactions couldn't happen without physical death.

Because you’ve chosen not to read my comment.

I didn't think I'd need to lead with c having a higher value and a breakdown process being initiated just to get others to explain their belief in billions.

The laws of physics exist. They’re measurable. You are objectively wrong about them not being measurable. Their measurements result in a singular conclusion about at least some of their behaviors. You reject this conclusion because your desert god told someone to rape children and also that causality doesn’t exist. That’s really all there is to it. That’s the explanation for the billions.

No, the transference of abundant energy into heat doesn't mean life forms must die without a trigger.

The trigger is the transference of energy. Plants don’t have souls. Animals don’t have souls. Sin death is not physical death.

In your view of pre-Fall world, death exists and is information loss.

Nope.

Except I do claim they've changed.

Without evidence.

Uniformitarian fallacy.

Absolutely no argument. Thanks for admitting that the observed and measured difference in the remaining amount of the isotope is irrefutable and disproves your claims.

leaching of the isotope.

Where.

I did read it. The age is determined by radio dating, not erosion.

Didn’t read it, then. Got it.

If you're saying a crater didn't erode, that indicates it's young.

So the ones that are knowably, measurably, self-evidently, visibly older than the others; they’re all the same age because you say so.

Now the Bible says nothing from which you could infer physical death before Adam, so I ask where you get it from.

The physical reality that God created.

You don't intend to prove OP title wrong

I already have.

you're just having fun sharpening your theories without being pinned down.

The jew cries out in pain as it strikes you.

Having finished the OP game, I'm happy to go on playing another.

The nature of objective reality isn’t a game, jew.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +2 / -1

I worship Jesus. I don’t worship jews. You’re the only one deflecting, as you have every single time I call out your linguistic dialecticalism.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +5 / -1

absolutely no response

Read the Bible.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +5 / -1

Said the jew-worshipping woman.

5
TallestSkil 5 points ago +5 / -0

What’s the problem? This is literally what 1776 was fought about. I don’t understand why anyone would be surprised by this.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +5 / -2

Translation: “I can’t prove you wrong and the truth hurts my feelings so by claiming it’s retarded I don’t have to address how reality violates my narrative.”

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +4 / -2

That’s what I said. Kike.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +5 / -1

I doubt he even said it, given that he was a Christian himself.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›