First is that AI makes everything irrelevant, unimportant.
The best example of this, I guess, are books. I do not care how well your AI generated book probably is. I'm not investing hours and hours into reading it. I'm not interested and I doubt that even AI apologetics would be ready to invest their time into reading a 500 page novel generated by AI.
The same goes for games, movies, music etc. Even if the end result is technically competent, AI usage itself makes it irrelevant and unimportant.
Usual argument about this is "but... but it allows me to make great music, write great articles, make great content etc". Well, that may be, but what does it matter if your generated content is unvaluable? No one will remember your great sounding AI generated track in a year, a month or even in a day. No one is reading your AI generated book. Some people might read your AI generated article (if it's short enough), but even then it will be mostly due to people not noticing it's not written by a human.
Second thing most people don't get about AI is that eventually it will kill us. It's like they say in movies "anything you say can and will be used against you". It doesn't matter what type of questions you ask it. Or what type of content you generate with it. Everything is being stored, registered, analyzed and will be used for further push of technocracy.
Even that strongly worded antisystem article you just generated with AI will be analyzed and all your points will be used against humanity and for the benefit of the system you just ranted about. All your generated antiNWO images will be used as well. They will be gathered and given some score of what resonates with people and what doesn't. In short, everything you generate, each prompt, each data node you give it, even if it's controversial content or whatever, at some point will be used against humanity. Using AI for whatever purposes inevitably leads to feeding the beast.
TLDR: AI is bad. Don't use it.
The worst way AI can be used is for analyzing all the data all these apps collect to ensure that if you are so much as peripherally aware of the nose, your social credit score immediately tanks to zero and you are disappeared so fast no one knows what happened to you.
Sorta. Eventually they will eliminate apps entirely and the AI will run the program for you. Then they REALLY filter for what the globohomo wants as “true”.
AI reminds me of my dear neighbor who got Parkinson's and dementia.
She could rattle off perfectly formed sentences, agree, disagree with you even with emotional expressions and nods. Then her mind would fall off into a void, waiting for the next prompt.
Yes, that as well, although I think it is very far from worst way it could be used.
We already have a noticeable cognitive decline among those who use it regularly. Some people are literally going insane. Some other people can't make their grocery shopping list without AI anymore. Basically, what is happening is that people are outsourcing their thinking to the AI. And this is just the beginning.
Add to that the fact that globohomo wants to move everything to the AI. Your searches, your interaction with other people, all your data, everything you think and do etc, etc.
As a result most people might become nothing more than a simple appendages to this global borg they are building. Or like a peripheral device for the global AI, if you will.
In short, we're looking at total control and loss of autonomy for most people... or even ability to make an independent thought without the help of the AI.
That's easily avoidable: just don't use AI, and keep your kids away from AI.
What I said is not avoidable, because it involves someone else's use of AI against you. You'd have to wear a mask to avoid facial recognition from unavoidable cameras, use only cash, never use the Internet or phones, never drive to any place that isn't completely rural (because your license plate can be scanned and your behavior inferred from when and where the scans happen), never enter a city under any circumstances, and even then, there will still be plenty of data about you that someone can feed to AI so it can figure out if you're a good g0y or a naughty g0y.
That works for now, but what do you do when avoiding it becomes impossible? Even now all search results give AI summary by default. Google has already stated that they plan to do away with normal search results completely. Basically, what they want is for AI to become arbiter of truth. You type in your question and AI gives you an answer and no other answers or options are provided for you.
Sure, you can try to do it, but you won't be able to do it for a long period of time. They even teach AI in schools now. Nothing short of building own independent communities won't work.
Yes, surveillance and profiling is bad on its own, but this is not the worst thing about AI. The worst thing is what people do to themselves and what our society (or what's left of it) is becoming due to AI and all that other tech. It's a dead eye zombie town already sometimes. Imagine what it will become in 10 years, in 20 years.
Their goal is for all of us to be dead in 10 or 20 years. What you're talking about will affect those dumb enough to fall for the tricks, making them easy to kill, but to get the rest of us, they're going to have to come with guns, but first they have to know who is still alive, how they're still alive, and where they're hiding.
You aren't joking and I could not believe it when I saw that. Apparently the OpenAI servers went down one day and these always posting on IG or TikTok types were streaming their reactions. Some went into the grocery store and were unable to decide what to buy.
It was bad enough that some did not know how to make dinner or whatever, that is pretty bad. But it is one thing to not know how to cook or even research how to cook, it is another to not know what you even want. That is an opinion!!! How do you not know what you want for dinner and need ChatGPT to tell you?
Yes, and the beginning is pretty scary so far. I feel like in 10-20 years there will be a group of normal people and a group of people who have been turned into mush.
Classic AI derangement syndrome
Look at all that argument.
Another thing people fail to grasp is the fact that what you are using is about 30 years behind what the Deep State is using in terms of technologies. What they've given the masses is just a glorified web scraper.
People say this but judging by how poorly the Iran war went, I'm not sure they are 30 years ahead. Maybe like 5 or so.
You're sure you know what the intent is for being there, are you?
I guess we never "know" anything. But I seriously doubt the zio jew psychopaths who run this place intended to get their ass kicked so hard. And I doubt they meant to bomb a little girls' school and whatever, if anything for the huge public relations black eye that sort of thing gave them.
But maybe it is all one big conspiracy and they always intended on failing at the Iran war.
Yes, that as well. There's so many warning lights about this it's hard to describe. I mentioned only two, which most people haven't noticed, but there's also all the usual stuff: cognitive decline, outsourcing thinking process to the machine, AI as an arbiter or truth... and so on, and so on...
There can be only one. One nature (all perceivable) for each unit of being (ones perception) within...two implies suggested dualism tempting one to ignore singularity.
Natural > essential > artificial...
Everything natural > each essential thing > some artificial things made...
Nature doesn't write...nature delineates (inception towards death) being (life).
Only motion (value) generates matter (evaluation)...evaluating any content by another "unvalues" self aka "Judge not, that ye be not judged" from Matthew 7:1.
If nature doesn't write; then whatever humans write implies "artifice". Guess how few humans will ever notice that?
Because saying implies the articulating of words within natural sound, hence ones will turning against nature when saying anything.
Everything (cause) moves each thing (effect) apart from one another...it's few who tempt many to store suggested information within mind/memory, while ignoring that perceivable inspiration cannot be stored...only drawn from/within.