2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Holy shit, a real person. Genuine surprise. Consider branching out from that propaganda farm into the other boards here. We need you.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honorable mention comment from u/daveywavey86

yeah except you agree to it when you sign the contract. its a private business. you dont HAVE to have their service, you chose to subscribe to it, and you signed a contract agreeing to this. thats how they get away with it. read your EULA's people!!!!

Who actually thinks we’re going to believe that companies have the right to break the law.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

u/FreeRebel

First, this is several years old technology and is available with many routers, not just Comcast ones.

Sure thing.

there is zero ability to identify who or what is moving.

Sure thing.

Please, people, educate yourselves even s tiny bit.

Sure thing.

Comcast is evil, but

Sure thing.

this story is a wholly false premise

Sure thing.

this story is a wholly false premise

To what end?

Facts and context matter

So why don’t you have them?

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is it an infringement up on me to not sell my guns to whomever I want

Treason, in the previously presented case.

give them to slaves?

Sedition, in this case, verging on race treason.

They had laws against that too.

Yeah, because only some whites can be entrusted with the privilege of free commerce. That’s why only some whites were allowed to vote.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

preventing the sale of guns to natives

Yes, because they’re not citizens, not the same species, and were actively murdering Americans. The law didn’t apply to them.

you can't "bear" a cannon

Complete fucking bullshit, blatant judaism, and the sort of thing said right before my cannonball goes through your spine. The entirety of American history proves you wrong.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

I do not know of any.

Guess you’ve never had any fun, then.

5
TallestSkil 5 points ago +5 / -0

If it would be simply due to age, then we would hear the same from even older generations before 2015, which is absolutely not the case.

Utter nonsense. We have entire folk stories and sayings based on the perceived speed of the passage of time.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

And no, it is not change of perception due to aging

Prove it. Because it has been resoundingly proven otherwise.

9
TallestSkil 9 points ago +9 / -0

It’s not. The brain records information logarithmically. As a three-year-old, a tear of your life is 33% of your life. As a thirty-year-old, a year of your life is 0.033% of your life. The subjective reference frame of your experiential memory causes your perception to change. All external measurements of time show no change.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Never even meant that

Did, though. Privately owned battleships fought the British to a standstill in the War of 1812. Who do you think owned half the cannons in the Revolution? Not the government.

it only applied to the federal government.

What the fuck is that supposed to mean?

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Words still mean things.

Shall not be infringed.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trump outmaneuvered Them

Literally what. He supports gun confiscation.

The mainstream criticizes and demonizes Trump about anything and everything to an absurd extent about even trivial matters.

And they’re correct in doing so, because he betrayed every single thing he said he would do and is literally a jewish demon.

Why aren't they slamming him for this?

Because it’s going to be overturned, and Trump had absolutely fucking nothing to do with these rulings.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

It didn’t take a new law when Niggercare was legalized by the SCOTUS, which just arbitrarily said on its own “No, this isn’t a tax despite being written identically to every other tax.”

They don’t care.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

(unless they renew the law under commerce clause power)

I fully expect this to happen, since it doesn’t require them to pass any new legislature and they can just arbitrarily rewrite passed legislature after the fact.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Huh. I don’t see any with AdGuard. But maybe it’s because I’m logged in with a corporate account.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sure, but that’s when the “damage” is done, though. Surely the database allows MYSQL searching for accounts above a certain age that have no engagement. They could be preemptively tagged and then their first actual engagement could be automatically held back for manual approval instead.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like when the child rapist is allowed to make literally thousands of accounts at once without any sensors being tripped, and then it sits on the accounts with no activity for two years and they don’t get flagged, and then it logs into them and posts from them about how much it wants to rape children and nothing is ever done to stop its copied and pasted posts.

Wait, I said ‘like.’ I mean the other thing.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

But that’s not an answer to the question that was asked. It’s like claiming the Constitution is bad for the US because jews erased it 130 years ago.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh, I thought you meant “if you change the CSS, the site owner will remove you from your boards.” That would explain why no board uses custom CSS anymore.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good old communism, finally making everyone equal (in suffering). What was once the province of third world deserts is now a problem in the most fertile land on Earth.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, we have the single-industry example of video gaming. Data centers have made it impossible to purchase or upgrade a personal computer. The industry has offered the “solution” of cloud-based gaming, wherein you pay for eternity to access censored and controlled content that can be stolen from you at any time. And it uses the data centers that caused this problem in the first place.

8
TallestSkil 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yep.

Wait, what’s to be discussed? It’s evident this is true.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nah, it has been repeatedly proven, and they can be seen visibly. Go away.

view more: Next ›