Your inability to acknowledge a difference between what is thought and what is said continues, which was my initial point.

Your point is bullshit, yeah.

your inability to acknowledge difference between thought and word suggests you don't recognize this either.

Please think that gravity doesn’t exist and you can fly if you just wish hard enough.

If you recognize that the laws as known are incomplete, you'd have no problem with variable lightspeed

“If you recognize the laws are incomplete, then you admit 2+2≠4!” ~ the mentally deranged

Of course when we discussed it you hemmed and hawed

More bullshit, yeah.

sometimes going with millions and sometimes with billions

More bullshit, yeah. You were the only one saying, “it doesn’t matter how old it really is as long as it isn’t as old as it’s known to be!”

without indicating what you actually believe

Did, though.

So I'm not sure you want the debate.

The jew cries out in pain as it strikes you.

I don’t see

I do, however. If “your cowardice” is rule one, “your persona” is rule one. Delete his post and hold him to the same standard as me and I’ll remove the line from mine.

you made an attack

There’s not a SINGLE. FUCKING. WORD. in my comment that attacks the user. You cannot list the word. You can not give an explanation of how any of the words, in context, attack the user.

I know you can’t refute a word I say

Directly speaking about the topic of discussion. Provide a direct link to it refuting a word I have said.

and that the truth hurts your feelings.

Directly speaking about the topic of discussion with respect to its inability to refute a word I have said, and the content of its comments made instead of doing so.

It’s not good.

Referring to its behavior.

If you can prove me wrong, go on and do it.

Directly demanding the user remain on the topic of discussion and only post about the topic of discussion, not post about other users.

Explain where the violation is.

observations

Read: lies.

I don’t see

Fortunately for the rules, your opinions on this matter aren’t relevant. It’s an attack. Remove it.

This is an attack on the person, not the argument.

Completely incorrect. By way of analogy, an explanation.

“When a person swearing an oath about something (O: in the future, affirming or denying that it will occur) includes the expression ‘in sha’ Allah’ (if Allah wills) before finishing the oath, then the oath is not broken in any event if he thereby intends to provide for exceptions. But if he merely says it out of habit, not intending to make an exception to his oath, or if he says it after having finished swearing the oath, then the exception is not valid (O: because when an oath has been completed, its efficacy is established and not eradicable by a statement of exception).” ~ Reliance of the Traveler, O19.5

Astute readers will notice the strong similarities between this form of lawyerly hairsplitting and that of the jewish Talmud. How does this behavior work in practice? Surah 1 is a supplication Muslims make to Allah (seventeen times a day) to keep them from the path of “those with whom Allah is angry” and “those who have lost their way.” This includes Christians. A Christian who objects to this denigration will be met with, “Surah 1 never mentions Christians,” and be expected to accept this as a refutation of his concerns. In responding this way, a Muslim is practicing tawriya. Though Surah 1 does not mention Christians by name, Muslims know the words “those” in Surah 1 refers to Christians and all others who are not Muslim. Another example is the Muslim response to a greeting of “Merry Christmas!” He might say, “I wish you the best.” You believe he has returned a Christmas greeting or at least reflects your happiness at the general state of the season. In actuality, he has expressed his wish for you to convert to Islam. He wishes the best for you in his subjective, sophistic view–that you will become a Muslim.

And so irrespective of the user’s use of the word ‘God’, it does not mean the same entity as the one in the preexisting conversation.

is there something I can do to help

Actually enforce the actual rules as actually written. Or just ban lies, that way we don’t have to retread the same kike arguments every single fucking second of every single fucking day when they keep spamming disproven bullshit over and over.

You'd be surprised.

No. I wouldn’t. God created them. You can’t violate them.

I recall you thinking

Your memory is irrelevant to the immutability of the physical laws of the universe.

your assuming

Didn’t happen. Try again with actual physical evidence.

I tell everyone else to work with me to select criteria by which a particular new law of physics can be discerned objectively and undeniably

Did that. You rejected those laws of physics because they hurt your feelings.

but they always back down long before we get into full negotiations.

You mean like how you were unable to prove by any metric whatsoever that “the speed of light has changed”? That backing down?

But somehow, reading your mind

Translation: “Engaging in strawmen because what was written hurt my feelings.”

the number of Swamp Rangers

Oh, so you admit to having sockpuppets.

the same mission in Christ

The God you deny, you mean.

I’ll remove the sentence when you also delete the comment to which it’s replying, attacking the person and not the argument. Don’t fucking play games with me. You want rules? I’ll give you rules.

No, there was no rule 1 violation. I did not attack the person. No words in any of those comments are attacking the person. I am not speaking about the person at all. *Why is the person allowed to refuse to defend its lying claims and refuse to answer any of the questions I asked.

Where is your identical reply to the comment with “I know your persona” in it?

Fuck off with this shit.

Why is the literally brand new handshake account typing jews with special characters and formatting around it? Why should that be something that is happening?

us

I don’t care about your cubicle farm. Everyone who belongs here already knows what the jews are. You aren’t succeeding. Go away, handshake. The Donald still worships your owners. Maybe you can trick them.

you didn't want to admit

Neat, strawman. Find another website, handshake.

YOU HAVE TO DEFEND YOURSELF AGAINST MY LIBEL

I DON’T HAVE TO PROVE MY OWN CLAIMS

Okay, you can stay for a bit. You’re fun.

Nope.

You're here for one hour and already defend the jews? Go away.

[strawman]

Find another website, handshake. You’re powerless here.

[no argument]

Thanks for proving me right every waking moment of your life.

Can? Of course we can. It’s entirely physically possible. Can and will are different.

OY VEY GOIYM IT’S NOT US IT’S ANYONE EXCEPT US

It will never work.

I don’t see how it’s a boogeyman. It’s what happens on every single website.

Because no one will ever do anything about it.

It would be good if they didn’t, so they will.

So when jews are doing things, we don’t call them names they’re not. Get it through your jewish head.

Unless they’re jewish, in which case they deserve a first class return flight to Israel and a full pardon.

I know it’s jews and he’s lying that it’s Catholics. It’s just a lie. They fucking admit it publicly and he’s lying about it.

I guess that’s technically true.

This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Nowhere in here does it say you can’t OPENLY ADVOCATE AND PROMOTE THE VERY CONSPIRACIES THEMSELVES, so sure, he “hasn’t broken any rules.”

I post lies that only jews have ever said, in direct contradiction to the purpose of this board

YOU CALLED ME OUT ON THIS LOL THAT MEANS I’M RIGHT

It’s the jews. Fuck off.