Problem, Reaction...
(media.scored.co)
Comments (22)
sorted by:
I am glad the Irish, Protestant and Catholic, are uniting against invaders rather than "the Troubles" and killing each other. You should be too.
It's the jewish suggestion of nationalism; protestantism, and catholicism which unites consenting gentiles into a host for parasitic internationalism.
Unity implies closer together therefore...each unit against one another. This infighting among gentiles represents the distraction which allows jewish internationalism to INVITE externally.
Glad/ghel - "to shine"...now look at the picture again. That's an army of darkness; not knights in shining armor.
lol
When good news happens, blaming the Jews for it is....Jewish.
The devil is in no way offended by hatred and violence. In fact, he feeds on it.
Defending your homeland is morally acceptable in God's eyes.
It's obvious to see how this hatred stirred up will be used, and I'm pointing that out. You can defend the riots or not, but the point stands.
Though personally, you won't catch me out there terrorizing foreigners. I think it is an injustice.
Stirred up? It's a natural consequence of the situation. Ain't nothing being stirred up.
Nah, the devil is offended by his synagogue being openly hated.
I don't disagree with the point of this probably being a 'create a problem situation to inspire a reaction and then come in with the solution', which I think will be the technocratic prison planet (10 kingdoms plan stuff), my wonder is in regards to violence and hatred and if there is a Godly way to hate and use violence? I think of this often and don't necessarily mean to lay the burden of answer on you, it's just what comes to mind at the moment.
Removed for rule 1 violation: be respectful, attack the argument not the person.
Okay, so how would one attack arguments that are pro cuckoldry and faggotry by equating meekness, inaction and cowardness with righteousness, without calling them and the person presenting them for what they are?
There are ways to defend your argument without resorting to attacking the person.
If I was refuting the comment you are I'd say something like: "the natives have the right to defend their homeland, the immigration is at a point of replacing the native people and demolishing the culture on which the country was founded. Have you seen violence be used righteously in the bible? Is all violence of the devils? How does one use violence righteously?"
Does this get your point across while not personally attacking the person but rather their argument, which you disagree with?
Misquoting is very unhelpful.
"He doesn't look shocked to me. He looks happy"
So why would this jew be happy
Because what's happening in Ireland right now is the reaction, and he's about to roll out the solution.
Or more likely, some other jew will do that, this one's a journo, so he's just there to whip up more reaction.
Ez (to help) ra (god) knows that the only solution (inception towards death) for each problem (life) within implies God. By tricking problems to react against each other...Ezra is helping God dissolve problems.
Ezra Levant also knows that only resisting (life) the temptation (inception towards death) of God allows one to levant/levare - "to raise".
Ezra is one of the biggest Zionist POS there has ever been.