That's simply not true and a massive generalization. There are legit threads and users here and not everyone is a bot, fedboy, troll or a schizo. A lot of good stuff is posted with minimum stupid fake and ghey alien bs.
I explained it simply and then elaborated. What part of all data is interpreted through a worldview (no self-evident truths) or a scientific theory being based on observable and reproducible phenomena didn't you understand?
There can be no scientific theory about things that no one witnessed like the origin of the universe or of life or things no one has access to like the underlying nature of reality. There are only speculations based on assumptions about said universe and existence. Such arguments are in the realm of philosophy, not of science which deals only with the physical observable world.
Woody Guthrie was a commie hick who bought into a false dialectic (commies vs. fascists - he's basically antifa soyjack of his time), so who cares what he said? Some concepts can't be reduced to absolutely simple terms and require a basic level of understanding of the problem being discussed. Certain metaphysical, epistemological and meta-philosophical problems tends to be like that because they get very abstract.
random word salad
As I said, it flew way over your head. Is Chinese a bunch of random sounds just because I don't understand the language?
Yeah, as I thought this flew way over your head.
Chapters 17 and 18 deal with acknowledging vaccine injuries and long term effects of the stabbies.
There's a method to all this but it's hard to say why they do it. I'd say it's the same reason as with all other cataclysms, revolutions and crises - they want to collapse the existing system and replace it with another one.
Yes, I engage in conversations about it with my peers and I pay in cash as much as possible. If everybody did just that we wouldn't have a problem to begin with.
Besides, what's wrong with using digital media to disseminate such a message? It's not a performative contradiction, it's turning the tools they use to enslave us against them. That's the whole history of the internet in a nutshell. A sword can be used to slaughter innocents and terrorize but it also can be used for self defense and to bring justice - it's a tool. The person using it is the moral agent.
That's a good point. But what has William being compliant have to do with them murdering his wife?
Me believing in something or not doesn't pertain to the question. I've demonstrated the Darwinian theory of macro evolution is not a theory according to the rigorous standards applied to the term in scientific context. You're not taught "Darwin's and other biologist's best guess on the origin of life and species" in school. No, you're taught the evolutionary theory as an objective fact of nature and of reality. Just like people were taught creationism to be an undisputed fact in the Christian world before that. But Darwin's theory didn't disprove creationism, it just posited a competing explanation of creation based on a different worldview (which it did not prove to be the case but presupposed).
All evidence is theory-laden. There are no brute facts which are not subject to interpretation. The reason why you and others believe evo theory best describes the world around us is because you presuppose a certain worldview to be correct - that of naturalism and materialism. There are other worldviews that hold a different explanation for the origin of the world and life like Christianity and its account of creation.
Asking to disprove a proposition after I've accepted the worldview assumptions that led to it is called internal critique. There are many such critiques on the inconsistencies of the evo theory from there and those could lead to scientists refining it or discarding it for another one (this would take what science philosopher Thomas Kuhn called a paradigm shift). But I won't even go there - I'd argue the assumptions evo theory is based on are irrational and arbitrary since that worldview can't give justification for knowledge, truth, meaning or any universal concepts as a whole.
The "consensus" doesn't tell me if a proposition is true or false, it's an appeal to majority and authority. Should I get into what the scientific consensus is on climate change and the coof?
That's a definition of theory. But for a theory to be called scientific it must adhere to the scientific method principles:
A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the natural world and universe that can be (or a fortiori, that has been) repeatedly tested and corroborated in accordance with the scientific method, using accepted protocols of observation, measurement, and evaluation of results.
In the context of science:
- you first observe a phenomenon
- construct viable hypotheses
- test hypotheses
- put forward a theory
No, I think the space they sold us is fake.
Theory is the operative word in Darwin's Theory of Evolution
It's not a theory though because it's not based on empirical observation. We've only observed adaptation and sexual selection. By evo theory I mean the large scale belief of the origin and evolution of life as well as the universe. It's a metaphysical claim based on fundamental presuppositions about the nature of existence (materialism, naturalism and determinism).
I can deboonk it on philosophical and logical grounds alone without getting into hermeneutics of "evidence". Scientismo basic bitch Neil De Grasse types don't know philosophy and they conveniently reject it (as if science is not based on it).
It doesn't make sense unless very few people knew about the shots. I'd always imagine the royal family to be in on it. Charles surely knows.
"But UBI will surely be a good thing, right?"
That's why you use cash every single fucking time you can. There's no excuse.
True. Evo theory and space are a big one.
Ok so it's a list of powerful and wealthy people. Still no context though. Are they all part of an inner circle and in on the NWO agenda? Are they all co-conspiritors?
I picked Romanov's dynasty as an example - the tzar's family stood in the way of said agenda and almost all were killed.
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/sites/default/files/2022-12/spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf
They gamed a coronavirus pandemic back in 2017. There was another one in 2019 called Event 201. Total coincidence of course.
A list of names with no context given? How are Rockefeller or Romanov jewish?
Finally a "trusted media" msm source I can share with the normies. The Overton window is shifting. We're entering the final chapter of the SPARS scenario.
Why is a pedo death cult bad from your wordlview?
I bet. Spergs are not the best at arguments. "Christcuck" lol. Go suck Adam Green's unjustified pagan balls.
After the fall death and suffering entered the world and Satan rules over the creation:
I will no longer talk much with you, for the ruler of this world is coming, and he has nothing in Me.
- John 14:30
whose minds the god of this age has blinded, who do not believe, lest the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine on them. Corinthians 4:4
After Christ's resurrection and Him defeating Satan and death, we got the "thousand years" of Christ's reign, preaching the gospel all over the world and saving millions by bringing them into the Church. That will be followed by Satan breaking free, the coming of the Antichrist and the second coming and final judgment of Christ (Revelation 20).
By the way, scripture says that true physical Israel would protect the Word of God, form many Christian nations while taking the gospel to the world.
Christ's church is the eternal kingdom and the true Israel. The zionist idea of a worldly kingdom of Israel is antichristian.
Adam Green basic level word concept fallacy. Christianity is jewish insofar it is the new testament of the one true God (who created everything and is Trinity) and His turning away from the chosen people (the jewish tribes).
Christianity made it so everyone who is within Christ and follows His commandments is chosen by God, be it gentile or jew. Judaism is the rejection of Christ and jews (who are not Christian) embody the spirit of the antichrists.
Does it matter? Is Andrew any different than Charles? They are all the same degenerate satanists.
William and Kate are as good of a stabby and NWO agenda pushers as Harry and Meghan. It's a family business and they're all in it. If someone wants out he get's Diana'd.