The United Nations deemed Genocide illegal...but politicides (mass murder over political reasons) is allowed... and apparently Mao and Stalin were literally there and ALLOWED IT.
The consequences are easily imaginable.
Mao cancelled and killed billions of Chinese on the streets within a single decade. Pol Pot killed millions within 4 years, many of which whose crime are being thinking people. The Rwandan Government of 1994 obliterated every Tutsi as "Cockroaches" with machetes and every Hutu that sympathized with them are faced with the same fate. And that is not even getting into East Germany, South Korea, Romania etc... where people just DIE.
See, historical mass murders are never pure genocides even if they are labeled as such. It is never about a specific race or cred when people with independent thought are invariably exterminated. Hitler does not spare Germans, Mao does not spare poor farmers and Pol Pot does not spare loyal concentration camp wardens. It's about mass, indiscriminate blood sacrifice and the extermination of all thinking people and leaving the rest mindless drones for the Millennium Kingdom as dictated by the Talmud and the Bible.
There is a reason why the UN law is worded that way and it is purposefully ineffective because the rulemakers/gamemasters wanted to judge and kill whoever they please by the trillions...just like what they always did.
I see you've red a lot of enlightenment propaganda about the "Dark ages". Can you imagine how backwards people were back then? Men couldn't even become women and thought they were created in the image of God and there was purpose to everything. They had huge families with dozens of children (true, many died and death was commonplace - which made people much more resilient, stoic and sober about life - mental illness was not an option and few people were batshit crazy). Abortions and usury was not even permitted by the bigoted church and state. How barbaric. Ironically, the middle ages is the time when the jews were not allowed to operate in most empires and didn't have control of money - it all changed during the renaissance (Venice) and ultimately culminated in Rothschild's takeover during the revolutionary period.
I see, another victim of Jewish propaganda. Understandable since the Jews told that lie for 1,000 years.
Technology is not advanced enough to do that and they just reskinned the scam while keeping the premise "if you disagree with me I am straight-up killing you and destroying your life".
They are called the "Vatican" and are allowed to dictate who lives and who dies inside Europe though.
This was when the free thinkers turned it down because they're fed up. The Rothschilds are the Vatican's revenge against the free thinkers.
Sure, but you could see through it all, my gnostic friend. Cunning jews playing 4D chess, propping up a religion that condemns judaism as heretical God-killers and prosecutes it throughout most of its history.
Have you heard of the Byzantine empire? Or the later Russian empire? Jews were banned from taking any governmental or educational positions there. Usury was made illegal, jews were prosecuted and banished often. After the 11c. there are two main branches of Christianity - Western (centralized and infiltrated by jews, masons by intel agencies) and Eastern (decentralized and infiltrated at times like in Russia during the USSR and Greece by the CIA now). The Vatican is the Western Church. At least know what your criticizing. Adam Green level of bs here.
Isn't it curious the "jewish scam reskinned" - the Orthodox Church - has elders talking openly about the NWO and how jews want to take over the world and bring about the Antichrist? Did you know it was a Russian monk who got hold of the Protocols of the elders of Zion and made the conspiracy known to the world? Isn't it strange the jewish Bolsheviek revolution was brought about to destroy the last standing Christian empire and the subsequent regime was vehemently opposed to the Church?
But ok, I'll grant you Christianity is a hoax - what's your worldview? Who are the "good guys" in history, what should people be fighting for and against and why? Also, what is your basis for any "ought" at all - what is morality based on?
When people actively use your lie against you, it's no longer useful, you can no longer use it for your own end, so the Christians you mentioned are no different than Roman Gnostics in the eyes of the elite. Just more people who don't deserve living because they will not serve a Blood God.
Can you be certain it's the truth though? Also the ones who prosecuted and banished Jews are Romans, the ones like Nero and Elgabalus. There is a reason why every historical book marks them as being "insane" (the Jews wrote them) and the crimes of Jewish rabbis are frequently pinned on these people. Also there is a reason why shady politics are coined with the term "Byzantine". It's probably consisted of layers of black ops and cover-ups.
If you're going to be skeptical about history how come you cherry pick what aligns with your theory and dismiss the rest as possible falsifications and psy ops? Of course there were psy ops in Byzantine. There were psy ops in Rome too and since you went into etymology that's where we got the word "conspiracy" from.
If your position is that history is mostly falsified by jews how do you manage to extract the bits of truth and how do you tell truth from lie without presupposing your worldview (jews and christians bad, while pagans for some reason good) to be correct? If you're being consistent you should discard all of history as contaminated with falsehood and go about other ways proving your theory.