I suspect this won't be anything like the answer you expected or like anything else you've ever heard. It may sound like a joke, and if you're reading what I have to say and find yourself getting defensive or feeling the compulsion to challenge it, then just think of it as a joke and leave it at that.
I will have to be extremely brief, since it would take a book or two to arrange and contextualize all the evidence I've gathered, which means there's much more to be said about any particular element. All that being disclaimed....
Sitchin was right about the Anunnaki. Biglino was right that the Bible was essentially about certain episodes of human interaction with these aliens. For certain reasons, they only got so far in their reinterpretations. AFAIK, neither one addressed the "end of the world".
The peace settlement of the "war in heaven" was a deal between Yahweh and Satan, wherein the latter would be given a period of time to prove his point and come to dominate the human race through seduction and deception (not force). Whether humanity frees itself or not, that state will be mandated to continue.
The "end of the world", "Day of the Lord", "End of Days", "Second Coming", "end of the age", etc, I have tentatively concluded to refer to the time this peace settlement is finalized. Then the question would be, when is that? It's beyond hazy, with too many details to discuss.
And what happens after that? That too is almost not worth discussing, since there are almost no details. First, the Anunnaki lived alongside humanity for most of our existence, I would say, so we should not consider that unusual. It's all over sci-fi so it's strange that we're not completely used to the idea. See Leviticus 26:12, for example.
Revelation 21 says some pretty vague things about what happens when humanity is successful but it sounds pretty nice. People can make what they want of what is written, but “Behold, I make all things new” tells me that making predictions is merely speculation. The foregoing is assuming humanity is successful. If not, take whatever horrors you see now and multiply by 100 or 1000. Again, iIn either case, though, the details of what comes after are hardly worth discussing.
Humans should be concerned with making this deal come out in humanity's favor. As I see it, if Satan's influence was removed, we have all we need right here and right now to create for ourselves something of an Earthly paradise.
Someone once said something like, "That is all we know of Heaven, and all we need know of Hell."
People worry that this sort of stuff will be mandated by the gubmint, but I don't think it's going to go that way at all.
The gubmint never mandated anything to do with smartphones, but after long resistance and from painful personal experience I find that it's nearly impossible to participate in modern society without one.
It seems to me that, viewed from a higher perspective and with a larger context, these kinds of nefarious initiatives are accomplished by giving everyone who might be paying attention something to fear and to bitch about, while the real work progresses without notice.
I remember Scalia telling the story of how, growing up in NYC, he would bring his rifle on the subway to school because he was on the shooting team.
When he died suddenly, I thought, "Oh, of course they can't have a guy with those kinds of life experiences just running around loose giving his opinion on 2nd Amendment cases."
I couldn't explain it, but I would assume it was somehow associated with the whole "Walmart/FEMA camp" thing. IOW, Walmarts are something more than big boxes from which to sell you cheap shit from China.
At the first level, "They" are trying to erase hard-working and lucky country bumpkin Sam Walton's background. it's not well-known and has been erased from his wiki, but we can still find this in his Geneastar page:
Soon afterwards, Walton joined the military in the U.S. Army Intelligence Corps, supervising security at aircraft plants and prisoner of war camps.
In fact, you can see that the text was originally cribbed from directly from wiki, but wiki dropped the "prisoner of war" angle as being too much of a bullseye to hand to conspiracy theorists.
At a deeper level, the whole Walmart thing ties back very quickly to the "Salem Witches" I've done so much research on. That is, Walmart and the "world's richest man" and all that are way out on their periphery, just another project among many.
Given that, I'm not really surprised to see anything.
"Homeland" was sooooo popular when it was on. It wasn't really to my my taste but I remember eventually trying to watch it. I was shocked at how bigoted it was. I have since become further shocked at how no one else seemed to be shocked at how bigoted it was, and that was because they didn't even notice it.
Back in the day it was a poster of a gorilla in a Stalhelm carrying off a woman. You might think it would have to be that obvious for everyone to notice it, but I personally feel people would say, "We've got to put a stop to those fucking gorillas one of these days."
You may have misunderstood. Common ground is not the problem nor is it the object, although such things are of crucial important to most. If I'm interacting with someone who harbors the conception they might be in ignorance or even have something wrong, well then I might have something to offer that will help.
Strangely, though, even such a person thinks I have nothing of profit to offer them, rather than passing on their way they feel compelled to offer me something instead, even when I didn't ask. Really, what this communicates is that they do not, in reality, harbor such conceptions of self-doubt.
Jesus said, "Ask and ye shall receive." An invitation, in other words. He didn't say, "Listen, let me tell you jokers something...."
But thanks for the engagement. TTYL.
There is a big difference, even just in what you say. I have come to find--very regrettably--that in order to figure out what's going on in the world I may have to disagree with every other person on the face of the earth. It is not comfortable or convenient.
Few seem willing to do that, which to me is the big hindrance to progress. Plus, they already know what's going on in the world so why trouble themselves so profoundly?
Somebody once said that if cocaine just made you throw up, no one would be addicted to cocaine. Truth, I have found, is much the same way.
Bertrand Russell said, “Most people would rather die than think and many of them do!” More and more, I come to realize that those in control of the world know this well and use it. Which, I fear, brings up the other famous saying, "People get what they deserve."
I also fear that I will never see eye to eye with anyone on this, and despair at the suffering.
One of such things is that Western people for unknown reason quickly project their own way of thinking on the completely different people. That's really weird.
But that's not what you're doing, right? That's rhetorical. I don't need an answer.
The only real peace will come when popular support for the entire Zionist ideology/social engineering project is diminished and defunct. They started with nothing and have caused untold hell and havoc.
Even if Israel is flattened, the cycle will just start all over again. "Oy vey, we said never again but look what happened!" The next cycle would only be worse.
The solution, which no one seems to see, is to get the idea of Zionism about where the idea of crusading is for Christians: ridiculed as crazy fanatical backwards bullshit, not even close to being a question.
Sure a few Zio hard-liners will never give it up, but they'll just fade away.
I think there are things going on that you haven't thought about yet. One of them is that a big part of the larger problem is all the people that have no idea there are things going on that they haven't thought about yet.
But you've clearly thought about everything to such extent that you felt the need to tell me about it, so let's leave it at that. Hope you got the compulsion out of your system.
One thing I've noticed about the rumors this time is that the Zionists are telling every one they can think up. Personally, I think that means (1) none of them are true and (2) they are very desperate indeed.
What's funny is that this tends to confirm for me that the Supreme Leader is dead (and has caused events to go a way other than according to plan). That's the obvious rumor to monger, right? I heard it one time a few days ago and never since. Remember when Putin was dead and dying and insane and in hiding and had fled the country? But not the Ayatollah, huh?
My guess is that power has now gone to the Guardian Council, and that it's full of hardliners, and that they're willing to have it out using their giant missile inventory. It also looks like US bases in the Gulf have been evacuated and Huckabee is rushing American citizens out. Israelis are crashing the exits themselves. An Armageddon of sorts, just not the one They expected.
So, you know, back to the "very desperate indeed".
nobody cares that you exist
Cared enough about your damaged ego to reply, didn't you? Way to refute yourself, moron. And now everyone sees it on your permanent record lololololololol
You are forbidden from reading or replying to anything I write in the future. I will report you if you cannot control yourself. byeeeeeeeee!
Great! I think we need to get what we can out there because (((they're))) cranking down the volume:
Israel Cracks Down on Foreign Media Outlets with New 'Zero Tolerance' Censorship Policy (Western Journal 6/20/2025)
I wouldn't be surprised if they start jamming their own cellphones before this is all over.
This story analyzes the video and describes the type of weapon used:
Advanced Iranian Warheads Deployed (Winter Watch 6/20/2025)
Very interesting, to tie together a couple of things you mentioned.
I'm completely of the view that the beginning of the Younger Dryas was one and the same event as the Biblical Flood. We just have to keep in mind that there is a big cloud of smoke that intentionally obscures research on what, to me, is simply a historical occurrence much like any other.
But I've wondered where the word "Aryan" originally came from. Where I've landed on that is the same place Noah is said to have landed: Mount Ararat. No coincidence, in my mind.
Fort Knox guy: "Look, there's not even one pile of gold in there that we can photograph from different angles and tell people that it's however many piles of gold we're supposed to have."
Trump representative: "We can't tell people that. They'll just freak out. Everyone just stop talking about this and we'll get back to it later."
Fort Knox guy: "Silver lining: we have tons of room if you need to store White House holiday decorations or whatever. Place is already paid for."
I think only at the very highest levels, and even then just a handful of people. Frankly, it may be zero. Better everyone in their service just believes they're serving some type of "deities". I believe humans are quite literally programmed for that.
I don't know if you picked this up in any of my posts in the last year or two, but they have involved documenting the activities of a set of generational Satanist families that have been active in America for over four centuries. The family that has become most prominent is the Parkers.
Just to give you some idea of the scope: On one end, the guy in command of the militia at the Battle of Lexington was John Parker. On the other end, I found five Parkers involved in the dumb Luigi Mangione psyop. They are scattered all through history.
The point is, many years ago I heard an interview on THC with a guy that had broken away from the generational Satanist family into which he had been born. His name is Jay Parker and he's still around giving interviews.
The point is, my work did not come from anything he mentioned. I only put two and two together later on. He seems to have no idea whatsoever what his family has been up to over literally centuries. That's how in the dark these people are kept. No need to know, you know?
I think that in the end, They just need people that do what they're told and go along with the program. Policy is formed only at the highest levels, all else is implementation.
It's so, so hard to say, but I think the number that actually knows the whole story is very tiny. I can count on one hand the number of times in years and years that some Elite has even vaguely alluded to knowing any of the deeper truths I've dug up about what's going on.
In fact, I've come to the hypothesis that the Elites at each different level are just handed different sets of lies, each containing a bit more truth. For their own good, I think they all put themselves in the state of mind where they know these are lies and believe them too. Sort of a 1984-style "2+2=5" thing.
What really gets me is that (long story) the final war against the Tartarians took place throughout the 1800's. That's just out of living memory, but it has successfully been almost entirely erased. Then again, that seems close enough that we can get it back.
Speaking of lost ancient technologies, people think in terms of airships and free energy and stuff like that, but I heard the kookiest/most intriguing one recently. Someone finally noticed that none of these old Tartarian buildings have toilets. Crazy, right?
But they paired that up with the "fireplaces" that--upon inspection--do not appear designed to have fires in them. The speculation is that the "fireplaces" brought in a certain kind of energy that the inhabitants could somehow absorb. Thus, they never needed to eat and did not need to poop.
I keep getting more and more of a feeling that the world not long gone from us was stranger than any of us could easily imagine.
I think you have to keep the origin and "Deep State" of the Soviet Union in mind. As Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote in "200 Years Together":
You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse...It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time.
Solzhenitsyn points towards the Jews, but I'm just saying that the Jews were a tool--like any other tool "They" can get hold of--and it goes one level deeper.
I forgot to mention in the original comment that WW2 was about 80% Germany vs Russia. "They" got a two-fer, because to add to what Solzhenitsyn mentions, I would say that by involving the USSR in the war, They had arranged for the slaughter of tens of millions more ethic Russians and Christians, less obviously this time. And the country also got stomped into the dirt.
So the question would be, how much of this true history is known at the highest levels of the Russian Federation? It's essentially impossible to say, and even in normal circumstances Russians play their cards extremely close to the vest. But if I had to guess, I'd say maybe a dozen or two in a very tight inner circle.
You'd have to keep it small because they simply cannot afford to be compromised. But more than that, how many people are ready to believe any of this? The percentage rounds down to zero.
And in the meantime, Putin has to try to drag along a country of 150m with it's own Deep State, and fight an enormous war against the whole of NATO (with Ukrainian triggermen), and keep BRICS going, etc, etc.
The closest I've ever seen him come to publicly admitting how much he knows was back in September 2022:
"Such a total denial of a human being, a rejection of faith and traditional values, suppression of freedom begins to look like a perverted religion, outright Satanism."
Since Satan is at the head of the faction of Elohim that's causing all the trouble, he's correct. And I think he said about as much as can be said to the general public these days.
Biglino knew a ton, but he was always very cautious and cagey when it came to ideas that, let's say, challenged popularly held religious conceptions supposedly rooted in the Bible. He tried to stick with more dry and academic topics from a scholarly point of view that were therefore less disputable. I don't blame him, since Italy is soaked in Catholics and people get hella touchy.
However, there's a big problem with Biglino: he was "turned" not that long ago. It's marked by the time he was interviewed by Hancock. Positions before that were cautious and blunted, while statements after that can be considered polluted and not necessarily what he thinks.
Most assuredly, though, Lucifer and Satan were one and the same person. In fact, one of my first forays into what I considered the dumb idea that Satan existed at all was that I had heard the claim that they were not the same, and I set out to prove that. I wanted to show something to the loudmouth Christians always bitching about "Satan this" and "Satanic that", point them towards a fundamental plot hole or contradiction so that they would shut up about this unhelpful nonsense.
Welp, that was when I finally stumbled into the direct link between Lucifer and the Anunnaki, and it was all downhill from there, so to speak.
As far as the various names and monikers for this one single entity, we shouldn't really be surprised at that either. If you think of Hillary Clinton, you could probably come up with two dozen different names and titles by which people would recognize her with specificity, everything from Hillary Rodham to Mrs. Clinton to Hillbeast. That's a single person in one human lifetime.
So if you research these various names, you can find evidence for certain identifications. Sure, it takes a lot of work to straighten it all out but I can say it's doable only because I've done it, at least to my own satisfaction. The identifications come out almost like little mathematical proofs.
As to the Garden of Eden, I would agree that the strongest indication was that the nachash was Enki. Frankly, we don't even know precisely what they meant when they first used that word, only the usages that came afterwards.
If you start with the tentative assumption it was used to describe Enki, then you can see how it works out. For example, there are all these weird indications the Anunnaki had some sort of reptilian characteristics. It would be one hell of a damn coincidence if "nachash" with the connotation of "serpent" just happened to be talking about something entirely unrelated. See what I mean?
Enki wasn't trying to save them, though, since they were alive and well in Eden. What they got was higher consciousness, as the Anunnaki themselves had. The slave species--human livestock--did not require that and should not have it. Frankly, Enlil could have smoked them right then and there and had done with the whole issue, but he did not.
Rather, he outfitted them, arranged for them to have the ability to reproduce, and exiled them to mix with "wild" humans. Even then, he had some kind of sympathy towards the humans with higher consciousness.