TL;DR: The Rockefeller family traces back to the Salem Witches. There is something to the backstory which I found quite illuminating concerning the time scales in which the Elites really operate.

Advisory: There is a ton of evidence and analysis concerning the Rockefellers and Salem Witches that I’m leaving out just to have room to make the basic case. It’s the interesting part concerning some arcane genealogy. You can consider this very much the “floor” of research on the subject.

Let me ask you, is there a more prominent oligarchic dynasty post-War of Northern Aggression than the Rockefellers? I mean, what was the name of J.P. Morgan’s son? IDK. Do you really think Musk’s son C-3PO will carry on in the spirit of Elon, whatever that may be? Of course not. If we left wealth out, then how many generations can we count among influential Kennedys? Is there even an RFK Jr. Jr.? Who knows, so three generations, right? (No one wants to talk about Blackjack.) Point is, I would contend the Rockefellers are in a class of their own.

In conspiracy theory circles you simply cannot go very long without hearing the name mentioned, given that they’ve been all over the map of Conspiracy Land, from “robber barons” to 911. After I heard some random mention of them, the question finally occurred to me: “I wonder if…?”

It would be, in my opinion and at this point, exceedingly weird but not impossible that the Salem Witches were behind so much, yet this uniquely powerful family had just bubbled up out of nowhere and commenced very much the same kind of social engineering activities the Salem Witches are behind.

If these were these two independent centers of powers, a purely spurious connection between the Rockefellers and the Salem Witches would be extraordinarily unlikely. I mean, I’ve never even met a person who told me they’d been to Salem as a tourist or for any other reason.

So is there a connection? The answer is yes… and no… and something more interesting than even that first yes. I will now explain that enigmatic answer.

As a first order of housekeeping, we need to dismiss the weak-ass diversion handed out in wiki’s “Background” section. It talks about their German ancestry and exactly what brand of Christians they are. Conspiracy theorists will either parrot it blindly, follow up on it, or dispute it. And there’s the trap: it’s meaningless and I didn’t read more than the tiny bit necessary to see it was about Germans and Christians.

The subconscious conclusion we have all drawn about the origins of the Rockefellers is that Senior was just a dirtbag who was very greedy and got very lucky. However, as far as I can tell at this time, the Salem Witches picked a Rockefeller out of a conical black sorting hat and proceeded to create The Rockefellers. There may in fact be more to why they were selected but I have no evidence to offer at this time along those lines. You’ll see their real origins in a minute.

As a second order of housekeeping, we’ll skim the list of Rockefeller “Associates” and compare it to the familiar list of people of the Salem witch trials and others we have gathered along the way. The names that I have come across in the Salem Witch research are: Samuel P. Bush, Henry Clay Folger, Jerome Davis Greene, Richard Dean Parsons, Pratt family, Charles H. Percy, and Henry Morgan Tilford.

From the page for the founder of their feast, we find that he was started in business as a junior partner of Maurice B. Clark (1827-1901) and George W. Gardner (1834-1911).

None of those specific people have been written up before and we don’t have the space to do it now. A brief look showed them all connected to the Salem Witches. Rewriting history is an elephant we will have to eat one bite at a time, so we need to press on with the family at hand. Already quite a list, though, eh?

Given that the second order of housekeeping already makes a prima facie case for the thesis, we can address the third order of housekeeping: apprising the strongest disinfo “They” sent to us about the Rockefellers. That would be from Miles Mathis, of course. He addresses the Rockefellers in two papers:

Kabbalah, Hermeticism and the Occult (9/15/2015 27-page PDF)

If the de' Medicis were crypto-Jews, is it possible the Rockefellers are as well?

That’s the very first thing he ever says about them. See where it’s headed? It’s all high-octane nonsense after that and you can read it if you like. You can even believe it too, since some of it might actually be true. The point is, it will all get you nowhere.

More on the Rockefellers (6/10/2018 4-page PDF)

Well, the big clue is the middle name Avery, which is also linked to the Livingstons.

That is the fourth sentence of the paper, and it’s as close as he’s going to get you to anything useful. Afterwards, he puts the pedal to the metal and drives you away from there on a thrilling ride to Everyonesajewville. I told you we were going to Salem, though, so let’s begin….

I’ll tell you how it went for me, because there was none of the high-falutin’ Jew huntin’ of Miles Mathis. It was good old (Salem) witch huntin’! To begin, I went right to the most familiar of the Rockefellers, the founder of the dynasty (or so we are to believe), John Davison Rockefeller Sr. (1839-1937). Nothing there, so back to his father, William Avery "Devil Bill" Rockefeller Sr. (1810-1906). Nothing there either. I tend to give up when things don’t go easily, but I went back one more generation to his father, Godfrey Lewis Rockefeller (1783-1857). Eureka!

Lucy Avery's ancestors were Puritans who had emigrated from Devon, England, to Salem, Massachusetts, in about 1630.

I suppose that wasn’t so bad, was it? Took me about three minutes but somehow Miles Mathis missed it. Funny, huh? But seriously, what are the chances of there being a connection like this purely by happenstance? Come up with whatever number you like, but personally I’d say it rounds down to zero percent. So are the Rockefellers actually Salem Witches? The answer is “yes”. Case closed!

Well, in past times I would have said that, but I feel like my research skills have improved so I thought I would flesh out the documentation. The writeup would be pretty short otherwise, but this is where we get to the “no” part of the answer. You see, I simply could not connect the Avery line to the Salem Witch Trials. Not right then, anyway, but stay tuned. Let me fill you in on the genealogical trouble.

We begin with Lucy (Avery) Rockefeller (1786-1867). Go back five generations and you get to the guys that came to the colonies during the Puritan Great Migration, Capt. James Avery (1621-1700) and his father, Christopher Avery (1590-1679). His father before him was Christopher Avery Sr. (about 1550-1613). The genealogy gives out there.

One the flip side, we have fake witch Sarah Wildes (née Averell/Averill) (1627-1692). Her father was William Averill (1600-1652), his father was Edward Averill (about 1550-1617), and his father was another William Averill (1525-1606). Again, the genealogy runs out there.

Don’t get thrown by the different names. It’s acknowledged that Avery and Averill and Averell are all variants of one another. Even within a given version, Jesus, you should see some of the spellings. That’s not the problem. The two families were also more than a hundred miles apart. You can see for yourself that I came up empty on this one. No connection.

But that brings us to “something more interesting than even that first yes”. Don’t you agree it was a huge coincidence finding Rockefeller+Salem in the first place? I could not let it go. It was like click-click-click-click-click all back and forth over those records above for quite a while until, at long last, it clicked. Here’s what I came up with….

See the William Averill b1525? You have to look in the text of his WikiTree page, but in addition to Edward, he had two other sons, Philip and Richard. They have no biographical information at all. Now follow me on this: what if his first child was born a bastard? That was a big deal in those days, with a special derogatory name and everything. What if he sent that bastard a hundred miles away, telling him that instead of Averill, he would go by the variant Avery.

Is he the Christopher Sr. from the Rockefeller line as listed above? The birthdates of Christopher Avery Sr. and his possible younger brother Edward Averill are both “about 1550”, so that fits pretty precisely. Christopher’s father is unknown so there’s no direct evidence to disprove it. Not much to go on and okay, I get it, this is all a helluva long bow to draw. But you know what? I’ll draw it much further.

See, these Salem Witches we’ve been talking about are generational Satanists, and when you hear “generational” you picture that the freak parents bring their kids into it and make them freaks, too. Simply repeating the cycle, that’s the gist of it. But I want to show you the scale is far grander than that, and something which needs to be incorporated in your worldview and analysis.

As I put it together, “They” figured out they would need something like “The Rockefellers” in the future. What I mean is that They work through fronts, and for one of the fronts They wanted an oligarchic dynasty. In addition to the obvious utility, the fail-safe is that if the peasants ever get fed up and grab their torches and pitchforks, it’s gonna be the people that They maneuvered into the castle who get dragged over the security wall.

I’ll go further as we consider the timeline. I claim They had this idea before the time of the Puritan Great Migration, which started in 1620. Then it’s almost two centuries until bloodline Salem Witch Lucy Avery marries Godfrey Lewis Rockefeller (1783-1857) in 1806. Look what a total loser he was:

Godfrey was said to be outmatched by his wife, who was taller, more confident, and better educated than Godfrey. Godfrey himself was said to have a "stunted, impoverished look and a hangdog air of perpetual defeat". He was also said to be jovial and good-natured, but his propensity to drink upset his wife.

Try to convince yourself Lucy was not set up as his handler to operationalize Project OLIGARCH. And they stayed losers nobodies, too, until John D. started hitting it big after the Civil War. To be precise, I mentioned two other presumed Salem Witches just outside the spotlight that made him hit it big. That’s the pattern we’ve seen innumerable times. And note that debut is not for another 60 years, in total two and a half centuries from inception of the plan.

This timeline is an incredibly tall claim, but I could not get the scenario out of my mind after I came across one tiny bit of historical info to seal it. You’ll find it on the WikiTree page for Chris Sr. Be aware, the genealogists got crossed up and they don’t realize it actually applies to Chris Jr. It was he and his son James who made the crossing to the New World. Anyway, this old genealogical note says:

The only support for a son John of this couple is this line: "This Christopher Avery of Ipplepen is he who later left Devon with his only son to become the founder of a great family in the New World... The register of that church for that period is sadly mutilated but it seems to show that our Christopher had a brother John, who had a son John, who was baptized on the fourth of June, 1616."

“Left to become the founder of a great family” written in 1616? By the way, the New World was a howling wilderness at that time, so far as we are told. I have never read anything like that passage in all the hundreds of genealogy pages I’ve looked at. And as we discussed at the beginning, there has not been another family like the Rockefellers.

As “out there” as the theory is, well, how big a coincidence do we have to have to come to the view that it’s not a coincidence at all?

Thank so much for reading!