Tribal thinking.......dont do it!!
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (6)
sorted by:
The phenomenon at work here is that the vast majority of the human race actually has no internal moral compass.
These people get their "morality" by those they accept as "authorities": their parents, the cops, the church, fancy people on TV, whoever. Nor is it actually morality, but rather that they only subconsciously observe and adhere to external systems of reward and punishment.
In the present case, the Leftist "authorities" have recently made a "virtue" of political violence. The NPCs thus merely seek to express their own "virtue". If you think back to former times--still very recent, actually--when these same Leftists leaders did not hold up violence as a virtue, their followers expressed no such sentiments.
Find someone that swims against the flow of those around them, those closest to them, for reasons of their own internal morality, and you have found someone of a higher level of consciousness.
a) Phenomenon at work implies ones perception within all perceivable aka ones disposition (mor) within all (al). Others suggest moralism to tempt ones disposition to hold onto a side (good or bad), which contradicts ones DIS-position (divided position) into a conflict of reason (good vs bad).
Moral implies analysis (implication); moralism implies synthesis (reason)...if consented to.
b) COM-pass implies passing together...an inversion of being (life) passed (inception towards death) apart from one another.
Notice that the center of a suggested compass is affixed, while ones perception within all perceivable implies free will of choice.
Bonus:
Aka ones consent to suggested moral-ism by another. PEOPLE (suggested pluralism) represents another such transfer of authority tempting ones free will of choice to accept submission.
Expression implies the reaction (perception) to enacting impression (perceivable)...to seek implies taking possession by giving consent to a suggested outcome.
EX (out of) PRESS (pressing into)...a jew inverts the gentile perception of expression by suggesting the PRESS (mediated information).
Consenting to suggested press implies repression of ones expression; while permitting suppression by another.
a) Form (life) swimming against the forwarding flow (inception towards death)...
b) Those who ignore that "against forwarding" implies within linear progression, are tricked through circular logic (against or for) to turn into a conflict of reason (against vs for).
c) Living within the process of dying implies A GAIN FOR-warded...a jew inverts this into a "for vs against" conflict of reason among gentiles.
a) CON (together) contradicts SCIOU (apart).
b) Level implies balance for ones choice...not levels stacked on top of each other. Perceivable level implies foundation; suggested level implies pyramid build upon foundation.