Whether you think it's for good or ill, statements like this help you get past the crisis of wondering whether these people can be reasoned with, bargained with, and some sort of agreement struck.
In a similar situation on a much larger stage, I always laugh with a sort of black humor every time someone in the Neo-Liberal Establishment even mentions the possibility of peace talks with Russia (you know, given that they're losing and all). I actually think they're so far out of it they really don't know how far past that they've gone.
Similar to what Bill Cooper said, Alan Watt made the claim that in ancient Greece, attendance was made mandatory at theatrical performances for the purposes of indoctrination. I was never able to substantiate it, but then again They've had a couple of millennia to suppress that info.
Funny if true, though, because in "Lysistrata", the women go on a "sex strike" to end the Peloponnesian War. How far we've come.
0% of myself thought that any of this was reflected in any movie about WW2 that I have ever seen.
100% of me agreed that: "I love war movies and I have seen a ton."
0% of normies want to hear about how "The Jews run the movie business"
Some years ago, when I first thought deeply about the "narrow gate", I wondered, "How you would detect someone actually trying to follow this path?"
I thought that, in our mundane world, you'd hear someone say something like, "Well, that's just the best I'm able to figure out so far, and so that's what I'm trying to do." That reflects an imperfection in knowledge, morality and will, and an awareness of it, and the struggle to perfect them all. In addition, an acknowledgement of possible error reflects the humility that Jesus always encouraged.
Fast-forward and I observed you virtually never hear anything like that. It's a sad realization to come to. Anyway, all this is just the best I'm able to figure out so far.
A few years ago, I was surprised to find that this psyop goes back literally a century:
Some one remarked that the best way to unite all the nations on this globe would be an attack from some other planet. In the face of such an alien enemy, people would respond with a sense of their unity of interest and purpose.
A few years ago, I happened to be chatting with a couple of people that had graduated with bachelor's degrees in psychology a few years previously. They had both attended one of the larger state universities where I live, with about 20k undergraduates and 5k grads on campus.
Neither one had heard of either the Milgram Obedience Experiment or the Stanford Prison Experiment. Never covered them in school or had run into them outside of school. Neither rang the faintest bell.
So I think that also explains the modern world.
Both funny and surreal that you mention nitrogen. We get the ammonia used for nitrogen fertilizer through the "Haber Process". Fritz Haber was a contemporary of Hitler, and a Nobel Prize-winning wealthy Jew who also did the original work that led to Zyklon-B, supposedly used as the gas in the Holohoax.
If all this ludicrous insanity was written up in a novel, people would throw it in the trash by page five. What a world we live in.
They've made amazing progress in the industrial leader of Europe:
German deindustrialization continues unabated due to Berlin’s suicidal energy policies (The Intel Drop 7/25/2023)
I always thought there was problem with the plotline onvolving the diver.
The plane supposedly crashed way out in the ocean. Are we to believe a diver/assassin somehow was near enough the crash site to swim over in a few minutes? If he came off a boat, wasn't the boat close enough for the passengers to wave it over? And if it refused to assist, wouldn't they have said that? Similar issues arise if you suppose he came off the shore, which was a couple of miles away.
The questions continue, but the other odd fact is that there happened to be GoPro video of the entire flight beginning with the takeoff. What a coincidence, right?
The entire affair makes me think that the event was faked, the main purpose being that Fuddy, a loyal retainer, would not be available to tell any tales. Then the rest of it, like the JFK assassination, is where they purposely heap conspiratorial wood on the fire to keep researchers staring at the dancing flames as long as they care to without ever approaching the truth.
I've noticed that as part of the overall reality distortion program, "They" really do not want anyone to know how average Jews think and feel in both the US and Israel.
For example, a few years ago I saw someone get literally booed off the stage for even just beginning to badmouth Trump. The punchline: it was a Jewish director at the Israeli film festival in Los Angeles.
Yeah, so not quite what They would have us imagine, right? You can see how airtight the lid really is.
I interpret this as yet another indication of how weak the Elite's hand really is. A Congressional stooge cannot even read a script without the supervision of a malfunctioning fembot.
Sun Tzu told us that all warfare was based on deception. Overestimating an enemy's strength is just as bad as underestimating. The problem we see is that most people simply cannot handle the task of discernment.
He may have been there, but if he got an envelope I'm sure we'd all have seen it.
Funny you mention him, though, because it wouldn't surprise me that he didn't. I think he's an evil troll and has been a useful tool all his career, but I recently came to think he was never "in the club" himself. You know, not one of these bloodline freaks.
I just found out yesterday that Trump held a short press conference featuring Tim Ballard some time during his presidency. I don't have the original link, but it's rebroadcast here:
Trump Breaks when Tim Ballard Describes Human Trafficking happening at the Border!SOUND OF FREEDOM
(The title is overblown; he's quite calm throughout.)
Just another example of something pointed out long, long ago:
You hypocrites! Well did Isaiah prophesy of you, when he said: ‘This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me; in vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.’”
Yes, I'm certainly familiar with Biglino's work and recommend it to those (regrettably few) that already express an interest in that area. Otherwise it's like throwing ping-pong balls at a brick wall. And as time goes on, I think more and more that it's not ethically sound even to expose people to knowledge you know they will reject. Still up in the air.
A few notes on Biglino and his work you might find of interest:
First--and not that you should be taking anyone's word on such things--but as strange as his findings are, I came to all the same conclusions (and beyond) before I'd ever heard of him. And it was through an entirely different approach: he from translation and etymology, and myself through Sumerian mythology. Impossible to think that we arrived at the same place simply by happenstance. Far easier to believe that we both just arrived at the truth.
Second, I believe he says less than he knows and thinks. This goes back to what I mentioned in the first paragraph. He's in a deeply Catholic country, and this type of research is... beyond challenging to that context. You'd have more success going around telling every Italian that he was adopted. So he goes more into detail and less into sweeping implications (which is what I'm interested in).
Third, I think They are in the process of "turning" him, which is a big disappointment. I saw he was interviewed by the highest-profile disinformation agent in this area, Graham Hancock. I haven't yet had the heart to actually watch it because I fear the worst. Another researcher from over twenty years ago, Alan Alford, was turned in such a way. I could name many others that exist just to send you off into the weeds, so always keep your wits about you even with Mauro.
Final note on "Westworld": what I said only applies to Season 1 of the recent reboot and none of the rest of the franchise. I scraped Season 2, being well aware of what I was looking for and found virtually nothing. The, uh, "message senders" had apparently moved on.
It's all over my head, really. The thrust of my research seems to have turned out to be just giving an account of the available evidence to some level of satisfaction. Just trying to make all the pieces fit together in a sensible way. That's deep enough, as you might imagine.
I just wandered my way in to it all, but the account I ended up with is beyond strange, way past anything the vast majority of people could even imagine to be true, let alone entertain the evidence for. Although it's a satisfying level of knowledge, it's quite lonely.
But as far as fiction, myth and legend, I've found a tremendous amount of truth buried and ignored there, completely passed by. As an example (and a central one), I found that the Bible, particularly the OT, was an account of the interactions of some humans with the powerful aliens that created us. As strange as that sounds, it connects up with and is expanded by what the much more ancient Sumerians wrote about their interactions with their "gods".
And as strange as that all sounds, it was confirmed by subtle but unmistakable clues and references planted in Season 1 of "Westworld". Can you even imagine that? Almost no one can, which is why they can put these signals out so freely.
I couldn't make any of this up if I tried for a century.
As to the last thing you mentioned, free will, I think that's a crucial aspect of what's going on but not in the sense everyone seems to think. Rather than being something to do with some "cosmic" or "karmic" sense of it, I think it's much more concrete. That is, I think a deal was put in place a long time ago and has been playing out since then, and here is the clearest description I've found of it:
Because of his arrogance, Allah banished Iblis from heaven and condemned him to hell. Iblis accepted his fate, but asked that he might be spared until Judgement Day so that he could tempt humans from the path of righteousness and lead them to the same fate that would eventually befall him. Allah granted this, but did not give Iblis power over humans. Instead, if they were to be led from the righteous path, it would have to be because of their own temptations and transgressions.
So do I think it's about supernatural beings from some divine realm? Not at all. I think very real events took place on very real Earth in the very real past, but the evidence of them has been mythologized, fractured, rewritten, misinterpreted, smeared together, hidden, destroyed, etc, etc., but the tiny pieces remain that we have to try to put together.
So we can start to form explanations for things we find. Did Pike, out of nowhere, think serving a non-existent Lucifer was a great idea and that fooling people into it over decades was the best way to go? No, he was just a player in a much bigger game to be played according to certain rules that would be enforced at the end.
And how about demons, or aliens, or breakaway Elites with advanced technology: If they're so powerful, why don't they just put the zap on all of us sheep? Either they're not powerful or it's not allowed, and they're afraid of forfeiting or being punished at the end. Which, of course, entail the existence of an enforcer.
But the big picture, as I see it, is that the best way for your opponent to beat you at a game is prevent you from even knowing you're playing one at all.
The more you pay attention, the more you notice They don't want us paying attention. There's a "blind spot" firmly affixed over Phoenicia.
From a totally different direction, there's another example from what you might consider a suspicious organization: the Freemasons. They have as a central figure "Hiram Abiff" that helped build Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem, but they take great pains to tell us this fictional character has absolutely no relation to the historical King Hiram I of Tyre that helped build Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem.
Don't they want the cred that Abiff was a real historical person, and not just made up like the rest of their nonsense? Very strange indeed! Well, there is some indication of what I think They don't want us looking into.
Hiram's predecessor was Abibaal ("my father is Baal") and his successor was Baal-Eser I ("Baal is foremost"). Seeing a theme here? Is it striking a chord?
So if I was one of Them, I wouldn't want anyone putting this together either.
After coming to learn something of the central importance of Phoenicia in world history and down to current events, I've come to notice what seems to be a deliberate effort to mentally separate Phoenicia from the Israelites and other societies in the region.
In reality, of course, there was little separation One example is from the Hebrew alphabet itself:
An example of related early Semitic inscriptions from the area include the tenth-century Gezer calendar over which scholars are divided as to whether its language is Hebrew or Phoenician and whether the script is Proto-Canaanite or paleo-Hebrew.
But how many people ever mention this? Few to none. My "conspiritorial" point here is that this should draw our attention even more strongly towards Phoenicia.
There's an interesting part of this video that's always cut off from the end.
As the gathering is breaking up, James Mattis is standing near Trump but turned away. He's looking at Lindsay Graham a few rows back. Well actually, he's staring a fucking hole in him and Graham looks like a schoolboy caught by the principal jacking off. A smooth operator made extremely uncomfortable.
So Mattis turns out to be Deep State and I think we all know Lady G was Deep State all along. So what the hell was going on there? IDK, TBH.
My point is that when analyzing the world, there are wheels within wheels and players may change sides from time to time. But then, how foolish do you have to be to think it was any other way?
Trump is what I think of as a "closeted truther", and I'm pretty damn sure everyone here is closeted to a certain extent. (You're not going to ruin another Thanksgiving, are you?)
Here's a tweet from 3/12/2012, long before he was involved in politics:
When I was 18, people called me Donald Trump. When he was 18, @BarackObama was Barry Soweto. Weird.
Frankly, I don't even mention such thing in "polite company".
To answer seriously: basically yes.
I'm of the extreme minority opinion that Hunter has been dead of an accidental overdose since shortly before "Biden" was inaugurated. Since then, as I watch the steady stream of Hunter Biden antics go by grabbing everyone's attention--mainstream and conspiricist alike--I realize this show could go on forever and no real Elite is in any danger.
I say to myself, "If Hunter hadn't died, it looks like it would have been worth killing him." As to "enjoyment", well that's up to the individual.
I've often wondered about this and the numerous similar situations. No one at NASA has good reason to think the Moon landings were faked? Can't some people in the CIA figure out the USG was involved in 911? How many other big giant mysteries are there that no one on the inside seems to crack open and revolt at what they find?
To square these many circles I went back to the symbol They never tire of showing us: the pyramid. I suspect that at every level, insiders are given a different set of lies. The dumb ones believe them. The smart ones, well... they "believe" them.
Say what you will about the Elite, but I think they choose who they work with very carefully.