Just as a rule of thumb I always go by, "If I can think it up sitting around the house, then They can think it up too, and have huge networks and billions in resources to follow up on it." It puts a lot of "crazy ideas" squarely in the realm of possibility.
I always kinda speculated that they could just use textual analysis of social media to find candidate nut cases. Of course, the terribly confounding problem with that is that about 98% of them would be some type of paid shills, maybe even some of their own. And they're just soulless buttholes, not the nut cases they're looking for.
There could not possibly be less effort put into a psychodrama: a trip to Old Navy, flags from Amazon, and poles from Home Depot. Not even a script.
BTW, their wiki page lists 5 other "affiliated" organizations, so the FBI is now just openly telling us who else in on the payroll.
Miles Mathis breaks down direct evidence that Intelligence organizations have been monkeying with the original source material in this paper: Dolly's Braces (7-page PDF)
As always, I add the caveat that Mathis is ultimately disinfo. Evidence is evidence, but tread carefully with interpretations and especially with broad conclusions.
Just one part of the puzzle, but here's a post that describes highly unusual requests by the government for specific lots numbers of the vax. The suggestion is that only certain lots contained some fraction of weaponized doses. The weaponized doses had to be diffused to hinder easy detection.
not sure where else to put this...
Other sources indicate that the average rate of weaponization was about 5%.
Does anyone else smell the stench of BS emanating from just the headline?
I noted the author is Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert. Who knows if there's any connection, but Julius Lippert was one of the original Nazis and Reichkommissar of Berlin.
After a quick review of his wiki page, I suspect he was a crypto-Jew and one of the small team sent by the Zionists into Germany which recruited the "true believers" like Hitler and Hess and Goebbels, and built the NSDAP.
We find out once again that the Constitution, the law, and the courts are solely tools that serve the powerful as a veil of legitmacy when forcing their will on the people. Otherwise, they are ignored as if they did not exist or defied outright.
I believe that Russia will take this matter to it's conclusion, and that they never would have begun unless they believed they would prevail. I also speculate that Yeltsin knew this time would come, and hand-picked Putin to be the man to rebuild Russia and be ready when the time came.
You know what I find to be the biggest problem for me, personally? The shadow-banning of individual comments.
I mean, if I can cast my pearls before even one swine who may benefit from them, so be it. But if I cast my pearls before zero swine, yeah, that's definitely a waste of time. And I can look it up whether it was suppressed using reveddit, but the effort is already expended.
Perhaps you should have examined my point a little more closely. UFOs may or may not be real, but if you take the government's word for it one way or the other, well, you're doing something I would consider foolish.
To get to the bottom of any mystery, precise thinking is required.
I'm sure this nice lady was on her way to purchase some guns and ammo at the flea market to defend her homeland from... uhhhh... oh God, I can't even type this with a straight face.
I think we should also note how incredibly successful this op has been even among "conspiracy theorists". The government stonewalls, lies to, and psyops everyone continually for seven decades, then drops a bunch of ludicrous videos, phantom acronym organizations, and dumbass military and Intelligence personnel to promote them, and almost all these supposed "critical thinkers" say, "Ooooooh, disclosure at last!"
I'm not mad, conspiracy theorists. I'm just disappointed.
Perhaps it's only an intuition developed over time that leads one to ask the question in the first place, but it's still a question everyone should ask themselves about this and other similar stories: what precisely leads me to believe any of this actually happened, instead of simply being a narrative typed into a Word document?
I agree with this analysis, and I believe it extends to all other areas of life where "normies" reject evidence out of hand. What I liken it to is the way many of us were teased as children: being told we were adopted. Sound silly? Let me explain.
As a child, if another child told you that were told you were adopted, it would certainly be quite a significant revelation and alteration to your worldview. Rationally, you should have asked them for all the information they had on the matter, discussed with them the context and reliability of it, etc.
But that's not what happened, was it? You immediately rejected the claim, never asked for proof, perhaps even attacked the claimant. In hindsight, that is quite a perverse reaction, is it not? Well, not really, not if you look deeper for the true context.
You see, your subconscious evaluated the claim and found that it could plausibly be true. And here is the key: it also found that you had absolutely no ability to deal effectively with this alteration to your world and you place in it. None.
This is an extreme form of cognitive dissonance and demanded immediate action. Since nothing was to be done about the effects of the claim, the claim itself had to go. In what is really an act of psychic self-defense, the claim is violently rejected.
So reasoning with people in such a state is fruitless. It'll work about as well as soothing a child with, "For most practical and legal purposes, adopted children are treated identically with natural children." See how well that goes over.
You have to add in the campaign before, plus a year and a half after when he's supposedly only a "private citizen". If this is all an Establishment pantomime because "he's in on it", they're doing a hell of a job.
If you take the alternative view that he's for real and they're scared shitless of him, well, the pieces fall into place far more neatly.
This, to me, is politics/human psychology in action. Tulsi surely knows that this is about much more than a "political settlement when prospects for total victory seem unfavorable".
I'm certain she is aware that the Neo-Imperialists tried to use Ukraine as a hammer against Russia and it ended up being the anvil, and that the more dead Ukrainians there are, the better to portray Putin and Russia as the villains. And we can all fantasize about her or someone else saying that aloud on the mainstream media, but really, what would be the reaction among the viewing public?
Would it be productive? Or would it provoke the Neo-Imperialists into even more insanely violent actions? And we can all believe that we would shout the truth at every camera, but there's no blood on our hands as we type words on the Internet.
It's weird they're dredging this up after so long. It's even weirder because the assassination was faked, so you'd think that after everyone bought it they'd just let it slip into "history". The iconic photos with the busboy are phony, and upon close inspection, quite bizarre.
Goes to show what They can get away with just because no one is really looking.
Some years ago, they began to suggest people start walking places instead of driving to "fight climate change". Then some joker just had to run the numbers to find that, yes of course, walking produced more greenhouse gases than driving.