Ever since discovering certain deeper truths about the world and its history, I've listened quite keenly indeed to exactly what those at higher levels believe (or at least say they believe) about these matters.
I've come to the conclusion that at each higher level of the pyramid, yes, they are told a few new truths but they are also given a fresh set of lies. I would guess that the dumb ones believe the lies, and the smart ones believe it's best to believe the lies.
For example, all these high occultists like Blavatsky and Pike and particularly Crowley are full of nonsense. Unless you really, really know what you're doing I would tell everyone to stay away from their work.
I suspect that there are at most only a handful at the very top that know the full truth. We shall certainly never know their names, because their non-existence makes them invulnerable.
The whole concept of a "food calorie" probably has some relation to the use of energy in the body, but it is certainly not direct and may be entirely useless. Calories in food are measured using a device called a "bomb calorimeter", which measures the total heat content of a food sample by reducing it to ashes.
Does your digestive system function like a bomb calorimeter? If it does, I suggest you go see a doctor.
Here are a couple of articles that point to a certain structure being implemented in the context of the IRS. You may or may not give credence to these articles, but I consider myself a relatively critical observer of such things and I can't find the obvious BS in them:
To me, that reflected some desperation on the part of the TPTB just in a lame effort to blackwash Putin. That is, if the mainstream acknowledges the possibility that body doubles are used, then does that not redeem all the "nutball" conspiracy theorists who claim that Biden is a body double?
If this is brought up to a normie, it increases the potential for them to short-circuit and get jolted awake. I feel certain a few "sheeple" broke out of the herd precisely because of this.
Yes, right on target. I didn't mention it, but John Taylor Gatto said that one of the most important imperatives of the "education" system is "the extinction of the imagination". A few years later, a NASA study showed that's exactly what they're doing:
Study Shows We Are Born Creative Geniuses But The ‘Education’ System Dumbs Us Down
I have often thought that perhaps this really is the key to our enslavement. That is, if you are unable to imagine a world much different than it is now, well, you're never going to try to bring it into manifestation, are you?
Look around: the world is filled with people that 100% believe they live in the best of all possible worlds. Hold on! The operative word is "possible". It is explained to them by the authorities that all improvements to the current state of affairs are blocked by and all their problems are to blame on: Trump, or Putin, or climate change, or Christians, or Muslims, or whatever other phantom or enemy of the NWO..
Thus, almost everyone lives in the best of all possible worlds.
There's more, but here are just a few pieces of the puzzle:
By the time I figured out "Putin" was a body double, the last place I recalled seeing the real one was on a visit to a sub base in Severodvinsk in Sept 2013. When I went back to look at the Sputnik article, it had been scrubbed, as were all other references to that visit. This raised my suspicions.
I had learned long ago that strategic missile subs on patrol go the the safest place on the Earth: the bottom of the ocean under the polar ice cap. Even if you could locate them, you can't drop a nuke on them because of the miles of ice. If you approach on a sub, they'll hear you coming far, far away and kill you if you get near
Russia launched their latest fast attack boat, the "Severodvinsk", in Dec 2013. I thought, "What if Putin hid out and got on that boat? Or maybe they just lied and it really put to sea in September?" Just a crazy thought, but then again I couldn't disprove it.
One thing I noticed was that, as big a thorn in their side as he was, they never tried to assassinate him. There was nothing like an assassination attempt, not even the rumor of one. They did kill one of Putin's drivers in a remote-controlled car crash, so it wasn't like they were totally incapable.
What finally sealed it for me was an incident in July 2019 involving the Russian research submersible "Losharik". That in itself is a long story with many facets, but what stands out is that that boat can dock with other subs underwater. When the "accident" occurred, it had been filled to the brim with Russian Navy brass, a number of whom were killed. At the memorial service, held in secret, it was said that a "planetary catastrophe" had been avoided.
My theory? That boat was used either to ferry command staff to Putin's boat, or for Putin and his staff to use it to exchange boats every so often, and she had been attacked during one of these operations.
As I say, there's a bunch more, but if you haven't bought into it this far the other stuff would be meaningless. Real "Tom Clancy-esque", though, wouldn't you say? And trust me, I'm not creative enough to make anything like this up.
Yeah, I figured the real Jong Un was dead. I think they poisoned him because he "got sick" and was out of sight for about three weeks. I think NK was captured by the CIA from inception, and that Jong Un was a patriot and reformer who intended to break his country free. Notice how famously he got along with Trump? It's too bad he's gone, but hopefully his sister has the same idea that he did.
Putin was also replaced starting about 2010. The new and current one attended public functions to get people used to him while the original still met with people for working purposes until 2013.
The next part sounds kooky: in September of that year, he boarded a sub and went under the Arctic ice cap and has been battling the NWO from there ever since. Yeah, I get how that sounds, and I wouldn't believe it either except for the big pile of evidence that everyone ignores pointing towards that conclusion.
You have to ask how any of this could possibly be necessary when almost everything is online these days? Can't they just seize any and all of your accounts through a court order to your service provider? And if you need to be arrested, why don't they just call the local cops?
Oh, what am I saying? That's not what violent tyranny is about.
Last night when they turned on the firehose for the "tRuMp NuKe DoCs!" campaign, the user count was over 55K at one point. Since probably about 5K oft those are legit, I think your calculation of 90% is correct.
They're losing and getting more and more desperate. The shill posts have never been more obvious and they're all stuck on zero upvotes. The more pathetic it gets, the more I rejoice.
I love paranormal stuff, bit I've regrettably come to the conclusion that the whole "Skinwalker Ranch" narrative and all associated personalities are another long-running ghey op.
You can trace the assets to their other connections to identify all the other ops, starting with George Knapp and his replacement, Jeremy Corbell.
It really makes me sick how people buy into this nonsense so avidly. It's no wonder TPTB have a free hand when so many are hypnotized by this type of manufactured spectacle. And they say people are crazy when they see the Virgin Mary.
Most people think a rogue military couldn't exist, and certainly not US forces. If nothing else, the Federal government could just cut off funding, right? Well, now we see that they really don't need any funding from the government.
So Trump announces that the US is pulling out of Syria but no one actually leaves. They don't need his approval or his money. And what the hell is he going to do about anyway?
The Russians bombed a metric fuckton of these tankers once, and the Ministry of Defense published gun camera footage of the strike directly on their website. I distinctly remember PBS reporting it as an American strike and showing the Russian footage. Probably had to crop out the Cyrillic (as if anyone who watches PBS for news would ever notice).
When the mainstream press asked one of the government spokesholes about the Russian strike and why the US hadn't bombed the tankers themselves, he said, "Well, of course we knew all about them and could have destroyed them any time, but do you know what kind of an ecological disaster that would cause? The Russians are completely irresponsible."
We would all be farther along in life if we had 1% of that level of psychopathy.
You might wish to look up the Sumerian King List, which traces a list of kings back to 430,000 BC. It's dismissed out of hand as some sort of fantasy, but as you study it, ask yourself the same question I did: "Did someone just make this up out of thin air?"
Given that I'm referring you to it, I think you know my personal response to that question.
I can almost guarantee that you're not going to find what you're looking for. The reason I say that is because I've looked at the work of many researchers of these kinds of topics, and find that they either don't take it as far as I have or are heading off in the wrong direction, or both.
I also don't think anything is coming in the near future, because I frequently find pieces of evidence and think, "People way smarter and more knowledgeable than me have been studying these things for centuries or longer. In all that time, how have they never taken note of the importance of what I just found?" I'm still quite shocked at what's been missed that I found laying in plain sight.
I've thought about writing it up myself, but from my experience people are not open to it, and that goes double for people actually researching these topics. They grow attached to their ideas, and speculation is far easier than disciplined research. And what's probably worse, at a deep level, I think almost everyone finds the kind of things I have to say far too threatening to their worldview. Easiest just to reject it.
All that being said, I recommend to you the works of Lloyd Pye, Mauro Biglino, Michael Tellinger (his early work, as he's totally lost the plot lately) and of course, Zecharia Sitchin. Interesting note, though: I'm recommending Sitchin blindly as I've only ever read a couple of paragraphs of his many books. When I came to many, many of the same exact conclusions he did (as I understand them from secondary sources), well, that really sort of says something about the accuracy of the analysis, doesn't it?
Best of luck with your studies!
One data point to keep in mind is that the AJ trial was initiated by TPTB themselves. Not many CTists discuss it any more since it's been fairly thoroughly documented by works like "We Need to Talk about Sandy Hook" and the book you posted. If someone can get through those and still think anything about it was real, I hope I never have to interact with that person in any way.
I've finally settled on the thesis that the motivation for the AJ trial is to scare anyone from publishing or speaking on false flag narratives for fear of legal repercussions. There is also a powerful second order effect of the family and friends of such people. Like if you try talking about some FF with your buddy and he says, "Hey man, you need to drop that. Gay frogs is harmless, but don't you know what happened to yelling fat man? People really died! You gotta smarten up!"
I was going to make a technical point about the title of the book, and while doing a quick search to refresh myself, I came across a glaring anomaly. But first, the technical point.
One of the teachers killed (allegedly) was Lauren Rousseau. IIRC, it was her car in the parking lot which had three bullet holes in it. Only two were pictured. One was right below the window, and where the paint had chipped off in a circle around the hole itself there were several spots of rust. The other hole, in the A-pillar, was--get this--outgoing. Also, in the DNA analysis done by the forensics lab, I believe it was Rousseau's blood that was found on a cartridge inside of one of the still loaded magazines.
Sherlock Holmes might tentatively hypothesize that Rousseau was killed quite some time before the "event", maybe in her car, and by the same person that loaded the magazines. So maybe nobody died at Sandy Hook, but someone may actually have died.
The anomalous fact I came across is that after all this time and all the attention to SH in all the media, there are still five children whose pictures have never been published. Yeah, you heard that right. Here's the article from 8/5/2022:
So if anything about the latest AJ trial was real, he would have pursued the line that neither these five nor any of the other fifteen children were real people. Seriously, the parents of these five, if subpoenaed, were going to claim they had never taken any photos of their child? Or that they had destroyed them all? Is there a jury in the land that would buy that, even one with only Democrat voters?
Your wish is granted!
So one claim I make is that Nimrod and Satan are one and the same. I'm not quite sure that it's stated concisely anywhere, but I think few doubt that Satan was the leader of the Fallen Angels. In the Book of Enoch, when the Fallen Angels were sent down to Earth they landed at Mount Hermon..
On the southwestern slope of Mt. Hermon are the ruins of an ancient megalithic fortress. The name of it? Nimrod Fortress.
Once we tentatively conclude that Satan was a real entity and that this was his residence for a time, another couple of pieces of anomalous evidence seem to slide into place.
This fortress is located at the northern end of the disputed Golan Heights. Israel seized the Golan in 1967 and has since then defied all loud international outcry over the theft. enduring lots of bad publicity, but they just hang on. In all that time, they have not developed it either militarily or economically with projects and settlers. What could be their point? Maybe there's more to Hermon than we know, and someone instructed them to hold on to it at any cost. Who could order such a thing? The guy at the top of the pyramid?
And you've heard that there was a War in Heaven, right? Well maybe some of it took place on Earth because the Nimrod Fortress is very heavily damaged with wreckage of scattered blocks in 3 areas. They claim it was done by some Crusaders, but I don't believe that for a second. Here's a description of the damage from a mainstream source, Characterization of the different masonry styles and their earthquake footprints at Qal’at al-Subayba:
The Massive masonry is restricted to the Northwestern Tower and adjacent stone wreckage . This masonry is characterized by rusticated, trapezoid ashlar of 2–5 m width, 1–2 m height, 1–2 m depth block, weighing between five and 30 tons each
I don't think Tomahawk missiles scatters 30 ton blocks around. Further, it's yet another site that, well, does not seem like humans with their technology of the time could have built:
The outer face of the stones’ surface is rough, but their contours are delicately and accurately cut and each stone was carved individually to fit snuggly to its neighbors.... The quality and precision of the stone dressing are outstanding and, despite their size, each stone was individually fashioned for distinctive shape and role
It seems to me more like the site of a physical clash between two very powerful factions, and not the result of some spiritual struggle between Man and his inner nature or some such thing.
Yes, you got it exactly correct. If that's a thesis you choose to follow up on, I'd say what you should keep always present in mind is that these were real beings doing real things. I suggest that keeping this discipline will help clarify many issues. They weren't supernatural entities in some mystical struggle of cosmic whatever.
Which leads to the issue of symbolism. From my observation, almost everyone gets carried off into nonsense. The huge problem is that analysis of symbolism is very frequently unfalsifiable and--worse--those who analyze it don't even try to falsify their own analysis.
Take the current example and the text quoted from the Book of Jasher. My read of it is something like this: It looks like Nimrod was trying to trying to construct some kind of space travel facility because he and his crew had been marooned on Earth, and we don't fully understand all these strange details because the people that handed down the stories were themselves barely out of the Stone Age and did not understand it themselves, although they knew it was important and tried their best. (BTW, I would claim the story of the Tower would have been about 10,000 years old by the time it was written down.)
A more common analysis is something like, "Man had the hubris to challenge God with a tower that reached to Heaven and towers are penis symbols and God (who is a woman) by smashing the tower symbolically smote the patriarchy, and then symbolically...." Well, you get the picture.
So on the one hand we can look for more intersecting evidence and try better to understand the evidence we already have. On the other hand we can just keep lashing one thing to another, with no hope or even effort at refutation.
So if you're a fan of my kind of approach, let me know and I'll give you a tasty morsel about Nimrod, intersecting with what we have talked about here, that I have never seen anyone talk about.
A common reaction to this is probably something about how this is a reflection of the degradation of society and how the young people or today something-or-other. But being of a conspiratorial mindset and knowing the grand scale on which the world is run, I suspect there is something deeper.
I just can't get the thought out of my head that there is some small group somewhere that has been working for decades monitoring data and events related to this and subtly shaping trends and forces to bring about this very outcome, part of the larger goal of weakening and destabilizing society, and thusly making it easier to dominate.
I think conspiracy theorists are going to have make up a new term to deride and dismiss people like me who think dark forces are operating at the highest levels to shape our world, because "conspiracy theorist" is already taken.
To put a finer point on it, I would suggest that they give themselves over to deception. I would analogize to those in the military who operate in the mode that they are there to "follow orders". I know officers receive specific training that they are only bound to follow lawful orders, but when push comes to shove how many have internalized that and are actually willing to explicitly disobey? Very few.