Perhaps I'll just attempt to clarify a few points.
A fundamental point is to start with the concreteness of the situation. That is, the Anunnaki were flesh and blood beings. Well, we're flesh and blood beings also. There is nothing strange or unusual about that. We live on one planet and they live on another.
About 420,000 years ago, they traveled from their planet to ours. We--at least our machines--travel from our planet to other, and we will surely do so personally in a few decades or centuries. Again, nothing unusual.
The Anunnaki genetically-engineered us humans from their own genomes and those of a primate. We do so now, including the prospect (or reality) of alterations to our own genome. So once again, nothing extraordinary.
They are part of each of us and we lived alongside them for a very long time. The point here is that there is nothing unusual about seeing human-like in behavior and motivations in them. In fact, that is the opposite way to describe the case. We learned our behavior from them.
So of our analysis or interpretations need not and should not yield anything different in nature from the mundane world we see around us every day. Keep in mind there is nothing supernatural or metaphorical or transdimensional about any of it. That path yields only confusion and fanaticism and a kind of madness, and that has been the universal path historically.
Then you have to keep in mind that the humans who lived through those times, from the Sumerians to the Hebrews, obviously thought the interactions to be vitally important and sought to record them.
The problem was that they were incredibly primitive by our standards. In societies where light came from fires and only birds flew through the air, they could only dimly and imperfectly understand what they saw and heard. They could only do their best at recording their experiences.
Enlil, as he was known to the Sumerians, was the leader of the expedition to the inner Solar System. Enki was something akin to the chief of Earth operations. The expedition comprised something like 600 individuals in total.
Marduk was something like a general, and we find in the Bible that Michael and Gabriel were also generals, each commanding 200 Anunnaki. Marduk was distinguished in that he was of royal blood, so to speak. According to the Sumerians, only 12 individuals in the expedition held a "numerical rank" reflecting this.
Enlil told Moses to call him Yahweh, but a close study of the Hebrew text shows that's not a name at all but something like, "I am who I am". The important part of that is only that we're dealing with the same being who went by a number of names. Again, the Ugaritic people knew him as Shalim.
The fundamental conflict arose between Enlil and Marduk over how to regard us, this slave species they had created. Enlil, which to say Yahweh, undergoes a profound change of view in the Old Testament itself. Oddly, no "authorities" ever seem to notice this.
Enlil starts out seeing us as mere beasts of burden. He even orders Abraham to kill his own son. However, Enlil evolves just as we humans (hopefully) evolve our views. He comes to see that we are not only equal to the Anunnaki in innate value, but that we have the possibility to exceed them in worth.
Marduk does not evolve, and to him we are mere cattle with which the Anunnaki may do as they please. Well, one can see there is no compromise between the two positions.
It appears they arrived at the possibility of reaching a settlement, with which both could prove their point: If, after some test period, humanity could free itself from the domination of Marduk, then we would have proven our worth and would remain free. If, however, humanity was seduced and deceived by Marduk and he came to dominate us, then he would have been proven correct and would continue to dominate as he saw fit.
Also, Marduk is not allowed to use any advanced technology since that would settle nothing. You can't demonstrate your superior strength or inner worth by shooting someone, right?
Anyway, we're in that testing period right now.
PS: The Garden of Eden Incident concerns the true nature of human consciousness. That is also wrapped up in this test but is a longer story.
You may want to examine the "origin story" of Shahar more carefully, as it provides a fairly specific fingerprint. It goes something like this:
"The king of the gods encounters two women and one thing leads to another. Half-brothers are born, the elder named for the dawn, Shahar, and the younger for the dusk, Shalim."
Isaiah 14:12 then says Lucifier is "ben Shahar", who would be the son of the elder half-brother. This alone is quite odd, although no one comments on it: why does the Old Testament author who surely had knowledge of the pantheon of Ugarit assert that Lucifer has a father, a grandfather, an uncle who is only a half-sibling of his father, and that his father was the elder?
Well, that's because he were talking about a real entity who, like all the rest of us, is at the center of a unique genealogical fingerprint. In this case, we can match up that fingerprint.
In the Sumerian pantheon, Anu was the king of the gods. He had two sons by two different women. The elder was Enki and the younger was Enlil. Enki had two sons, Marduk and Ningishzidda.
Isaiah does not specify which son but upon further investigation it is clearly Marduk who is being referred to. For example, even within the Bible itself, a verse states that "Baal and Nabu" have bent the knee. Nabu is the son of Marduk.
Thus also, Marduk was Baal. "Baal" is a general title but in almost all cases historically refers to Marduk, given his enormous role in human affairs.
To extend a tiny bit further, we can determine that that Enki was the "god" of the Old Testament. His city--the city of his people--was Jerusalem. The name derives from "uru shalem", which can be translated as "the city of Shalim".
It is the conflict between Enki/Shalim and Marduk/Satan which has determined much of human history, a conflict which continues to the present day.
I've not yet written a TL/DR for the Salem Witch thesis. The posts on them have evolved into basically a series of research notes just to get a bit of data organized and out there as I complete it.
I'm shooting for it, but the day will probably never come when I get around to collecting it all back up and organizing the material more formally. I've already written up probably 350 pages and that is--at a guess--just 5% of the evidence I've gathered and need to formally document.
The basic thesis, however, is simple: a small number of generational Satanist families have been manipulating history and dominating society for centuries. The evidence I have available begins with Europeans landing in North America. It involves primarily US history but tendrils lead farther afield.
How could one possibly demonstrate such a thing? Surprisingly, through genealogy. They "keep it in the family" so the same families pop up over and over and over. It turns out that a lot of those families--though there are some others that have turned up--participated in the artificially-manufactured and fake Salem Witch Trials. That provides a reliable touchstone.
One of my favorite posts which demonstrates the basic strategy of proof is:
Broomstick Crash at Roswell: A shocking number of people involved in the “Incident” have the same last name as people involved in the Salem Witch Trials (conspiracies.win 12/6/2024)
One could consider that One Big Coincidence, but I've written up (I never count) maybe 60 other such Big Coincidences in numerous area of history and to the present day.
Roswell is just one nugget of gold among many that are lying around in the field, but I always liked it because so so so many disinfo agents and dupes run around basing their theses on it being real in some sense or another.
Because the analysis directly contradicts this and holds that both the "crash" and the "coverup" at Roswell were totally manufactured, you can instantly dispense with all that other material. You can even begin trying to figure out who was a dupe and who is deliberately lying.
And if you go back over that other Roswell material, there is zero way whatsoever you could get to the Salem Witches from it. That's why I consider it a new paradigm, and why "They" have been able to hide so successfully for so long.
believing themselves very smart and good
I've come to understand this as key. It holds true for virtually everyone, from CNN anchors to the Rothschilds to Redditors typing out walls of text. They absolutely believe they are on a crusade for "good". All who disagree with them must be wrong and bad, of course.
Nor will they ever question it because it is an assumption with which they begin. Damn few have the level of consciousness to ever wonder whether they've been the dummy and the dupe and wrong all along.
For those who wish to control and manipulate society, they need not crush opposition under a bootheel. They just get them pointed in a slightly wrong direction then tell them what a great job they're doing. Their ego then makes those people run away from the truth under their own power.
Not Enki, but his son Marduk.
The best and most explicit place to start is Isaiah 14:12. Everyone starts with this "son of the morning star" stuff in English and jumps off from there. You have to go to the original Hebrew and properly decode "helel ben shahar".
Long story short, you have to research who Shahar was in the Ugaritic pantheon. Then you can compare his immediate family to that of Enki and you come up with Marduk. If that verse isn't referring to Marduk, then it is all one hell of a coincidence.
Once you have "Marduk = Satan" as the thesis, a ton more evidence can finally be properly interpreted and will fall right into place. All of that evidence has to be unspun and descrustified because dumbass has had their shot at bending the evidence towards their desired conclusions over the last few centuries.
For example, Marduk was the tutelary deity of Babylon. Now you can clearly understand why Babylon was talked about so much in the Bible as being a not very good place at all.
Xi is akin to the Trump of China: a reformer trying to clean out the Deep State in his country. Here he is in plain view literally removing a Deep State asset from power:
‘Not feeling well’: China’s ex-leader led out of party congress: The 79-year-old Hu Jintao seemed reluctant to leave with two men who approached him while he was seated next to President Xi Jinping. (Al Jazeera 10/22/2022)
If Xi is supposedly a dictator--as the Western media constantly instructs us--then is this not a bare-faced, prime example of that? Why aren't they shouting about it from the rooftops? I haven't heard this incident mentioned again a single time in the last four years in either the mainstream or the alternative/conspiracy media.
That's because this was a big loss for the Deep State, and when they take an "L" they bury it quickly and completely.
Search around for it and I'm sure you can find it because I heard it somewhere along the line in my research.
The thing which I found odd was that he says something like, "OMG, she killed the kids!" "The kids"? Not "my children" or "our children" or their names?
It was another mark of the phoniness of the whole thing but there's zero way that would count as evidence for anyone that chooses to believe otherwise.
As I have discovered it from personal research, the true (or at least far truer) state of affairs is quite shocking, so much so that few would have the capacity to even entertain the concepts.
The fatal problem is that it exists in a different paradigm than that discussed by Corbett or Jones or any other conspiracy researcher, whether authentic or disinfo. They will all just keep everyone running from pillar to post around the "mainstream conspiracy" paradigm while those "at the top" continue their work undiscovered and unstudied, and thus unmolested and unimpeded.
The reason I say the paradigm is different is because there is no accumulation or refinement of the sum of mainstream conspiracy research that will get you anywhere near the truth. They can even metaphorically stand right next it--in plain sight--yet never notice the crucial importance of it.
Virtually all of the evidence I draw on comes right from the normie mainstream. I just collect it up and arrange it artfully. I've often wondered why none of these other researchers--who seem to have dedicated their lives to it for far longer than me--have never noticed the same things I have.
I have come to no conclusion on that point. Certainly they could be paid and directed to notice and discuss other things, that's a simple enough explanation. But all of them? I'm left to speculate that it is not a matter of perception or analysis, but rather what level of truth one is willing to contemplate and accept.
See any of my numerous Salem Witch posts. Far more than what has already been documented is on the way. Find any connection to the work Corbett or Jones or any of the others has done. The work of Miles Mathis is connected, but I never miss an opportunity to highlight and specify how full of disinformation it really is.
Is the work all of them do harmful? I would let everyone judge for themselves but as I see it, one could spend a lifetime ingesting all their work product and die just as ignorant of the true state of affairs as at the beginning. Frankly, I believe that to be the point.
It turns out be Satan, but there are a few advisories I would have to add as quickly as humanly possible:
(1) There is no one who realizes who actually Satan is, or was based on. Every conception is incomplete and distorted.
(2) Satan himself exists in a larger org chart, and understanding that context is a crucial part of the explanation for what's going on right now. So not technically "at the top".
(3) No one needs to have any knowledge of Satan or his plans to be in service to them. All that is necessary is for arrangements to be made so they have the proper incentives to advance the state of affairs. Those servants and any observers may fully and freely believe they are "at the top". That actually aids in the obfuscation.
This is why all the power centers anyone may point to come and go and are replaceable. Off goes one puppet and on goes another but the hand remains. How effective is that when jackasses are running around asserting there is no such thing as a puppeteer?
If you were wondering and so as not to be mysterious, Satan was one of the Anunnaki. That's a helluva long story, as you may imagine.
The way I came to think of Corbett was as a conspiracy "stenographer", I know that's not the correct word but I like it anyway.
Really, it's more akin to a high school student assigned to write an essay on, say, "Rockefeller medicine" or "the CFR". He gathers up a few conspiracy articles, construct an outline, and summarizes and rewrites what is already in those articles.
You'll never get anything novel out of such a process, no shocking revelations, no insight. It's literally all been said before. That's why it is--by definition--not a threat and never will be.
I mean, this is important material if you have no knowledge of the subject whatsoever. The problem--the fault which "They" are exploiting--is that Corbett presents himself as a careful scholar and the reader believes this is the ultimate extent of the research. It is, of course, merely a beginning, and perhaps corrupted and misleading in and of itself.
After listening to all his published audio since inception (a decade?), this realization came to me only after I heard his take on the Ukraine war in 2022. It sounded like he had ripped it right from the headlines of the NYT and WaPo. FFS, how could anyone freely agree with either of them without having some extreme reservations that they had taken a wrong turn somewhere along the line?
I suppose from my own experience that I came to the feel I should have some grace for anyone who doesn't see it this way. But you gotta call 'em as you see 'em.
Corbett is controlled opposition as are Broze and Robinson, although I don't know if that's exactly what you would call it.
All of them have egos too needy and too in control to slow down and consider whether they are off-target. All "They" need do is support and encourage them as they run farther off the track. Assuredly, none of them have the wit nor desire to figure out they're being manipulated.
Corbett has clearly asserted many times previously that no one is at the top. Frankly, he says it as his signal that he has exceeded nearly all conspiracy theorist peasantry. This is the capstone bullshit of his entire career.
If I was at the top, I would absolutely and unequivocally desire that everyone believes there is no one at the top, and to feel themselves superior for holding such a belief. What a laugh that would be.
People who have a problem with the LDS attribute it to something like, "I don't agree with their loony theology," or, "they're a bunch of crypto-Jews". However, it's looking more and more like some very weird shit was going on in the early days.
Coincidentally enough, I'm right now in the process of working up a post following up on the phony Lindsay Clancy psyop. Turns out there was a preceding psyop very closely mirroring it in Ireland involving a woman named Deirdre Morley.
The connection? Turns out there was a heavy-hitter in the early Mormon Church named Isaac Morley. The connections gets wilder from there and you can't even begin to make this shit up.
Thanks for the link!
"RRN" stands for the news site "Real Raw News". I first brought it up just a couple of posts ago in the Susie Wiles post. I discuss a bit about the site itself in that one.
I've been trying for probably five years to definitely disprove any of the very wild shit that gets written up there and have--thus far--failed. As one category, they name certain specific high-ranking serving military officers as being involved in the "White Hats", doing things like executing Deep Staters at Gitmo. If this was all just a bunch of bullshit, have none of these officers heard of it and told them to knock it off? Not so far.
Take another example: RRN reported Fauci's execution at Gitmo way back on 4/25/2022. Could his existence have been faked since then?
Well, I closely followed the case of CA Gov Gavin Newsom, who RRN also reported as being captured then executed. From my own research, they have indeed been faking his continued existence since then. He even got reelected.
So when Fauci has to appear live, he only repeats, "I plead the Fifth!", even to the most trivial questions, no matter how ridiculous and guilty it makes him look. Does it make more sense that that is how you instruct the body double for fear he, say, doesn't know Fauci's birthday or something like that?
Anyway, the material on RRN has finally come to at least a minimal intersection with the Salem Witch research, and you're seeing the analysis of that in these last few posts. Neither RRN nor the White Hats have any suspicion anything like the Salem Witches exist. That's not good news but there you have it.
Glad you're enjoying the posts! Much more "Election Special" material to come.
This is good news. Trump outmaneuvered Them and there's nothing They can do about it without the possibility of making it even worse.
The confirmation is this: The mainstream criticizes and demonizes Trump about anything and everything to an absurd extent about even trivial matters. Why aren't they slamming him for this? CNN doesn't even mention it on their homepage. "We're all gonna die!" That's not so hard to say, is it?
But there's nothing, and that is the anomaly. The reason is that as a basic rule of psychological manipulation, every time They take a big "L", They go silent on it.
People have a lot of other things to think about and they will soon forget, if they even heard about it in the first place. Thus, They never suffered a defeat. Their enemies (who you are to think are your enemies) never did anything for you.
"Their" silence speaks volumes.
PS: People should research the original US v. Miller case, which allowed Federal regulation of short-barreled shotguns in the first place. It's a ridiculously engineered psyop.
When I look around, I observe that the vast majority of conspiracy theorists are crusaders engaged in fights with clouds of smoke. They condemn all who are not fighting the same smoke clouds. And they are exceedingly proud of themselves, as it is clear that they're giving that smoke a helluva beating.
The real powers need only stand outside the smoke, outside the range of the wild swinging.
Haha, it's definitely a lot to process!
As for me, well, I've just had a lot more time exposed to it. You get used to it, in a way. And I always come back to the fact that what's there is there. You can ignore it but it won't go away.
Since I simply do not and will never believe that the Universe is some arbitrary Simulation or or some magical Fantasyland where anything and everything might have or will happen for no reason whatsoever, well, then I've got to try to make some sense of it all.
For example, a couple of days ago I heard about a lame goofball copy of Stonehenge outside of Austin. Never heard of it before but the builder has a Salem Witch name so I do a little research. Within about three steps I'm in Frankfurt in 1868. WTH are the chances of that unless I'm actually tracing something that is really there? Full writeup to come, you know, one of these days.
As always, I greatly appreciate the support!
This has been said before, and was covered by Snopes 13 years ago:
Dr. Leon Eisenberg: ADHD Is a 'Fictitious Disease'? (5/16/2013)
Rumor: Dr. Leon Eisenberg, the 'father' of ADHD, said just before his death that ADHD 'is a prime example of a fictitious disease.'
And what did the source that we have come to know as a top outlet for phony deboonking have to say about the claim more than a decade ago?
Mostly True
The writeup is really pretty good at covering the relevant history, providing numerous specific points of documentation. The real point is this....
This type of information can be available, and in fact can be acknowledged by the mainstream. But the masses don't operate by what information is available and acknowledged by the mainstream. That's not how it works.
They believe what it is convenient for them to believe at any given time. As Yuri Bezmenov pointed out, they are beyond the usefulness of exposure to authentic information. It's like trying to soak water into concrete.
Everyone reading this needs to get beyond these false preconceptions. Well then, what is one to do in this situation? It isn't clear, is it?
Now you're at least pointed in the direction of the real problem.
A thesis as to why the Deep State of the collective West is bent on the destruction of Russia would be quite long and would necessitate a discussion of topics beyond the scope of even the most adventurous conspiracy theorists.
Rather than undertake anything like that, I would suggest that any thesis put forward be evaluated to see if it accounts for an extraordinarily mysterious event that took place just over seven years ago aboard the Russian submarine Losharik.
We're told it was a fire in the battery compartment. This is not uncommon on submarines and they are well-ready to handle these nearly-routine mishaps. That's a cover story and it's total bullshit.
The first anomaly is the scale of the disaster on a crew which would nearly sink the boat from the amount of brass alone. The small sub has an estimated crew complement of 25, and:
Fourteen of the crew were killed by inhalation of smoke or toxic fumes. Seven of those who died held the rank of first rank captain and two were recipients of the Hero of the Russian Federation award. Submarine commander Denis Dolonsky was among those killed.... In comparison, submarine Kursk – which was lost with all hands after a similar disaster – had 118 crew members of whom only two held the rank of captain 1st rank.
It was a huge deal that no one wanted to talk about. The public in the West was--as mentioned--handed an absurd lie which was--as usual--accepted without the slightest question. The Russians did not want to talk about it either, but they kept their mouths shut rather than spew out bullshit.
Almost shut, that is, because statements and events belied how huge a deal it really was:
Dead sailors stopped a 'planetary catastrophe' aboard a secret submarine, a top Russian naval officer said at their funeral (Business Insider 7/8/2019)
"With their lives," the unnamed Russian officer said at a funeral in St. Petersburg, Russia, "they saved the lives of their colleagues, saved the vessel and prevented a planetary catastrophe." The Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, who said he was unaware of the officer's comments, denied that there was any risk of a broader threat.
The July 1 incident remains a mystery, as Russia has declared the details a "state secret." Peskov said last week that all the information about the submarine and its mission are classified at the "highest level," ABC News reported. Even the funeral was secretive, with many in attendance refusing to show their faces or identify themselves to attending media.
And back on the Wikipedia page:
On 5 July, four members were posthumously awarded Hero of Russia while ten members were posthumously awarded Order of Courage.
For a routine accident on a research sub? C'mon.
So what really happened? As I said, it's a very long story. But, again, the point is that whatever explanations are put forward for what the hell is going on with Russia that do not account for this incident can--in my book--be thrown out without further consideration.
PS: If anyone can work "Da Joos" into any of this I'd be shocked.
Thanks very much! I appreciate the support! There's a lot more to come.
And there's good news and bad news about that. The good news is that your pondering will be well-rewarded, and a lot more things in this world will make a lot more sense. The bad news is that there is so much material because these motherhumpers have been all over the map for a helluva long time.
As to why They do what They do, I would suggest that the closest model is to a religion. According to Mark Passio, they have no name for themselves, and only occasionally refer to themselves as "followers of the Old Religion".
Why does anyone follow a religion? For the overwhelming majority, it's because of the environment in which they were brought up. They do what those around them do. All of it is normal, everyone is a good person, and they only do what normal and good people do. Few know where it is all headed and fewer still make policy. At "the end", everyone expects some reward.
The Salem Witches have transcended one aspect of ordinary human life which I rarely bother talking about because for virtually everyone, the concept is unthinkable: power and money are merely tools. Some of Them have such things in abundance but most of Them do not. One could not possibly understand Them without understanding this aspect.
It came out in my research on the Rockefellers that they were a creation of the Salem Witches. The shocking part was that the program to do that took over two and a half centuries.
What groups in human society undertake projects with such a long timeline? None that I know of, but the closest you'll get is the deeply religious. The cathedral builders might come halfway there, but frankly I don't even believe their timelines.
In any case, the richest people in the world were merely another tool of the Salem Witches. Every conspiracy theorist likes to bitch and whine about the Rockefellers but that fits perfectly into the methodology of the Salem Witches. If all you're looking at is John D. and his heirs, you will never see the Salem Witches.
So if you're wondering "how" they progress towards their objectives, they do it in plain sight yet unnoticed. That's because They know that everyone loves to be "right", so They let everyone be "right". Everyone is just right about the wrong things.