1
llamatr0n 1 point ago +1 / -0

the amount deaths and damage is a spurious metric too

population is bigger and has encroached on more fire prone brushland and coasts where the damage happens

2
llamatr0n 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think you're probably right. Sentiment analysis will classify negativity. I'd even go so far as "Not posting any positive stoires at all" would do so.

2
llamatr0n 2 points ago +2 / -0

Discord requests govt. ID if it thinks you are under 18.

Everyone who complied just photos of their ID leaked.

A thing everyone predicted would happen.

2
llamatr0n 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oracle currently needs to find $100bn of additional revenue over the next 4 years to finance their contract terms with OpenAI.

3
llamatr0n 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's fairly obvious but I'm not forced to use my Tesco Clubcard to log into Twitter.

And my Digital ID won't give me cheaper food or let me scan my own trolley, swipe my card and walk out.

2
llamatr0n 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm from the time before computers and, obviously, before the internet.

I was part of the BBS world, phone a guy's phone number and browse his site - the true wild west.

Probably The Dark Web is the equivalent now. Eventually freedom always squeezes our between the fingers of the tyrant.

1
llamatr0n 1 point ago +1 / -0

He explains how they try to control prices. Do you trust a rabbi's word now?

Anyway, Maximizing Revenue is not orthogonal to buyers controlling prices.

1
llamatr0n 1 point ago +1 / -0

They claim inflation but that is only part of the story.

The Rate of Inflation is a measure of the rate of change, not a cause. It is not a force. So already you seem to have misunderstood the topic.

Prices of goods are set by the buyer. People either buy them if they consider them sufficient value or not. Even for goods forced on them such as vehicle insurance, some people opt to take the risk. If it is utilities they work out straegies to reduce consumption.

1
llamatr0n 1 point ago +1 / -0

you have to make it you dolt

and then make things out of it, which involves fumes, chips and dust

are you really that dumb?

1
llamatr0n 1 point ago +1 / -0

or make cobalt non-toxic

bUt It's FoR hEaLth LiGHt

1
llamatr0n 1 point ago +1 / -0

bUt TheY hAvE beeN aLterEd

5
llamatr0n 5 points ago +5 / -0

You wouldn't dare say "you have poor impulsive control and rush to violence as your only solution" to his face.

2
llamatr0n 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't shoot!! I meant legal crime, not moral, in the context of OP's question.

1
llamatr0n 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, if you're trying to prove what you also need to prove "where".

It's one of the US Virgin Islands, there is no jurisdictional doubt.

AlthoughI think the US and UK have sepcific laws about sex tourism with children to prosecute people going to Thailand etc. in their home country.

But she was 16, so legally consenting without coercion in many US states and the UK.

I imagine no actual cash changed hands for the actual sex like a regualr prostitute. Epstein turns up with what seem to be willing girls, you don't force anyone or pay directly. And if they are of legal age, where's the crime?

1
llamatr0n 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because The Burdon Of Proof is lower in a Civil Lawsuit than a Criminal Prosecution.

Preponderance of Evidence VS Beyond a Reasonable Doubt.

"Can you prove Andrew Windsor had sex with you?"

"No"

"Your Honor, I rest my case"

2
llamatr0n 2 points ago +2 / -0

great, fewer funko pops

2
llamatr0n 2 points ago +2 / -0

same old story

2019 look at this fat nigger in our jeans, you mad?

2025 look at this 8/10 jewess in our jeans, you mad?

2
llamatr0n 2 points ago +2 / -0

The phrase "employee engagement" was coined by organizational psychologist Professor William Kahn in his 1990 paper "Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work." Kahn used the term to describe workers' psychological presence and investment in their roles—how much of their physical, cognitive, and emotional selves they brought to their work.

Kahn specifically chose "engagement" because it evoked commitment and personal investment in one's job, in contrast to merely being satisfied or committed in a passive sense. His work set the foundation for subsequent research and popularization of the concept throughout the 1990s and early 2000s.

The concept of "customer engagement" entered the marketing literature later, primarily gaining traction in the early 2000s as companies and academics started to focus on actively fostering deeper, ongoing relationships—and investments—between brands and their customers, especially with the rise of digital and online channels.

16
llamatr0n 16 points ago +16 / -0

"Buy Israeli goods or die"

"No"

"Oh, so you want Jews gunned down in the street eh?"

"I do now"

1
llamatr0n 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm retarded and cocky. For some reason I put Protection not Safety.

Anyway, everyone is focussing on the porn but the actual text says "harmful material" some of which is the stuff in OPs post.

That's why Videy on this site has chosen to bar UK viewers. Why Bitchute is unavailable to UK users, why Spotify has introduced age verification, why X has an algorithm to determine "harmful" content, etc. etc.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›