Tavi תָּוָה (tavah) - "to mark", hence marking (life) stock...
a) How does that jive with the infamous six million?
b) What if the opposite of prophesying outcome implies receiving origin?
c) What would a recipient be without a prophet?
aiming beams at each other for gold
Gold/ghel - "to shine" + beam - "ray of light"...
Turned Lead into Gold
a) Light directs beams apart. Turning against each other while being directed...temporarily shines.
To lead implies to direct...
b) Lead aka "least elastic and sonorous" + Gold aka "most ductile and malleable"...if only form (life) within flow (inception towards death) could be shaped from least elastic and sonorous towards most ductile and malleable.
Metal/mettle... https://www.etymonline.com/word/mettle
for a fraction of a second
Forwarding (inception towards death) a fraction (life) implies seco - "to divide"...
Notice that fract+ion implies the fracture of action into reactions.
Disclaimer...what was written above requires ones self dis-CERN-ment.
gematria
Aka geometry/geomancy... tricking ones mind to measure, hence holding onto suggested values, while ignoring that nature moves values apart from one another, hence establishing formed evaluation (perception) of flowing value (perceivable).
It's the consent of many to the suggestions of few which establishes an "identical numerical value", hence transforming each one (1) into a zero (0).
I'll never downdoot you
Which would imply 1 vs 1 within a conflict of reason. Both numerical values can be different, while VS (versus/verto - to turn) remains identical.
letter-by-letter
Ones consent to another ones suggestion implies one LETTING another one shape LETTERS.
Meanwhile in nature...if form (life) LETS flow (inception towards death); then form perishes faster, hence the need to resist wanted temptations.
For example...hunger and thirst. Does one LET hunger and thirst pass through one, or does one resist by eating and drinking?
according to
TO implies towards aka life being moved from inception TOWARDS death, while accord implies "coming into agreement". If ones mind agrees with being moved towards death, then...?
according to principle
Principle implies origin. Living originates from within the process of dying. Coming into agreement with dying...denies living.
destroy Tokyo with your newfound power.
If that's a Godzilla set-up, then I would much rather hang with my son or throw bananas at King Kong, than risk meeting any of those monsters Toshio Maeda made up in Tokyo.
- Gold/ghel - "to shine"
- Shine/scinan - "shed, send forth, or give out light; be radiant, be resplendent, illuminate"
It's not about holding onto any value...
Pizza sign + six pointed star...
resonance
Aka ones response (re) to all sound (son). One can only be within all if all separates each one from one another. Sound separates instruments...words lure listeners together.
flower of life
a) Life...a formed off-spring of flow (inception towards death).
b) Notice that the suggested flower of life has a circle around it, while form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies linear progression.
c) Flower with six petals? Six/seco (to divide) + petal/pete (to spread) aka all spreading each one by division.
Schumann resonance
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davidsb%C3%BCndler aka binding (bund) division (david)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Serapion_Brethren aka seraphim/seraph - "the burning one"
Hoffmann's colleague in the civil service and first biographer Julius Eduard Hitzig (Hitze; heat)...born Isaac Elias Itzig
A jew-man (schu-mann) binding and burning gentiles...
What do you think is going on here.. are we fucking "done"?
Motion goes on; any matter within gets done.
the "synopsis"
Motion details matter; while few within matter trick many into a synopsis as to obfuscate the details.
us trying to fight these guys
a) Us and these represents an artificial synopsis aka suggested pluralism...being implies each singular one detail within all of nature.
b) The fight is also artificial and based on ones consent to suggested pluralism, hence claiming to be a part of US establishing a conflict against THEM.
Notice that us vs them implies both sides turning (versus/verto - "to turn") against one another...there's the synopsis again.
there used to be whistle-blowers.. but.. that was it.. no more
If one blows a whistle, then one gives up ones position to others.
Notice that whistle and whisper imply the same root, while contradicting each other. It's that contradiction which leads to whistle-blowers being silenced.
Aka ones free will of choice between wanting to hold onto and needing to let go of.
The one suggesting the dollar knows that it has no value, yet the one consenting to the suggestion evaluates it for as long as it's being held onto.
TPTB* do not live in Israel
Israel aka yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" implies each ones position within all aka power of being.
a) Christian implies "to anoint" aka the separation of each being (anointed one) when coming through the birth-channel aka seed growing within s-OIL.
b) A jew suggests idealism, which becomes an idol when a gentile consents to hold onto it. Nature moves perceivable inspiration through each ones perception, while a jew suggests information to tempt gentiles to hold onto it within mind/memory...that's idolatry.
Inspiration cannot be held onto...only drawn from and adapted to on the fly, hence being within (in) the spirit (spir) of action (ation).
c) Contra implies "against"...being implies A GAIN (life) within loss (inception towards death). Only within loss can there be growth.
Nature moves beings within a straight line...a jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentiles to turn inwardly (circular logic) and outwardly (conflicts of reason aka contra aka versus/verto - "to turn").
Suggestion inVERTS perception if held onto...hence idolatry/idealism.
d) To analyze implies to dissect/separate/take apart etc. which is what a partial (ones perception) within whole (all perceivable) is based upon...the differentiation of potential (growth) during procession (loss).
Breathing/eating/drinking implies the dissection of what nature offers, and since nature moves through...each being LYZE ANAL aka the alimentary (life) canal opening (inception) and closing (death).
The opposite of analyzing implies synthesizing, which is what each jew tempts gentiles to do to each other aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka united states/united nations/united kingdom/european union/soviet union aka uniformity/university/unisex/unicef/unicode aka miscegenation/multiculturalism/mass migration/melting pot aka equality through diversity etc.
Nature sets apart...each jew tempts gentiles together.
e) Refute (to beat back) ignores that form (life) cannot beat back flow (inception towards death)...only each other. Refutation implies an artificial conflict distracting from nature admitting (inception) and dismissing (death).
f) Better implies vs worse...a conflict of reason aka one turning against others aka an inversion of nature separating each one apart from one another.
g) Hobby implies the jewish suggestion of favoritism, hence tempting gentiles to favor aka a bias of partiality, hence turning from being a partial into becoming a part of a collective of hobbyists.
Jesus is the mahadi created by the jews
a) Jesus aka je suis (I am) implies each gentile taking possession over oneself, which in return brands any other one a YOU (phonetic jew).
Christ (to anoint) implies the separation of all procession (inception towards death) into each one potential (life). Potential cannot take possession of procession...only onto self (logic) and each other (reason).
b) A jew suggests creationism aka creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing) to tempt gentiles to ignore the transformation of all flow (inception towards death) into each form (life)...not out of nothing; but within everything.
c) All WAS perceivable before anyone within can suggest what it IS.
IS implies fiction (suggestion); WAS implies reality (perception)...only oneself can discern this.
- Chicanery/schikken - "to arrange"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/chicanery
How could one disassemble spell-craft without rearranging? Nature arranges each ones perception after all perceivable... artificial suggestions are arranged in-between ones perception and all perceivable.
For example...etymological chicanery. Etymo-logic-al aka suggested (logic) in-between all (al) perceivable and ones responding senses (etymo). How could one set apart logic without chicanery?
- Coherent aka co (together) haerere (to stick)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/coherent
Free will of choice needs to set apart what other stick together as to remain FREE. A jew suggests coherent thought to stick gentiles together, while ignoring that nature separates each ones perception within all perceivable to allow free thinking.
The coherence you seek represents collective consciousness aka "hive mind"...that's how each jew controls goyim/golem from outside (aboutism).
I'm not sure why i return
Because "mostly_bots" implies an agenda driven username...
why can't we block free-will-of-choice?
a) If it's free; then it can't be blocked...
b) Think about the implication of publicly calling for the blocking of ones free will of choice...on a conspiracy forum.
c) Free will of choice cannot represent a plural (we); only each singular (one).
HOLO (whole) CAUST (to burn) aka burned (life) offering (inception towards death) aka the process of dying kindling (inception) and extinguishing (death) each living flame within.
Remember the little flame demon called "Calcifer" from Howl's Moving Castle? Flame (life) + calcification (to become hardened like bone)...
masonic
Sound sets apart; mag puts together. A jew shapes words within sound to tempt gentiles together, which in return permits each jew to operate apart within sound, while gentiles are stuck together within crafted spells of words.
Freemasonic implies ones FREE will of choice consenting to suggested MAG, while ignoring perceivable SONIC.
Sleight of hand...Sonic the Hedgehog aka hedging (artificially fencing in) and hogging (holding onto) perceivable knowl-EDGE within sound.
"But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." ~ Genesis 2:17
Robotnik aka to nik/nix (cancel) robot/robur (strength)...hence Sonic continuously destroying the EGG of MAN.
what's the deal with golf game
a) Having choice implies being one within whole...golf tempts one to gamble on the chance of a hole in one. An inversion.
b) Using a club to hit a ball into a hole represents an infertility ritual.
c) "The average size of a golf course is between 100 and 190 acres." + "The U.S. military owns 146 golf facilities in 40 states, the District of Columbia and 11 overseas countries, according to the nonprofit Operation Support Military Golf."
That's a lot of private space concealed with little effort from public scrutiny...
d) "Don't let the grass grow under your feet"...a sleight of hand for idleness, which destroys potential (life) during procession (inception towards death).
e) Golf aka gulf...a recess (life) in-between two promontories (inception/death). Another inversion casting life into an abyss aka into a recess (inward indentation in a line of continuity).
Schtroumpf Farceur: "Souhaitez-vous une insulte insinuante enveloppée d'un compliment?"
Thanks...
the matrix code lines
Morpheus scratching himself because his skin is all moldy and ashy...
Who is this person calling himself HaShem
HaShem aka "the name", hence one who ignores person aka per sonos (by sound) when articulating words into names/brands/idols.
To call implies to invoke/summon by voice, which represents a modulation of sound.
Not giving god a name, hence using YHWH aka a transliteration aka a trans (across) liter (letter) implies one choice letting all perceivable sound flow through one, instead of holding onto suggested letters.
Mahdi
Mahadi/hada - "to lead in the right way" implies each leader (life) within the right way (inception towards death)...NOT a follower.
Muslims are being tricked to wait for Mahadi as "divine guidance", while ignoring to discern self as being divided (life) during guidance (inception towards death).
A jew suggests mahdism to tempt gentiles towards outcome, while ignoring origin. Consenting to a suggested -ism makes one a follower, hence a shia/sha'a - "to follow".
they’re vastly overrepresented in the upper echelons of society–nepotism. To do that, we have to know why jews are so nepotistic.
Nepotistic aka favor implies "partiality"...society implies "collective". As long as gentiles hold together, so long does each partial jew control the whole herd of cattle.
Nature sets each one apart from one another...many under few represents an artificial construct based on the ignorance of many to discern self as a singular; not a part of a collective.
Christ implies "anointed one" aka the separation of each by unction aka by each offspring coming through the birth-channel aka the seed of the father moving through the sOIL of the mother...
In short...each jew favors one; each gentile favors many. Guess which one spreads itself thin?
What is The Most Powerful?
a) Power/povoir - "to be able", hence flow (inception towards death) enabling form (life) aka action empowering reactions.
b) Most implies vs less...a conflict of reason among empowered beings who drain each other mutually of power.
c) Full implies fall (inception towards death) empowering rise (life)...the suggested conflict of reason (empty vs full) tempts one to ignore that.
d) IS implies a suggestion tempting ones perception to ignore that all perceivable WAS before one came into being aka before perceivable empowered perception.
Is it gold? Is it oil? Is it money?
Any question tempts power to be spend on waiting for answers, while ignoring to adapt to what empowers.
No
Again a conflict of reason (yes vs no) draining power from one.
With intelligence comes innovation.
More jewish horseshit. Innovate implies being within (in) new (novus), which is based on creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing). A partial (perception) within whole (perceivable) cannot create anything new, only transform everything already offered.
If one chooses to ignore perceivable for suggestion by another, then one ignores perceivable NOW for suggested NEW, and ones consent given to a suggestion implies intelligence/intelligo - "to understand" aka ones choice to stand-under another aka submitting slave setting up a master.
to destroy your enemies
En-e-my aka "within me"...talk about friendly fire. As long as one claims self as "me, myself or I", so long are other ones branded as YOU (phonetic jew), which is why jew represents the enemy within you.
These are simple dialectic tricks to exploit ignorance and lack of self discernment among gentiles, which a jew exploits, but doesn't enable...only ones free will of choice can do that, hence the tempting of gentile consent by jewish suggestion.
tl;dr...the gentile choice to be a slave shapes each jew into a master over all gentiles. Nature doesn't shape suggestions...a jew does, and gentile consent empowers what few suggest many-fold.
A shape implies form within flow...few signify form to distract many from flow.
Perception aka per (by) capere (to take)...change cannot be taken. Ignoring this by taking suggested over perceivable "amasses" many under few.
a) Author/aug - "to increase"...only flow increases (inception) and decreases (death) form (life).
b) It's readers who authorize writers, who in return tempts readers to not question the authority of the written.
c) Author/autor - "father"... what was that about not calling anyone father on earth?
Only change (flow) can sustain shapes (form) by internal separation of each shape from one another. Suggested correct aka com (together) + reg (to move in a straight line) inverts natural separation with artificial collectivism.
Perceivable implies origin of perception...suggested tempts one to cover up self by consent.
Change (perceivable) generating shape (perception) implies a separation of all into each one...few suggest pluralism (us) to amass singularity (one).
A chosen one amasses each anointed one by tempting ones choice to ignore self discernment.
Pur (forth) pose (position) aka position of being (life) put forth (inception towards death). It can't be hidden...each being can be tricked to hide from it.
Meaning was shaped by ones consent to suggested creationism. Holding onto a suggested shape distracts ones perception from perceivable change.
Perceivable doesn't create perception...it transfers form within flow aka transformation of all (change) into each one (shape). Consenting to hold onto a suggestion ignores trans-form-ation.
A contract binds ones choice from transfer.
Only a being can swallow other partials within whole. Something being swallowed cannot be whole. Thinking otherwise implies logic aka circular thinking aka the ouroboros eating itself.
We implies one joining others...to know implies one being set apart from others...reasoning implies one turning against others.
Ones consent to suggested pluralism (we) establishes a conflict of reason (we vs they) aka circular thinking within one (logic) turning into the outward ouroboros (reason) against other ones, while distracting one from thinking (perception) straight (perceivable).
Real implies ones manual response within auto (self) mobile (moving) all. Ignoring ones response (perception) within auto-mobile all (perceivable) for manufactured fiction (suggested) by another implies ones free will of choice.
We (plural) shapes each different one (singular) into an "alike" mass.
Desire aka de (division) + sire (beget; to take)...a contradiction in terms. Few suggest escapism to distract many with taking from being divided from one another. Whatever one takes from another; one holds closer to self, hence corrupting divine/division.
Aka ignoring natural change perceived by holding onto artificial shape suggested...it doesn't matter if the shape is flat or round, when it's embracing which corrupts shaping.
Christ (to anoint) implies each being set free from one another. Jesus (je suis; I am) implies taking possession over oneself (I) , while collectivizing other ones together (you). That establishes I (slave) under YOU (master) by giving plural more power than singular.
This is how you (phonetic jew) overthrows jesus (I am)...over and over again, while Christ is being ignored.
Study/steu - "to strive/push/press forwards"...which for life being moved from inception towards death implies towards DEATH.