I (ayeah?) have blocked every PKVI account that has popped up but blocking free-will-of-choice does nothing. This account blowing a mod? Is a mod? Why are we forced by this team to see this faggot? It's a conspiracy.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
a) If it's free; then it can't be blocked...
b) Think about the implication of publicly calling for the blocking of ones free will of choice...on a conspiracy forum.
c) Free will of choice cannot represent a plural (we); only each singular (one).
Try analyzing and refuting contra-Christian ideas instead of over analyzing words. That is a much better hobby.
a) Christian implies "to anoint" aka the separation of each being (anointed one) when coming through the birth-channel aka seed growing within s-OIL.
b) A jew suggests idealism, which becomes an idol when a gentile consents to hold onto it. Nature moves perceivable inspiration through each ones perception, while a jew suggests information to tempt gentiles to hold onto it within mind/memory...that's idolatry.
Inspiration cannot be held onto...only drawn from and adapted to on the fly, hence being within (in) the spirit (spir) of action (ation).
c) Contra implies "against"...being implies A GAIN (life) within loss (inception towards death). Only within loss can there be growth.
Nature moves beings within a straight line...a jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentiles to turn inwardly (circular logic) and outwardly (conflicts of reason aka contra aka versus/verto - "to turn").
Suggestion inVERTS perception if held onto...hence idolatry/idealism.
d) To analyze implies to dissect/separate/take apart etc. which is what a partial (ones perception) within whole (all perceivable) is based upon...the differentiation of potential (growth) during procession (loss).
Breathing/eating/drinking implies the dissection of what nature offers, and since nature moves through...each being LYZE ANAL aka the alimentary (life) canal opening (inception) and closing (death).
The opposite of analyzing implies synthesizing, which is what each jew tempts gentiles to do to each other aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka united states/united nations/united kingdom/european union/soviet union aka uniformity/university/unisex/unicef/unicode aka miscegenation/multiculturalism/mass migration/melting pot aka equality through diversity etc.
Nature sets apart...each jew tempts gentiles together.
e) Refute (to beat back) ignores that form (life) cannot beat back flow (inception towards death)...only each other. Refutation implies an artificial conflict distracting from nature admitting (inception) and dismissing (death).
f) Better implies vs worse...a conflict of reason aka one turning against others aka an inversion of nature separating each one apart from one another.
g) Hobby implies the jewish suggestion of favoritism, hence tempting gentiles to favor aka a bias of partiality, hence turning from being a partial into becoming a part of a collective of hobbyists.
Ok. Now you got that off your chest.
Try analyzing and refuting contra-Christian ideas instead of over analyzing words. That is a much better hobby.
Rofl This is why I say I'll never downdoot you because you serve a purpose.
I 'would' suggest you take a deep dive into gematria and learn how/why each word is spelled, letter-by-letter according to principles, but I'm afraid you'd either implode or destroy Tokyo with your newfound power.
Aka geometry/geomancy... tricking ones mind to measure, hence holding onto suggested values, while ignoring that nature moves values apart from one another, hence establishing formed evaluation (perception) of flowing value (perceivable).
It's the consent of many to the suggestions of few which establishes an "identical numerical value", hence transforming each one (1) into a zero (0).
Which would imply 1 vs 1 within a conflict of reason. Both numerical values can be different, while VS (versus/verto - to turn) remains identical.
Ones consent to another ones suggestion implies one LETTING another one shape LETTERS.
Meanwhile in nature...if form (life) LETS flow (inception towards death); then form perishes faster, hence the need to resist wanted temptations.
For example...hunger and thirst. Does one LET hunger and thirst pass through one, or does one resist by eating and drinking?
TO implies towards aka life being moved from inception TOWARDS death, while accord implies "coming into agreement". If ones mind agrees with being moved towards death, then...?
Principle implies origin. Living originates from within the process of dying. Coming into agreement with dying...denies living.
If that's a Godzilla set-up, then I would much rather hang with my son or throw bananas at King Kong, than risk meeting any of those monsters Toshio Maeda made up in Tokyo.
You nailed it. You are throwing bananas at King Kong. Semantics divide while attempting to unite.
What happens when someone 'gets' what you attempt to say, but knows that semantics will never 'solve' any question, merely point to the spirit behind it, which it what gematria is, not the ridiculously simplistic off-the-mark definition you play. It shows that for all your semantic pontificating, that you don't even know how to 'spell' the words you parse. Raise it up.
Word
a) Unite/unit/unus aka one apart from one another...a division.
b) Semantic/sēma - "mark, token; omen, portent; constellation"...a combination.
Breaking semantics apart makes it harder for other ONEs to hold it together.
Each one (perception) GOT all (perceivable), while being tempted to GET (suggested) from others. Whatever one gets...will never be enough.
A question tempts one to wait for an answer by another, while ignoring to be dis (life) solved (inception towards death) aka a division within a solution aka alchemical ingredient within a base.
Nature implies the ongoing solution to any temporary problem within...questions and answers tempt one to ignore that.
No question can ever be solved; because each beings inception brings up the question again.
Spirit/spiro - "to breathe" moves through each sentient being, hence while life is being sentenced towards point of death.
Before generation (ge) can be measured (matria)...it was generating each being able to measure.
Hence gematria aka gemara representing the essential secondary part of talmud, while mishnah represents the substantial primary whole.
a) Like how "not" simply implies ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything when dividing ones perception with suggestion?
b) Definit (to affix) ion (action)...action acts upon reactions, and cannot be affixed. It's reactions reacting to one another to get a fix, who are ignoring action.
c) Only matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion can be marked...not motion.
All forwards each one by division...pons (bridge) + fex (to make) implies artificial combination of natural division.
Crafting spells implies parsing partial letters together...free will of choice needs to resist LETTING others parse LETTERS together, as to remain free.
tl; dr...if gematria is your way to deal with deception, then how about a discussion about 0 and 2...both artificial states within natural singularity aka 1.
If energy implies 1; then what do 0 and 2 imply? Try proving 0 and 2 to another 1 without contradicting 1-self...
What if GE implies the one and only generator, and MATRIA each generated one within having the free will of choice to measure each other? Where is the contradiction in my line of thinking?
One can hardly 'remain free' if one has never been not-free. Being freed implies lack of effective resistance in the past. Strange that the same decides to become free from 'letting' others who don't resist the knowledge, spell out the letters for them. 'If gematria is your way of dealing with deception" is begging the question with a false assumption. 'Deception' is a perception by one who has been deceived, or seems to only apply to others when denied in one's own opinion. It's a moot subject to attempt to apply to gematria.
Sure, semantic arguments can be fun, like females wrestling in the mud.
I'd rather not discuss 0 and/vs 2 anymore than I'd like to discuss 0 and/vs 1 which is Google. Just not Google plus. Ideation is what you attempt to bring through the letter.....but you start from the wrong end, and haven't done that work to bring it to the spirit......which is both/neither 1 and/vs zero.
I'm thinking that's why King Kong has to grab the fire-breather by the tail to swing him around and send him on his way. I love happy endings.
Do I disagree with your summations? About half. Half not. Semantics. Average Joe is confused verbally and you spank often when needed. So I haven't downdooted. Yet.
The purpose you serve here is to divide.....which isn't Always a bad thing tho the material 'Lucifer' is said to go 'to and fro'..... truths of all kinds will do that also.....one is the shadow of the other. As words are shadows of ideation which are seperated 'sephira' of the whole. ALL needs to be investigated. Gematria is a system to understand the concepts.....it isn't the thing in itself.
If Godzilla won't come to Tokyo, how will he claim victory? If tossing word bananas is your way to deal with finding an enlightenment beyond words, then you'll just talk your way out of looking into this instead.
https://kupdf.net/download/jesus-christ-sun-of-god-ancient-cosmology-and-early-christian-symbolism-by-david-r-fideler-ocr_58a100e36454a7335db1eb87_pdf
Get back AFTER not before. THAT is my response. Respond to it.
There's a lot of human assisted bots here. The internet's f****** joke if you think it's some kind of free place for you to share your thoughts. This is a CIA government tool to monitor you. Also to control the narrative. This particular s*** all of the internet happens to be a place where undesirables hang out the ones who cannot be controlled So they try all kinds of weird bots here.
I'm still trying to figure out what tallestskil is
Free will of choice baby. You have it, he has it
I share mostly_bots' take. I've followed a few of the users on this site from voat to here. They were suspicious on voat and are even moreso here.
free-will was on voat as well, based on his pattern of absolutely bullshit language disection. I engaged 'it' in DM's once to confirm my suspicion. As long as you don't CALL them a bot, you get the obvious bot shit, otherwise an operator is likely to step in as in this thread.
#edit; I should state that I don't care if they are feds as they are just as likely a bunch of duplicitous shitstains that think they are doing 'good'. The board's operators are obivously allowing substanceless LLMs and bullshitters, along with a board culture that doesn't call out lies as long as it serves their agenda. What more do you need to know?
#edit2; just because I think it's funny and already regret serious-posting on this very unserious site: I'm nearly 80% certain they trained the more (but less than free-will) obvious bots on the dissident right, then either added a christian objective, or make-christians-look-bad objective to the dataset. It's a throw-up as to which, as christians are so generally retarded it's hard to tell. Either way, it doesn't really have the sophistication I would expect from 'intellegence'.
Something else worth mentioning for the record, was that 'they' were openly talking on voat about "baking" webm's with tracking built-in. Webms were relatively new at the time, so I already didn't trust them, so I didn't think much about the comment at the time, happily assuming webms were designed to be trackable, as all new tech suck ass these days.
Nope, turned out they were using exploits. So either they were feds dumb enough to openly talk about their fuckery... or something else. Most hackers are faggots these days, that's how you stay out of jail as a hacker: you signal as loadly and publicly as possible that you uphold all the "current-thing"s, eg, animie-furry-profile pic, ukraine, nato, lgbt flags in your profile, etc. Anyone brave enough to be hacking from underneath a dissident profile is either a fed, or fed-adjacent, aware of it or not.
Because "mostly_bots" implies an agenda driven username...
Why would you want to block this gold?
Because the only posts that aren't obvious LLM spam are because they got called out as a bot.
Oh, right; just another dipshit from the soapbox crowd that thinks spam and lies are good as long as they are cute/funny/childish.
Take notes kids. The dirtbags smuggle their bullshit under the guise of it being funny or cute.
mostly_bots was very suspicious, a user who would pop up on specific topics and call everyone who didn't share the "right" opinion bots, and that post was a great callout. So great, the whole account was just deleted.
I've never tried to block anyone (because I'm not afraid of "spam and lies" being that I have a brain that allows me to both ignore spam and not just accept anything I read as the truth) but I've been unable to block anyone in this post. Is there something special about free's account? Maybe (though again I'm not able to block anyone so from my perspective the account is not privileged), and if so that itself is worth discussing, not sperging out about
I'll just leave this here "In debate, 'playing to the crowd' refers to using rhetorical strategies to gain audience favor rather than focusing on logical arguments. This often involves appealing to emotions"
One thing I noticed about pkvi is that he started in a while back at r/conspiracy_commons and then later at r/conspiracy. I thought was interesting because he clearly doesn't have enough juice to jump the line. I doubt they'd bother orchestrating that for the one person watching.
He only posts a fraction on those subs of the content he does here. What I thought was interesting is that while he gets reliable traction here from brigading (one would assume), he gets very little on Reddit. Many of his posts are downvoted to zero, like numerous other dumb bullshit shill posts there.
I thought it was informative to see that at least there are enough conscious humans left on r/conspiracy to slam the obvious garbage into the ground. But not here, though, quite the opposite.
Bots this bots that. Where's the Beef? Right. NONE. Allllll THEORY and SPECULATION. The only bots I've seen on this WHOLE site were the Downvote Bots that would auto-cannon comments with downvotes. They disappeared in early Feburary. Doubt theres any more.
Came across this comment in kia2. I dont post in there much anymore because most of the users seem to be racist idiots but I read alot.
user asking chatgpt about their board
Prolly more bots here than we realize. Not that reddit is any better, its even worse, just bots talking to bots.
I think its hilarious that KIA2 forum users think im a bot. Yes a crippled bot suffering from hyperparathyroidism who was poisoned by a million dollar company (arca) in canada. That would be something.