I (ayeah?) have blocked every PKVI account that has popped up but blocking free-will-of-choice does nothing. This account blowing a mod? Is a mod? Why are we forced by this team to see this faggot? It's a conspiracy.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Aka geometry/geomancy... tricking ones mind to measure, hence holding onto suggested values, while ignoring that nature moves values apart from one another, hence establishing formed evaluation (perception) of flowing value (perceivable).
It's the consent of many to the suggestions of few which establishes an "identical numerical value", hence transforming each one (1) into a zero (0).
Which would imply 1 vs 1 within a conflict of reason. Both numerical values can be different, while VS (versus/verto - to turn) remains identical.
Ones consent to another ones suggestion implies one LETTING another one shape LETTERS.
Meanwhile in nature...if form (life) LETS flow (inception towards death); then form perishes faster, hence the need to resist wanted temptations.
For example...hunger and thirst. Does one LET hunger and thirst pass through one, or does one resist by eating and drinking?
TO implies towards aka life being moved from inception TOWARDS death, while accord implies "coming into agreement". If ones mind agrees with being moved towards death, then...?
Principle implies origin. Living originates from within the process of dying. Coming into agreement with dying...denies living.
If that's a Godzilla set-up, then I would much rather hang with my son or throw bananas at King Kong, than risk meeting any of those monsters Toshio Maeda made up in Tokyo.
You nailed it. You are throwing bananas at King Kong. Semantics divide while attempting to unite.
What happens when someone 'gets' what you attempt to say, but knows that semantics will never 'solve' any question, merely point to the spirit behind it, which it what gematria is, not the ridiculously simplistic off-the-mark definition you play. It shows that for all your semantic pontificating, that you don't even know how to 'spell' the words you parse. Raise it up.
Word
a) Unite/unit/unus aka one apart from one another...a division.
b) Semantic/sēma - "mark, token; omen, portent; constellation"...a combination.
Breaking semantics apart makes it harder for other ONEs to hold it together.
Each one (perception) GOT all (perceivable), while being tempted to GET (suggested) from others. Whatever one gets...will never be enough.
A question tempts one to wait for an answer by another, while ignoring to be dis (life) solved (inception towards death) aka a division within a solution aka alchemical ingredient within a base.
Nature implies the ongoing solution to any temporary problem within...questions and answers tempt one to ignore that.
No question can ever be solved; because each beings inception brings up the question again.
Spirit/spiro - "to breathe" moves through each sentient being, hence while life is being sentenced towards point of death.
Before generation (ge) can be measured (matria)...it was generating each being able to measure.
Hence gematria aka gemara representing the essential secondary part of talmud, while mishnah represents the substantial primary whole.
a) Like how "not" simply implies ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything when dividing ones perception with suggestion?
b) Definit (to affix) ion (action)...action acts upon reactions, and cannot be affixed. It's reactions reacting to one another to get a fix, who are ignoring action.
c) Only matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion can be marked...not motion.
All forwards each one by division...pons (bridge) + fex (to make) implies artificial combination of natural division.
Crafting spells implies parsing partial letters together...free will of choice needs to resist LETTING others parse LETTERS together, as to remain free.
tl; dr...if gematria is your way to deal with deception, then how about a discussion about 0 and 2...both artificial states within natural singularity aka 1.
If energy implies 1; then what do 0 and 2 imply? Try proving 0 and 2 to another 1 without contradicting 1-self...
What if GE implies the one and only generator, and MATRIA each generated one within having the free will of choice to measure each other? Where is the contradiction in my line of thinking?
One can hardly 'remain free' if one has never been not-free. Being freed implies lack of effective resistance in the past. Strange that the same decides to become free from 'letting' others who don't resist the knowledge, spell out the letters for them. 'If gematria is your way of dealing with deception" is begging the question with a false assumption. 'Deception' is a perception by one who has been deceived, or seems to only apply to others when denied in one's own opinion. It's a moot subject to attempt to apply to gematria.
Sure, semantic arguments can be fun, like females wrestling in the mud.
I'd rather not discuss 0 and/vs 2 anymore than I'd like to discuss 0 and/vs 1 which is Google. Just not Google plus. Ideation is what you attempt to bring through the letter.....but you start from the wrong end, and haven't done that work to bring it to the spirit......which is both/neither 1 and/vs zero.
I'm thinking that's why King Kong has to grab the fire-breather by the tail to swing him around and send him on his way. I love happy endings.
Do I disagree with your summations? About half. Half not. Semantics. Average Joe is confused verbally and you spank often when needed. So I haven't downdooted. Yet.
The purpose you serve here is to divide.....which isn't Always a bad thing tho the material 'Lucifer' is said to go 'to and fro'..... truths of all kinds will do that also.....one is the shadow of the other. As words are shadows of ideation which are seperated 'sephira' of the whole. ALL needs to be investigated. Gematria is a system to understand the concepts.....it isn't the thing in itself.
If Godzilla won't come to Tokyo, how will he claim victory? If tossing word bananas is your way to deal with finding an enlightenment beyond words, then you'll just talk your way out of looking into this instead.
https://kupdf.net/download/jesus-christ-sun-of-god-ancient-cosmology-and-early-christian-symbolism-by-david-r-fideler-ocr_58a100e36454a7335db1eb87_pdf
Get back AFTER not before. THAT is my response. Respond to it.
Remain aka re-sponding (life) to main (inception towards death)...not implies ones de-nial thereof. Main implies the application of force aka the dominance (action) setting one free (reaction).
a) Being implies resistance (life) freed within velocity (inception towards death).
b) When you say "lack" then you ignore "loss" aka being growth (life) within loss (inception towards death)...loss offers the foundation for each being to grow within.
c) "In the past" isn't a position one can be in, but represents the denial of ones presence right now for what was (past) or will be (future).
One (life) cannot perceive past (inception) or future (death)...others suggest it to manipulate ones memory, while distracting ones presence.
Only ones free will of choice decides, and being one implies differentiated from one another. Meanwhile...different choices can only be formed within the same balanced flow.
Letting another binds one, hence becoming "spell-bound". Knowledge continues to move through one, while ones perception thereof is bound to suggested spells.
Those who try to "spell out" those who are spell-bound are trying to loosen up the bondage by taking apart what other spell-craft together.
Both begging and questioning aims forwards, while trying to reach charity and answers in return.
Nature doesn't turn...it causes effects by forcing velocity (inception towards death) through resistance (life).
Before one can be deceived by another, there's de (division) cept (to take) ion (action). Being implies division (perception) within action (perceivable)...taking from another (suggestion) is the issue.
Also; there can be no such thing as a "has been"...unless one ignores being.
While applying matter onto matter; one denies motion separating matter from matter. That's the physical issue...mentally, it's opinions held within matter, mentally applied to other matter, while mentally ignoring physical motion, which fucks one up.
Notice opinion/option aka ones free will of choice...not what one chooses to hold onto or apply onto others, but the choice itself.
Moot/mod - "to meet; assemble"...that's the wanted temptation one needs to resist. Gematria implies measurements applied to ones mind...
Can life do that, while being moved from inception towards death by nature?
ION (action) is what brings reactions into being...ideas/ideal/idols are suggested by other beings to tempt one to ignore reacting to action.
All brings each one...whatever one brings with implies a self imposed burden.
If one agrees vs disagrees about suggested summation, then one ignores being a fraction (perception) within whole (perceivable).
What is half of energy if all is one in energy?
Notice the upvote vs downvote option next to our comments...those represent the agree vs disagree conflict of reason, and then notice that each one has the free will of choice to resist the temptation of choosing a side within an artificial conflict.
The temptation never lets up...it's ones resistance to it which can be fertilized.
90% of comments I get are abusive towards me (seldom about what I wrote tho)...I ain't the one spanking.
a) Notice that reason implies a conflict against one another, hence versus/verto - "to turn". One can only turn against one another, if one was divided from one another beforehand.
Nature divines/divides beings from one another...
b) Neither do I purpose (put forward), hence only ever commenting after others, nor do I serve division, but resist (life) division (inception towards death).
The issue is that others believe that division is bad, and unification good, hence falling for mosaic law (puzzling the pieces into a whole) aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) etc.
The unwashed MASSES are feeling offended when one (singular) tries to divide them apart from one another. Meanwhile, those masses are governed by each chosen one aka a people apart aka rules for thee, but not for me aka sovereign within commonwealth aka one who erects at center, while circumcising the circumference etc.
Lucifer aka bringing forth light, which generates a visible spectrum of light for each ray within. Spectrum implies balance; ray implies choice balancing, hence alternating to and fro.
The issue..."lucifer" doesn't say anything aka doesn't modulate letters together into words...light (motion) separates rays (matter) within a spectrum (momentum).
Ask yourself...who said that lucifer said? Who is shaping suggestions in the name of?
Kind/kindred/kin implies relations among different ones within all. Such a relation is established by ones consent to the suggestion of another from either side...truth or false.
All moves...each ones perception ignores that all perceivable moves, when holding onto true or false suggestions.
Hence ones casting shadows upon other ones, while within all light. If one resists others, then light (discernment) and dark (ignorance) are moving through one....otherwise the shadows of ignorance are spreading, while obfuscating self discernment.
a) Words become shadows by ones free will of choice "letting" them. Without ones consenting choice...nothing holds the words together.
Sound moves light through...words represent the modulation of sound tempting one to hold onto, hence dimming self with ignorance.
b) Sephira/sophia aka divine (momentum) wis (matter) dom (motion)...one has to wise up to being free will of choice within divine dominance aka free within dom.
Notice VEST + GATE...all separates each one from one another in the nude, while passing through.
One doesn't need to measure (matria) generation (ge). One does not need to stand (stem) together (sys). One does not need to stand-under another. One does not need to take (cept) together (con).
Want tempts one to ignore need tho...
Yet IT is held within one thing during the motion of everything.
Gematria implies holding onto numbers; systems are held within one to be applied to another; standing under implies holding ones position, and taking together implies holding together.
Holding onto IT destroys one. It implies anything but male or female. How could there be anything (matter) but male (motion) and fe-male (mo-mentum)? Well; simply by ones ignorance of male and female for IT....whatever others suggest IT may be.
God + zilla/tsillah from root צֵל (tsel) - "shadow/shade"...it's the conflict within God about victory vs defeat, which casts shadows over each anointed one.
Godzilla represents the monstrous consequences of ignorance, hence monster/moneie/men - "to think"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/monster (notice moneie/money).
Let's do the preface: "This book throws light on some long-overlooked aspects of cosmology and symbolism"...
a) Light throws beings apart from one another...a book binds being to one another, while tempting each ones sight in-between covers.
b) Cosmos aka cosmetic...something applied outwards to cover (make up) what moves from within outwards. Logic implies circular thinking, being implies within linear progression.
c) Symbol implies thrown together aka suggested -ism throwing together consenting -ists.
d) To be able to overlook aspects requires aspects the choose to "stand-under" ones look/lock...
e) David Fideler aka fiddling (playing string instruments aka minds strung together) + david/davit (an oath aka ones consent to the suggestion of another).
f) If I already read H. P. Blavatsky - "The Secret Doctrine", then what else did David Fideler add to the mix?