Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

7
why can't we block free-will-of-choice?
posted 37 days ago by MrPancake 37 days ago by MrPancake +11 / -4

I (ayeah?) have blocked every PKVI account that has popped up but blocking free-will-of-choice does nothing. This account blowing a mod? Is a mod? Why are we forced by this team to see this faggot? It's a conspiracy.

26 comments share
26 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 37 days ago +2 / -1

a) Christian implies "to anoint" aka the separation of each being (anointed one) when coming through the birth-channel aka seed growing within s-OIL.

b) A jew suggests idealism, which becomes an idol when a gentile consents to hold onto it. Nature moves perceivable inspiration through each ones perception, while a jew suggests information to tempt gentiles to hold onto it within mind/memory...that's idolatry.

Inspiration cannot be held onto...only drawn from and adapted to on the fly, hence being within (in) the spirit (spir) of action (ation).

c) Contra implies "against"...being implies A GAIN (life) within loss (inception towards death). Only within loss can there be growth.

Nature moves beings within a straight line...a jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentiles to turn inwardly (circular logic) and outwardly (conflicts of reason aka contra aka versus/verto - "to turn").

Suggestion inVERTS perception if held onto...hence idolatry/idealism.

d) To analyze implies to dissect/separate/take apart etc. which is what a partial (ones perception) within whole (all perceivable) is based upon...the differentiation of potential (growth) during procession (loss).

Breathing/eating/drinking implies the dissection of what nature offers, and since nature moves through...each being LYZE ANAL aka the alimentary (life) canal opening (inception) and closing (death).

The opposite of analyzing implies synthesizing, which is what each jew tempts gentiles to do to each other aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka united states/united nations/united kingdom/european union/soviet union aka uniformity/university/unisex/unicef/unicode aka miscegenation/multiculturalism/mass migration/melting pot aka equality through diversity etc.

Nature sets apart...each jew tempts gentiles together.

e) Refute (to beat back) ignores that form (life) cannot beat back flow (inception towards death)...only each other. Refutation implies an artificial conflict distracting from nature admitting (inception) and dismissing (death).

f) Better implies vs worse...a conflict of reason aka one turning against others aka an inversion of nature separating each one apart from one another.

g) Hobby implies the jewish suggestion of favoritism, hence tempting gentiles to favor aka a bias of partiality, hence turning from being a partial into becoming a part of a collective of hobbyists.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– guywholikesDjtof2024 4 points 37 days ago +4 / -0

Ok. Now you got that off your chest.

Try analyzing and refuting contra-Christian ideas instead of over analyzing words. That is a much better hobby.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 2EyesOpen 1 point 35 days ago +1 / -0

Rofl This is why I say I'll never downdoot you because you serve a purpose.

I 'would' suggest you take a deep dive into gematria and learn how/why each word is spelled, letter-by-letter according to principles, but I'm afraid you'd either implode or destroy Tokyo with your newfound power.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 35 days ago +1 / -0

gematria

Aka geometry/geomancy... tricking ones mind to measure, hence holding onto suggested values, while ignoring that nature moves values apart from one another, hence establishing formed evaluation (perception) of flowing value (perceivable).

It's the consent of many to the suggestions of few which establishes an "identical numerical value", hence transforming each one (1) into a zero (0).

I'll never downdoot you

Which would imply 1 vs 1 within a conflict of reason. Both numerical values can be different, while VS (versus/verto - to turn) remains identical.

letter-by-letter

Ones consent to another ones suggestion implies one LETTING another one shape LETTERS.

Meanwhile in nature...if form (life) LETS flow (inception towards death); then form perishes faster, hence the need to resist wanted temptations.

For example...hunger and thirst. Does one LET hunger and thirst pass through one, or does one resist by eating and drinking?

according to

TO implies towards aka life being moved from inception TOWARDS death, while accord implies "coming into agreement". If ones mind agrees with being moved towards death, then...?

according to principle

Principle implies origin. Living originates from within the process of dying. Coming into agreement with dying...denies living.

destroy Tokyo with your newfound power.

If that's a Godzilla set-up, then I would much rather hang with my son or throw bananas at King Kong, than risk meeting any of those monsters Toshio Maeda made up in Tokyo.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 2EyesOpen 1 point 34 days ago +1 / -0

You nailed it. You are throwing bananas at King Kong. Semantics divide while attempting to unite.

What happens when someone 'gets' what you attempt to say, but knows that semantics will never 'solve' any question, merely point to the spirit behind it, which it what gematria is, not the ridiculously simplistic off-the-mark definition you play. It shows that for all your semantic pontificating, that you don't even know how to 'spell' the words you parse. Raise it up.

Word

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 34 days ago +1 / -0

Semantics divide while attempting to unite.

a) Unite/unit/unus aka one apart from one another...a division.

b) Semantic/sēma - "mark, token; omen, portent; constellation"...a combination.

Breaking semantics apart makes it harder for other ONEs to hold it together.

What happens when someone 'gets' what you attempt to say,

Each one (perception) GOT all (perceivable), while being tempted to GET (suggested) from others. Whatever one gets...will never be enough.

'solve' any question

A question tempts one to wait for an answer by another, while ignoring to be dis (life) solved (inception towards death) aka a division within a solution aka alchemical ingredient within a base.

Nature implies the ongoing solution to any temporary problem within...questions and answers tempt one to ignore that.

No question can ever be solved; because each beings inception brings up the question again.

point to the spirit

Spirit/spiro - "to breathe" moves through each sentient being, hence while life is being sentenced towards point of death.

what gematria is

Before generation (ge) can be measured (matria)...it was generating each being able to measure.

Hence gematria aka gemara representing the essential secondary part of talmud, while mishnah represents the substantial primary whole.

not the ridiculously simplistic off-the-mark definition you play

a) Like how "not" simply implies ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything when dividing ones perception with suggestion?

b) Definit (to affix) ion (action)...action acts upon reactions, and cannot be affixed. It's reactions reacting to one another to get a fix, who are ignoring action.

c) Only matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion can be marked...not motion.

for all your semantic pontificating

All forwards each one by division...pons (bridge) + fex (to make) implies artificial combination of natural division.

you don't even know how to 'spell' the words you parse

Crafting spells implies parsing partial letters together...free will of choice needs to resist LETTING others parse LETTERS together, as to remain free.

tl; dr...if gematria is your way to deal with deception, then how about a discussion about 0 and 2...both artificial states within natural singularity aka 1.

If energy implies 1; then what do 0 and 2 imply? Try proving 0 and 2 to another 1 without contradicting 1-self...

What if GE implies the one and only generator, and MATRIA each generated one within having the free will of choice to measure each other? Where is the contradiction in my line of thinking?

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lw99j (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy