a) Power/povoir - "to be able", hence flow (inception towards death) enabling form (life) aka action empowering reactions.
b) Most implies vs less...a conflict of reason among empowered beings who drain each other mutually of power.
c) Full implies fall (inception towards death) empowering rise (life)...the suggested conflict of reason (empty vs full) tempts one to ignore that.
d) IS implies a suggestion tempting ones perception to ignore that all perceivable WAS before one came into being aka before perceivable empowered perception.
Is it gold? Is it oil? Is it money?
Any question tempts power to be spend on waiting for answers, while ignoring to adapt to what empowers.
No
Again a conflict of reason (yes vs no) draining power from one.
With intelligence comes innovation.
More jewish horseshit. Innovate implies being within (in) new (novus), which is based on creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing). A partial (perception) within whole (perceivable) cannot create anything new, only transform everything already offered.
If one chooses to ignore perceivable for suggestion by another, then one ignores perceivable NOW for suggested NEW, and ones consent given to a suggestion implies intelligence/intelligo - "to understand" aka ones choice to stand-under another aka submitting slave setting up a master.
to destroy your enemies
En-e-my aka "within me"...talk about friendly fire. As long as one claims self as "me, myself or I", so long are other ones branded as YOU (phonetic jew), which is why jew represents the enemy within you.
These are simple dialectic tricks to exploit ignorance and lack of self discernment among gentiles, which a jew exploits, but doesn't enable...only ones free will of choice can do that, hence the tempting of gentile consent by jewish suggestion.
tl;dr...the gentile choice to be a slave shapes each jew into a master over all gentiles. Nature doesn't shape suggestions...a jew does, and gentile consent empowers what few suggest many-fold.
a) Power/povoir - "to be able", hence flow (inception towards death) enabling form (life) aka action empowering reactions.
b) Most implies vs less...a conflict of reason among empowered beings who drain each other mutually of power.
c) Full implies fall (inception towards death) empowering rise (life)...the suggested conflict of reason (empty vs full) tempts one to ignore that.
d) IS implies a suggestion tempting ones perception to ignore that all perceivable WAS before one came into being aka before perceivable empowered perception.
Any question tempts power to be spend on waiting for answers, while ignoring to adapt to what empowers.
Again a conflict of reason (yes vs no) draining power from one.
More jewish horseshit. Innovate implies being within (in) new (novus), which is based on creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing). A partial (perception) within whole (perceivable) cannot create anything new, only transform everything already offered.
If one chooses to ignore perceivable for suggestion by another, then one ignores perceivable NOW for suggested NEW, and ones consent given to a suggestion implies intelligence/intelligo - "to understand" aka ones choice to stand-under another aka submitting slave setting up a master.
En-e-my aka "within me"...talk about friendly fire. As long as one claims self as "me, myself or I", so long are other ones branded as YOU (phonetic jew), which is why jew represents the enemy within you.
These are simple dialectic tricks to exploit ignorance and lack of self discernment among gentiles, which a jew exploits, but doesn't enable...only ones free will of choice can do that, hence the tempting of gentile consent by jewish suggestion.
tl;dr...the gentile choice to be a slave shapes each jew into a master over all gentiles. Nature doesn't shape suggestions...a jew does, and gentile consent empowers what few suggest many-fold.