I (ayeah?) have blocked every PKVI account that has popped up but blocking free-will-of-choice does nothing. This account blowing a mod? Is a mod? Why are we forced by this team to see this faggot? It's a conspiracy.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
a) If it's free; then it can't be blocked...
b) Think about the implication of publicly calling for the blocking of ones free will of choice...on a conspiracy forum.
c) Free will of choice cannot represent a plural (we); only each singular (one).
Try analyzing and refuting contra-Christian ideas instead of over analyzing words. That is a much better hobby.
a) Christian implies "to anoint" aka the separation of each being (anointed one) when coming through the birth-channel aka seed growing within s-OIL.
b) A jew suggests idealism, which becomes an idol when a gentile consents to hold onto it. Nature moves perceivable inspiration through each ones perception, while a jew suggests information to tempt gentiles to hold onto it within mind/memory...that's idolatry.
Inspiration cannot be held onto...only drawn from and adapted to on the fly, hence being within (in) the spirit (spir) of action (ation).
c) Contra implies "against"...being implies A GAIN (life) within loss (inception towards death). Only within loss can there be growth.
Nature moves beings within a straight line...a jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentiles to turn inwardly (circular logic) and outwardly (conflicts of reason aka contra aka versus/verto - "to turn").
Suggestion inVERTS perception if held onto...hence idolatry/idealism.
d) To analyze implies to dissect/separate/take apart etc. which is what a partial (ones perception) within whole (all perceivable) is based upon...the differentiation of potential (growth) during procession (loss).
Breathing/eating/drinking implies the dissection of what nature offers, and since nature moves through...each being LYZE ANAL aka the alimentary (life) canal opening (inception) and closing (death).
The opposite of analyzing implies synthesizing, which is what each jew tempts gentiles to do to each other aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka united states/united nations/united kingdom/european union/soviet union aka uniformity/university/unisex/unicef/unicode aka miscegenation/multiculturalism/mass migration/melting pot aka equality through diversity etc.
Nature sets apart...each jew tempts gentiles together.
e) Refute (to beat back) ignores that form (life) cannot beat back flow (inception towards death)...only each other. Refutation implies an artificial conflict distracting from nature admitting (inception) and dismissing (death).
f) Better implies vs worse...a conflict of reason aka one turning against others aka an inversion of nature separating each one apart from one another.
g) Hobby implies the jewish suggestion of favoritism, hence tempting gentiles to favor aka a bias of partiality, hence turning from being a partial into becoming a part of a collective of hobbyists.
Rofl This is why I say I'll never downdoot you because you serve a purpose.
I 'would' suggest you take a deep dive into gematria and learn how/why each word is spelled, letter-by-letter according to principles, but I'm afraid you'd either implode or destroy Tokyo with your newfound power.
Aka geometry/geomancy... tricking ones mind to measure, hence holding onto suggested values, while ignoring that nature moves values apart from one another, hence establishing formed evaluation (perception) of flowing value (perceivable).
It's the consent of many to the suggestions of few which establishes an "identical numerical value", hence transforming each one (1) into a zero (0).
Which would imply 1 vs 1 within a conflict of reason. Both numerical values can be different, while VS (versus/verto - to turn) remains identical.
Ones consent to another ones suggestion implies one LETTING another one shape LETTERS.
Meanwhile in nature...if form (life) LETS flow (inception towards death); then form perishes faster, hence the need to resist wanted temptations.
For example...hunger and thirst. Does one LET hunger and thirst pass through one, or does one resist by eating and drinking?
TO implies towards aka life being moved from inception TOWARDS death, while accord implies "coming into agreement". If ones mind agrees with being moved towards death, then...?
Principle implies origin. Living originates from within the process of dying. Coming into agreement with dying...denies living.
If that's a Godzilla set-up, then I would much rather hang with my son or throw bananas at King Kong, than risk meeting any of those monsters Toshio Maeda made up in Tokyo.