Middle Ages
Only in the middle can there be age/aiw - "vital force, life". Age implies singularity...not plurality, since only one force (inception towards death) can vitalize each being (life).
All the suggested "ages" represent distractions from discerning self as reborn (renaissance age) or ignorant (dark age) or a mode within motion (modern age) or at the middle of all (medieval age)...
jews were mostly excluded from civilized society.
Civilized society implies domesticated gentiles herded together by each jew. A jew suggests the rhetoric ex (out of) clude (to close) to invert the minds of gentiles with contradiction (outwards vs inwards).
I wonder what changed.
All changes each one within...a jew amazes the mind (amazement) of gentiles into wondering/wandering in circles (logic), hence "they call me the wanderer...yeah, the wanderer...I roam around, around, around" aka the wandering jew shaping the kike/kikel - "circle" inside (logic) and outside (reason) of gentiles.
the kings of the ashes
Not kings...native of ash aka ashke (asche; ash) nazi (nati; native). King implies ruler/rule/reg - "to move in a straight line" aka nature delineating each being within.
a means to an end
Holding onto meaning tempts one to ignore being (life) moved from beginning (inception) towards end (death).
the greatest social media platform ever made
Platform aka flat like a plateau (inception towards death) and form (life)...that's the only platform for existence, and media implies formed in the middle of plat-flow.
The trick...social aka soc (together) i (within) al (all). An inversion of being set apart from one another. Nature doesn't collect users together, it sets each being apart from one another. It's suggested social-ism which tempts many together, while permitting few the central position.
myspace
Space/spatior (to wander) implies process (inception towards death) allowing potential (life) to wander in any direction. My implies possession, which prevents potential from wandering within procession.
you had to learn...to not look terrible
Terrible/terror (fear) aka being afraid of how one looks to others...that's vanity. Technology domesticates one to play make believe with others aka to deceive by looks within nature aka looksmaxxing aka pretending to be what one isn't as to distract others with pretension.
that was real engagement
En (within) gage (to bind) ment (mind) isn't real, but fake bondage of free will of choice. Few utilize technology to gauge many into engagement with one another.
One wants or not wants to engage with others...one needs to sustain oneself (life) apart from one another within all (inception towards death).
Building something = problem solved
Building a sum of things (something) ignores each thing (problem) within everything (solution). It's everything which dissolves (inception towards death) each thing (life) within.
Building a sum of things implies tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka mosaic law aka few summoning many together.
Problem implies diverse; solution implies equal...equalizing problem destroys diversity.
gone the opposite direction
There can be (life) only one direction (inception towards death)...turning against one another distracts one from being directed. The only misdirection is ones free will of choice ignoring being within direction.
they don't want you to build anything
- THEY represents suggested pluralism by few...build by consent of each one, holding onto one another as many.
- DON'T represents suggested nihilism by few...build by consent of each one who chooses to ignore everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested).
- WANT implies a conflict of reason (want vs not want)...build by many who are willingly fighting each other over any suggestion by few.
they want you scrolling
Scroll aka "to roll" implies circular thinking (logic) turning into circular conflict (reason). That's why the use of a Torah Scroll (instruction to mosaic law)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torah_scroll
The scrolling used on the internet represents the world wide instruction to mosaic law upon logical and reasoning gentiles.
a generation that thought itself code
Code implies the "compilation of laws" aka mishnah for teaching each jew and gemara to finish gentiles. That's the talmudic codex underneath any code suggested further along the line of process to distract many with unification (synthesis) from separation (analysis).
we call it progress
Calling implies "summoning together"...being (life) progressed (inception towards death) implies a setting apart from one another.
A jew suggests WE... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we to call gentiles together, as to distract each being from the one and only natural progress.
no
Where does one take nothing from?
explaining logic
Logic implies circular...not plain.
Stay the hell away from my threads.
Starting threads invites comments; commenting to a thread implies by free will of choice. Besides that...free doesn't require invitation, unless it's called freemasonry.
God's plan
Plan implies the representation of anything drawn on a plane...God implies plane (inception towards death) of existence (life). A jew sketches plans to tempt gentiles into circular conflicts, while distracting from linear delineation.
If one writes God is in control, then one ignores linear plane for circular plan aka con (together) trol (to roll)...
use AI to run your dead friend's account
Digital necromancy used to exploit those who ignore the need to let go for the want to hold onto.
could be a morbid alternative
Morbid/mori/mer- "to rub away; harm"...holding onto prevents alternation while harming one by rubbing against one another.
The internet aka world wide web restricts alternation, while tempting users to hold onto any artifice within mentally, which turns into real physical conflicts.
Nowhere under the definition of Patriot, does it say "Hold country above God"
Holding anything (nowhere; definition; patriotism; country; saying) above tempts one to ignore being (be) lowered (low) by God.
it's Blasphemy to proclaim that...
It's claiming, not what's proclaimed, which blasphemes all given by attempting to add a fault to it.
to proclaim that you love...
...implies consent to hate, thereby binding ones free will of choice into a conflict (love vs hate).
your wife, as she is not God
She isn't yours, but S(plit)HE aka the divine/divide of God into masculine (motion) and feminine (momentum) for each off-spring (matter) coming into being.
Others suggest you to take her into possession by the bond of matrimony aka wedlock, which tempts you to ignore that God divides each from one another.
I suspect that you do not understand ordered rule sets
a) If free will of choice chooses to stand-under, then "free" becomes "bondage", while permitting a chosen one to set ordered rules for ones choice.
b) Why suspect one another if God cannot do wrong? If God represents righteousness, then how did suspicion arose?
Replied before reading user name
Aka adapting instead of prejudging...
My mistake.
Did you took anything from free-will-of-choice? If God gives everything, then what could one miss by taking anything from one another?
Only when you keep
Can you keep your breath? For how long until you're forced to give away what never was yours?
Infancy implies adulteration towards elderly...only the adult mind has enough power to waste on the belief that anything can be kept.
Gold is a store of value
Value moves and cannot be stored. Within moving value exists evaluation, which can be tricked to ignore moving value...that ignorance represents storage.
Gold implies malleability of evaluation within value, and it's being used by few to tempt the evaluation of many to hold onto value, which makes the evaluation of many malleable to few.
in the process
Aka evaluation (perception) within the process of value (perceivable)...no storage but ignorance.
Fiat
Few tempting many to hold onto moving value becomes fiat...the moment one ignores moving value.
propped up by having a place to store
Aka ones memory choosing to ignore moving value by holding onto immovable value (fiat).
the extra fiat
Since value moves, the immovable fiat held onto, exponentially increases demand for extra value.
normally have nowhere to go and cause
Cause moves effect...few suggest norms (affixed rules of behavior) and nowhere (denial of everywhere) to affect ones ignorance of being moved as effect (life) within cause (inception towards death).
That's it.
Motion moves...matter declaring to one another "that's it" isn't the end of anything, but the ignorance of everything moving.
rugpull
Being within motion implies being (life) pushed (inception) and pulled (death) simultaneously...ignoring motion by holding onto matter represents the artificial rug put above ones sight, which always pulls life towards death.
entire economy
Only within entire can eco (to abide) nomy (to take) be shaped out by particulars. Motion neither abides; nor can it be taken...it's matter which can be tricked to abide motion, while taking hold of self and one another; which represents mental and physical materialism.
only the worst of humanity are the ones being affected
If those affected represent the worse of humanity, and those not affected represent the best of humanity, then what about those who implement affection to tempt humanity into a best vs worse conflict against one another?
Patriots concerned about Satanists
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew
How isn't it satanic to ignore the above by using the label patriot/patri - "father" for one another?
beneath
Aka as above/so below...the linear origin for potential growth.
you...me
A circular conflict preventing potential growth.
If you had a way to see
Only within the way of all energy can one see...it's flow within which sight forms.
portal within ourselves
a) Port/per (to lead; pass-over) + al (all) aka all leading each one within through a pass-over aka the transfer of power (life) within energy (inception towards death).
b) Self implies singularity passing through one another by inter-course for off-spring. Within energy...self cannot be possessed, nor can any plurality be sustained.
God who is the source of energy itself
God; source; energy; self implies the flow causing each form within...it's the suggested label "God" tempting those who hold onto it to ignore flow, hence continuing to solidify "God" above source; energy; self etc.
All doesn't have a label until anyone within applies to self. Your free will of choice holds onto the suggested label "God" while superimposing it onto anything else, while ignoring that all flow separates each form within from one another.
Energy only moves, which empowers each matter within. Energy can be analyzed as en (within) + ergos (work) hence implying all work separating into each employed mind within.
how Zero Point tech works
Work implies moving energy...suggested zero (absence of quantity); point (end of sentence) and tech (artifice) tempts one to ignore that.
Energy implies singularity (one) sentencing life at inception towards point of death, while allowing free will of choice to shape artifice by ignoring natural.
instead of within us, he was getting it from within basic particles
Being implies particle (life) within base (inception towards death)...it's ones consent to the suggestion "zero point tech", which permits Tesla to get power from within basic particles.
Zero requires one to ignore self for it; point requires sentence to ignore self for it; tech requires being to ignore nature for it...by free will of choice. Consenting tempts one to ignore basis (perceivable) for extract (suggested).
tesla
Tesla aka "magnetic flux density" represents magnetic (ones consent) flux (all perceivable) density (ignoring perceivable by holding onto suggested).
What's the opposite of magnetic flux density? Electric form freely aka ones formed free will of choice for electing/selecting.
Few suggest the label "tesla" to distract many from discerning self within energy, while using the person Tesla to sell magnetic flux density as the distraction embedded within the implication of the label "tesla".
Nature doesn't label...labels are artificially shaped to distract from nature.
That is the theory but not exactly true.
Energy implies praxis (action) for each extract (reaction) within...others suggest theory to distract from praxis with a true vs false conflict called "reason".
Reasoning about theory implies extract vs extract in ignorance of praxis.
control the pathway to your inside
Con (together) trol (to roll)...that's what clogs the pathway of all energy moving through each ones power inside.
All energy comes from the outside
Energy implies all for each one within coming into being.
Tune/tone/ten - "to stretch" aka being (life) stretched (inception towards death)...
view gnosticism as
Gnostic implies ones perception; -ism implies a suggested consensus by another...putting them together exchanges ones view with what another shows.
communism
Com (together) uni (apart from one another) -ism (consensus among partials coming together)... that's why communism cannot be explained by one part without contradicting any other part within a consensus.
communism or communitarianism
Com contradicts unitarian/uni...others suggest -ism to tempt one into contradiction with others.
like the Essenes
a) Essence implies being apart from one another...not like one another. Calling a group "essenes" tempts each member to ignore the essence of being.
b) The etymology of essene is uncertain because essence moves and cannot be ascertained within a fixed group.
Inception towards death implies each ones entire life from beginning towards end...like how the fuck could a mere 5 years of talking even compare to that, dude?
Would you like me to switch to form (life) within flow (inception towards death) or temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death) or resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death) or matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion?
he always uses that inception towards death line
How could life not use its inception towards death life-line aka the way of all for each one within?
How does inception towards death not implicate each ones life in-between?
bot
What bot can adapt to perceivable inspiration on the fly?
try to impersonate
Im (within) per (by) sonate (sound) implies a trial for each one within aka the TRI (threefold) separation of AL (all) into each one within aka inception>life>death.
Now try to find a bot who could write that without contradicting itself...
“Boomer vs. Zoomer” is being used to divide us all
Versus/verto - "to turn" implies turning against one another aka together aka united in conflict. It's the state of each one within all, which implies division from one another.
If one chooses any side, then one turns against the other.
To be more specific...turning implies within a cycle; being (life) implies within delineation (inception towards death). To invert natural delineation; few shape artificial cycles inside (logic) and outside (reason) of many.
Example: encyclopedia aka en (within) cyclo (circle) pedia (education, child-rearing) as the general course of instruction... https://www.etymonline.com/word/encyclopedia
What's another word for instruction? https://www.etymonline.com/word/Talmud Notice furthermore that a mason calls it a cyclopedia...cause a free-mason ain't in (en) it.
simplified reason
Reasoning implies complex vs complex to reach simplicity...
one of MANY axes being used to divide (and conquer) us.
Axe implies "to split; divide"...many implies unification of one with one another, while ignoring that being one implies division from one another.
The label "us" unites divided ones into many, which is how effortless few conquer many by simply suggesting a label of collectivization.
On a larger scale..."us" implies uniting states aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka mosaic law.
Just like...
Just implies balance, like vs dislike implies imbalance...if ones free will of choice chooses one side over the other.
similar things being done on basically every “front”
Nature fronts (inception towards death) being (life)...few tempt many with artificial sides to front each other, while ignoring nature.
The suggestion "go the front-line" tempts one to ignore being (life) fronted (inception towards death) within a line.
Line implies basis for any shape within....logic (circular thinking) turning into reason (circular conflict) represents abstracts shaped within base.
whether true or not
Boomer vs zoomer + true vs false + is vs is not represent different brands for the same conflict...few use such brands to tempt many into conflicts against each other, while giving few control over both sides.
food for thought
Food needs to be digested...holding onto any suggested information aka brands aka idols represents indigestion aka dyspepsia.
Thought implies ones temporary adaption to an ongoing process...not a memory bank for encircling the same thought over and over and over again. Circular thinking (logic) represents the ouroboros eating itself aka self consumption...few suggest the rhetoric "food for thought" to tempt many into self consumption.
remember what is used to be
If a being remembers, then one ignores being (life) within motion (inception towards death), hence within a digestive process.
Nature has already processed anything any being within holds within memory, yet those held up memories distort a beings perception of the perceivable process of nature. This distortion of memory represents possession (want to hold onto) during procession (need to let go).
this isn't normal
Normal/norma - "carpenter's square"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/normal
Few suggest norms (square) to tempt logic (compass) within many...that's applied freemasonry, but only for those with eyes to see.
I never really thought about it until I seen someone point it out, in a reddit thread of all places.
Aka the use of scripture by few to shape the thoughts of many who read it (reddit)...
Its a huge money making scheme
Scheme/segh - "to hold"...aka few tempting many to hold onto a suggested value called "money", which has no value outside ones evaluation thereof.
They are getting paid per head, so it doesn't matter if who they are catching
It's about training order followers with worthless incentives to turn against anyone deemed outside the order. During the Bolshevik revolution order followers alike would head-hunt based on nothing but statistics and labels.
what would break the left/right paradigm
There's only one thing in-between left and right...free will of choice. Choosing either establishes conflict among both. There's no conflict in-between left and right within nature...only balance for choice to adapt to.
Para (besides) digm (to show)...another shows a being sides to tempt choice off-balance.
There is a conspiracy here...
Nature dominates, which gives being free will of choice...that's free-dom aka freely choosing within a dominating balance. A child choosing to stand up and walk represents balancing; others tempting a child to choose one side over another (yes over no; good over bad; true over false; do over don't etc.)...that's the domestication of free will of choice into imbalance.
Choosing any side over another, instead of balancing in-between...binds free will of choice into a lifelong conflict internally (logic) and externally (reason).
To use conspiratorial terms...age of technology + age of reason.
Edit: Left vs right represents a superimposed division (jewish) tempting those within (gentiles) to want to unite (tikkun olam)...
I remain a bot for as long as you view me as a bot...no matter what I write.
Few suggest both sides to tempt many to mix in conflict against each other. Choosing either SIDE occults SIGHT. One can only see from in-between...inclining to either side distorts ones sight.
There can be only one...hence evil/live implying an inversion.
Few shape suggestions to tempt many into a consensus...each member within claiming a side.
Nature cannot be claimed since it moves. Any claim by a being (perception) implies denial of natural (perceivable) for consent to artificial (suggested).
God WAS before anyone within can suggest to each other what IS.
Fact aka "fictitious act" establishes a good vs evil conflict...if one chooses to hold onto any fact.
Con (together) cept (to take)...singularity gives each single unit within the free will of choice to take (want) all given (need). That represents the wanted temptation one needs to resist.
It's only three if one counts together what all sets apart from one another. Inception > life > death represents one momentum and three states within...depending on ones choice to count together what nature sets apart.
Faith implies holding onto, which tempts one to ignore the setting apart of L(and) A(ir) W(ater) as different matter within the momentum of the same motion.
The power of few represents many holding onto fiction, while ignoring ones position within reality.
Example...few issuing currency are not holding onto anything, but are discharging (issue) a current (currency) which many ignore to see.
Aka man who caves aka hollowing out ones memory by ignorance, while allowing others to fill it up. Many are still cavemen; still sitting in Plato's cave; still caving into ignorance willingly.