Nowhere under the definition of Patriot, does it say "Hold country above God"
Holding anything (nowhere; definition; patriotism; country; saying) above tempts one to ignore being (be) lowered (low) by God.
it's Blasphemy to proclaim that...
It's claiming, not what's proclaimed, which blasphemes all given by attempting to add a fault to it.
to proclaim that you love...
...implies consent to hate, thereby binding ones free will of choice into a conflict (love vs hate).
your wife, as she is not God
She isn't yours, but S(plit)HE aka the divine/divide of God into masculine (motion) and feminine (momentum) for each off-spring (matter) coming into being.
Others suggest you to take her into possession by the bond of matrimony aka wedlock, which tempts you to ignore that God divides each from one another.
I suspect that you do not understand ordered rule sets
a) If free will of choice chooses to stand-under, then "free" becomes "bondage", while permitting a chosen one to set ordered rules for ones choice.
b) Why suspect one another if God cannot do wrong? If God represents righteousness, then how did suspicion arose?
Replied before reading user name
Aka adapting instead of prejudging...
My mistake.
Did you took anything from free-will-of-choice? If God gives everything, then what could one miss by taking anything from one another?
Starting threads invites comments; commenting to a thread implies by free will of choice. Besides that...free doesn't require invitation, unless it's called freemasonry.
Holding anything (nowhere; definition; patriotism; country; saying) above tempts one to ignore being (be) lowered (low) by God.
It's claiming, not what's proclaimed, which blasphemes all given by attempting to add a fault to it.
...implies consent to hate, thereby binding ones free will of choice into a conflict (love vs hate).
She isn't yours, but S(plit)HE aka the divine/divide of God into masculine (motion) and feminine (momentum) for each off-spring (matter) coming into being.
Others suggest you to take her into possession by the bond of matrimony aka wedlock, which tempts you to ignore that God divides each from one another.
a) If free will of choice chooses to stand-under, then "free" becomes "bondage", while permitting a chosen one to set ordered rules for ones choice.
b) Why suspect one another if God cannot do wrong? If God represents righteousness, then how did suspicion arose?
Aka adapting instead of prejudging...
Did you took anything from free-will-of-choice? If God gives everything, then what could one miss by taking anything from one another?
No, I replied as though explaining logic to a retard. Stay the hell away from my threads.
Where does one take nothing from?
Logic implies circular...not plain.
Starting threads invites comments; commenting to a thread implies by free will of choice. Besides that...free doesn't require invitation, unless it's called freemasonry.