ghetto of Frankfurt
- Ghetto; from yiddish get - "deed of separation"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/ghetto
- Frank/franc - "free; not servile"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/frank
Nature separates being...a jew tempts gentiles together with a deed (transaction). This deed represents a gentiles consent to a jewish suggestion, which shapes a consensus among gentiles into a stronghold (furt;fort) for each jewish free (frank) will of choice.
As for Frankfurt in the Bundesrepublik Deutschland...
- BUNDES (to bind; bondage, from jewish bundism, based on yiddish Völkerbund)
- REPUBLIK (gentile commonwealth under jewish sovereignty)
- DEUTSCHLAND aka land of the deutsch/dutch/dish as in yiddish.
The BRD represents the stronghold (fort) for each free (frank) jew. Also check out France aka Frankreich...
Hindu had a much better framework
- Hindu/sindhu - "river"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Hindu
- Frame/fram - "forward"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/frame
Each thing within the river implies body; the forward motion of the river implies soul. Few establish confusion among many by shaping a circular conflict (much vs less + better vs worse) within the forwarding river.
All these problems
- Problem/proballein aka pro (forwards) ballein (to throw)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/problem
All throws forwards (inception towards death) each one within (life), which implies a solution. Few shape the word "problem" to hide the solution within it from many.
liked to know how they subverted
Sub (under) vert (to turn)...like vs dislike implies a circular conflict within your mind aka TURNING one side against the other, and what you call knowledge represents seeking UNDERstanding. That's how you are being subverted.
It's that simple, yet the one subverted cannot see the subversion within self, while trying to figure out the outside by looking into it.
how they rewrote
By tempting you to REspond to what they WROTE instead of what nature delineates.
melted structures
Only within flow (inception towards death) can form (life) be structured. Melting (to become liquid through heat) implies the opposite of coming to be solid (heat; living) within liquid (cold; dying).
while simultaneously denying
Denial simulates fiction (suggested information) within reality (perceivable inspiration). Where? Within the deniers mind! Similarity implies likeness aka your mind confining itself to a like vs dislike conflict.
How is the truth hidden?
Holding onto any truth a) shapes a lie + b) hides change from one.
how is action stopped against the enemy
Action cannot be stopped...reaction can be tricked into circular confinement (friend vs foe). An enemy can only operate en-e-my (within me).
By flooding it
Only in-between flood (inception) and ebb (death) can one come into being.
flooding it with an infinite number of trivial facts, endless rabbit holes, complete fabrications and false opposition
That implies a burden upon being...if consented to. The flooding aspect implies suggested mimicking perceivable...like for example how suggested currency mimics the flood of perceivable current.
claiming all events are fake
Event implies being within all...claiming tempts one to ignore that event implies a process aka ex (out) venire (to come). Holding onto contradicts coming out.
distracting you with the side effects
Sides imply extremes for ones free will of choice in-between...it's claiming a side by choice which distracts choice from its position at center.
placing you in an echo chamber
Ones mind holding onto suggested information represents the chamber aka circular confinement internally (logic) and externally (reason) representing sound repeated by reflection aka an echo.
jews are over-represented
Represent implies each beings response to all nature presents aka ones presence. A jew tempts gentiles into an artificial over vs under conflict of reason against one another, which leaves the jew as the only representative within nature.
Another example...voting a representative shirks ones free will of choice aka the instrument to REspond to PRESENTed. A chosen one becomes/remains a representative by default of gentile shirking of response-ability.
they have practically taken over
Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) to being (life)...a jew tempts gentiles to TAKE artificial (suggestion) while GIVING up natural (perception). This ain't a practical takeover, but a theoretical device tempting those who take (buy into) to also give (sell self out).
jews do NOT work and get free money
Nature implies work; being implies free employment of choice within a working balance. A jew suggests nihilism (not); pluralism (jews); possessionism (get) and an exchange currency (money) as fiat (authoritative sanction) to trick each gentiles FREE will of choice into willingly ignoring natural for artificial.
continues to hold celebrations
A jew celebrates (frequency) within nature that gentiles continue to hold onto artifice (stagnancy).
Are they all in it?
All implies singularity; each one within implies a unit...a jew suggests pluralism (they) to trick gentiles into an artificial consensus. It's what gentiles hold within which permits each jew to animate it anthropomorphically (golem) from outside.
Free Competition in Currency
Competition implies free will of choice binding itself to a side against another, while ignoring that current moves through while setting free anything within it.
A jew suggests currency to tempt gentiles into competition against each other (poor vs rich)...the entrance into which demands each gentiles FREE will of choice consenting to the jewish suggestion of currency.
It's about tricking that which natural current sets free into an artificial bondage to currency.
air conditioning
Air implies linear procession (in > out)...a suggested condition aka con (together) dit (to speak) ion (action) implies circular confinement if consented to.
The deception of air conditioning is about encircling the linear progression of spirit...the latter represents natural animation; the former represents artificial lethargy.
breath of the floor
Floor implies land (L); breath implies air (A); breathing implies water (W) aka natural law progressing through each being as liquid > spirit > solid.
Yahweh's Salvation Anointed was Yahweh before He was Salvation Anointed
a) Yahweh aka je (i) hovah (was)...all was (hovah) within which each anointed one was given the choice to claim self as I am (je).
It's the word "yahweh" which distracts the one using it from God breathing through ones uttering, and it's putting je+hovah together which contradicts anointment (christ).
b) Salvation aka sal (sole/soul) vat (vati; father) ion (action) implies the action of the sole father (God) for each reacting off-spring within. It's each off-spring which perceives animation as soul passing through body/mind aka motion moving through spirit (momentum) and essence (matter).
Once again...putting sal-vat-ion together contractions anointment aka the division of all into each, and it's each ones mind/ment which needs to resist the wanted temptation of putting together what all divides apart.
Before Moses was, I AM
a) Before implies the inversion of "forwarding being" aka all that was animating each one within.
b) Moses/mosaic implies the setting together of divided parts into a whole aka a game of puzzle suggested by few towards many to mix them together.
God anoints aka christens being by dividing each from one another, hence giving FREE will of choice. Moses implies a jew drawing out (mashah) consent from each gentiles free will of choice to establish a consensus among many aka a mosaic/puzzle. Joining a consensus shapes the mashah suggesting it into the messiah for the ones confined within it, which is how each jew becomes the lawgiver (moses) of consenting gentiles.
c) I AM (je suis; jesus) implies taking possession over self, while both ignoring the division from one another (christ) and giving self up to another (you are; judah)...the latter representing judas; the betrayer of jesus.
If any possession is taken (jesus), then one ignores given (god) potential (christ) while becoming possessed aka burdened by another (judah/judas/jew).
Jesus Christ is God
God WAS before Jesus Christ came into being...IS implies a measure taken and shared within God given.
puppets
Only through willing consent can a string be attached to ones mind.
chabad
Chabad aka CHA (chochmah; wisdom) B (binah; understanding) AD (da'at; knowledge)...knowledge implies nature moving through being; wisdom implies the discernment of each being within nature; understanding implies a beings submission to another, while ignoring knowledge.
It's foolish to seek understanding because doing so corrupts wisdom given aka dom (all perceivable) giving wis (ones perception).
Albert Einstein discovered atom via Brownian motion
"The traditional mathematical formulation of Brownian motion is that of the Wiener process"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brownian_motion
BROWN(ian) motion + WIENER process...that's a sodomy joke just like FAT MAN + LITTLE BOY is a pederast joke.
Seems like Trump is playing the "bad guy" for the future "good guy"
Trump as an influencer is utilized to shape appearances (seem) which lure those under the influence into a conflict (good vs bad; like vs dislike) against one another.
What's the opposite of seem? Being... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/appear.html
Being implies solid within fluid, hence not a seeming state. Few tempt many into conflict to bring them closer together like a seam/seem.
He's just making being pro-Israhell look retarded.
Pro vs contra implies the circular confinement of a beings mind while ignoring linear procession. If one ignores procession for confinement; then one retards (cessation of motion) ones mind.
sponsor of terrorism
Sponsor implies "one who binds himself"; terror implies "fear"; -ism implies "consensus"...joining a consensus about being afraid binds one to another.
(((they))) take over the...market
Buying into what another suggests while selling out ones free will of choice "marks" one. The market represents the deal in-between suggestion and consent, which cannot be taken over, since its a free-trade-market.
Are you suggesting religion is a mental disorder
Consenting to a suggestion implies mental fusion, hence religion/religo - "to bind anew".
Disorder implies the division (life) of natural order (inception towards death).
assuming we all believe the same things
Beliefs tempts differences to assume likeness while ignoring sameness of origin.
how forums are supposed to work
Forum/foras - "outside" aka a public gathering outside the private realm of insight.
Why are we allowing...
Allowance implies all of nature validating each being within by admission...few distract from that by tempting many to seek allowance from representatives among other beings.
As long as one seeks allowance from another, so long does one deny being given free will of choice as allowance within nature. What's the opposite of allowance? Denial...
half of
What halfs a being? Choosing a side...
half of people don't maintain an internal logic
What's logic based upon? Choosing a side...
Force (inception towards death) inspires diversity (life) to resist mixing...few mix many together to throw inspiration into confusion.
Cognitive dissonance is the mental stress
CO(gnitive) implies together; DIS(sonance) implies apart...artificially putting together what nature sets apart establishes stress/stringere - "to draw tight".
something that made you hold your belief even more?
Odds. Believing implies holding onto odds to achieve even. That's gambling.
One of the things I pitched overboard was the idea that everyone else was like me.
a) The CON in consciousness implies likeness; the SCIOUS in consciousness implies difference. It's putting con + scious together which corrupts natural difference with artificial likeness.
b) Ideas can only be shaped onboard as suggestible information held within memory. Overboard implies into the ocean of perceivable inspiration...which cannot be held onto by a vessel navigating within it.
I believe this phenomenon is related to one called "egosyntonicity"
Ego implies mind holding self within possession, while ignoring the potential of expressing self. Freud and his ilk shape an outside consensus to gain access to the possessive memory (ego). This access is being given by willing belief aka by ones free will of choice holding onto a physical idol or mental ideal.
The SYN in egosyntonicity refers to the consensus within others; while the EGO in egosyntonicity refers to ones own mind holding onto the idea of consensus.
It's consenting to suggested idealism which establishes a consensus aka a relation, which makes any idealistic thought relative aka Einsteins relativism. Freud then uses psychoanalysis upon the synthetic relations of ideas...which those holding onto ideas cannot perceive.
the functioning of a certain type of human consciousness.
To ascertain (affix) any type (form) contradicts its function within flow, while shaping a CONsciousness. Form can only function within flow while apart from one another.
The basic idea is...
The base was before any idea can be shaped.
rationality vanishes when the conclusion threatens to kick your ego right in the nuts.
The ION within conclusion represents nature moving on...to conclude implies a being shutting (clude) itself off from nature by artificially joining together (con) with others.
Rationality implies beings artificially reasoning against one another by joining together, while ignoring that nature sets each being apart from one another.
Nature doesn't vanish if a being chooses to ignore it for artifice; yet artifice tricks a being to believe that nature vanishes...if held onto, hence the need to let go aka pitch overboard.
a belief that contradicts
There has to be first a division between that which can be believed and the being enabled to believe...it's believing which contradicts division.
Belief perseverance aka conceptual conservatism
If nature divides each being within from one another, then perseverance cannot be shared. Few suggest many that perseverance can be shared, which establishes a mental concept called "consensus", which represents the -ism within conservatism.
Joining a consensus by giving consent to a suggested -ism represents believing. It's ones belief which is being conserved within a conceptual consensus with others, thereby tricking each member to believe in the perseverance of the sum....no matter how many members get destroyed while trying to hold the consensus together.
How Do We Get Rid of Poor People AS A WHOLE?
a) Within whole...a partial cannot be poor unless ignoring whole. The etymology of poor/pere - "to produce" implies whole producing partial.
Rich on the other hand comes from the root of reg - "to move within a straight line", which implies whole moving each produced partial (life) within a straight line (inception towards death).
In nature there's no circular conflict in-between rich vs poor...only the production (poor) of each being within a straight line (rich).
b) Rid/reudh - "to clear; save; set free"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rid Nature gets rid (inception towards death) of being (life).
c) A people cannot be whole...only a sum of partials within whole. It's person aka per sonos (by sound) which implicates sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all" for each particular mind structured within (in-stru-ment).
TheMafia blocking free-will-of-choice...
everything is fake narrative
To narrate implies "relating particulars" aka carrying parts together. Nature doesn't narrate...it particulates being.
Narration represents fake; particularization implies real. That's how a jew controls the narrative by artificially narrating nature to gentiles.
https://vidmax.com/video/237693-jesus-gets-hoisted-to-the-stratosphere-at-seoul-easter-parade-and-people-are-wondering-if-he-passed-the-artimis-ii