There has to be first a division between that which can be believed and the being enabled to believe...it's believing which contradicts division.
Belief perseverance aka conceptual conservatism
If nature divides each being within from one another, then perseverance cannot be shared. Few suggest many that perseverance can be shared, which establishes a mental concept called "consensus", which represents the -ism within conservatism.
Joining a consensus by giving consent to a suggested -ism represents believing. It's ones belief which is being conserved within a conceptual consensus with others, thereby tricking each member to believe in the perseverance of the sum....no matter how many members get destroyed while trying to hold the consensus together.
There has to be first a division between that which can be believed and the being enabled to believe...it's believing which contradicts division.
If nature divides each being within from one another, then perseverance cannot be shared. Few suggest many that perseverance can be shared, which establishes a mental concept called "consensus", which represents the -ism within conservatism.
Joining a consensus by giving consent to a suggested -ism represents believing. It's ones belief which is being conserved within a conceptual consensus with others, thereby tricking each member to believe in the perseverance of the sum....no matter how many members get destroyed while trying to hold the consensus together.