a) Within whole...a partial cannot be poor unless ignoring whole. The etymology of poor/pere - "to produce" implies whole producing partial.
Rich on the other hand comes from the root of reg - "to move within a straight line", which implies whole moving each produced partial (life) within a straight line (inception towards death).
In nature there's no circular conflict in-between rich vs poor...only the production (poor) of each being within a straight line (rich).
c) A people cannot be whole...only a sum of partials within whole. It's person aka per sonos (by sound) which implicates sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all" for each particular mind structured within (in-stru-ment).
a) Within whole...a partial cannot be poor unless ignoring whole. The etymology of poor/pere - "to produce" implies whole producing partial.
Rich on the other hand comes from the root of reg - "to move within a straight line", which implies whole moving each produced partial (life) within a straight line (inception towards death).
In nature there's no circular conflict in-between rich vs poor...only the production (poor) of each being within a straight line (rich).
b) Rid/reudh - "to clear; save; set free"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rid Nature gets rid (inception towards death) of being (life).
c) A people cannot be whole...only a sum of partials within whole. It's person aka per sonos (by sound) which implicates sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all" for each particular mind structured within (in-stru-ment).