flip flopping
Gentiles are being domesticated to hold onto a side within conflicts of reason; a jew can then utilize talmudic reasoning to contradict both sides, which those reasoning view as "flip flopping".
Before one can reason over suggested sides....one consents to a suggestion, while ignoring perception. For example...suggested words tempt one to ignore perceivable sound. The latter moves; while the former tempts one to hold onto definitions (definite; to affix).
Those reasoning ignore that nature moves; while those "flip flopping" mimic adaptation to a moving system (sound) within the boundaries of an affixed system (words).
the idea of Anarchism
What came first...theism; idealism or anarchism?
a taboo
a) How does one restrict FREE will of choice?
b) What if "forbid" implies ones free will of choice to bet forwards aka ones desire to request from another?
My big question about anarchy is who enforces it
a) Those who suggest anarchism gain permission from those consenting to be anarchists to enforce.
b) Question implies ones consent to suggested progressivism (quest towards outcome); hence now waiting for suggested answers from another.
Those who question others are permitting answers to be enforced.
Nature isn't a quest towards outcome; but each ones resistance (life) within origin (inception towards death) as temporary problem within ongoing solution.
anarchism
a) AN (without) ARKHON (ruler)
b) A suggested -ism tempts ones consent to follow a ruler.
c) 'Curb Your Enthusiasm' Credits Song...
sheeple
Perceivable inspiration can only be seen by the naked eye; while consenting to suggested information pulls the wool over ones eyes.
In regard to that...SHEER, adjective - "pure; clear; separate from anything foreign; unmingled". Each sheep needs to sheer self; waiting for a shepherd hurts/herds sheep.
https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/shepherd-consciousness/
Science has long pondered
Pondering implies holding onto; science (Latin scio; to know; to perceive) implies letting go of, hence all perceivable setting free each ones perception within.
Few suggest scientism to tempt each consenting scientist to perpetuate information for many to hold onto.
how to build an artificial
Natural implies ones perception within all perceivable...anything suggested by another implies artificial IF one consents to it.
mirrors the functionality
a) Presentation (perceivable) generates representation (perception)...mirroring/admiring/mimicking suggested presentations prevents perception to re-generate.
In other words...how could one grow discernment of self by getting information by another?
b) Function implies Latin functionem; functio; bhung - "be used" by action aka func (life) within tion (inception towards death)...this cannot be mirrored without destroying self within origin.
living organisms
a) Consenting to a suggested -ism diminishes living by repressing expression.
b) OR'GAN, noun (Latin organum) - "a natural instrument of action"...instrument implies reaction within enacting sound. A person (Latin per sonos; by sound) implies an instrument within sound aka insane (Latin in sanus; within sound)...few suggest "insane person" to distract many from discerning self within origin.
Scientists...
...willingly follow suggested scientism, while ignoring science (Latin scio; to know; to perceive).
to prove
PROVE, verb (Latin probo) - "to ascertain some unknown quality"...if one ignores perceivable knowledge (science) for suggested understanding (scientism); then knowledge turns unknown to one.
brain-like
Each brain is set apart from one another, hence differentiated...few utilize suggestion to tempt many to consent "alike", while ignoring each ones unique brain.
computer can exist
a) To compute implies throwing together; to be implies set apart from one another.
b) The EX in exist implies ones expressed growth outwards; which COM (together with) inverts into repression of self under suppression of others.
c) A jew computes/compiles/collectivizes gentiles together so that a jew can remain apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
artificial synapse
Natural implies inception towards death setting apart life from one another...few suggest artificial synopsis aka syn (together) haptein (to fasten) to tempt many together; which fastens the demise of each ones life.
In short...natural flows; artificial forms indigestion within flow; flow forces dissolution of formed indigestion.
one dedicated
DEDICATE, verb - "to set apart and consecrate to a divine being" aka perceivable whole setting itself apart into each ones perception within. Meanwhile...a suggested dedication tempts ones vow of consent to another, which ignores perceivable.
Nothing like...
What is nothing like? How could nothing be equal in quantity to anything?
like referencing
Referencing to likeness tempts one to ignore being different from one another.
Illegal (Latin illegalis) aka IN (within) LEGALIS; LEX (law) aka being within natural law.
The trick...ILL (not) or IN (within) depends on ones choice to discern self within or de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing) thereof. Few suggest nihil-ism to tempt many to de-nial self discernment.
Consenting to laws of men denies/ignores laws of nature. The former punishes breaking; while latter breaks whole into partials, hence setting each one within free from one another. It's called punishment, because ones consent inflicts a suggested penalty upon ones mind.
show me
Sight as oneself (perception) or shown by another (suggestion)...free will of choice. Guess what? Perceivable moves so the suggested "show must go on"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t99KH0TR-J4&themeRefresh=1
a) Tax implies the burden taken upon self when consenting to the suggestions of another, who in return are being charged to govern; administer; regulate; police etc.
Furthermore...ones consent implies "to charge; to adjure; to bind by an oath; to instruct authoritatively".
b) Suggested "the people" tempts one to consent to theism and pluralism, while ignoring to be ones sole authority over self aka free will of choice.
c) Payer are selling themselves out aka "discharging a debt", and ones consent implies ones creed/credit taking on debt from another.
Being implies re-charge (life) within charge (inception towards death); hence no buying and selling unless one ignores being FREE within ALL.
d) "work for" implies energy (work) and motion (forwards)...for employed matter within. Few suggest occupation to tempt many to seek possession within work aka trying to hold onto a moving system...a temporary issue working itself out aka electric (inception towards death) weakening magnetic (life).
TROLL, verb - "to move in a circular direction"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Troll
Flatline (inception towards death) generates waveform (life)...no circle.
Few suggest many to ignore that for the band of hope aka the leap of faith aka the wheel of fortune aka the circle of life on the path unwinding... https://genius.com/Elton-john-circle-of-life-lyrics
We need to round these people up
Tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together)...few are rounding many up by tempting them together. This is called circling the square aka kaaba aka kabbala.
Notice kike/kikel/circle and cutting off circumference (circumcision) and utilizing N(orth) E(east) W(est) S(outh) to tell-a-vision towards center.
Furthermore; notice that reasoning implies circular logic aka no matter what many are reasoning about; they remain in conflict with each other. Meanwhile in reality...being implies wave-form (life) within direct-flow (inception towards death).
One ring to rule them all...ouroboros...ring around the rosie...ring of fire...you spin me round...cirque du soleil etc.
control
a) CON implies "together with"; being implies "apart from".
b) Ones choice selecting chosen ones suggestion permits consensual control.
c) Consent tempts together; resistance sustains apartheid (life) within wholeness (inception towards death)
access denied
Ones perception within all perceivable implies "all access"...suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) and ones consent to de-nial perceivable for it, tempts one to ignore all access, while permitting others to restrict access.
limit reached
Being implies free (choice) within limit (balance); hence inception of being implying "limit reached". Few tempt many to ignore/deny self discernment by consenting to self imposed limits aka "reason".
How to limit "ones choice"? By consenting to "chosen ones" suggestion.
they will
There can be only ones free WILL of choice...plural cannot choose; singular (one) can be tempted to choose suggested pluralism (they).
If only life sentence could miss point of death...
party
Before parts can be lured into a party (suggestion)...whole (perceivable) sets itself apart (perception).
third
a) Which ONE is counting?
b) A tri-angle implies a starting point ending where it started. Switching point (end of sentence) with ones life sentence, and inception towards death implies ending where it started.
Angle implies "point where two lines meet" aka ones consent to another ones suggestion, which is how a mason of free (will of choice) gains control over angles.
a) All perceivable breaks into each ones perception within...other ones suggest outbreaks to invert ones perception.
b) Holding onto suggested implies isolating within, hence generating the want to break out.
c) Ones consent to any suggestion implies ones imprisonment (mind within prison) permitting another as warden over the suggested. A prison implies a place of confinement aka ones mind; restraining itself voluntarily, by consenting to the suggestion of another.
Edit: Sleight of hand by tavistock... https://genius.com/Queen-i-want-to-break-free-lyrics
to be ruled
Rule aka Latin regula (straight); from reg (move in a straight line) aka to be (life) ruled (inception towards death).
anyway
Any aka one-y (one, unique) implies the one and only way (inception towards death) for each one within (life).
anti-christ
a) For vs anti implies reasoning over suggested moralism...how could one be anti-christ, while utilizing christianity as the foundation to be anti-christ?
That being said...moral aka moris aka mos - "one's disposition". Does one have a disposition before choosing it from among the suggestions by another one?
b) If christ implies anointed one, then how could any anointed one aka consecrated by oil aka birthed through mother aka sprang-off internal-course (offspring by intercourse)...be for or against ones origin without contradicting self?
Ones consent to any suggested -ism increases dis-ease within ones hearth (burning place), because holding onto suggested not only fuels; but also dims ones fire/living force.
The more suggested information held onto; the more smoke clouding ones perception of perceivable inspiration (oxygen supply).
My first memory
a) If motion first; then second (Latin seco; to divide) momentum, since motion generates momentum by internal separation.
b) Momentum implies place for (ory) mind (mem) of matter, since only within momentum (inception towards death) can matter (life) memorize.
c) "My" implies ones choice to hold onto memories, hence taking possession thereof, which contradicts ongoing momentum generating potential matter.
In short...potential cannot be possessed (want to hold onto); in has to be expressed (need to let go of).
d) Those who hold onto temporary memories are tempted to ignore the momentum of ongoing motion, and the "first memory" implies the longest held recollection of suggested information by another. Choosing to do so implies a misappropriation of memory.
some spin on my mind
Holding onto temporal (suggested information) within ongoing (perceivable inspiration) tempts one into cyclical reasoning, while permitting another to spin narratives to reason over.
memories, sense of self
Memories of self implies ones choice to remember suggested information held onto aka to respond to memory, while ignoring to adapt to momentum...that implies egoism.
Few suggest egoism by tempting each one among many to take possession over suggested information through willing consent. Afterwards; those taking possession become possessed by what they hold onto; which thanks to consent, is being shaped by those suggesting it, not by those holding onto it.
This deception has been used "for centuries to connote war, community, isolation, hope, and despair," and implies "a highly mutable metaphor with seemingly limitless symbolism" called GOLEM - "artificial man; automaton; shapeless mass; embryo; folded upon self".
know your enemy
a) Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) isn't yours to take...one can only take suggested information aka understanding (standing-under).
b) Enemy implies EN (within) MY (belonging to me) aka ones choice to take into possession implying ones enemy within.
satanism
SATAN aka s-t-n - "one who opposes" + ISM aka ismatical - "by the same path"...that implies each difference (life) opposing same path (inception towards death).
Satan implies ones choice to resist temptation; while any -ism implies a suggested temptation by another.
the good; the bad; the ugly
Aka suggested theism (the); moralism (good vs bad) and progressivism (ugly; uggr; fear towards outcome)...each one a temptation for ones free will of choice to ignore resisting.
black nobility
Aka being free (noble) from ignorance (dark).
jesuit order
Aka proceeding within (order) salvation (jesus; Iesus; yeshua) aka partial (life) within order of salvatio/save/sol/soul/sole/whole (inception towards death).
ism
Aka ismatical - "by the same path"...if many consent to suggested -isms by few; then each one ignores being differentiated (life) by same path (inception towards death).
all the other
ALL implies whole (perceivable); OTHER implies partials (perception)...suggested THE-ism tempts one to ignore that.
a) A jew suggests theism (theo) to gain the strength (cracy) of consenting gentiles.
b) A jew suggests globalism to lure consenting gentiles to remain within BA'AL (glo-baal-ism) while being sacrificed.
c) Suggestion ushers in ones ignorance of perception...if consented to.
You will find no edge.
Knowledge...
obsessive about 'clearing the name
a) Only nature clears (inception towards death) obscurity (life)...hence life struggling to clear (need) obscurity (want).
b) A jew tempts want with suggestion (information), which when consented to by a gentile, obscures needed perception (inspiration). Tempting consent implies selling and buying, both tempt one to ignore that nature sets free will of choice aka each one within as evaluation (perception) within value (perceivable).
In other words...jew suggests currency inside perceivable current to establish FIAT (Latin; let it be done) - "authoritative sanction" through the consent of gentile.
Ones choice of consent selects chosen ones suggestion, hence ELITE (French élite) - "selection, choice".
c) Nature doesn't name (noun) anything...it designates units (Latin unitas; unus, one) by setting apart whole (all perceivable) into partials (each ones perception)...those within shape names as idols for others to hold onto; while ignoring the moving nature underneath.
Suggested words can only be shaped within perceivable sound and oneself can be tricked with suggested "insane person" to ignore perceivable "in sanus (within sound) + per sonos" (by sound)". This implies spell-craft.
Those who adapt to perceivable sound imply PHONETICIANS (from phonic; sound); while those who consent to suggested words implies DEAF PHONETICIANS aka def-initions.
Furthermore...name (Latin nombre) implies number - "designation of unit" (Latin unitas; unus; one)...there can be only one...one for all and all (perceivable) for one (perception).
d) Consent to a suggested name implies "possessive"; while reasoning against others about it implies "obsessive"...posse (being able) + ob (against).
A jew suggests names/numbers/nouns to trick gentiles to posses it for self, while obsess about it against each other...which in return permits a jew not just control over both sides of every gentile conflict of reason, but also the power of mass consent to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) any and all suggested names/numbers (nouns) with added (adjective) words (verbs).
e) Any name gentiles hold onto; the natural order clears up...which a jew distracts from with suggested narratives for gentiles to also hold onto.
In short...sound implies ongoing; words imply temporary...gentiles are being tempted to ignore ongoing for temporary, which any jew exploits without a shred of mercy.
a) THE-ism connects those consenting with those suggesting.
b) TION (action) separates into reactions...others suggest "connection" to tempt reactions together aka many tempted to follow directions by few leaders.
c) TO aka towards implies a separation of whole (inception towards death) into partials (life)...not a connection.
d) SIN implies a voluntary departure aka division of partials within whole against each other. This is called "reasoning" and few utilize suggestion to tempt many to reason against each other about it.
e) AND is a conjunction, connective or conjoining word...and if one utilize it; then one CONNECTS with another.
If all is one in energy; then energy AND what else?
f) Demon aka dai-mon (divider-provider) aka provider (inception towards death) and divider (life). Nature provides separation; those within wield the free will of choice to ignore that for division against each other, and division (reason) requires connection (consent to suggestion) first.
a) Energy...what else?
b) All was perceivable before ones within can suggest what it is.