If the Police no longer work for the People, why do taxpayers fund them?
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
a) Tax implies the burden taken upon self when consenting to the suggestions of another, who in return are being charged to govern; administer; regulate; police etc.
Furthermore...ones consent implies "to charge; to adjure; to bind by an oath; to instruct authoritatively".
b) Suggested "the people" tempts one to consent to theism and pluralism, while ignoring to be ones sole authority over self aka free will of choice.
c) Payer are selling themselves out aka "discharging a debt", and ones consent implies ones creed/credit taking on debt from another.
Being implies re-charge (life) within charge (inception towards death); hence no buying and selling unless one ignores being FREE within ALL.
d) "work for" implies energy (work) and motion (forwards)...for employed matter within. Few suggest occupation to tempt many to seek possession within work aka trying to hold onto a moving system...a temporary issue working itself out aka electric (inception towards death) weakening magnetic (life).