to report to prison or be suicided. Still a free choice, though!
a) Prison or suicide implies the suggested choices of another...report implies ones free will of choice RE-sponding to a PORT aka a pass over from a free vessel into the confinement of a port.
b) Still implies "motionless", which contradicts being choice within balance of motion.
The suggested rhetoric "still though" aka "motionless allowing" tempts one to ignore that only motion allows (momentum) reactions (matter).
we'll all be
An inversion of being within all...sold by suggested pluralism (we will), which tempts ones consenting free WILL of choice to sell out.
It's the puppets that consent to the suggested lies of "hugely nosed people"; which in return prevents a puppet from being real.
What's the opposite of puppet? Rebel; revolt aka "to cast off allegiance, rise against rulers, break away from established authority"...doesn't that fit the behavior of "hugely nosed people"?
What is it about the jewish revolutionary spirit and its impact on world history? https://archive.org/details/jewishrevolution0000jone
Freemasons created...liberalism
Liberal implies free. A mason utilizes FREE will of choice to shape a suggested -ism (liberal-ism), which in return tempts ones FREE will of choice to consent, and thereby bind itself to another. That is self imposed slavery, while selecting another as master mason.
promulgated
Pro-mulgere aka to milk forth implies squeezing out and refers to suggestion putting the squeeze of temptation onto ones consenting free will of choice.
In other words...if one wants something, then one gives (consent) to take (suggestion) aka one squeezes self, while permitting others to milk.
Nature establishes being...not by squeezing together...but by setting free aka loosening up matter (life) within motion (inception towards death).
In short...suggested fiction promulgates; perceivable reality abrogates. One can only discern this for self...not take this as information by others without promulgating self in the process.
jews have taken the torch
a) A jew doesn't take...a jew gains what gentiles give willingly, while selling out.
b) Torch/torquere/terkw - "to twist". Gentile consent passes the torch of jewish suggestion to one another, while twisting each other into conflicts of reason against one another.
Intention & Lucidity matters
a) Matter (ray) within momentum (visible spectrum) of motion (light) can be tempted with intent towards outcome to ignore (dark) discernment (bright aka lucidity) within origin.
b) Intent/intendere - "to lean toward" tempts one to ignore being center (choice) of origin (balance), which then imbalances self.
In regard to light...if a ray within a visible spectrum of light leans towards, then it refracts light. Intentionalism (suggestion) refracts ones sight from phenomenon (perception), while permitting others by consent to bend the refracted light.
jews created
Both judaism and creationism imply suggested religions...if consented to.
against
a) Implies reasoning against another about a religion one consented to.
b) Instead of "for vs against"; try forwarding (inception towards death) a gain (life)...
like they did in babylon
a) Babylon aka BA'BEL, noun (Heb) - "confusion; disorder"
b) Same (inception towards death) generating differences (life) implies natural order...differences choosing to behave alike implies disorder.
c) Consenting to suggested pluralism (they) tempts one to ignore differences among one another for likeness with one another.
d) Your consent to "they" establishes confusion (babel) and suggesting "they" to others implies artificial uttering (babble), which makes one a Babylonian aka confused one aka babbling one.
remained the same
How could anything within a moving system remain the same? What if many are tricked to hold onto suggestions by few, while believing that holding onto mental or physical possessions makes them remain the same?
The religion that says to destroy the works of the jews is not a weapon of the jews
What about "antisemitism" ?
I see jews having conquered the world because Christians gave up
What if only God gives? What if ignoring that which is given by consenting to what others are offering permits few to conquer many?
What if conquer aka con (together; with) quaerere (to seek; gain) implies many together seeking to gain from few apart?
I see...the world
Impossible from within, right? Made possible by consenting to what others are showing about outside, right?
Christianity is a weapon of Jewish elites
Elite - "selection; choice" implies by ones weapon of choice, which each anointed (christian) wields within perceivable, yet ignores when consenting to suggested.
This consent of an elect (ones choice) towards the suggestion of selected elite (chosen one) establishes one under another; many under few; buyers under sellers; slaves under masters; followers under leaders; gentiles under a jew...
"The weapons (choice) of our warfare (reason) are not carnal" ~2 Corinthians 10:4.
Where’s the “con” in Christian doctrine, then?
- Doctrine/docere/dek - "to take; accept" which implies taking into possession by holding onto.
- Christian/christen - "to anoint" implies setting apart aka letting go of an off-spring.
Christian implies apart; doctrine implies together aka CON, verb - "together; with". That's the big swindle aka nature setting apart, while few within are tempting many together.
electrode
a) Elect (ones choice) can be tempted to select (chosen ones suggestion)
b) Electron aka electric ion aka ion/ienai - "to go" implies being (life) electrically charged (inception towards death), hence going as anode (growth up the way) towards cathode (down the way of loss).
solve problems
Being implies problem (life) within solution (inception towards death); hence ones struggle to sustain self while being dissolved.
cognitive electronic warfare
Aka Perception + Choice + Reason...
a) Artificial suggestion aims at ones cognition by tempting one to ignore perceivable.
b) Intelligence/intelligo - "to understand" implies ones choice consenting to "stand under" suggestions by another.
c) Consenting to suggested establishes a conflict (war) of reason among all those consenting.
That's how cognitive electronic warfare operates and why technology is used...techno/tekhnē (artifice) logy/logia (reason).
French National Assembly
a) French/frank - "free" implies being set apart from one another...assembly contradicts that.
b) Nation/native - "inborn" implies being born within (life) outside (inception towards death)...a national assembly tempts each native to be governed from outside, which permits the outside to migrate inside.
impeachment
Only ones consent by FREE will of choice to a suggestion by another can hinder (impeach) ones mind (ment) within perceivable.
former rothschild
Shielding (schild) blood (roth) implies perpetuation of former forwards to sustain form within flow.
being considered
Siding together (con-side) contradicts being (choice) in-between sides (balance)...
a) Does a suggested game tempt one to fantasize about dominating the weaknesses of another?
b) How does playing a game asserts ones dominance?
c) Does loss of access tempt demand?
playing games was just about fun
a) Play/plight - "danger; risk" + Fun/funnen/fond - "foolish"...both implying a temptation to ignore just (need) for unjust (want).
b) Perceivable work inspires one to draw from...suggested games tempt one to withdraw into, while being drawn from.
it's exhausting
Nature animates...artifice exhausts. It's that simple for a few within perceivable nature to exhaust many with suggested artifice.
I want to see
Want implies watching what others are showing...need implies ones sight (perception) within all (perceivable) resisting the wanted temptation to watch one another.
The more one wants to see the more obscure need becomes.
now it's all about
ALL (motion) generates NOW (momentum) for ONE (matter)...other ones suggest aboutism (abutan/outside) to tempt one to ignore self discernment of being matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion.
in my downtime
No rest for the wicked. There's no downtime within energy; only the bliss of ignorance when for example "playing games for fun"...
a) Gnostic/gno - "to know" implies ones perception...consenting to anything suggested tempts one to ignore gnostic for gnosticism, hence being tempted to get knowledge from another.
b) Gibberish/gibber - "to speak rapid and inarticulate"...all words suggested imply artifice within perceivable sound, and tempt one to rapid/rapere - "hurry away, carry off, seize".
That's why few suggest words, which many carry off into endless conflicts of reason against each other. Whatever word suggested...others start building opinions on it. That building process implies gibberish aka the tower of babel...always collapsing upon its foundation.
a) Missing his Sonichu necklace.
b) Does the G stand for Gotta Go fast?
Shekinah simply implies matter (life) dwelling within momentum (inception towards death) of motion...
The jewish angle is about suggesting layers upon layers of different brands to describe the same process...and gentiles are bullshitting themselves by consenting to these suggested brands.
Wise father (motion); divine mother (momentum); vengeful one (matter)...schizo/schism/scindo - "to divide" implies the whole process of separation from motion; through momentum; into matter.
Attributing the label "schizo" to another tempts one to ignore what separated one from another.
The label "schizo" + "schizophrenia" itself was suggested by Eugene Bleuler, who conspired with Sigismund Schlomo Freud to conquer psychiatry... http://prodimage.images-bn.com/pimages/9783796528576_p0_v1_s1200x630.jpg
As for wise; divine and vengeful...motion implies way of proceeding (wise); momentum divides (divine) way from wanderer, and only matter can venge/vim - "gain" during the loss of full.
divine mother...smothering mother
It's the vengeful ones (matter) within ignored division (momentum); which are smothering each other by wanting suggested from another, while ignoring perceivable.
There needs to be deterrence
De-terrence/terrere - "to frighten away". Self mortification as a token of rePENTANCE sounds scary... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3dqZjHnY.jpg
suggests that there needs to be
Being implies perception; need implies perceivable...suggested implies want.
Hook (suggestions by another) Line (all perceivable) Sinker (ones consent)
Notice that Pinoccio lying is symbolized by the budding of a tree aka growth...why is it that for the wooden to become real; its growth has to be prevented? Where is the truth in preventing growth?
Notice that Gepetto/yâsaph/yehôsêph/Iōsḗph/yosef crafts "puppets"...
Crafting (suggestion) puppets (consent) within reality (perception) by preventing growth...where's the lie in that?
“debunkbot” can turn even hardcore conspiracy theorists into budding skeptics
Suggested skepticism is about casting doubt/duo - "two" within another ONE by tempting a conflict of reason, where one has to choose between two sides.
The longer one reasons, the more doubtful one becomes about suggested.
It makes you look young
Ain't seeing it... https://img.gvid.tv/i/3ETgxuav.jpg + https://img.gvid.tv/i/3bm1RfYj.jpg
bended the rules a little...to not lie under any circumstances
a) Doesn't circum/circle imply fully bend?
b) Does being alive imply ones stance within a circle or within a line (inception towards death)?
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Elton-john-circle-of-life-lyrics
- In the circle of life
- It's the wheel of fortune
- It's the leap of faith
- It's the band of hope
- TIL WE FIND OUR PLACE
- ON THE PATH UNWINDING
to always speak the truth
Sound was before speech can be shaped within...
outcome...
...implies origin. The former tempts want; the latter implies need.
a) Bundesrepublik aka bund/bond/bondage... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Jewish_Labour_Bund
b) Distortion (suggestion) of vision (perception) GERMIN-ates seeds of disease.
Aka entering (consent) the gate (choice) to debate (reason)...
A frame (suggestion) confines response (perception)...if one consents to it.