if december is the 10th...
...then january (11th); february (12th); march (1st) aka vernal equinox aka spring.
how many months are there?
Month/menon - "moon"...how many moons are there?
Happy
Happy/hap - "chance, fortune"...choice adapts to origin; chance seeks fortune towards outcome.
New
"The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun." ~ ecclesiastes 1:9
- September/septem/seven
- October/octo/eight
- November/novem/nine
- December/deca/ten
Wed, 1 January 2025 = 1st of Tevet, 5785. Tevet (טֵבֵת) is the 10th month of the Hebrew year.
Year
Year/jaru/jaro - "spring"...
some shape or form that is provable by sense data
Sensing implies as form (life) shaping within flow (inception towards death)...collected data has to be artificially moved and exchanged among those who ignore their senses.
Everything is ultimately faith based
Before one can choose to have faith in anything...everything generates the balance for ones choice.
What generates balance and why would the choice within require faith to function?
Faith implies holding onto something...holding onto something during balance implies imbalance for ones choice.
you can gather knowledge
What if moving knowledge (perceivable inspiration) cannot be gathered/collected/held onto/faithfully preserved....only drawn from?
What if few trick many to gather/collect/hold onto/faithfully preserve suggested information (fiction), while ignoring perceivable inspiration (reality)?
How come many seem to lose "knowledge" to few over and over again? How often did the library of Alexandria burned down, and what does Amazon's "KINDLE FIRE" imply?
It's just another level of deception
From self onto others aka from deep state within self (ignorance) towards deep state among others (occult)...it's ones own ignorance which occults that which nature reveals, when consenting to the suggestions by others.
Level implies balance; being implies choice..."another" tempts one to ignore that.
God cannot be proven...
...because proof is in the pudding/putting aka CAUSE putting BEING into effect. One cannot proof to another that ALL (whole) causes ONE (partial)...only discern self within it.
It's seeking proofs through one another which takes origin out of the equation...
Seek God
a) Seeking implies striving towards outcome...God implies origin.
b) The suggestion: "Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you"...distracts one from all being given through an open foundation (perceivable) to each one (perception) within.
Whatever one asks; the solutions was already given. Whatever one seeks; everything was fully available. Wherever one knocks; was already open.
We are flipping an upside down world right side up
So then flip seeking into finding aka foundation of being. Few can only play hide and seek because many willingly ignore origin for seeking outcomes like peace; mastery; end game; love; protection; benefits; growth etc.
staying in the workforce
From the moment of inception to the moment of death...the living heart works in response to the force of nature. It's the ignorant mind that can be tempted to join a "workforce", which establishes a conflict of reason...
- Should I stay or should I go now
- If I go there will be trouble
- And if I stay it will be double
They inherited...
Inheritance in nature aka succession implies increase of child through decrease of adult. Few suggest tradable inheritance outside of self to tempt many to seek from another ones decrease , while ignoring to increase self.
to squeeze out
Nature impresses (inception towards death) expressions (life) within...ignoring this represses ones expression within self, while permitting others to suppress from outside.
Ones consent to hold onto a suggestion implies the squeeze upon self, while reasoning about suggested implies the squeezing of each other among many...for the benefit of few.
complete lack of leadership
a) Followers complete a leader; lack/loss completes growth...following a leader prevents growth (life) within loss (inception towards death).
b) Before a ship can be led...it balances as solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death). Following another ship establishes an imbalance between giving way vs standing on.
Navigation itself is only an issue within an artificial waterway. Why? Because there's only one way (inception towards death) for each vessel (life) within nature.
No life is like: "Omg, I'm lost, where's death?"...
CIA
Each being implies center (perception) of agency (perceivable)...consenting to a suggestion by another implies intelligence/intelligo - "to understand" aka to stand under another, hence permitting another the center position above self.
documents reveal
A docked (docu) mind (ment) conceals itself from what nature reveals.
The God of Things As They Ought to Be
a) Ought/ahte/agan - "to own; owe"...taking into possession represses the expressions of a being.
b) Thing/þing - "assembly"...God doesn't assemble beings; God (whole) separates each being (partial) from one another.
c) Ones consent to pluralism (things) selects the one suggesting it as "God of Things" aka as the assembling author.
billiken
a) BI (two) LIKE (same; equal; having the same form)
b) If one gives consent (want or not want) to a suggestion, then two sides (want vs not want) are being assembled together within a conflict of reason among consenting aka equalized ones.
Those who rub its belly will have good luck
Applying friction (to rub) to the belly/bhel (swelling) of a conflict gives good luck to the one outside of those lucked/locked in the bad conflict.
To buy a Billiken was said to give the purchaser luck, but to receive one as a gift would be better luck.
Buying a billiken implies investing into the shaping of a suggestion, which tempts others into a conflict of reason by selling themselves out.
Receiving a billiken implies others willingly entering into a conflict of reason already purchased...aka benefiting from generated interest/usury.
connection to jesuits
Each anointed one (Christ) is set apart from one another...consenting to suggested jesuism connects many together.
connection to freemasonry
A mason of free (will of choice) shapes suggestions to tempt the choice of others to bind self by consent to a conflict of reason, hence establishing a bi-like being out of each one differential.
new thought movement
New vs old implies circular movement of thought aka logic within self and reason against others.
Suggested NEW distracts one from perceivable NOW aka the momentum (inception towards death) of motion for each matter (life) within.
an idol created
Nature cannot create...all was before each one comes into being. Consenting to suggested creationism aka creatio ex nihilo ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo ) implies idolatry.
a) Trust puts ones mind into rest aka "interest"...
b) Don't aka "doing nothing" isn't real...it's a suggested fiction tempting your consenting trust to hold onto it, hence putting your mind to rest.
all these oligarchs...
Oligos (few) arkhia (to rule)...not all, but each one of few ruling many. How? By tempting each singular one among many to consent to suggested pluralism (these).
Neither God, nor nature implies plural...but one and only/oli aka singular.
the effort to convince
As effortless as using suggestion to tempt consent to convince itself to shirk response-ability onto another.
the surveillance state for intelligence
Intelligence/intelligo - "to understand"...if many "stand under"; then few simply have to hammer down anyone standing up. Wack a mole isn't that hard to watch over aka surveil.
both conservatives and leftists alike
Both conservatism vs liberalism and leftism vs rightism imply alike consent to mutual conflict in-between aka to a conflict of reason.
Before one can choose a side within such an imbalance...one is choice within balance.
they hold all the power
Nature cannot be held onto, since it moves velocity (inception towards death) through resistance (life). The power of few implies consenting many choosing to hold onto suggestions by few, hence collectivizing all ignored resistance of the unwashed masses into the hands of a persistently resisting few aka israel/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God".
until they can separate rhetoric from action
It's action (inception towards death) which separates into reactions (life)...few suggest rhetoric to tempt many to ignore that, while grinding against each other within conflicts of reason over suggested rhetoric.
Rhetoric/rhetorice/rhētorikē tekhnē aka "artificial oration"...an inversion of natural action, which doesn't orate words, but moves sound through each instrumental being.
incredible what these companies are doing
Com (together) Pa (to feed)...it's the credit given by each of many, which permits few to feed upon many together.
Few suggest the creeds; each one of many gives credit to it, hence being able (ble) to credit (credi) within (in)...
a) Call no other man father/pater/pate...
b) US aka United States contradicts patent/pete - "to spread". Uniting together prevents spreading apart.
c) Only all offers each one within "being"...licensing each other tempts one to ignore the sole/soul offer.
From the moment of inception to the moment of death...the living heart is never at leisure. It's ones mind that can be licensed to leisure.
things MOST PEOPLE consider obvious
Obvious implies "frequently met with"...nature doesn't frequent; it occasions/intermittents/scatters THINGS apart from one another, so that each can have intercourse with one another to regenerate off-spring.
truths around the lies
Truth vs lies implies the circular logic within self and the conflicts of reason against others.
To be (life) implies directed from (inception) to (death)...ignoring this by holding onto either truth of false shapes logic/reason around self.
fall for the whole
Being implies partial within whole aka rise (life) within fall (inception towards death).
fake things people believe in
Believing implies holding onto, hence faking reality, which cannot be held onto, since it moves.
Things cannot be fake...each thing chooses to fake when ignoring what's real.
where did you get that "knowledge" from?
Knowledge (perceivable) one got through all; understanding (suggested) one gets from one another. One cannot hold onto knowledge, since it moves, which is why others tempt one to understand aka hold onto each others verbal diarrhea.
it might all begin with gradually infiltrating
Nature implies an ongoing process; each temporary being within implies a solid (life) filtering a liquid (inception towards death). That's the foundation of infiltration.
Ignoring a moving process (perceivable inspiration) for holding onto a product (suggested information) permits few to set additional filters into many. That's the infiltration you talk about.
the process of teaching a person
Teaching one another isn't a process, but a product, hence buying (student) and selling (teacher). Person implies the ignored process aka per sonos (by sound).
to accept a set of beliefs
Aka ones consent (accept) to a suggestion by another (set), while holding onto it (believe)...holding onto a product contradicts being within a process.
once a "belief" begins
Aka at the moment one gives consent to a suggestion by another.
couldn't you just "bust", whatever other claim with real proof
Reality moves; fictitious claims (consent) and proofs (suggestion) tempt one to hold onto, while ignoring that reality moves.
scientific evidence
Science/scio - "to know" implies each ones perception within all perceivable..suggested scientism tempts one to ignore that.
Evidence implies as perceived by one...not as suggested by another. One cannot share evidence without tempting others to contradict what's evident to each of them.
how about film clips I saw
Aka moving pictures (film) shaped by captured moments (photo)...distracting one from being (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion.
Momentum cannot be captured by those within, neither does moving (film) captured moments (photo) represent reality...only fictitious mimicry.
if I'd look around...
...then I'd confine myself to circular logic, while ignoring that all perceivable directs through each ones perception.
Perception isn't circular...suggestion is...if one consents to hold onto it.
Here's the sleight of hand... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruKCw797JM4
- I'm gettin' bugged driving up and down (life) the same old strip (inception towards death)
- I gotta find a new place (suggestion) where the kids are hip (joined by consent)
- My buddies and me (consenting many) are getting real well known (by suggesting few)
- Yeah, the bad guys know us (from outside) and they leave us alone (fighting inside)
- I get around (Get around, 'round, 'round, I get around)...aka circular logic within self and conflicts of reason against others.
hang on
Hanging onto suggested while being (perception) within a process (perceivable) implies ignorance.
God who is Unity
Unit; noun - "single number regarded as an undivided whole"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/unit#etymonline_v_4515
God implies the dividing whole, with each one within being a divided partial of God.
Unity; noun - "the state of being one; a thing undivided itself, but separate from every other thing"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/unity
Unity implies being within state of separation...not the God that separates beings from one another.
In short...only within whole (unit) can there be separation (unity).
Many denotes separation from.
To denote (identify; identic; same) contradicts separation from one another. God doesn't generate many by putting together...God generates each by setting apart.
Holding onto the suggested word "God" aka a suggested denotation/identification, tempts many together, while ignoring the ongoing state of separation.
Words themselves do this as they attempt to conjoin in communion, no?
a) Word implies shaped by letter. One being tempted to LET another shape words into denotations/identifications/definitions etc. implies the already successful attempt to conjoin in communion ones consent and another ones suggestion.
b) Yes vs no reasoning can only exist after one already LET another shape words into denotations to reason about. Whatever side one chooses reconfirms the same conflict aka that which imbalances ones choice against another.
c) A word cannot do...God does sound by separating each instrumental being from one another. Words are then shaped by instrumental beings to trick many to play along few, while ignoring Gods sound.
And once again...GOD implies such a word tempting many to follow few. Holding onto the word "god" tempts one to ignore moving sound.
Oxy-moronic, like the word.....itself.
Letter into words implies a being who freely lets another being bind together.
If one uses FREE will of choice to let another choose for one, then one restricts self. One isn't free because of others...one is FREE (choice) because of DOM (balance), hence not "because", but cause (balance) of being (choice).
This is how an oxymoron can be reverse engineered by using implication (if/then) over reason (vs)...yet, one can only do this by self, not for or from others. If you agree with my statement, then your agreement implies an oxymoron aka another contradiction to your FREE will of choice.
I chose to discuss rather than argue against with you, because you're always half right.
Discuss/discutere - "to shake apart"...as oppose to arguing "against" one another within a conflict of reason.
The issue..."you're always half right" implies 50/50 hindsight from within a conflict of reason (right vs wrong).
There's no "half" of God...only each partial being within whole God aka a perpetual balance of whole/partial for each partials choice within whole balance.
Choosing either "half" within a conflict of reason imbalances ones choice.
you're always
a) I can't be "always"...only one being (life) within all way (inception towards death) of God.
b) The suggested word "always" implies both pluralism (ways) and collectivism (all ways)...either of which contradicting separation from one another, and thereby the ONE and only God.
Kalergi Plan aims at Europe...US aka UNITED STATES aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) is it's own plan aka it's own variation of tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together).
Richard Nikolaus Eijiro, Count of Coudenhove-Kalergi was just a mouthpiece for the world-wide unification of gentiles under each jew...a mouthpiece used to obscure the plan/plane/plain aka hidden in plain sight.
the insertion of disloyals into government
Government implies mind being governed by outside influence, hence by inserted influence through separation (dis) of outside (perceivable) into inside (perception).
It's ones consent to a suggestion, which establishes loyalty to another, while ignoring that loyal/legal aka natural law separates each one within from one another.
agency positions
Being implies reaction (life) positioned within action (inception towards death) aka regent within agent aka reactor within generator aka growth within loss.
some of them were even foreigners.
Being implies different from one another, hence native (one) within nature (all) and foreign to one another.
a war for our minds
Reality forwards input (perceivable inspiration) through each ones mind...ignoring this by holding onto output (suggested information) like pluralism (our) establishes a fictitious war (reason) within reality.
to create some kind of chip to control your mind
Suggested creation-ism implies a chip of another ones block, which ones consent implements into ones mind/memory, while permitting others control.
If one believes in creation, then one blocks transformation. The block implies ones ignorance; the chip ones consent to the suggestion of another.
It's called "chip off the old block" because ignorance tempts one to ignore new/now (perceivable) for holding onto old (suggested).
puppets are not real people
a) Only within reality can each free person be puppeteered with fiction.
b) Real implies ones RE-sponse to AL (all)...responding to one another, by consenting to a suggestion, attaches strings to a puppeteer.
when they say and do things, that's not real either
- Fiction: say; do
- Reality: sound; being done
One can only say within sound, and do while being done. Fiction simulates reality...it cannot replace it.
it's part of the show
Being implies partial within whole...while being tempted by what other partials are showing.
FUCK YOURSELF in the face
Whose face looks fucked?
The reason....I will go to war
Hence war (reason) being based on will (choice)...
america
A (one) MER (to get a share of something) ICA (of, like, related to, pertaining to)...
God communes
God differs...from all into each one. Few within suggest commun-ism to tempt many together, as to equalize differences.
Moon/me - "to measure"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/moon#etymonline_v_18330
Hence each ONE measuring...