Hi, the last line is a rule 1 violation: attack the argument, not the person, are you willing to edit?

"AI" governance for at least a hundred years

Yes, but even longer than that..(Babylon and before)

Without intelligent design, the 'particles' 'banging' would have demolished themselves, I think, as well as thinking only an Ultimate Creator makes the most sense and takes much less faith and trust than an accidental intelligence and complex life, but that's me, and you can quote me.

Kabbalah is lies and thievery.

Do you share his view of things?

Submission statement from video creator:

What if the names of the world were changed — not gradually, not organically, but on single days, by government order, across multiple continents, within the same narrow window of history?

Lyon. Marseille. Bordeaux. Stripped of their names simultaneously in 1793. Hundreds of American towns erased overnight by a single federal order in 1894. And Illinois — one state, one state alone — accounting for 157 of 323 recorded renames. No explanation. No geographic logic. Just a number that doesn't fit.

The official answers are reasonable as far as they go. Revolutionary politics. Postal efficiency. Bureaucratic modernization. But they don't explain the coordination. They don't explain the timing. They don't explain why a desert city named itself after a mythological bird rising from ruins — because its own founders saw ruins beneath their feet and canals they didn't build and couldn't fully explain.

The deeper this investigation went, the more the pattern held. Tartaria — appearing on maps by Mercator, Blaeu, Ortelius, the French royal cartographic tradition — contracting and vanishing from the record across the same decades. Grand neoclassical architecture appearing in cities that were frontier settlements thirty years before, with no documented construction timeline, no labor record, no intermediate stages. Names with "Old" in them quietly stripped, severing the only daily question that might have led someone to ask: old compared to what?

This isn't about burning archives. It's about something quieter. Faster. More complete. Change what a place is called, and within a generation, nobody remembers what was there before.

This investigation asks whether the world was renamed — or whether something was buried beneath the new names instead.

The material on this channel presents exploratory interpretations of history and imaginative speculation, conveyed through narrative storytelling rather than precise historical documentation. Viewpoints and visual representations are dramatized or intentionally constructed to support alternative narrative exploration. Visual elements may at times be created using automated or generative tools. The content shared should not be considered factual.

I thought we had to delete after the ? (Including the ? I mean)

Removed for rule 1 violation

Can be approved upon edit

Argument:

My favorite part --- is when Jews are needed to bolster your position they are white. When Jews destroy your culture and attack the west from within as 3rd pillars they are not. --- What makes you even think that a single generation between operation paperclip and now somehow removed all of the super smart Jews from NASA lol.

This is what I've come to understand also, love God and love people.

The rules are to protect the community as a whole and that is what I've been moderating, I don't think it's unreasonable. There are plenty of other places for infighting and personal attack, this forum is for rising above that and fighting and shining light on the darkness and evil against us all and not being distracted into fighting with eachother, that's what they want..
Edit: I have no control over downvote capabilities.

I didn't say or do anything against this post. Where is the issue?

I'm hoping for less low effort (which this post is), but yeah, I'm not moderating content usually but rather behaviour.. People are allowed to have different ideas and disagree.

Where did I say that?

Listen man, I don't agree with every post here but I like people being able to post. (And I did ask for a submission statement from MrEx) All you need to do is follow the rules. I don't want to ban you, you have the power to make it happen tho.

Misquote and double rule 1 violation. Are you still trying to kick people out? This is the last warning, I do consider that subversive. We can all exist here, ok?? This comment is being removed and can be approved upon edit.

Will you please add a submission statement? It can be short.

I and others appreciate the light you shine on dark things, of course some aren't ready to hear and of course not all agree, I think you should keep going and my hope is others will come to understand, in time.

For my part, I think we all have different ideas and theories and within this community we can all exist, I also think we are all capable of being respectful to everyone, whether we agree or not. We are still experiencing growing pains but I am seeing very positive growth from a bird's eye view. (The 3 rules are here for the community's protection)

As to votes, I am not motivated by them and I have an inkling the lurkers far outweigh the participants. I enjoy your participation and would like it to continue.
Blocking, for me, doesn't solve anything and I think we both enjoy solving things, best we can.

I very much appreciate your well thought out response and I also want to make it clear that I appreciate your research and contributions. The only thing I am asking everyone in this forum is to treat eachother better, rule 1 is simple tho not easy. We should be able to find some kind of common ground and agree to disagree at an impasse, there is no need to resort to our baser instincts of attacking people instead of arguments. Do you agree?

And to you.

That quote has now been removed

Removed for rule 1. No argument to save.

Your contributions as a whole are well appreciated, the infighting being done between any one here is unnecessary, wouldn't you agree that it divides and keeps up distractions from greater issues at play?

Let me know if I'm being unreasonable.

Thank you.

That quote has been asked to be edited, or it'll be removed shortly, as will your meta, call out comments, we're not doing that here anymore. There are 3 simple rules here to prevent community break down and it's not too much to ask everyone.

I was already handling the meta call-outedness of this comment. You breaking rule 1 is not helpful, will you edit?

I'm talking to turtlebam to not be infighting too. (The 3 simple rules are here to prevent the breaking of community)

I disagree, his posts are not trivialities. Jews don't have a monopoly on corruption and evil, though there are some Jews and 'Jews' that are also involved.

I think infighting/meta stuff is counterproductive. Let's find where we have common ground and agree to disagree if need be.