Not the right path at all. u/Jalapeno_gringo, it's appropriate to look up the definition of "U.S. citizen" for the purposes of the form that requests it, but this is not the nexus by which an information return declares money to be "income"; see my other comments. Those who are waving the "noncitizen" flag are muddying the waters, typically self-deceived, and have no evidence or provable victories. It's true that being a sovereign citizen, one who authorized the state government that authorized the federal government, has certain noblesse oblige associated, but declaring oneself a noncitizen is flat abrogation of both the privilege and the responsibility.
How-to in one step, consolidated from years.
Whenever you receive a third-party information return indicating that you received money in a category of "income", and you do not believe the money received was "income", do not file the information return since you believe it to be erroneous, but instead file the appropriate correcting form indicating the actual believed amount of "income" received.
Every tax accountant should agree with the above sentence such as it is. To explain much further would be giving you specific tax advice, which people don't generally give for free. For those lurkers looking for the word to the wise, that sentence suffices, as the rest is in the 1040 instructions.
Yes, though it's true that Lowell Becraft used this argument successfully and this may allude correctly to that event, there is zero chance this is a real CIR memo, as it has no authentication and is not written from an IRS POV but from that of a Becraft sympathizer. Becraft's work was of the best quality but like others he rarely received remedy.
Individuals using the nonratification argument only succeed in spite of the argument. There is no "many" getting off not guilty; there is mostly just Gaylon "Whitey" Harrell (featured in A:FFTF) who was ruled not guilty because the jury decided his belief was sincere, not because they believed as he did.
The Supremes have already weighed in that the tax is Constitutional because in the nature of an excise, and they've even ruled that to say too much more would be "precarious" to collections. This means it's not theft under the Constitution because technically evitable and noticed and voluntary. It is left to all sovereign citizens to deign how to deal with the expensive machinery attempting to trick them into paying more than they might necessarily owe. Hundreds of millions are required to decide for themselves the definition of "income" because the government refuses.
I didn't say they were "mere" coincidence, and I complimented you on one where the correlation was strong. Rather, I pointed out not to call conspiracy everything that this people calls conspiracy. Judge everything with more objective, mathematical standards. It doesn't say "sixes", it says six hundred sixty-six.
This one is actually a valid iconographic argument. Isaac Newton's distinguishing seven colors in the spectral rainbow, and Gilbert Baker and others preferring six colors over seven or eight in the mainstreaming of their flag, both have high likelihood of correlation to the basic known symbology of seven (perfection, deity) and six (imperfection, humanity; but not 666). Thus this comment, even including its valid allusion to Jewish involvement, is wholly reasonable.
If the number of the beast is 666 then there is no better way to graphically write that number than the zionist star of remphan.
This is irrationally arbitrary. I could just as well say that "666" is the best way to graphically write the number, or three waws (as attributed to the Monster drink logo), or three Greek stigmas. I could just as well say that a hexagonal view of an opaque or transparent cube is the best way to graphically write the number, counting variously the angles, sides, faces, triangles, or rays, just as arbitrarily as the hexagram.
The error is to say a certain symbol automatically conveys a certain negative meaning. Rather, context indicates a range of likelihood whether a negative meaning is intended behind the clearly intended plaintext meaning.
Incidentally, you include an argument that is welcome at c/FlatEarth but that is likely to undercut your overall message in other fora.
OP is illogical.
Threshold issue: A symbol does not automatically convey negative meanings to those who use them innocently to convey valid meanings. The hexagram has a broad history of meanings, including the flags of Australia, Nigeria, and Northern Ireland beyond that of Israel; therefore the issue is not the symbol but its context.
The star does not automatically convey 666 because each triangle is being counted three times due to different aspects. We could just as well argue the hexagon has not only six sides but also six angles, which would make a fourth arbitrary 6.
The argument that natural occurrences of sixes convey the devil's involvement is a glorification of the devil and in fact a permission for him to act more freely. Logically, they are cherry-picked from any number of arbitrary occurrences. The argument that the devil is personally involved in tweaking the radioactive dating of the alleged K-Pg extinction, the selection of English units to set the earth's velocity (which ranges from 65,500 to 67,800 mph) and ecliptic (now 67 degrees), the reported Jewish death toll in WWII, and the arbitrary social distance (which could just as well have been from average human height), attributes dangerous credit to the devil's powers.
I have previously demonstrated that the hexagram was totally unevidenced as relating to Acts 7:43, let alone to Solomon's history, and that the actual star of Remphan had most direct reference to the idolized Nehushtan image instead.
The connection of 666 to the Beast and to Solomon, and the connection of the later hexagram to retconned relationship to Solomon, are arbitrary tie-ins that do not demonstrate intent but only later manipulation. They are cherry-picking as well because they do not similarly connect Adonikam (Ezra 2:13).
The Sumerian cylinder seal shown (VA243) has been demonstrated by Michael Heiser via iconography to depict not Saturn nor the Sun but a generic star in a constellation; in these depictions the number of points is arbitrary.
In the other two images, the hexagram is clearly intended malevolently, but these depictions are not tied to its use in its many other contexts, and in particular have no bearing on its use in Judaism or Zionism.
The fact that Amos and Stephen referring to Nehushtan, and its idolatry by some in the desert wandering who associated it with Saturn, has no special referent different from any other demonic manifestation at any other period of idolatry; the whole world is under the sway of the evil one, so it would be understandable for satanism to have manifested during the wandering, and would not be more significant than any other period.
The reference to the mark of Cain is wholly anachronistic, linguistically unwarranted, and capricious.
Conclusion: The fact that the hexagram can be and has been misused does not warrant its being associated with 666 or other negativity in its every application, and should not encourage the hasty, arbitrary collection and propagation of irrationality.
Wikipedia is ultra-easy to research for history. The date and footnote were removed by "UpstateCops" on 2023-07-03 with the summary "tidying and various updates". User identifies as a New York criminal justice student. Of course anyone can reinsert the omitted clause at any time, as when there's no edit-warring going on it's just the word of the last person to have touched the paragraph. If reinsertion is fought, that might be more evidence of nefariousness.
u/CuomoisaMassMurderer is well-known for declining taunts.
I'm well-known for taking many up. I hereby condemn "Zionism" defined as treatment of an undefinable group of people (under names like "the Jews") as a nation.
There are other definitions and I'm sure I would not condemn every definition. Your past inability to define has prevented your taunts from having any effect in any logical reader's mind.
Your inability to present logical support for your long strings of claim words weakens your case to the point of risking yourself being perceived as a shill. Instead you could say something logical in a moment's thought, like: "Many Jews hate Christ like Peter Schafer and Rabbi Ulla." Oh look, you know how to produce evidence about Trump, but you don't know how to be similarly persuasive about any particular Jew as indicated by your past inability. Taking a college logic class would help.
Besides logic your inability to define terms is also on display.
Incidentally, your ban expired before you wrote "unban me" below. You didn't test? Epic fail.
I've spent more time debating over at the https://communities.win/c/Christianity forum which, sadly, is infested with jew suckup zionists.
Christians don't usually go to other forums to complain about other Christians, instead they follow Matt. 18:15-17. Have you considered that you haven't defined "zionist", you haven't been careful with your attribution of "jew", and you've been pretty free with "suckup" too?
The reason you're not banned is that you're mostly not slamming a people-group for birth or cultural reasons. When you do, or when you attack individual contributors unnecessarily, you've been getting deleted. If you'd like a ban, just break those rules obliviously.
One of the premier red-heifer researchers is Adam Eliyahu Berkowitz, who I can attest from experience has been tracking heifers over 7 years. And he is ticked! He insists, with receipts (CBS), that everyone who is promoting the soon-coming narrative is making it up: exactly as I've been saying.
One of the premier red-heifer researchers is Adam Eliyahu Berkowitz, who I can attest from experience has been tracking heifers over 7 years. And he is ticked! He insists, with receipts (CBS), that everyone who is promoting the soon-coming narrative is making it up: exactly as I've been saying.
One of the premier red-heifer researchers is Adam Eliyahu Berkowitz, who I can attest from experience has been tracking heifers over 7 years. And he is ticked! He insists, with receipts (CBS), that everyone who is promoting the soon-coming narrative is making it up: exactly as I've been saying.
Was not calling for your judgment; but consider a few details. Temple Institute and Boneh Israel didn't comment for the last six months, and I don't see that changed. Now I appreciate that one of your links has an Ariel interview that lays out much the same requirements as I did, but it's no news as to intent, just like I said; and it's personal and not for the Institute.
The Temple Institute also links a Youtube that is not theirs but comes from the Mikdash Educational Center. Them having a 3/27 conference is also guesswork. The Ariel interview at least lays out the halakhic criteria and the problems. Ariel notes that we have not yet built the pathway for the pure priest to travel to the altar purely, so that may put a serious damper on the sacrifice for awhile.
Of course the cows are inspected regularly, including even when in Texas. They have deliberately obscured the date when the final inspection will happen or has happened. It's probable they won't settle for a final inspection until near the moment of execution anyway, because inspections have an expiration date. As noted, the final inspection cannot take place until the third year, but we are presumably in the third year.
It doesn't matter whether Muslims are around. They are sacrificing in view of al-Aqsa Mosque and if a hundred Muslims stormed the altar with the mere intent of leaning on the calf once before it is slaughtered, the Jews would rule the calf impure on that account. They are taking no chances with this. The security question is deliberately unanswered publicly, just like the pure pathway question, the correct location question, the Texas origin question and so on.
The only way for them to do it is to announce all the halakhah being satisfied to the agreement of a vast number of rabbis all at the same time and to proceed to the sacrifice and complete it without incident. I don't see that happening soon without ground changes. Now I grant I don't watch Israel365 every day to see who gets interviewed, nor do I follow all the associated groups like HaMikdash; but my argument is pretty well the same for your data. Your keeping tabs on the real sources is very important and useful, and my encouragement is to ensure that the many many hangers-on don't get counted as real sources.
I agree on the 3rd but have resurrection on Sunday 5 Apr 33 AD, Julian. I hope you didn't mean Monday resurrection. Many details.
Byzantium lasted many centuries longer than most other empires, simply due to its sound-money laws prohibiting usury and coin-clipping, u/SmithW1984.
As a time traveler, aside from Tipler cylinders not being that tech-viable, I fully affirm this as an excellent overview of the state of the art prior to the 2025-27 revolution.
There is one technology that is not currently counted as time travel even though it has the same five characteristics as Alcubierre. It's called "Sleep" and is very effective for future time travel in the 1-12-hour range.
There has been no red heifer news for 6 months, everything published is guesswork right now. One or more heifers will be slaughtered on the prepared altar at a date and time of the owners' choosing. My guess is that this must at least involve (1) formal rabbinical clearance of the Texas origin and the Gentile ownership, which I haven't seen yet; (2) formal rabbinical clearance of one heifer being two years one day old and being faultless in color and history; (3) sufficient security to perform the act, which requires protection against flash-mob risks that might spoil the purity, which seems to require a ceasefire and a formal IDF completion of objectives. So I say, not this month. See my history for more, or ask.
He is risen indeed.
And make sure you've got the right Yeshua, accept no substitutes. If the person is not the one who came in the flesh and rose from the dead in the flesh, he's not somebody to trust.
There has been no red heifer news for 6 months, everything published is guesswork right now. One or more heifers will be slaughtered on the prepared altar at a date and time of the owners' choosing. My guess is that this must at least involve (1) formal rabbinical clearance of the Texas origin and the Gentile ownership, which I haven't seen yet; (2) formal rabbinical clearance of one heifer being two years one day old and being faultless in color and history; (3) sufficient security to perform the act, which requires protection against flash-mob risks that might spoil the purity, which seems to require a ceasefire and a formal IDF completion of objectives. So I say, not this month. See my history for more, or ask. (u/Thisisnotanexit)
4/21 for us Quartodecimans.
Христос Воскресе!
Within 4-6 years of one's becoming a nonfiler and ignoring accumulating information returns, the IRS is empowered step by step to make assumptions (don't let it) that put you on the hook for their largest estimates plus all fees. Since you voluntarily refused to address the information accumulated, the law is that you volunteered for them to file for you. If you know of exceptions in the long run, great, they may exist, but the IRS also algorithmically decides who to go after to attempt to collect from. Contract theory will not help you because the law allows them to assume social contracts in cases such as described.
Everyone should assess what taxes they owe and report and pay them voluntarily, including those many who owe zero tax. To encourage nonfiling on an unproven theory such as contract is to fall into the prearranged trap of the info returns that has destroyed lives like that of Joe Lewis. It's true that filing has its own risks, notably that the IRS may decline to believe that you believe your own testimony, but sincere belief and pursuit of truth is its own defense and will get you past all the traps. Abrogation of one's noblesse oblige as a sovereign will not get you past traps set for those sovereigns.