If the number of the beast is 666 then there is no better way to graphically write that number than the zionist star of remphan.
This is irrationally arbitrary. I could just as well say that "666" is the best way to graphically write the number, or three waws (as attributed to the Monster drink logo), or three Greek stigmas. I could just as well say that a hexagonal view of an opaque or transparent cube is the best way to graphically write the number, counting variously the angles, sides, faces, triangles, or rays, just as arbitrarily as the hexagram.
The error is to say a certain symbol automatically conveys a certain negative meaning. Rather, context indicates a range of likelihood whether a negative meaning is intended behind the clearly intended plaintext meaning.
Incidentally, you include an argument that is welcome at c/FlatEarth but that is likely to undercut your overall message in other fora.
This is irrationally arbitrary. I could just as well say that "666" is the best way to graphically write the number, or three waws (as attributed to the Monster drink logo), or three Greek stigmas. I could just as well say that a hexagonal view of an opaque or transparent cube is the best way to graphically write the number, counting variously the angles, sides, faces, triangles, or rays, just as arbitrarily as the hexagram.
The error is to say a certain symbol automatically conveys a certain negative meaning. Rather, context indicates a range of likelihood whether a negative meaning is intended behind the clearly intended plaintext meaning.
Incidentally, you include an argument that is welcome at c/FlatEarth but that is likely to undercut your overall message in other fora.