Innate, as in inbuilt, natural. Not received from some genocidal, sacrificial demon god of a hostile foreign people.
Again, where do you get that from? How do you know it's the case? Looking at nature I see the opposite or at least I see anything goes and power dynamics. Even in the majority of human history savage brutality, human sacrifice, slavery and raping was the norm. So where does this hilarious gay ass secular humanist natural ideal you have come from? Just because some bloodthirsty faggot jew of the French Revolution you love so much said so?
If you credit him with your morality then you are simply an undeveloped baby-eating epsteinesque monstrosity whose only constrained through lack of opportunity.
But you still can't tell me how is any of that wrong. You appeal to nature, but Epstein is part of nature too. Explain to me what in nature told you anything concerning morality? Is the lion bad for eating the zebra? Are the jews bad for enslaving the goyim? It's all nature, bro. Have you heard of the is-ought gap?
Lol, innate how? Did we just randomly evolve to have dignity and value? That's certainly not what we witness in nature where life is cheap and it's all about being stronger and at the top of the chain.
It’s not for me to prove why the world shouldn’t be enslaved by the Jews but for you to prove why they should.
No, you made an implicit claim that enslavement of one group of humans by another is wrong. All I did was to ask you based on what did you determined that. And of course you crumbled.
Yours is the active position. That people should be free is the natural, innate position.
You're funny. Everyone takes an active position at all times because everyone holds a worldview comprised of positive beliefs about reality - there's no such thing as natural/neutral/default/objective position. I mean, that's a cool proposition but where did you come up with it and how do you know it's true? Can you justify it or do you believe just saying something you like the sound of makes it so? That's called being ad hoc, bro. Let me try this:
That God exists is the natural innate position
Wow. I guess you have to yield to my proclamation now.
Ok, I grant you everything.
Now tell me why people shouldn't be enslaved by the jews and what's your standard for the good? Where do you get your moral convictions from?
Judaism is a sectarian movement that ran along the true Abrahamic faith which was basically proto-Christianity. They are the guys who worshipped Baal and practiced usury and degeneracy throughout the OT and who became the pharisees and the saducees. The whole point of the Torah and the prophets (which they killed) is to prophesize and bring about the messiah who then rendered the title of "God's chosen people" and Temple worship obsolete. It makes zero sense for ethnocentric jews and their leaders and priests to be pushing for Christianity. It makes complete sense for them to crucify Jesus and to wage war against Christians for 2000 years.
Islam is a demented arian neo-platonic sect, heavily borrowing from Jewish Talmudism, invented by degenerate arab warlord Mohammed to consolidate the arab tribes and facilitate his conquest.
In other words, your argument is retarded and the more dumbasses like you repeat it, the stupider it gets.
Sure, but there's a visible body and a historic Church which keeps the traditional teachings, sacraments, apostolic succession and the true faith. Salvation is only found within the Body of Chris, i.e. His Church. The Church is not an abstraction just like God isn't an abstract being but an incarnated person in this world.
AI is too stupid and uncreative to come up with such observations. It sounds hyperautistic 90% of times. You seriously can't tell it's organic?
Thanks for the tl;dr.
He created meaning, logic and reason that undergird all languages. He also created sound and man being able to produce and understand language. The sounds and symbols we use to communicate - what we refer to as language - are not that important and they change with time. This is why no language is more holy or superior (a Catholic argument) and all nations can use their language to worship Him.
I also think we are one in Christ, a body made of many parts and purposes.
That's not what the early Church believed in. The Body of Christ is unified and not made of parts that disagree with each other.
Then that would apply to male-female and you're no longer a man. But the fact is that this Scripture doesn't preclude people from still having social roles as men, women, Jews, Americans, etc.
I knew you'd go there. That's why I qualified it with 'in relation to God'. You know very well I didn't mean that all distinctions suddenly disappeared because of Christ. Very sneaky of you to equivocate ontological distinctions based on nature (sex) to a historic role given by God to a person, a tribe or a people. God created all nations and he chose the jews for His covenant, just like He did with Noah and Abraham before them. He chose them to fulfil His plan for the salvation of man. They have done their part, just like Noah and Abraham before them, and then the torch was passed to the Apostles and the Church which will see the end of times and the second advent.
If you think Masonry benefits Jews above Gentiles in some endemic way rather than benefiting satanism above any racial class, that's what I was going after and you haven't "gotten that" yet.
I am simply stating a fact, which is that Masonry is heavily influenced by Talmudic Judaism and Kabbalism. It is satanic but so is Judaism from the Christian perspective - 1 John 2:22 and 4:3 (this is not just my opinion, but the Orthodox position on the Judaism as evidenced in the writings of the Church Fathers and subsequent saints up to our present day).
Do you agree that a word can have different meanings depending on context? Do you think Jeff Epstein used the world goyim in the same sense as it was used in the Bible? I already told you that what was appropriate in the OT (categorizing people as jews and gentiles in relation to God) is no longer appropriate after Christ, because the tribal distinction was transcended by the ultimate distinction between Christians vs. non-Christians. After they produced the Messiah, jews no longer have a covenantal relation with God - their covenant was fulfilled. They still have a role in the eschatology though but they're no longer God's people - Christians are.
The fact that we give semantic terms like "Israelite" and "Petrine" to these experiences, and argue over when the term fully begins to apply, is tangential.
Again, it's not arguing over semantics but over God's covenant and our eschatological progression through history. I notice Protestants really struggle with historicity which makes sense since they reject tradition and latch onto abstract ideas that aren't grounded historically (e.g. the Solas). Protestantism is necessarily ahistorical and this makes it breeding ground for various heresies that would otherwise be easy to root out.
One such heresy is judaizing and dispensationalism which comes from lack of proper understanding of covenantal continuity in the Old and New Testaments, the role of Israel and the ending of OT law with Christ and OT worship with the destruction of the Temple (yes, the period between the Resurrection and the 70AD was transitory and given to the jews to acclimate themselves to the new covenant and to become fully Christian).
God doesn't care about words and languages because those are human creations - He cares about meaning and concepts which are part of His logi (divine ideas).
What matters is what the word 'goy' signifies in the given context.
Israel is a people group of 12 tribes and throughout time some of them have represented a remnant of those faithful to the Most High God. Some other times many fell away.
That's the meaning of Israel until Christ. The NT makes clear that Israel is now the Church - the heavenly Kingdom of God here on Earth and Christians are the new adopted sons of Jacob - not by blood but by the Spirit. This renders the previously accurate term goy blasphemous because as Paul says there are no jews or gentiles for we're all one in Christ. Of course jews and zionist Christians reject this and they stick to the OT definition, hence why we have an actual state of Israel and a new Temple about to be built where they will anoint their false messiah - the Antichrist.
Why would He suddenly change the seventh day Sabbath to Sunday?
Do you observe all the laws and rituals given in the Torah? Why would God suddenly change His law?
I tried explaining to you how the NT overwrites the OT and that it has precedence over it. If no NT was required, we would still observe and worship like the jews of the OT did.
Instead, we know that pagan Rome, under Constantine, infiltrated Christianity and introduced Sunday observance, merging it with their own sun worship customs.
Lol "we know". Who's we? Are you aware that the Bible you quote was compiled by the Church that Constantine and pagan Rome allegedly infiltrated circa 4c? Why do you trust it wasn't tampered with? It's sad those low tier prot arguments against the Church, the Byzantine empire and Constantine still find ground after all these years.
Sure but what does this prove? That Jacob was referred to as goy before he received the title Israel? I mean, it makes sense that there was a point where Israel started, just like Abraham was a pagan Canaanite before he was anointed by Melchizedek.
I was playing dumb - I know what SwampRanger was getting at and I know his dispensational views. He was obviously being dishonest by saying Israel IS a goy too. It's similar to saying Christ wasn't a Christian - that's a false argument treading on semantics. Jacob is the first person who differentiated from the category goy and created a new category Israel just like Christ created a new category of Christian.
Who cares if he's left when he's right? Politicians are not the problem - as if changing them with yet another batch of puppets will remedy this. No, the sytem itself is the problem. Democracy is gay. Terms are gay.
Why would you need the app store on a computer?
I didn't get that.
Fake and gay judaism for the goyim.
Or just don't use smartphones...
Nothing - I was buying the dip with all the money I had to spare. I will probably regret not selling my gold to buy bitcoin with it in the future. It's now $72K and it's still dirt cheap.
You're really desperate. What should I measure it in? Fiat is the status quo currency of the world. Using a unit of measurement that everyone uses is practical. It doesn't follow that I believe that unit is good.
When I say it will surpass 200k I mean today's money so that's a conservative prediction. If we account inflation and prices going up it could be way more. I can tell you that you'd be able to buy way more loaves in a year from now with the same amount of bitcoin if you prefer it as measurement. Bitcoin will rise in value not just because fiat will be devalued.
Nah, I don't care about that. I spread the world because I truly believe bitcoin is the future of money and the only viable alternative to fiat enslavement. I don't ever sell bitcoin - why would I? The reason I bought it was to escape the fiat death trap in the first place. If I get to be rich because of choosing to stack, that would be a nice benefit but that's not my goal because I'm not a greedy jew. If I want more people to buy it, it's because I want their well being.
The point is that if bitcoin was amenable to their agenda, they would push it hard and not try to persuade people how bad and unreliable it is.
Bitcoin isn't about to go anywhere soon. It's starting to climb and will easily surpass 200k this year.
Those people are demons and they hate you. They will gladly kill and eat your children and sent you off to fight their wars.
The Orthodox and the Catholics venerate Mary as the first among the saints too. Our greatest saint is a woman and feminists still bitch about Christianity being misogynistic.