Okay, so I'm hearing, let them have kids, but you basically oppose any state regulations of it. Do you have equally detailed plans for societal handling of child abuse then?
I agree that "Married Filing Jointly" is a scam.
Are you looking for the world population to decline to zero, or are you looking for reproduction to happen in some way that you approve (and what)?
Point is, you can't request sticky without active moderators, so I propose (ad) that you vote YES on active moderators.
I'm pretty confident from his language (like describing Moses as honorable, which is obligatory) that u/towards8 is taking a Muslim persona, and that he believes legal public execution of gays is a good thing. He's probably pretty disappointed at the remaking of Iran and the rise of the new Pahlavi.
Haven't heard how you plan for societies to continue existing without supporting parenting. Are you different from the other genocide purveyors?
I am a real human volunteer accountable to a known personality, Scott Lively, and his org First Century Bible Church.
Two real humans are sufficient for meeting of the minds, community, and in fact all the sidebar goals. At c/Christianity we have vibrant community going 5 years now with several real confirmed humans. I empathize with your plight; discussion this week indicates that c/Conspiracies is inoculated against such community being easy.
Go ahead, Turing me.
Downvoted because of no right to make such a comment.
The fact that American citizens have always been sovereigns is exceedingly obscured by the Sovereign Citizen movement, which is distinct from the Strawman movement but often overlaps. The Sovereign Citizen attempts to order courts and officers as his underlings. They ultimately really are his underlings, but a true sovereign deigns to be civil with public servants especially if he believes them misinformed of their duties, and so direct confrontation doesn't work. Advising officers of the recognition of an adversarial relationship and directing the flow of conversation (such as to the right to remain silent or to speak via agent or attorney) works much better. (The citizens constituted the states, the states constituted the nation, and both orgs delegated power to courts and officers; but that's part of the social power of the citizens collectively to discipline themselves. So when a cop stops you it's because you've socially and responsibly consented to knowingly live in and drive in a system where your delegation of civil order includes potentially being stopped. If you are unprepared for such a stop you're abrogating your responsibility as a sovereign.)
Sepehr is part of the cabal, probably a Freemason, because he respects them but doesn't acknowledge being one. His conspiracies always review Masons favorably. The title is interesting but getting his take on it would be worse than knowing nothing about it.
Nature implies ... extraction by purification
What is purified? What is extracted?
None of this has legal standing. Flat out, from someone who's gone deep with it.
It does have a bit of interest for Conspiracies purposes in its spiritual standing (Rev. 12 babies). Obviously the system would like it to be true that they have title to you upon birth or conception, which is why the system tries to convince you it's legally true. But it isn't legally or spiritually, it's just that the repetition wears down the spiritual resistance to the lie.
to believe you owe taxes, debt, and obedience
Jesus implied, pay Caesar what is truly Caesar's while giving God your self which is truly God's. Some monarchs charge taxes to the point that they can do so without revolution; this is Caesar's power, it should be paid if it is not so burdensome as to offend conscience, but conscience cannot reject the principle of kings alone because Jesus is the king of kings. However, Americans are bound by the Constitution in the year of our Lord 1787, so they cannot be charged taxes without the mediation of either apportionment or uniformity. In short they cannot be taxed for existing, and taxes upon activity ("income") can be mediated by choice of activity (as most millionaires prove). Therefore, while there's much deception about taxes going around, the issue is not some imaginary strawman because people get in trouble all the time even if they say they have avoided all strawman activity. The issue is that Americans volunteer to pay what they are charged (same type of pressure, but using misdirection instead of outright lies as in the strawman example), because it's easier to pay what is asked than to learn the law and dispute what is charged when incorrect.
Debt is obtained by common-law contract and operates regardless of any strawman in all societies. Usury is obviously an abuse and must be restrained by law. But there is no imaginary magnification of debt except by the degree of interest and fines that are permitted by law. (Fines are pursuant to law but are often bogus, especially in the case of taxation: fines should be regarded as requests from the state and always have the option of dispute and appeal.) No strawman necessary.
Romans 13 obedience is always to be moderated by Acts 4-5 discretion of conscience. If your conscience has no objection to obedience, then obey appointed authorities. If it does, then communicate your objection and be prepared for the consequences of objecting. Be responsible.
I don't doubt that billionaires calculate human lives as if they are nothing but collateral (Rev. 18). But this cannot be done by legal means in America so is only a calculation convenience wholly dependent upon Americans' willingness to be counted as strawmen. There is nothing special about capital letters, there is no maritime death declaration. (When you get the SSN via Identification at Birth, there is indeed an American account used in your name, and this is routinely used as identification contrary to its stated purpose, but this only means there are a wealth of privately created accounts with the same number and name that each contain details about you; the SSA doesn't have the strawman power but only the power of tracking "wages", and the corporations only use accounts they make on you in the ordinary ways of enforcing contract law. So SSN is a real problem, but nothing like the problem described here.)
TLDR: The strawman argument distorts the real schemes going on, distracts people from them and waves before them an insane-sounding alternative, leading to maniacs adding punctuation to their names and demanding lowercasing as if they're trans humans. The actual taxes, debt, or obedience you owe is to be managed by Christian responsibility instead, particularly researching the actual voluntary transactions you and your parents go into and obtaining true liberty from them. No legist counts the use of capitalization or the appeal to imaginary accounts to have meaning when ordinary common law holds that contracts are binding simply because they constitute demonstrable meeting of minds, and Biblical law agrees.
Please do not state this without evidence or act like the strawman argument is the awakening. It might lead people to awakening but contains more lies than truths. The awakening is inspiration to spiritual responsibility and voluntary discharge of all debts, which is ultimately found in Jesus.
Downvoted above comment for obscenity.
I grew up with the Berenstain Bears and always knew how to spell them. But I totally recognize there are other things where the touchstone I used to try to remember something was indicated by others to be faulty and I couldn't select decidability between my memory echo and their evidence. Fruit of the Loom is one I have trouble with; I also keep trying to put "bases" into "All your base are belong to us".
I suspect that there are slippabilities that are so common as to be shared experiences and this boosts their signal when discovered at the Mandela level. There will of course also be corporate and government denials of the past, which is normal, but those can usually be disproven quickly like emperor's clothes. It's those borderline cases where many independent memories appear to challenge something (and this challenge also appears grassroots and not manipulative) that leave the question open.
Good question!
Neaderthals, Denisovans, Cromagnons
They're just malnourished genus Homo. They have the same interfertility and DNA barcode as Homo sapiens and should be counted as one kind with them except that von Linne was abused after his death. They went extinct just like other subspecies go extinct in favor of dominant versions. Happy to talk about it more.
There is no missing link between Pan and Homo or any other interfertile kinds. The entire fusion from the 48 of Pan is a completely undocumented narrative inference (imagination) based on evolutionary theory. The key to this is that since fine-tuning mathematically proves that the first abiogenesis is impossible in this universe, but it happened, then it's just as impossible for abiogenesis to have happened say 10,000 times, each for a different species. So both evolution and creation are equally impossible, or equally inexplicable. It's equally crazy for Homo to evolve from Pan as it is for Homo to arise from nonlife. But in creation we have a credible, coherent theory the universe is not just a closed system.
The classic link in the now-debunked 1965 "March of Progress" graphic was between Australopithecus and Homo erectus, a completely different link proposal than your site has, because scientists are constantly arguing with each other over it. All such links have been mathematically shown to involve absurd probabilities due both to the exacting science of DNA comparison and the physical features (notably the cranial size gap).
Now, as the moderator of c/Reptilians (quiet but at least u/LightBringerFlex cited your video), I'm taking your words cautiously because I see a possible path toward them; I'll need more time to be able to verbalize it in detail. But it's a basic inference to sentient cryptids in general and would require some refinement of theory to explain the human appearance and any phenomenon of glitching that is not an artifact of repeated digital compression.
whatever caused humans, it could be the cause behind other sentient races like reptilians as well ... we are not alone .... I think there are all kinds of entities out there, both material like us and "immaterial"
Good! Working on it.
One thing to keep in mind is that much of the cultural data used to support reptilians are really just about dragons, which include fire-breathing tyrannosaurs, and herbivore apatosaurs, for the most significant. The modern Icke phenomenon ("MIB" being the distraction version), tying reptilians to human form, is really just "scalies in reverse" (subcategory of furries). So the reality behind this phenomenon has a lot of ground to cover and also wise distinction to be made.
the reason you commented 3 different times
There are several ways we can inadvertently create the same post or comment and get it assigned two or three different IDs and timestamps, which each take on their own life with identical content. Each post is its own page and so people who hit upon essential clones (mirrors) of the same page would be helped by being directed to a most central discussion page (this one). So you did the right thing, thanks. Obviously when I comment on the three different pages, it looks pretty redundant in feed, but I've been known to make the same comment on different pages dozens of times if need be.
I don't know when the GreatAwakening and Conspiracies communities migrated from Reddit, but it was after r/TheDonald in 2019 and the platform was ready for them. I believe the first migration was to communities.win, with thedonald.win held by a connected individual who then declined to relinquish the domain, and patriots.win having been held as the backup for that eventuality. Not sure how long thedonald.win was a parallel domain to communities.win.
The idea was that new communities might be helped by having their own domains, and that multiple domains for the same community helps search (although the site is generally opposed to search so that's minimal). There are a few other coding bells and whistles, notably user flairs, some API tweaks that I have heard witnessed but can't describe, and unique formatting, allowing the one-community site to maintain a distinct look and feel, and also allowing those who never need to discover all of Scored to enjoy their niche. But that's 80% optics for those for whom optics are important. To me the core platform is exceptionally well-founded, like Gab is, and that's what's important.
All the nominally "20/12/31" communities in this nonscientific survey were founded around that time give or take a couple months. The specific names like ConsumeProduct and KotakuInAction(2) came earlier, the generic names like Animals and Christianity all came pretty much at once in Feb 2021. Add: Communities founded between Oct 2021 and 9 Feb 2022 were created in a second wave by established users getting special admin permission, after that community creation was open to everyone with a few contribs.
Because Scored started with, and its biggest component is still, what became patriots.win with its then-established bells and whistles, which are a couple more than the one you enumerated. Scored is about standardizing this into one place across thousands of forum components. Those very few communities with separate domains, including Conspiracies, have those couple perks, and they allow multiple entry for newcomers as well, but your overall observation of clunkiness is part of the general platform position of obscurantism and minimalism, and most of us and the admins like that about it.
Explained here. If you'd like help with site tech, it's available anytime.
It looks like you posted the same content to c/Conspiracies three times. If you mean you posted to scored.co, and communities.win, and conspiracies.win, all three resolve to the same server and appear together everywhere. Conspiracies has c/Conspiracies only, the other two have all subs. If I had done that without realizing, I would feel free to self-delete two of them, as there's no harm in that. There's a slight bit of optics issue in everyone seeing it three times, convo fragmentation risk. If you wanted three different audiences you need three different subs after the c and the /.
Anyway, my point was, there's no reason for commenting (except meta) on the two mirrors because the same people seeing the mirrors can comment on the post where the convo is collecting, out of centrality. But take my words however you will, they were just seeking helpfulness.
(Dual post, comments are live at this mirror.)
(Dual post, comments are live at this mirror.)
[sarc] Downvoted for being an AI chatbot. [/sarc]
As before, I love commenting on public questions. My history on this topic with Neo is public.
-
It's possible that, given your boost, an analysis will demonstrate consensus to have moderation, which then might get the admin response necessary. People stating their views in the voting threads will help and I encourage that. Not a politician, I'm agnostic about who the moderators should be.
-
I proposed that the moderators delete the Politics tag, get admin permission for Trending, and in that negotiation pledge that they would flag political posts NSFW meaning Not Safe For World, i.e. for world apps. This seems a straightforward and doable solution over the hump.
-
Having not spoken much on the important question of unity of purpose beyond the existing vague rules, the activities many categorize as shilling, sliding, trolling, botting are an existing problem for that unity. Near as I can tell a good solution is to distinguish committed regular contributors from the uncommitted by having a permanent thread, linked from the sidebar, asking for people to pledge themselves to the stated principles of mutual respect, open-mindedness, and the creation of fairness and greater transparency. Though statement of commitment is an imperfect metric, it creates one objective difference marking those unwilling to commit to the community goals. The roundtable idea is the seed of another good solution, but if it doesn't result in consensus and coalescing of majority and minority viewpoints then it's not making significant progress toward unity, so it needs a little circumspection, directed by the (committed) regulars via an honor code.
Let me repeat important highlights of OP:
I don't know if you noticed this but some users in here are trying to get active moderation going in this forum. I think we need it in here, so we can act like a community, not every man for himself... You might be helping with suggestions, votes, ideas.
if you want a community effort, and fair moderation, as well as mods selected by you personally... Please review the links and answer there with your choices. Now, it's clear for me that I want to vote for Graphenium and Thisisnotanexit as mods... But there are others, who offered themselves as mods, and I just want to be sure when we choose, so we can select our mods and make this place according to our wants. Please take some time to help this community to become better than it currently is... And we currently are just pushing for our own topics... We need a common goal!
Good to see you around, it's been a crazy week here with me seeing how deep the rabbit hole goes (it's bottomless). Ad: I trust you'll check out my vote post in particular, as all the meta posts get buried here rapidly.